Nation Revisited
#
79, May 2011,
Law
and order
Britain has been shocked by the teenage gang shooting of
5 year-old Thusha Kamaleswaran and 35 year-old Roshan Selvakumar in south
London. This is less than a year after the murder of 16 year old Agnes
Sina-Inakoju who was shot dead in east London by a boy on a bike armed with a
machine gun. There have been plenty of gang members shot or stabbed by rivals but
these deaths, and others, were of innocent bystanders caught in the crossfire.
The white middle class are escaping to the countryside
where they only encounter ethnic minorities when they go shopping in the local
town. Murderous gangs of black youths are not a problem in the shires. These
metropolitan refugees are not necessarily racists but they are afraid of
violent crime. They read about terrible things happening in the big cities but
all is well in Beaver-Cleaverville – to quote Harold Covington.
But all is not well. A combination of wishful thinking,
political dogmatism and stupidity has created ghettos ruled by criminal gangs
who have no fear of the law
Most people of Afro-Caribbean origin would welcome police
action to disarm the gunmen. The main victims of black crime are black people.
But the police are controlled by politicians who only talk about immigration-related
problems at election time when they are looking for votes. At other times they
ignore the besieged residents of the inner cities who are victims of an
experiment in social engineering that has gone disastrously wrong.
In order to tackle the problems of drugs, gun crime,
people smuggling and benefit fraud we must stop making excuses for criminals. Gangsters
do not carry firearms and knives because they are socially deprived but because
they have no fear of the law. They terrorise housing estates with vicious dogs,
knives and guns because they are allowed to.
If the police acted against the criminal gangs the majority
of blacks would support them. The usual alliance of black agitators and white
liberals would scream “racism” but the majority of people would welcome police
action to protect their children from the pimps, drug pushers and gunmen that
make their lives a misery.
Traditional police methods have failed to eradicate gang
crime. It would take a coordinated national operation involving thousands of
cops and costing millions of pounds to make our cities safe. But it would be
justified by the restoration of law and order and offset by savings on benefits
claimed by dole-scroungers, illegal immigrants and bogus asylum seekers.
Dave Cameron didn’t hesitate to use our armed forces to
help Libyans oppressed by Colonel Gaddafi. He should show the same
determination to liberate Britain’s no-go-areas from the thugs and gangsters. Let’s
see if the cowardly gunmen who target children and shopkeepers are any match
for the professionals.
Federal
Support
Portugal has joined Greece, Ireland and Iceland as a
recipient of federal funds. The smaller states of Europe borrowed too much
money during the boom and were caught out by the credit crunch. They will now
have to impose austerity budgets and stop living beyond their means.
Britain also borrowed too much money but our economy is
just about big enough to make the repayments. Even so we have been forced to
slash public spending.
Across the Atlantic the same thing is happening.
California is virtually bankrupt. The state government has closed dozens of
hospitals and sacked thousands of schoolteachers in an effort to cut a budget
deficit that is expected to reach $37 billion. The property market has
collapsed and one in four Californians under the age of 65 has no health
insurance.
California is not alone. Several states have crippling
deficits and can only survive with federal help. This is why the individual
states joined the United States in the first place. A hundred years ago
California was a sovereign republic with a booming economy. People poured into
California from all over America and the rest of the world to seek their fortune
in the Gold Rush. The state was blessed with fertile soil, natural resources
and a wonderful climate. But far-sighted Californians saw the necessity of
union and the folly of trying to go-it-alone. If the state of California had
her own currency it would now be worthless. And if she was on her own, outside
of the USA, her people would be starving.
The devaluation fanatics of the Daily Telegraph maintain that if Portugal still had her own
currency she could simply devalue. But how would a depleted escudo help them to
pay back loans made in euros or pay for oil in dollars? Devaluation is only a temporary
expedient. Britain devalued the pound in almost every decade since the war but
it didn’t stop us from running up the biggest deficit in Europe.
Somalia is a proud and independent sovereign state with
no political connections to the rest of Africa. She is also starving, backward,
lawless and bankrupt.
Nations came together out of necessity; a process driven
by economics, culture and proximity. Outbreaks of separatism by discontented
minorities have only succeeded when funded and encouraged by hostile powers.
Napoleon backed Polish and Italian independence to counter Prussian and
Austrian ambitions. Britain and France stirred up nationalism in the Balkans to
counter Austria and Russia. America dismembered Yugoslavia to display the formidable
power of NATO. And Libya backed the IRA in revenge for Britain’s complicity in
America’s bombing of Gaddafi’s compound.
But international interference cannot prevent geo-political
unity. The United States still has an abundance of skilled labour and raw
materials. She will soon recover when she stops printing money and balances the
books. The sovereign debt crisis is a blessing in disguise; it has highlighted
the dangers of unrestrained borrowing and economic isolation.
Selective
Compassion
NATO has decided that Colonel Gaddafi of Libya is a
tyrant who has to be deposed. He has replaced Osama Bin Laden as the worst man
in the world. Gaddafi has been in power for more than forty years but we have
just realised how bad he is. Britain has plenty of reasons to dislike him. He
provided the IRA with explosives and ammunition that were used to commit
atrocities throughout the UK. A member
of his diplomatic staff shot dead WPC Yvonne Fletcher outside their London
embassy in 1984. And Libyan agent Abdelbaset al-Magrahi was found guilty of
causing the Lockerby air disaster in December 1988.
But Gaddafi had his reasons; he helped the IRA in revenge
for the American bombing raid in 1986 that killed his daughter. The planes that
bombed Libya flew from bases in the UK and President Ronald Regan was given
carte blanche by his loyal ally Margaret Thatcher.
The Lockerby plane bombing is thought to have been in
retaliation for the deaths of 290 passengers and crew aboard the Iran Air
Flight 655 that was shot down by the US Navy cruiser USS Vincennes over the
Straits of Hormuz in July 1988. The giant Airbus was apparently mistaken for a
jet fighter!
There is no doubt that Gaddafi sponsored terrorism but
it’s equally certain that he was the victim of Western intrigue and violence.
Following Tony Blair’s affectionate meeting with the Libyan leader in 2004 he
abandoned his nuclear ambitions and scrapped his chemical weapons. He was
promised trade deals with Europe and America if he behaved himself. But the
West has double-crossed him by supporting revolutions in all the Arab states; except,
of course, in occupied Palestine, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states.
Muammar Gaddafi may have become a tyrant but he set out
with good intentions. In his Green Book – once endorsed by Nick Griffin – he
outlines a democratic system based on local participation. Libya boasted the
highest GDP in Africa and had a growing economy. Libyans enjoyed free
electricity, low-interest loans from the state bank and free education. Nevertheless
we have taken sides in their civil war and are using tribal animosities,
‘military advisors’ and airstrikes to tear the country apart.
Dave Cameron supports democracy in Libya, and now Syria, but
ignores Robert Mugabe’s ruthless dictatorship in Zimbabwe and the genocidal
Israeli occupation of Palestine. He needs to explain this selective compassion;
tell us why we are bombing Libya but trading with oppressive regimes all over
the world and selling arms to the bloodstained despots of Bahrain and Saudi
Arabia.
American foreign policy is unfathomable and Europe’s
blind obedience to it is unforgivable. Having destroyed Iraq and fought
ourselves to a standstill in Afghanistan we are now involved in another war for
no apparent reason and with no escape plan. When we were fighting colonial wars
all over the world we thought that we were defending the British Empire. But
now we are better informed and not so gullible. Everybody, except the
government knows that this latest intervention is a complete waste of lives and
money; all that we will get out of it is refugees.
The
meeting
After months of careful planning a meeting was arranged
between the various factions of the far right to form a united party. Every
branch of nationalist thinking was represented, these included; Aryan mystics,
British Israelites, conspiracy freaks, dole scroungers, English nationalists,
flat earthers, Griffinites, head measurers, isolationists, Jew-haters, Ku Klux
Klanners, Luddites, monarchists, neurotics, occultists, pyromaniacs, quitters,
revisionists, sociopaths, troglodytes, unfrocked vicars, vacillators, wasters,
xenophobes, yahoos and Zionists.
In order to avoid trouble the following were banned from
the meeting; aesthetes, Bonapartists, chartists, distributists, esoterics, futurists,
green campaigners, humanitarians, integralists, Jacobins, Kemalists, levellers,
Mosleyites, Nietzscheans, objectivists, patriots, quasi-fascists,
revolutionaries, Strasserites, totalitarians, utopians, visionaries,
Wagnerians, xanthocroi, Yockeyites and Zarathustrians.
The meeting was called to order by Major General Algernon
Fruit-Cake, hero of the Mandingo emergency of the 1960s. He introduced the
Reverend Milo Culper, who had been his padre in the dark days of the jungle
campaign. Rev Culper tried to recite the Lord’s Prayer but he was rudely
shouted down by the Druids, led by Arthur Merlin of the Native British
Liberation Front and the Odinists led by Sven Skullcrusher of the Nordic
Alliance. After a fierce battle resulting in several fatalities order was
restored by a paramilitary security squad from the Heritage Association helped
by volunteers from the Militant Jesuit Society.
The meeting adjourned to a neighbouring pub called the
Jolly Hedge Fund Manager. But half way through lunch hostilities were resumed
when the real ale lovers of the UK Party clashed with the lager louts of the
English League. As beer glasses and pool cues flew in all directions Major
General Fruit-Cake beat an orderly retreat back to the meeting hall with only
minimal losses.
The reassembled patriots debated a motion banning the
Druids, the Odinists, the UK Party and the English League from membership of
the new party. This was opposed by the National Party, the Reformed National
Party, the Real National Party and the Kosher National Party. The dissenters
began to march out of the hall in protest but they started fighting amongst
themselves before they reached the doors.
By now the only participants still standing were
delegates from the British Empire Party, the Heritage Association and the
Militant Jesuits. BEP spokesman Mohammed Goldstein proposed a motion condemning
the actions of the National Party’s various factions but it was vociferously
opposed by the HA and the MJs. Heated debate led to another riot resulting in
the total destruction of the Nelson Mandela Memorial Hall and the untimely
demise of the Rev Milo Culper.
Eventually the worst of the violence abated but as the
bedraggled ranks of walking wounded staggered out of the smoking ruins they
were charged by a column of sabre-wielding mounted police commanded by
Detective Sergeant Jock Fiddler of the elite Special Branch Cavalry.
Only a handful of patriots lived to bear witness to the
ensuing carnage. The exact number of deaths is still being calculated. But following
an intensive enquiry by the authorities it was announced that the multiple fatalities
sustained were not caused by DS Fiddler’s “measured and restrained police
action.” The enquiry was led by his cousin Lord Justice Whitewash.
A file has been passed to the Department of Public Prosecutions
for possible action against Major General Fruit-Cake. But legal experts doubt
that the much-loved 94 year-old jungle fighter will be charged.
In the House of Commons up and coming Labour frontbencher
Cindy Slack demanded the banning of all parties to the right of the Tories.
Dave Cameron said that he agreed with her in principle but would be seeking
legal advice. Nick Clegg said that he agreed with the prime minister. A
spokesperson for a leading charity called for increased funding for
anti-fascist groups. And Major General Fruit-Cake said “bloody good show.”
The
Banker and the Nazi
Professor David Bowen, the forensic pathologist died on
March 31st aged 87. In his extensive career he investigated the
horrific Denis Nielsen murders and conducted autopsies on Ross McWhirter who
was shot dead by the IRA in 1975, Blair Peach who died during an anti-National
Front demonstration in 1979, and PC Keith Blakelock who was hacked to death
during the Broadwater Farm riot of 1985.
He also reported on the deaths of Roberto Calvi the
banker found hanged under Blackfriars Bridge in 1982 and on 93 year-old Rudolf
Hess who was found dead with an electrical cable around his neck at Spandau
prison in 1987.
Professor Bowen did not believe that Calvi or Hess had
committed suicide. This opinion went against the official verdicts and
encouraged the many doubters who believe that both men were murdered.
Anybody with information on these matters is welcome to
submit an article. It’s easy to jump to conclusions but what we need is
evidence. Perhaps the key question is
Quo Bono? Who would benefit from the deaths of an Italian banker or Hitler’s
former deputy? If anybody knows the answers please tell us. In the mean time we
will have to accept the official version of events.
Time
to Move On From Traditional Nationalism
By
John Bean
Today’s BNP and the various splinter groups that have decided
to break away from the Nick Griffin dictatorship share a common nationalist
outlook that has not changed since the formation of the National Front – or
even the earlier MK1 BNP. Even the English Democrats concept of nationalism has
many similarities.
With Britain’s relegation to a secondary power in both
its economy and its influence in world politics, a nationalism which was
founded on the early post-war belief that the UK could rely on both economic
and military support of the White Dominions, plus some remnants of Empire,
needs drastic revision. That means in particular our approach to the white
world and our neighbours in Europe in particular. This does not, of course,
mean that we should now support the European Union, which is Marxist inspired in
origin, although mainly administered by its liberal “useful idiots,” and has as
its final objective the formation of a One World government.
In the May 2010 BNP Manifesto, Section 27, it rightly
says that: “The suggestion that membership of the EU is necessary for our
prosperity is nonsense.” It then says we would enjoy the higher standards of
prosperity of Norway and Switzerland if, like them, we were outside the EU.
This is a non-starter as it ignores the fact that Norway has less than 5
million people (and does well on substantial exports of oil and gas to its
neighbours) and Switzerland less than 8 million. This is against our 61 million
-including the 15 million of non-European stock.
The Manifesto then suggests we “would be free to
negotiate trade agreements which are exclusively in our favour.” This is
typical Griffinesque comment, based on pure optimism. In the real world a
nation would have to be very indebted to us to offer trade deals “exclusively
in our favour.”
The BNP Manifesto is right when it supports trade
agreements with the Old Commonwealth, i.e. Australia, New Zealand and Canada,
as outside of the EU we can scrap the EU-imposed tariffs on agricultural goods
which put as much as £1,000 p.a. on the family food bill. This clause is
probably a left over from John Tyndall’s day, when a prominent part of BNP
policy was to form ever stronger links, to the point of a single union, with
the Old Commonwealth countries. Aussie nationalists in particular thought this
rather patronising and suggested that we could not back the EU on one hand and
try and resurrect a colonial empire on the other. But at least Tyndall did
think of Britain’s relationships with other countries (even if secretly he
thought that “all wogs begin at Calais – with the exception of the Germans”),
which does not seem to be the case with the BNP today.
In Section 63 on “Foreign Policy”, we can fully support
the view where it says in regard to realigning this policy we should put our
nation’s interests first and not interfere with the sovereignty of any other
nation – and certainly ending the use of our armed forces in conflicts that do
not cause problems for Britain’s general interests. About the only other
subject covered in this section is the swindle of Foreign Aid. I would suggest that
we reduce this to a £1 billion holding fund from which we would supply
emergency aid to nations suffering calamities such as major droughts, floods,
earthquakes, etc. However, the overall tenor of BNP ‘foreign’ policy (as also
that of nationalist fleas that have sprung from the old BNP dog) at present is
that of a minor state that has buried its head in the sands of the UK’s
confines rather than taking action to ward off the global threats from the
world banking system and colonisation by Afro-Asia. To “strive for the best
possible relationship with our European neighbours” is a good start but that is
all the Manifesto has to say after we have withdrawn from the EU.
Confederation
of Europe
I would suggest that the BNP, or a new radical right
party if the BNP is beyond saving, should campaign for a European Confederation
of national sovereign states. As well as the economic co-prosperity sphere that
was promised us under the original idea of a European Common Market it should
give priority to defending our common European culture and its people. The
principle enemy of such a European Confederation will be, of course, the one
world Marxist-inspired multiculturalists of the EU. Incidentally, Marine Le Pen
has said that if France’s Front National continues its new dramatic growth it
would leave the EU. A European Confederation would welcome the presence of a
new France, as well as Britain and other European states that are currently
represented in the EU by what were misleadingly termed ‘nationalist’ parties.
There is also the issue that we have to face of the now
established parliaments for local affairs in Scotland, Wales and soon to be
Northern Ireland – and England also if the English Democrats had their way.
This was not an issue in the early days of British nationalism. To maintain its
integrity and mutual prosperity the UK must now look to a United Kingdom
Confederation.
Editor’s
comment – The Swiss Confederation is a perfect model for European union;
autonomous regions with their own languages within a single state with one
army, one flag, one constitution and one currency. The Swiss are German, French
and Italian by blood but totally united under the slogan; “one for all, all for
one.”
Robert
Schuman, the father of European Union, was a devout Catholic of French and
German ancestry who fought in the German Army in the First World War and the
French Resistance in the Second World War. He was not a Marxist and nor were
Konrad Adenaur, Oswald Mosley or George Orwell - all supporters of united
Europe.
You
accuse the administrators of the EU of being ‘useful idiots’. But who are they
useful to? Communism collapsed in Russia twenty years ago and the Chinese have
embraced capitalism with a vengeance. The liberalism that you object to is a
Western phenomenon epitomised by President Barack Obama. Marxism may have been
a spectre but it’s now just a phantom. The political complexion of the EU
reflects that of its member states; it’s up to us to change it.
“The
European spirit signifies being conscious of belonging to a cultural family and
to have a willingness to serve that community in the spirit of total mutuality,
without any hidden motives of hegemony or the selfish exploitation of others.
The
19th century saw feudal ideas being opposed and, with the rise of a
national spirit, nationalities asserting themselves. Our century, that has
witnessed the catastrophes resulting in the unending clash of nationalities and
nationalisms, must attempt and succeed in reconciling nations in a
supranational association. This would safeguard the diversities and aspirations
of each nation while coordinating them in the same manner as the regions are
coordinated within the unity of the nation.” Robert Schuman, Strasbourg 16th
May 1949.
Fantasy
and Reality
Some things are credible and some are not. We can make
society fairer by improving education and redistributing wealth but we cannot
wipe out differences in intelligence or ability. The first proposition is
possible but the second is a fantasy.
We can control immigration into the UK but there is no
way that we can round up all the immigrants and send them back. We haven’t got
the manpower, the logistics or the international clout to do it. A joint
European initiative tied to trade deals and foreign aid could organise a great
programme of resettlement. But the idea that Britain acting alone could reverse
immigration is a fantasy.
Britain is an equal partner in the European Union. We are
represented in the EU parliament, the Council of Ministers at every level of
government. We have negotiated opt-outs and exclusions on a number of issues
but we will never quit the EU because it accounts for 70% of our trade. South
Africa and Rhodesia have been taken over by the blacks and have ceased to be
White Dominions. Canada is tied to the USA and Australia and New Zealand are
commercially tied to China and Japan. A resurrected Commonwealth is therefore a
fantasy.
The ultimate fantasy is that the world is run by a secret
gang of plotters who meet regularly to organise wars and revolutions, famines
and droughts, and even earthquakes. Some say they are Jewish, others believe
they are Freemasons and David Icke and his followers think that they are
lizards! These conspirators are supposed to be responsible for all our troubles.
But it’s difficult to believe that a collection of Rabbis and Rotarians are
running the world.
These delusions are propagated by hundreds of magazines
and websites and believed by thousands of people. Some think that the Moon
landing was staged in the Nevada desert and that the 9/11 atrocity was a false
flag operation by the CIA. An e-mail doing the rounds even suggests that the
Fukushima earthquake was caused by electrical pulses generated in Alaska. These
people are victims of a paranoid mindset that dominates the far right.
Governments often tell lies and do stupid things but the world has not been
hijacked. It’s time for the conspiracy junkies to wake up and smell the coffee.
No comments:
Post a Comment