Nation Revisited
May 2006, # 7
An occasional email to friends
Race and Religion
Church attendance is declining throughout
Europe even in formerly devout countries like Ireland and Poland. Modern Europeans are moving away from
religion and only go to church for weddings, christenings and funerals. They
have not necessarily rejected the teachings of Christianity but the traditional
power of the Church has been greatly diminished. The authority of the Church
enforced the Ten Commandments and brought law and enlightenment, but education
steadily undermined the structure of the religious state until the starving
subjects of Louis XVI stormed the Bastille and changed the world forever. Since
then mankind has experimented with almost every type of political system. In
the West we have settled for instantly available credit combined with mass
production and cheap labour. This is working well at the moment but nobody knows
how long it will last.
In contrast to the decline of Christianity
in the West the Muslims from Asia and Africa still cling to their religion.
Bengalis and Pakistanis pouring into Britain and Moroccans and Algerians in
France feel protected by belonging to a worldwide religion. In fact Islam has
not stopped conflict throughout the Sahara between Arabs and Africans, and in
parts of Britain Pakistani and Somali drug gangs regularly fight over
territory. The extreme Wahabi version of Islam practiced in Saudi Arabia is
seldom found in the Muslim periphery of Europe. Turkey and Albania are less
religious than Greece and Serbia, and the former Soviet republic of Azerbaijan
is only nominally Muslim, just as the adjacent Caucasian states of Armenia and
Georgia are nominally Christian.
There are fanatics in all religions but
they tend to wither and die in an atmosphere of liberty and plenty. Religion
fulfills a human need and is part of the culture and tradition of every nation.
From time to time there will be outbreaks of evangelism but the inevitable
trend is towards secularism. For good or bad, people are rejecting strict
observance in favour of a more enlightened approach. The atrocities committed
between Muslims and Christians have been matched by the terrible fratricide
between rival sects of both religions .The cruel and unnatural practice of
female genital mutilation is a primitive tribal ritual that is practiced
amongst Muslims and Christians in Egypt and East Africa. Other customs such as public executions and
whippings have only died out in Europe and America in the last hundred years.
There is really not much to choose between
the three great religions of the Book. All have produced beautiful art and
literature, elevated mankind above the animals and searched for truth and a
higher purpose. But they have also sanctioned slavery and encouraged war,
subjugation and exploitation.
The British people are not particularly
religious but they have generally been tolerant of other people’s faiths. There
have been synagogues in Britain since Oliver Cromwell readmitted the Jews and
mosques and Hindu temples since the days of the Indian Empire. Immigrants have
long been free to practice their religions, but now for the first time, we are
being forced to limit our own devotional freedoms and hide our religious and
cultural symbols; not by the immigrants themselves but by the anti-Christian
zealots of the state-sponsored race-relations industry. The problem is really
one of race, culture and numbers rather than religion. Most of the Caribbean
immigrants to Britain are English-speaking Christians, but they still create
ghettos and figure disproportionately in inner-city crime statistics. This
might be due to social deprivation and disadvantage but that doesn’t make much
difference to the victims.
The politicians who organized the
multi-ethnic colonization of Europe have tried various ways to integrate black
and brown immigrants into our society. The French have tried to assimilate
their immigrants by turning them all into Frenchmen. To this end they have
banned Muslim schoolgirls from wearing the hijab, as required by their
religion, and printed official information only in French. In Britain we
adopted exactly the opposite approach by encouraging each ethnic group to
retain its own language and culture and by spending millions of pounds
translating everything into dozens of languages. We have also revised our
history books to play down European achievements and promote a doctored version
of history complimentary to Africans and Asians. In order to silence our
objections to this invasion draconian laws have been enforced to limit freedom of
speech and publication. Recent trials in Britain and throughout Europe show how
determined the establishment is to enforce the multiracial agenda.
The results of these unwarranted social
experiments have been disastrous on both sides of the Channel and have resulted
in bloody riots from a second generation of disaffected immigrants. Whites,
Blacks and Asians have engaged in voluntary ethnic cleansing by congregating in
their own areas and creating states within states that show no sign of wanting
to integrate. It is not just religion, language or culture that prevents
non-Europeans from being successfully assimilated into British or French
society. It may be unfashionable and legally questionable to recognize racial
differences but they are a fact of life that cannot be wished away or
legislated against.
Mosley summed it up in his 1961 book
“Mosley Right or Wrong.”
Question 126. Would you describe yourselves
as a racialist party?
Answer. No, because racialism is usually
taken to mean that one race dominates others, and we believe that all races
should be free to develop their own civilizations. We believe in the principle
“Live and let live.” We believe in preserving our own race by two methods:
(a)
by preventing immigration to this country, which creates overcrowding and other
social problems. (b) By publishing the facts which science reveals: races have different characteristics, and that the mixture of extremes is detrimental to both races involved. If our people are given this knowledge no laws on the subject will be necessary.
Government of the People
In ancient times the chief of the tribe
made the decisions helped by a council of Elders.
These were the most experienced members of
the community who had been around the longest. They knew when to plant crops,
when to prepare for winter, how best to defend against hostile tribes and so
on. Eventually this tribal system evolved into King and Parliament. But along
the way a few things altered. Instead on a hereditary ruler, descended from one
of the leading families of the country, we got an elected leader who could be
sprung from the lowest level of society. And the Parliament, instead of being
drawn from the most experienced and wise of the King’s subjects was elected by
the mob. This system we called democracy. The idea behind it is that the
majority will come to the right decision by some kind of mathematical magic.
Somehow this has degenerated into the
system that we have today. The Prime Minister is the chief of the biggest
party. That is not to say that he is the man with the most support in the
country but the leader of the party with the most members elected. That should
be the same thing but it isn’t because of a complex system of constituencies
spread over four countries. This PM is appointed for four years at a time and bestows
titles, awards and government contracts to his financial backers. Parliament is divided into parties, which
used to represent the upper class, the middle class and the workers. Now such
distinctions are long gone and the parties represent whoever is giving them the
most money. So money controls the executive and the representative branches of
government. The particular party in power makes no difference to the big
business interests that own all of them.
Many of the people who participate in this
charade have little idea which country they live in. They probably couldn’t
find Britain on a map of the world and if they did they would not be able to
tell you much about it. They would be ignorant of its economic and cultural
achievements. Most of them would have no idea how many people live in the
United Kingdom or anything about its history or ancestry, but they would be
able to tell you what is happening in Coronation Street or which footballer is
getting the most money. Those that can read get their opinions from ‘The Sun or
‘The Daily Mail.’ They therefore believe that Britain is part of the United
States and hate France and Germany because of a dim and confused idea that we
fought them in the war. They think that our black population were brought here as
slaves and many of them have embraced black culture and music.
This ignorant, semi-literate rabble return
incompetent MPs to a corrupt Parliament to govern the country as directed by unscrupulous
businessmen. In return the grateful billionaires who own the country allow the
peasants to pay mortgages for plasterboard houses and spend all of their money
in supermarkets. This system has been so successful that we are determined to
export it all over the world. To this end we will spend billions of the taxpayers’
money and kill hundreds of their sons in foreign wars. We are determined that
Iraqis and Afghans should live in doll’s houses and shop at Wal-Mart.
The Falange and the Fight for Spain
Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera was born in
Madrid in 1903. He was the son of General Miguel Primo de Rivera the military
dictator of Spain from 1923 to 1930. He studied law at Madrid and following his
graduation and military service he founded the Falange in 1933. In 1934 the
Falangists united with the like-minded National Syndicalists of Ramiro Ledesma,
who was assassinated by the Reds in 1936. This coalition of the FE and the JONS
became known as the National Movement. Jose Antonio was elected to the Cortes
in June 1936, a month before the murder of the Catholic Party leader Calvo
Sotelo; the event that sparked General Franco’s historic revolt that became the
Spanish Civil War.
The Reds arrested Jose Antonio as part of
their ‘general liquidation of the Right.’ On November 18th he wrote:
“Condemned to death yesterday, I pray to God that if he does not spare me from
coming to that last trial, he may preserve in me up to the end the seemly
submission with which I contemplate it, and that in judging my soul he may
apply to it not the measure of my merits but that of his infinite mercy.” On
the morning of the 20th he was executed by firing squad in Alicante;
one of 55,000 nationalist prisoners executed by the Reds.
By the time of General Franco’s victory in
1939 half a million had died, including; 200,000 Spanish Nationalists, 4,000 Italian
Blackshirts, 300 Germans and over 1000 other anti-communist volunteers mostly
from France and Ireland. Volunteers who
survived the war included Andrew Fountaine, the veteran nationalist campaigner
and writer. Also John Amery the leader of the British Free Corps who was
executed by the British Labour Government in 1945.
Against all the odds General Franco smashed
the Soviet-backed Red Republic and Saved Spain from communism. But the advanced
social policies of the National Movement were never implemented. Franco was
forced to adopt pragmatic policies to rebuild a shattered economy. When Franco
died in 1975 he left King Juan Carlos a rejuvenated country. Autonomy has since
been granted to Catalonia and the Basque region and Spain is flourishing as
never before. But this prosperity is acting like a magnet to the impoverished
refugees from Morocco and Black Africa. They are arriving on the mainland and entering
Spain through the North African enclaves and the Canaries.
Once again it is the Falange that is
fighting to save the nation. The Social Democrats and the Christian Democrats
are spouting the same fallacious multi-cultural nonsense that is state policy
in America and throughout Europe. The same lies about the need for immigrant
labour and the benefits of a multicultural society. But the Falange is organizing and
demonstrating against the relentless invasion that is driving crime and turning
parts of Spanish cities into no-go areas. The fight against communism in the
Thirties ended in a glorious victory and united European Nationalists. Let us
hope that the new fight for European civilization in Spain will once again be
victorious. After the heroic sacrifices of the Civil War we must not fail.
Views on The News
Miss Rotha Linton-Orman founded the British
Fascisti in 1923 but within a year Colonel H. Rippon-Seymour formed the
breakaway National Fascisti. Since then we have had over 80 years of divorces,
the occasional wedding and plenty of funerals.
More than 25 nationalist parties have come and gone in a bewildering
display of manifestos, titles, papers and websites. Leaders hoped to gain
respectability by keeping their ultras under control, but the establishment
would never allow a White Nationalist party to be accepted. The splitters were
just as misguided by thinking that they could gain power by sheer enthusiasm.
As always art imitates life, and the daring revolutionaries of 20 years ago are
the established leaders of today. The answer must be to balance enthusiasm with
experience; we have had enough parties.
A BNP candidate for Bradford has been
revealed to be of Armenian descent. This has revived the debate about who is
and isn’t white. In South Africa under the Apartheid regime there was no
problem with Lebanese, Syrian or Turkish immigrants. If they looked white and
acted white, they were white. Nowadays the nationalist movement in the UK
accepts all Europeans but in the Sixties the Latin nations were suspect and the
Slav nations were not even considered. Nationalists in those days identified
with North West Europeans only. Then as now various theories were expounded to
prove that the British, like Hancock in the Blood Donor, were descended almost
entirely from Anglo-Saxon stock with just a dash of Viking.
Dave Cameron has told the Tories that they
must change to become an inclusive party that reaches out to minorities. But if
they are determined to change, what exactly will they conserve? And what is the
point of voting for a party that dumps everything that it has always believed
in. Tony Blair has transformed the Labour Party from being traditionally
socialist and anti-American into a free-market, pro-American party. Now Dave
Cameron is trying to change the Tory party into a multi-cultural copy of the
Labour model. Conservatives must realize that their BNP-hating, old Etonian
leader is committed to more immigration and more unjust restrictions on free
speech. The grandees of the Tory Party have chosen Cameron because he is young
and presentable, but he cannot succeed without grass roots support.
Somalia has been without a government since
President Siad Barre was overthrown in 1991. But according to the CIA factbook,
the economy is thriving and the Somali Shilling is stable. The country exports
bananas, maize, sugar and fish. They have 15 airlines with over 60 aircraft and
the best telecommunications system in East Africa. With no proper banks,
entrepreneurs handle $1 billion a year. The country is divided into clans and
policed by local militias. Murder and kidnapping are rife but probably no worse
than in neighbouring Kenya and Ethiopia. The Somalis have proven that mankind
has an innate ability to survive and reorganize. The ever-increasing levels of
government in the UK are in stark contrast to Somalia. We have local, regional,
national and international gangs of politicians, all getting huge salaries and
index-linked pensions. We could replace all of them with a few dozen lads with
pick-up trucks, AK47s and lots of attitude.
No comments:
Post a Comment