Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.
This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart
information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless
of frontiers.
Nation
Revisited
# 72,
October 2010.
Reducing
the prison population
Tory Justice Minister Ken Clarke is right to be worried
about the UK’s booming prison population. It has nearly doubled from the 1980s
to 85,000. We now have the highest prison population in Europe but there is
little evidence that criminals are being rehabilitated or that society is being
protected. It costs £20 billion a year to convict and lock up criminals but we
are adding to our problems by importing murderers, rapists, pimps, bag
snatchers and drug dealers from all over the world.
Home Office statistics show that Third World immigrants
are disproportionately represented in our prison system. More than a third of
convicted young offenders in the UK are from ethnic minorities; the
imprisonment rate for black men is almost 10 times as high as white men, and
nonwhites who constitute less than 10% of the UK population make up nearly 30%
of our prison inmates.
Deporting Third World criminals would reduce our prison
population by a third and save about £7 billion per annum. The state-sponsored race relations industry
would object but most taxpayers would be glad to relieve prison overcrowding
and reduce public spending. Overcrowded prisons are unacceptable in a modern
European country and we have got more than enough lowlifes and parasites of our
own without importing them.
It’s undoubtedly true that some members of ethnic
minorities suffer from racial discrimination. This is inevitable when different
races and cultures are forced to live together. But the majority of immigrants
do not break the law so the criminal element can’t blame racism for their
troubles. Instead of locking them up we should send them home to be dealt with
by their own people.
Economic necessity has forced the coalition government to
tackle problems that were ignored under the Labour regime. The government is
borrowing one pound for every five spent. Dave Cameron must reduce public spending by
all means possible. He should start by deporting alien criminals who will never
make a positive contribution to British society. This would not only save money
and relieve overcrowding; it would also send a message around the world that we
are no longer a safe haven for criminals.
The
unemployable underclass
Britain’s social security costs reached £164 billion last
year which is almost as much as our £167 billion public sector borrowing
requirement. On top of that we gave away £23 billion in tax credits. These
figures dwarf education, health, defence and all the other things that the
government spends our money on.
Of course nobody can help being made redundant, or
growing old, or getting sick. But there are hundreds of thousands of
able-bodied scroungers out there who prefer to lie in bed until midday instead
of going to work.
People come from all over the world to work in the UK but
we have allowed a home-grown underclass to prosper without working. They will
not take jobs because the wages are not much better than they can get from the
state. Look at any ‘sink estate’ at night and you will see lights blazing. The
scroungers stay up half the night because they have no intention of getting up
and going to work. They do not stir until noon when they take the pit bull
terrier for a walk and have the first spliff of the day.
Some of them are second or third generation wasters who
have grown up and raised children without ever having a job. If something isn’t
done about it their children will carry on the family tradition by producing
another idle generation. They have given up the idea of work. Their local shops
are run by Bangladeshis, the bus that takes them to the betting shop is driven
by a Pole, the postman who brings their social security cheque is a Lithuanian
and the clerk that signs it is a Pakistani.
If they fall ill they are treated by Nigerian nurses and Indian doctors.
They eat in Chinese and Turkish restaurants, they drink in Irish pubs and when
they get drunk they are arrested by a Jamaican cop and are brought before a
Greek magistrate. But they say that they can’t get a job because there’s no
work about.
We must discriminate between genuine cases of hardship
and those who refuse to work. The Labour Party wouldn’t tackle the problem
because the welfare scroungers overwhelmingly voted for them. But the
Cameron-Clegg coalition government is being forced to make massive cuts in
every department; now is their chance to abolish the culture of state
dependence that is undermining Britain. It may be too late to rescue some of
the older ones who are psychologically incapable of work but at least we could
save their children from a life of uselessness.
If we want to stop immigration we must persuade our own
people to drive taxis and buses, work on construction sites, harvest
agricultural produce, clean hospitals and do all the jobs currently done by
imported labour. Some immigrants come here to join in the scrounging but the
majority come here to work.
It’s the duty of a civilised state to provide training,
education and practical assistance to the genuine unemployed. The idea that the
market will sort itself out is cruel deception.
People who have lost their livelihoods can’t wait for the economy to
pick up. The ‘free trade and open borders’ enthusiasts claim that everything
will come right in the end; but as John Maynard Keynes said: “in the long run
we are all dead.” We have tried the uncaring policies of the Tories and the
criminal wastefulness of the Labour Party. What we need is an ethical social
policy that values people above profits, rewards hard work and enterprise, but
deals harshly with criminals and parasites.
This is a problem that politicians have tried to ignore.
Some of them have woken up to the madness of uncontrolled immigration, and
others are campaigning on law and order, but they have been slow to recognise
the persistent growth of an unemployable underclass.
The British economy can only be revived by getting people
back to work. But every job that we export and every immigrant that we let it
makes things worse. It will not be easy
to change the culture of dependence but until we do we will forced to plunder
the diminishing pay packets of those still working.
John
Tyndall on British Nationalism
Six
Principles of British Nationalism was written in 1966 when
Britain was a major industrial power with huge reserves of gas and oil. Despite
being overtaken by world events it remains a template for nationalist
movements.
JT started with a damning assessment
of Britain in the Sixties:
Most
of all, the weakness of Britain today is the product of an intelligentsia which
during living memory has been hypnotised by the madness of liberalism and
internationalism, before which altars an unending succession of British
interests have been sacrificed – to the impoverishment of British power and to
the profit of Britain’s enemies, not all of whom lie East of the Iron Curtain.
Whilst acknowledging the
post war shift of global power from Europe to America he puts most of the blame
for our national decline on democratic politicians:
British
sovereignty and freedom have been placed in jeopardy. Dependence has been
preferred to independence. Idle dreams of an international Utopia have been
made a substitute for national self reliance and national strength.
Britain’s last attempt at independence ended at Suez in
1956 when US Secretary of State John Foster Dulles issued an ultimatum forcing
us to withdraw our forces from Egypt or face economic ruin. Ten years later JT
wrote these words:
We
believe that the future of the British people rests, not on treaties, summit
conferences and international goodwill, but on our own strength and
resourcefulness as a nation, our own determination, our own effort and our own
self confidence. Today we are continually being told that the world has grown
smaller and that nations must be ‘interdependent’ with one another. In the case
of some nations this is undoubtedly true. What is also true is that only those
nations who have the means and the courage to remain self-dependent can qualify
for the description of great and free. We believe it is right for Britain to be
great and remain free.
Our politicians may have been cowards but they sent our
servicemen to fight and die in Palestine, Malaya, Kenya, Egypt, Cyprus, Aden
and Ireland before relinquishing the empire.
JT goes on:
The
other great empires of the world have not in the meantime been afflicted with
this masochistic urge to become weaker and smaller, but have single-mindedly
expanded in size and strength. That the present balance of power weighs so
heavily in their favour and against
Britain is not the verdict of almighty providence but only of different
attitudes of national leadership and will: of the will to live as distinct from
the will to die. We are where we are today because our leaders have been
dominated by the will to die.
The USA and the Soviet Union were expanding empires but
Britain, France, Belgium, Netherlands, Spain, Portugal and Italy all lost their
colonial possessions after the war. We lacked the resources to fight unwinnable
colonial wars. JT put too much faith in determination but his vision of a
united nation cannot be faulted:
Nationalism
has one final and vital role: it must restore unity to the British people.
Today we are torn apart by all manner of factional interests representing
class, occupation religion and political ideology. Three major parties argue
with one another over details of day to day government which are superfluous as
long as they exist within the overall framework of a weak and lethargic
national body. Sections of industry, goaded from the rear by political
exploiters, fight over the spoils of the nation’s production. Social groupings,
representing manual workers and brain workers, are encouraged to identify
themselves with conflicting political causes and to believe that the interests
on one must always be pursued to the detriment of the interests of the other
and that the state of the country is the fault of the other.
When JT was born the British Empire straddled the globe
and the Royal Navy ruled the waves. But long before he died the former Governor
of Aden Sir Richard Turnbull told Denis Healey that when the British Empire
sinks beneath the waves of history, it will leave behind it only two monuments:
the game of Association Football and the expression “Fuck Off.”
We actually left behind a banking system that worked
until it was brought down by greed, and systems of law and government designed
for an advanced European nation that were completely unsuited to Africa and
Asia. But JT never really accepted that the Sun had set on the British Empire:
We
must not only recognise the Commonwealth as the singular source of our future
existence; we must urgently begin to remake the Commonwealth into a genuine
instrument of national power.
A revived Commonwealth may have looked possible in 1966
but we lacked the money and the international clout to make it happen. Today it
would be almost impossible to separate Canada from the USA or Australia from
East Asia. And if we included South Africa we would gain 45 million blacks and
only 5 million whites. JT recognised
that European Union was an alternative but he discounted it:
Today
some unthinking people are suggesting European Union as an answer to this need.
It is no answer. A great part of the European economy is based on the same
predominance of manufacturing as is that of Britain. Europe, like Britain has a
shortage of space and raw materials. It only recreates the problems of our
island economy on a larger scale. Furthermore, and most important of all, its
people are not united by kinship and cannot be kept together by other than
mutual economic interest...
Most Australians and half of all Canadians were of
British and Irish stock in 1966 but both countries have since absorbed
immigrants from all over the world and developed their own identities and their
own markets. JT could not have guessed that the Soviet Union would collapse and
be replaced by a democratic Russian Federation; a vast country endowed with
unlimited raw materials on Europe’s doorstep. Convinced by his own rhetoric he
put his faith in nationalism:
The
triumph of Nationalism in Britain will only come from the leadership of men who
are identified heart and soul with the cause of Britain, who recognise no other
cause or loyalty than to the people of Britain and who have faith in the
capacity of the British nation to accomplish any task and meet any challenge
with which life may confront it.
We desperately need a party that combines patriotism and
nostalgia with realpolitik. Our choices are; to go it alone like starving North
Korea, accept humiliating colonial status like Puerto Rico, or to take our
place as an equal partner in United Europe.
I’m
not a Muslim but...
Some people have asked on Google whether Don Andrews is
an Islamist, which kind of shocked me a little bit, when I consider my
more-or-less traditionalist liberal racist lifestyle while proposing the
virtues of racial pride and racism for everyone, especially our white race
(Yeah, there is a white race, you dumb, meddling internationalist self-hating
anti-racists, you’re the goofs who brought us such catastrophe on our heritage
and culture while stupidly trying to impose ill on the planet through bags of
rice, bicycles, wells and bombs.) The Islamists have been the ones to
successfully stand up to this white-pauperizing, extinction-bound globalism. You
don’t get any whites out of race-mixing; anything that encourages that is the
antithesis to white race survival, particularly when that’s the main mission of
the internationalist frequent flyers and military mercenaries from the once
white countries.
The Islamists generally mind their own business and only
bother their immediate neighbours. Never mind the 9/11 conspiracy incident,
this Middles Ages patriarchal society is the least demanding on the planet’s
resources and the
most eco-friendly compared to the destructive demands of consumerist
matriarchies of the West and East. Only New World Order globalist warmongers
and their busybody white tax-wasting schlep military and NGO’s would be out to
plow fallow Earth for hedonistic profit reasons and white father-hatreds. The
population of Earth has exploded in the last century thanks to these
anti-Islamist meddling morons with their foreign aid railways, dams, health
care and other mega-projects that promote proliferation of jealous non-whites
in such large numbers to threaten our existence.
For years, I thought that Christians believed in God, and
that belief was the most important basis of their lives, with secularists
shaming, abusing and driving the Christian God off the public square. I still
thought that they were just turning the other cheek while quietly praying at
home. However, now we know that neither Christian leaders, nor most of their
adherents, are God-believers at all.
How else can you explain their blind “support our troops” invasion and killing
of the same Old Testament God-believers
in Muslim lands? The Islamists have a lot to teach us regarding courage,
stamina and sacrifice in battling our rent-a-grunt enforcers for globalist
causes, without an air force, navy, artillery, modern health care, insurance
and pensions. Attrition in Afghanistan technically spells defeat for any
invader – something that the mujahedeen (holy warriors) have achieved. Only
fools don’t give credit where credit is due and I haven’t heard any of it from
our military towards the so-called “scumbags” that they’re fighting against on
behalf of our pluralistic, hedonistic non-culture. Every foreign mercenary
involvement guarantees non-white foreign stooges entry into Canada. And yet
feminists still promote endless involvement in Afghanistan for their women’s
rights while they disappear here.
No, I don’t like genital mutilation, particularly the
widespread circumcision that Muslims practice, or their narrow world-view of
fun. But that’s the nature of serious religious believers. Fears of a world
caliphate are totally unfounded, when the Muslims are already so bitterly split
on race, which trumps everything in the final analysis. The Islamists are the
only ones able to give a bloody nose to globalist aspirations, thus
safeguarding us from one-world government better than and G20 demonstrators.
What freedom-loving individual can be against that?
White nationalists are lucky that some racist leaders are
savvy enough to reject the Jew’s media propaganda for the “War on Terror”
prison-planet precepts by concentrating on our non-white immigration invasion,
and not a Muslim woman’s veil. That’s not being an Islamist – that’s common
sense. The first of three precepts (common sense, good will and fair play). Try
it.
The
nature of capitalism
A century ago the British working class lived in
conditions of abject poverty. When the British Empire dominated world trade and
the Royal Navy enforced the Pax Britannica children were working in dangerous
mines and factories. And when the Germans first encountered British soldiers in
the First World War they were shocked by their stunted and unhealthy condition
compared to their own troops. The whole world was run by capitalism but it was
seldom as brutal as it was in Britain.
By enslaving the working class Britain rose to the top of
the industrial league and by enforcing trade deals at gunpoint we led global
capitalism. This all changed with the First World War. The old order was not
destroyed but it took a battering from which it has never recovered. The
working class has made tremendous advances ever since and we will never go back
to bowing and scraping to the so-called nobility.
But the bosses had another trick up their sleeve. When it
became difficult to exploit British and Irish workers they imported millions of
blacks and Asians. Karl Marx said that labour always follows capital; our
government made sure of it by recruiting West Indians for London Transport and
the National Health Service. These were quickly followed by Asians who flocked
to the northern mill towns. Today Third World immigrants make up ten percent of
our population and despite government denials they are still coming in.
People were alarmed by the influx of racial aliens but
they were baffled by the bullshit of the Old Gang. Political parties opposed to
immigration, like Union Movement in the Fifties and Sixties, the National Front
in the Seventies and the BNP in recent years, never got a single MP elected.
The BNP had scores of councillors a few years ago as well as a member of the
GLA and two members of the European Parliament. But the party has lost momentum
and appears to be falling apart.
Life has greatly improved for most people in the UK but
we are at the mercy of a global capitalist system that we no longer control.
The far-Right (for want of a better label) is too busy tilting at European
windmills to make a difference. There is nothing sinister about ‘free trade and
open borders’, it’s the stated objective of the American-controlled World Trade
Organisation. America has taken over from the British Empire and is using her
military might exactly as we did a hundred years ago.
Instead of clinging to
obsolete policies we should dedicate ourselves to promoting European consciousness
and realise that international capitalism cannot be defeated by petty
nationalism.
Read European Action
a bi-monthly publication in support of a National Party for Europe. webmaster@europeanaction.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment