Sunday, 28 February 2021

Nation Revisited 173 March 2021

It's all in the Mind


It takes twelve years training to become a psychiatrist, but we can all recognise anxiety and depression. These conditions have been highlighted by the current lockdown, but they have been with us for a long time.

The Brexit movement has little to do with economics; it's all about emotion. The Brexiteers believe that the EU is a dictatorship and they have convinced themselves that dark forces led by George Soros are behind it.

Now, the same people suspect that the Coronavirus pandemic is man made. They think that the Chinese have weaponised a virus to kill as many Westerners as possible. The fact that we are China's best customers doesn't register with them.

These ideas are driven by paranoia; a morbid anxiety tied up with feelings of persecution and a dislike of foreigners. In the UK they inspired the Brexit movement and in the USA they convinced Donald Trump's supporters that the presidential election  had been rigged against them. 

The difference between sensible politics and paranoia is illustrated by attitudes to immigration. Reasonable people see immigration as cheap labour but the paranoid tendency sees it as a plot to destroy the white race.

It's all in the mind; the Jews are clever and resourceful people who run show business, but they do not run the world. Immigration is a matter of labour being attracted by capital. The European Union is a free collective of European states not a diabolical conspiracy to destroy Britain. The Coronavirus is a natural thing, not a plot by Bill Gates, George Soros, or the Chinese government. The most obvious answer is usually the right one; don't look for conspiracies. 

Bill Barnes

The Alamy photo agency has stock photos of my old friend Bill Barnes with Captain Serecold Skeels. Skeels was a South African schoolteacher who, according to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, was a Nazi spy. Bill Barnes was a political activist who moved between the various fascist movements of the 1930s.

Unfortunately, I can't show the photos because they are not licensed for publication in the UK, but you can find them by searching for the United British Party in the Cambridge by-election of 1934.

Skeels intended to stand for the UBP but he pulled out.  Bill was the father of my school friend Paul Barnes, who introduced us to politics by taking us to Oswald Mosley's Union Movement meetings in Trafalgar Square and Kensington Town Hall. These meetings were usually peaceful until 1962 when Colin Jordan held a National Socialist Movement rally in Trafalgar Square which was smashed up by gangs of 'anti-fascist' thugs.

Later that year two East London meetings held on the same day were attacked by the same violent criminals. Union Movement's meeting in Ridley Road was turned over and so was the BNPs rendezvous point in Balls Pond Road. Most of us escaped injury but Bill Barnes, Jack Lelievre and a few others were badly beaten up.

Bill was acquainted with all of the pre-war and post-war fascist leaders including William Joyce who was hanged for treason for broadcasting from Germany during the war. Bill admired Oswald Mosley for his intelligence and Arnold Leese for his bravery, but his favourite was John Beckett who was godfather to his son Paul.

Little remains of Bill Barnes' writing which was mostly in the form of letters to newspapers, but John Bean records in his memoir 'Many Shades of Black' an article which appeared in my newsletter 'Nation in 1974, in which he called for an end to provocative marches. This was at the height of the National Front marches of the 1970s, but Bill, who had seen it all before. warned that the ensuing violence would be counter productive. 

Bill was born in 1912 and died in 1981, his son Paul was born in 1946 and died in 2012.

Candour 


I disagree with 'Candour' about our membership of the European Union, and I found the March 2011 issue unnecessarily offensive to the Irish, but I agree with them about immigration control and financial reform. And I admire Rob Black, the Candour webmaster, for keeping the magazine going during the enforced absence of their editor Colin Todd.

Politics in the age of Brexit has become a bitter affair in which people disrespect their opponents and dismiss them as traitors. There have always been MPs such as Bob Mellish the Labour member for Bermondsey who campaigned against coloured immigration. Or Jeremy Corbyn, the former leader of the Labour Party, who refused to abandon the Palestinians. Not to mention Enoch Powell the popular Tory MP who was sacked by prime minister Edward Heath for advising people to vote Labour.

Dissent should not be an offence in the parliamentary parties or in the movements of the so-called 'far right'. Candour stands for old-fashioned imperialism but it's entitled to its opinion. The following politically incorrect  passage is from an article by Hereward More entitled Black Lives Matter:

"We will defend all the statues against those who now attack them, apart from foreigners attacked for reasons foreign to our island story, such as those of Haile Selassie or Gandhi, although we have no great love for some of those depicted such as the arch globalist Woodrow Wilson or the champion of the Jewish moneyed interest Cecil Rhodes.

We will always defend the stand the Confederacy took against the financial power and progressive sentiment of the North, although we make no defence of slavery which was degrading because it brought our people (and other white nations) into close relations with lesser peoples very much to their own detriment and the benefit of the blacks involved as is proven by the fact that the descendants of slaves living in the Americas (even the worst parts of the Americas , Haiti and Cuba) are healthier and wealthier than those who stayed back home in Africa.

Candour believes that Black lives do matter, but they matter rather more to blacks than they do to anyone else. It is, therefore, as much for their own as for everybody else's benefit that they should live and work, and remain within their own self-contained communities until they can be returned to their ancestral homelands." 

Candour is available from www.candour.org.uk

Jeffrey Hamm Addresses Birmingham Nationalist Club - 'Union' No 152 Saturday January 27th 1951

We left the European Union following a 48 to 52 percent referendum result but recent opinion polls show that the country is still divided. We may have left the EU but the debate goes on.

On the evening of Wednesday 17th January, members of the Birmingham Nationalist Club were addressed by Jeffrey Hamm of Union Movement (with the club's organiser Mr JCC Jordan in the chair).

Hamm opened his address by suggesting that although members of the club, as nationalists, might not be prepared to accept European Union as the alternative to internationalism, they would at least agree wkith him in his condemnation of the international system.  He proceeded to recall the widespread unemployment which had been caused in pre-war Britain by the activities of International Finance, which had been free to exploit the East and to flood Britain with produce of Oriental sweated labour. The natural reaction to this had been the emergence of the nationalist movement of British Union, which under the leadership of Oswald Mosley had advocated the development of Britain and of British Empire. 

Today, the speaker suggested, anti-European nationalism was obsolet, No longer could "the former British Empire" be economically independent while, in the age of the rocket and the atom bomb, we could not shut our eyes to the danger of Europe being overrun by Communism from the East. We should, therefore, advance  beyond our pre-war nationalism to the new idea of "Europe a Nation."

Hamm said he sympathised with the nationalists in the desire to see an independent Britain arise again, but if they were realists they should agree that she could not do so as an isolated unit. The world today was dominated by the two forces of American Capitalism and Soviet Communism. It was, therefore, necessary, if we were to regain our independence, for us to create a "Third Force". That force was Europe, united as one nation in a common faith and idea.

Europe united could save the peace and win back the lands seized by the Soviet Union. Then, by turning to Africa, we could win our own foodstuffs and raw materials and thus regain our economic independence. 

The speaker dealt with a number lof questions covering many aspects of Union Movement policy, and it is hoped that as a result of this meeting the Birmingham Nationalist Club will have advanced beyond their nationalism to the new conception of "Europe a Nation."

What is Wrong With Joe? - Sam Dickson

Cousin Morrison:

Someone like Biden and his disloyalty are easily explained when you think it through.

Our political system is selective for sociopaths.

Almost no one like the heroes of our history (Sir Fancis Drake, Bismark, President Polk, Jefferson) would seek public office in our universal suffrage democracy/plutocracy in which civil debate is controlled by an alien-owned news media.

American politics attracts sociopaths, Sociopaths do not have to bear the burden and suffer the restrictions imposed by normal feelings of loyalty, attachment and morality. Sociopaths do not connect. They are lone wolves. When they have families, the don't really have any emotional tie to them (like another of my distant cousins Senator John Edwards of N.C. to whom his teenaged sons death provided an opportunity to con voters by appealing to their sympathy and nothing more) . Their spouses and  children are just theatre props to put up in pictures on their office desk or in their campaign literature.

Sociopaths do not get emotional satisfaction from things that normal people need. They don't have to 'waste' their time with their families, friends, law partners, fellow Little League players or fraternity brothers. They can devote full time to their political careers. They can handle a life of several "appearances" per day at which they give little talks to strangers. They aren't impeded by having to go home for junior's birthday.

Sociopaths are not encumbered with any sense of shame. As shown in the example of Bill Clinton they suffer no emotional distress when a scandal like Monica Lewinsky giving him ten blow jobs in the Oral Office breaks.  A sociopath like Clinto can carry on without losing a minute's sleep in the midst of a scandal that normal people would find emotionally unbearable (like knowing that hundreds of millions of people all over the world + your wife + your daughter know that you spilled your seed ten times down the throat of an obese, ugly Jew girl.

Modern democracy is something new in modern history.

In previous times the more loyal you were to your people the more likely you were to rise to higher positions.

The commoner Francis Drake became a knight and was ennobled in recognition of his heroism in defending England from the Spanish Armada.

That's how men became leaders.

In modern American democracy it's the opposite... at least  for Whites.

Loyalty - of any kind - is a career impediment.

Loyalty to one's race, religion, region (the South) etc. are not only impediments. Those kinds of loyalty are radioactive, instant death. 

Even loyalty to one's family is a career impediment. The normal young law firm associate wants to go home at 5.00 p.m. to be with his wife and child. The sociopath will work on till 8.00 on the important brief without any psychological  conflict. He'll call up the wife and tell her he won't be home for dinner without any upset.

This explains someone like Biden feeling no loyalty ro his country and being willing to pimp for those with power and money without any regard to what it means to people at large.

What makes the situation in America even worse, however, is that this situation is the opposite for the predatory ethnic groups seeking conquest at our expense.

Black, Hispanic, Jewish politicians are successful the more they are loyal. A law student who can put in his resume that he was President of the Black Law Student's Association, the La Raza Club or the Hillel Foundation enhances his chances of getting a high paying job with a prestigious law firm, a federal judgeship or election to the US Senate. (Like Sheumer who was recently caught  explaining to other Jews that his whole life is spent scheming on how to advance his own particular ethnic group.)

What these two contradictory patterns  lead to is what's going on in contemporary America.

Our antagonists are led by men  whose loyalty to their ethnic group exceeds that of most of the others.

We are "led" by people like Biden, Clinton, John McCain, William F Buckley Jr, Johnny Isakson, Lindsey Graham and McConnel who are bereft of loyalty to us.

This is another reason why there is no hope of reform under the present System. 

Grown ups must think realistically and political campaogns to save America are unrealistic.

We must think and act "Post America."

Your distant cousin, Sam

Nation Revisited and European Outlook

Both blogs seek reform by legal means. All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. We uphold the United Nations' Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:

"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people."

The next two issues of European Outlook, March and April 2021, are devoted to my autobiography.
https://europeanoutlook.blogspot.com 









 





Sunday, 31 January 2021

Nation Revisited # 172 February 2021

Fishponds Road 

Mark Cotterill, the editor of 'Heritage and Destiny' magazine, asked me about Fishponds Road which was the last address of Action Society and its journal 'Action'.

`

It all started in 1931 when Oswald Mosley founded the New Party with 'Action' as its newspaper. Following disappointing results in the 1931 general election the party was disbanded, but it was replaced by the British Union of Fascists in 1932, The movement published 'The Blackshirt' which was edited by AK Chesterton, and 'Action' which was edited by Alexander Raven Thomson from 1939 until it was closed down under Defence Regulation 18B in 1940.

Oswald Mosley published 'The Alternative' in 1947. The BUF believed in Imperial Preference but the Second World War had destroyed the Empire and Mosley realised that our future was with Europe. Union Movement was founded in 1948 with 'Union' as its newspaper. 'Union' was edited by Alexander Raven Thomson. He died in 1955 and 'Union' was replaced in 1956 by 'Action' edited by Robert Row. Mosley died in 1981 and the paper's financial position was reported in 'Action' of July 1981:

"By the end of June 'Action' had survived six months since the death of Sir Oswald Mosley, which was not only a grievous personal loss to us, but also deprived us of the quarterly fee he was paying us for research and secretarial services we provided for him. This aggravated our already grave financial problems."

'Action' of November 1983 was published form its new address, Nash House, Fishponds Road, Tooting, London SW17. This served as the headquarters for Action Society until May 1992. The post-war publication of 'Action' began in 1956, when it replaced 'Union', edited by Robert Row. It ended in November 1992 following the death of Jeffrey Hamm, the leader of Action Society.

The Friends of Mosley organisation was founded in 1982 and 'Comrade' was published as their in-house journal in 1986 under the editorship of professional journalist and press photographer John Warburton. He died in 2004 but 'Comrade' continued to be published until 2017.

There's no longer a hard copy journal dedicated to Oswald Mosley's ideas but they are propagated by the Friends of Mosley website: www.oswaldmosley.com  


The Good Don't Realise How They Hand Power To Evil - Bernard Franklin


Many Europeans look aghast at the immoral actions of their government, as British and American servicemen, in particular, are sent to attack sovereign countries where we have no right to interfere. In whose interest are these attacks, usurpation of power, and theft of national assets taking place? The answer is the secretive New World Order that wants to rule the world. Are these murderers, corrupters, scaremongers, liars, cheats, thieves, destroyers of nations, cultures and civilisations really the kind of people who should be in charge of Western governments and as a result, have the ability to legislate for developing countries? The answer must certainly be no!

There are millions of good Christians who attend church every week ro ensure they follow God's laws. These churchgoing Christians, even collectively, do not possess the power to start warts, put countries in debt, or bully nations into acceding to unreasonable demands. Yet, through ignorance, it is good Christians who have voted the evil people into power. There are surprisingly some Christians who feel Satan has got so far with his programme of destruction, that he should be helped along until the situation becomes so terrible that Jesus Christ will have to take over. This makes no sense at all. We know which politicians are following the Anti-Christ agenda and logically, it can only be those with the ability to make changes that are responsible for the destruction of the white British nation and other countries.

The drive towards world government has created a situation where power is concentrated in very few hands. By taking charge of the West's armed forces, today's rulers, can inflict carnage on a scale unimagined at the time of the English or French revolutions. The saying that "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely" is very true. See how Tony Blair, George Bush, Winston Churchill, Obama, Sarkozy, May, Cameron and Boris Johnson having been elected as inappropriate national leaders, and went on to feel they have a right to act as universal Gods, despite their characters being seriously flawed.

According to Christian teaching we are put on earth to resist evil temptation. Then why, by voting for the major parties, has the predominately Christian public give an evil army complete control over our lives? One possible explanation for the sudden attempt o remove certain long established Arab leaders is that unlike Christian Europeans, they refuse to allow their people to become slaves to the bankers' system of usury. 

The overall effect in the West has been to pass power to the unelected 1% of greedy manipulators. They have been able to buy up 95% of broadcasting companies around the world and control public thinking, start unnecessary wars, and control world trade, while their banking system has constantly devalued money. With their multinational corporations they have polluted our planet and been responsible for global warming. They are also the ones who committed the greatest single crime in history by making the atomic bomb.

Don't Neglect Those Worthy of our Support

There are many thousands of great Britons tirelessly working for the community without expecting payment or fame. Many do charitable work, while others try to gain some political say for the British. All of these volunteers give up their time, and spend their own money on what they consider to be vital for our collective welbeing. If you were to sit down and write a list of what you believe should be government policy, and present it to the Committee of the local Labour, Liberal or Conservative Party, you would find them either dismissive or hostile. There are many honest and knowledgeable Britons who could do a far better job than politicians. But none of them would join a political party. I don't know anyone who belongs to a political party. One has to be very brave in Britain today to stand up for the British. Doesn't this tell you that there is something terribly wrong with the political establishment? This is good reason to support those who raise their heads above the parapet for you.

To become a teacher in a comprehensive school today one has to be prepared to instil in white children a loathing of their own race. This teaching is followed up by dangerous race hate nonsense which suggests that  to overcome an illusory racism one should take a black partner. The origin of the anti white programme can be traced to September 1952, and is recorded in the files of the Canadian Intelligence Service. This non military warfare states: "We will identify with the races of Asia and Africa... In the interest of wiping out racial tensions (that they created with their immigration programme) whites must be forbidden from mating with whites. The white women must cohabit with members of the dark races, and white men with black women. Thus, the white race will disappear, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory." Like fools we allow our children at school to be programmed for our own racial suicide. Schools exert too great an influence on young minds to be left in the hands of our enemies.

Eustace Mullins 


The speech mentioned by Bernard Franklin was given by Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovich to a meeting of the Emergency Council of European Jews in Budapest in 1952. The Jews denied that the speech had been made, just as they denied the 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion'.

The 'Protocols' appeared in Tsarist Russia in 1903. They were investigated by The Times newspaper and declared to be a forgery, but the great American industrialist Henry Ford was so impressed by them that he had half a million copies printed and distributed. He said: "The only statement I care to make about The Protocols is that they fir in with what is going on."

Eustace Mullins (1923-2010) obtained a copy of 'Our Race Will Rule the World Undisputed' from a Bulgarian diplomat who defected to the United States. It was published by several right wing journals including the Canadian Intelligence Service which was published by the Canadian League of Rights.

Eustace Mullins was a prolific writer on the Money Power and the Holocaust. He was convinced that the Federal Reserve was controlled by the Rothschilds. He campaigned for banking reform and contributed to James Madole's National Renaissance Party and Matt Koehl's American Nazi Party.

He was a disciple of the modernist poet Ezra Pound who was confined to a mental hospital by a vengeful American government for broadcasting from Italy during World War Two. 

His books include; The Secret of the Federal Reserve, That Difficult Individual Ezra Pound, The Federal Reserve Conspiracy, The World Order, and Our Secret Rulers.

Like many anti-Zionists, Mullins never tried to justify what the  Nazis had done to the Jews, he simply denied the whole thing.

The Eustace Mullins website is at: http://www.eustacemullins.us/ 


How Many People Actually Entered The Cabinet Building? -Sam Dickson


According to USA Today the day after the tempest in a teapot, "several dozen" Trump supporters entered the Capitol.

On the front page was a huge glaring headline saying "Pro-Trump Mobs Attack Capitol."

(One mob was not enough. It has to be mobs, plural. I couldn't figure out where the different mobs came from.)

The front page was full of shocking accounts of what transpired - in generalities. Lots of "wide brush" tactics. "Trump demonstrators looted the Capitol." Things like that.

But when you turned to Page 2, the story began to shrink and shrink as the facts sifted out from the hyperbole and hysteria.

Instead of "mobs " storming into the Capitol as asserted on Page 1, the reader learned that "several dozen" Trump supporters entered the building. (it wasn't expressly stated but the pictures made it clear  that many thousands of Trump supporter demonstrators did NOT attempt to enter the Capitol but simply stood on the steps and street in front of the Capitol with their protest signs and flags.) Somehow, all of them are guilty.

Please remember that demonstrations take place on the Capitol steps ALL THE TIME. I personally have witnessed around 10 such demonstrations when I have walked past the Capitol on trips to DC. The last one was a demonstration by Sarah Brady's people in support of gun confiscation. So it is absolutely NOT a crime or anything out of the ordinary for demonstrations to take place there.

As one continued to read USA Today, one saw lots of pictures and stories about the "several dozen" illegal entrants.

Of course, there were the ubiquitous pictures of the guy holding the podium (this was the only picture of any looting but the Media labels all the Trump supporters as "looters,") or the guy with his feet on Pelosi's desk, the guy with the only Confederate flag in view (this has become mass displays of Confederate flags  according to media like National Public Radio on its "All Things Considered") and the guy repelling from the balcony into the House Chamber.

So that's 4 out of the "several dozen."

The rest of the illegal entrants appear in pictures answering questions from journalists, walking around the hall carrying a sign or a flag. etc.

Please also remember that incidents like this one are commonplace,

You will remember that during the tense hearings on the shocking and breath-taking issue of whether or not Kavanaugh came on to a woman 37 years ago, when he was 17 rears old and a drunk 11th grader, the hearings were several times interrupted by organised groups of feminists standing up and shouting down the hearings before being dragged out by the police. Nothing to be upset about there!

This is an elaborately feigned morality fit.

An academy award should be given to Shoomuh, Pelosi and the others for their acting in the drama.

The End of an Era


Donald J Trump has finally left the White House after four flamboyant years. His populist regime was supported by half the American electorate, but Joe Biden won the race to be president. One geriatric Zionist has been replaced by another. Both of them serve what President Eisenhower called "the military industrial complex."

President Donald Trump masqueraded as a businessman but he turned out to be just another bandwagon jumper who would do anything to stay in power. He started to build a wall to keep the Mexicans out, but he employed them on his construction sites. He banned Muslims from entering the US, except for those shopping for military hardware with which to attack their neighbours. He didn't start any new wars but he provoked a trade war with China, despite China's massive ownership of American bonds. And he quit the Paris agreement on climate change and the World Health Organisation.

As far as the UK is concerned, we will slavishly follow whoever is in charge of the US. Boris Johnson and his motley crew are obsessed with 'sovereignty' but they cherish the 'special relationship' between the UK and the US. In fact, their only special relationship is with Israel. America came to our aid in both world wars, and we speak the same language, but American foreign policy has always put America first.

The Coronavirus pandemic has severely damaged the American economy, but no nation is better placed to recover. The US is self sufficient in gas and oil and has almost unlimited industrial potential. A resurgent America would revitalise Europe and the UK. We live in a global economy where the success of one nation does not depend on the failure of another. When America booms the whole world booms. We therefore pray for the success of the Biden government. 

Nation Revisited and European Outlook

Nation Revisited is published monthly, our sister blog European Outlook is published less often. Both blogs seek reform by legal means. All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. We uphold the United Nations' Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:

"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people."






 


 








      





  




   


                          

Thursday, 31 December 2020

Nation Revisited # 171 January 2021

Tony Blair's Suicide Note for the British - by Bernard Franklin


For all the Union Jack flag waving, engaged in by the Labour Party during the last election, it is clear that the victorious "New Labour" government is just as committed to the destruction of Britain's Anglo-Saxon-Celtic ethnic unity, cultural identity and national sovereignty as was Old Labour.

Evidence of this was seen in the support which Tony Blair has given to a "Commission on the future of Multi-Ethnic Britain." The Commission was recently set up by the Runnymead Trust, which describes itself as an independent charity concerned with the issues of racial injustice and equality. In reality it is a self appointed organisation which seeks the destruction of European nations and tries to bring in laws to make the genocide of the white race compulsory.

In response to the "Commission" Mr Blair wrote: "Britain is changing fast: old patterns are being replaced by new diversity and it is vital that we modernise our institutions to reflect this changing reality. I would like to encourage groups and individuals to contribute to create a fair and open Multi-Ethnic Britain."

If we British as a people should ever cease to exist as a result of genocide through race-mixing, that trite little message will be seen by historians as the nation's suicide note.

At first sight Blair's message seems nothing more than a vacuous hyperbole of the type that Peter Sellers lampooned in the "All purpose political speech." What are "these old patterns" to which he refers so casually? Are they some unimportant scrap of cultural litter to be confined to the dustbin?

No! What de dismisses so lightly are two thousand years of history, of nation building, of creativity, toil and struggle in every field of human endeavour by a racially homogenous folk whose achievements, generation after generation, have shaped the world to an extent that has never been surpassed.

Ethnic Continuity

What does Blair mean by "new diversity"? The flooding of our island sin ce 1960 with millions of racially alien and culturally dissimilar people who are uncomfortable with, or downright antagonistic to the very concept of the British nation and culture and who are resentful of our history as it stands in comparison to their own. Amazingly Blair talks of "diversity" and "social cohesion" asif they were one and the same when they are complete opposites. For a nation to exist the people must have a common history, a common identity, and a shared vision of the future. The major political parties have no long term plans for a British future, for they are hell bent on destroying the British as a nation. In the strident tone of all tyrannies down the ages, we are told, in this instance, that we must accept a massive foreign invasion, the loss pof our country and racial identity. Should we demur too stridently, we face prosecution and imprisonment. This is a fact, but of course it never appeared in any Labour, Liberal, Conservative or communist manifesto.

A second foreword to the "Commission" prospectus was written by the "Chair" of the Runnymead Trust, the black broadcaster, and long term friend of Peter Mandelson, Trevor Phillips. In it he declares: "The question that we are trying to answer is about identity and culture and how we reshape the nation - these are matters of intense interest to the whole nation..." How kind of Mr Phillips to acknowledge that the way in which he and his equally alien cronies plan to "reshape" our nation to be more congenial to himself, should also be of interest to those whose ancestral home is being destroyed.

The Runnymead Trust constantly asserts that it is in business to highlight injustices being inflicted  on ethnic groups. The British are suffering the greatest injustices, which are being aggravated by this particular (Runnymead) kangaroo court.

1) The injustice to the ethnic British people of having a multi-racial society inflicted on them without their permission ever having been sought or given at any time, and in the face of their sustained, if sometimes muted majority opposition.

2) The mass trespass of our country by millions of uninvited aliens. A situation which would lead the white British being outnumbered in our own country by coloured non-Europeans. This is a contrived political programme aimed at the destruction of our nation and culture through multi-racialism. This is definitely a contrived genocidal process, since Britons are being denied the fundamental human right to survive as a distinct ethnic group in their own homeland. It has been made a serious crime even to comment on it.

Tony Blair like so many twerps hell-bent on the destruction of European nations was brainwashed at Oxford University. The reason we are constantly ruled by our enemies is that the Ashkenazi tribe are warmongering Europeans and not Semitic  Jews as they make out. This allows our enemies such as Peter Mandelson, Lord Levy, Theresa May, David Cameron, Keith Joseph, and Boris Johnson to get elected. Because they are Europeans they look like us. To fool the public many of them have changed their names. As a reult an ever increasing number of our enemies are taking over Parliament, our shops and industries, They have total control of Oxford University and the LSE, as well as the Stock Exchange. They own 95% of the television broadcasting companies world wide, transmitting what they want us to believe. Since 1939 the Ashkenazi menace has been creating wars  that could have been avoided . See how Parliament still continues to make a big thing out of Rememberance Day. Most of the soldiers who actually fought in the Second World War did their best to forget it. The Ashkenazi tribe are trying to take control of every country to create what they call  "The New World Order". Every country has a right to exist and should unite against them.

Happy New Year

Older NR readers have lived through some terrible times. We remember the humiliation of Suez in 1956 when America ordered us out of Egypt under threat of economic ruin. And twenty years later when our Chancellor of the Exchequer, Denis Healey, was forced to borrow £3.9 billion from the International Monetary Fund to stop our leading bank from defaulting. But nothing compares to the economic crisis facing us today with the Coronavirus pandemic.




Boris Johnson has signed a trade deal with the EU that  satisfies all but the most fanatical anti-Europeans, but our economy is already on life support due to the Coronavirus pandemic. How will he pay back the enormous sums that he has borrowed? The poor can't be taxed anymore because they have no money, and the rich have hidden their ill-gotten gains in trust funds and offshore accounts. That only leaves the working people, the backbone of the nation, who are already ground down by excessive taxation.

Our recovery will depend on how quickly the world gets its act together. China, the US and the EU are big enough to withstand the storm, but we are not so fortunate. Of course, we will recover but it might take some time.

Meanwhile, Boris' chums; the asset strippers, tax avoiders, pension fund robbers, slum landlords, and rent racketeers are destroying our traditional high streets and the multinational corporations are dodging taxes by locating in one country and trading all over the world. The UK has become a crook's paradise under Boris Johnson. The gap between rich and poor is getting wider, our doorways are full of rough sleepers, suicide rates are soaring, and school fees at Eton start at £42,000. Happy New Year.

Julian Assange

The campaigning Australian editor and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is awaiting extradition from the UK to the US where he faces a possible 175 years imprisonment for revealing details of the United States' invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. He is being held in London's Belmarsh Prison and his hearing will be held on January 4th 2021.

Support him by visiting Crowd Justice: https://crowdjustice.com/case/julianassange/


Poverty in Britain



Jacob Rees-Mogg, the fabulously wealthy MP for North Somerset, is upset that Unicef has donated money to relieve poverty in Britain. But poverty is a reality in many parts of our unequal country. It will not go away because the Tories are embarrassed by it. The social Metrics Commission estimates that there are 4.5 million people in Britain living in 'deep poverty'. 

Mark Webb writes from South London.

Those on low pay, benefits, pensions, and students, unemployed graduates, and others are facing crippling debt. Those without these issues just cannot grasp what's happening. I hear middle class women in Camberwell  saying that those on benefits are "swimming in cash". Right wing, liberal, green or socialist in nature, they are all under exactly the same impression that we do not have poverty here, that there is no hardship and people are not going without.

I know three young women in their late teens, early twenties, all living and working in Camberwell. One is working in a shop, one in a supermarket, and one in a restaurant. All three are on low pay and sharing digs with others. They were not born locally so they are trying to return home to see their parents at Christmas. One needs to get down to the West Coast, one to the North of England, and another to Denmark. Between their rent, travel and cost of living they are all borrowing, using credit cards and taking loans. They are all getting help from their parents. All of them are very bright and should be working in industry or business, and yet they are stuck in dead end jobs.

The current set-up in society is soul crushing for younger people. These young women are hard workers, all are good natured and yet their futures are very unstable. One may not be able to work or even to live here due to Brexit. One is facing the sack if building plans for the centre of Camberwell go ahead. The other wants to return to college but this is in doubt due to the Coronavirus. 

Sadly a factor in the mix is that they have been raised to be weak. They are the 'snowflake' generation, they cannot fight, they cannot look after themselves in conflict situations. Underneath their outwardly happy demeanour, I sense fear, weakness and a feeling of hopelessness. None of these women know one another, but they all live in close proximity. London is a big but lonely city. All three girls are very attractive but none of them are dating. Between work, study and sleeping there's not much time for a social life, let alone a love life. They live and work in London but none of them have seen its sights, been to a show or been out for a meal in the West End. They have been conditioned to lack ambition.  All three are still working despite the current pandemic regulations. They are getting by on tips, freebies at work, staff discounts and the like. It's heart breaking to see bright talented people just wasting their lives and living in fear of everything.

Richard Edmonds RIP


Veteran nationalist Richard Edmonds was born 10th March 1943 and died 23rd December 2020. He joined the National Front in 1972, but he was not a narrow nationalist, he spoke Russian, French and German and he was a member of the Swiss-based Europaeisch Aktion which stands for European Confederation.  See his tribute in Heritage and Destiny: www.heritageanddestiny.com

Churchill, The Jews And The Second World War - Richard Edmonds  

Why are white people so demoralised? Only a really demoralised people would tolerate so dumbly the massive and heartless betrayal committed against them by the vicious, shameless and useless party-politicians. Clearly it is the two world wars that have knocked the stuffing out of the White race. Look at all the British names on war-memorials from one end of this country to the other. The names of those men who marched away from every town, city and village in this country never to return. When you look at modern Britain, you know that those men died for nothing. They were betrayed by the party-politicians.

The dedication to the Fallen of the two world wars inscribed on the War-memorial at Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire reads:
"We gave our todays, so that you might have a tomorrow." But we who come after, we know that our Tomorrows have become a nightmare, a multi-racial, multi-criminal nightmare, where we are becoming a minority in our own cities, and where white children, under-age girls are raped, sexually abused, and sold into prostitution: crimes committed with impunity for years and years right across the North of England by the vile Asian grooming gangs, and in the full knowledge of the authorities.

Question: So how then did we get a Second World War just twenty years after the First, when the majority of British folk most certainly did not want another war? Who then did want a second war? Who schemed and who agitated and who got a second war just twenty years after the first mindless bloodbath?  Almost a million British soldiers were killed in the First World War: a wicked waste of good men's lives. Two million German soldiers, a million French soldiers, several million Russian soldiers and hundreds of thousands of American soldiers; all good white men ; and nobody can give you a justification for that first murderous war.

First off: the only prominent politician who wanted a second war was Winston Churchill. Churchill was almost unique amongst British politicians at that time in campaigning for a Second World War. But Churchill was not alone in wanting the destruction of Adolf Hitler and his Germany. Out of sight to most people, were powerful and wealthy Jewish individuals who saw war as a means to destroy the Germany that they hated. These powerful and wealthy Jews saw Churchill as the man to bring about the war against Adolf Hitler that they so desired.

In those years before the Second World War, effectively nobody in Britain wanted a second war, nobody in Europe or the USA, and nobody in Russia outside of the sinister Bolshevik-Communist clique around Joseph Stalin. Churchill in the 1930s was politically and socially isolated, but he found backers and supporters he needed in wealthy and powerful Jews. David Irving in his book, Churchill's War Part 1, writes of Churchill that "he sold his soul to a syndicate of politicians and financiers." Irving then proceeds to name those to whom Churchill sold his soul: Sir Robert Waley-Cohen, chairman of the Shell oil company and vice chair of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, donated fifty thousand pounds to Churchill's campaigning for a repeat war against Germany. Irvin writes of Churchill receiving substantial Jewish funds, and gives the example of Sir Henry Strakosh, a Jewish gold-mining industrialist based in South Africa, who "lent" Churchill twenty thousand pounds. These were colossal sums of money. At the height 1930s world-wide economic slump, a man who was lucky enough to be in full-time employment might be earning two pound a week, the pound having a much greater purchasing power then.

This backing of Winston Churchill was, of course, a closely guarded secret only revealed decades later by the researches of David Irving and others. But in parallel other powerful Jews openly called for war: within a few weeks of Adolf Hitler being appointed German Chancellor, the wealthy American Jew, Samuel Untermeyer, organised a campaign which the British Daily Express newspaper (of 24 March 1933) reported with its notorious headline: "Jews of the world declare war on Germany."

A full year before the outbreak of war, in June 1938, the Jewish publication, The American Hebrew, made this prediction:

"The forces against Adolf Hitler's Germany are being mobilised (that's our soldiers they are talking about). A combination of England, France and Russia (Joseph Stalin's Soviet Union) will oppose the crazed Fuhrer. Either by accident or design, a Jew has come to the position of foremost importance in each of these nations, England, France and Russia. In the hands on non-Aryans lie the very lives of millions (Gentiles)." The American Hebrew concludes: "When the smoke of battle clears away and the man who played God, the swastikered Christus, is buried in a hole in the ground, then a trio of non-Aryans will intone a requiem, standing proud, militant and aggressive, "Elie, Elie, Elie."

This quote can be found in Arnold Leese's book, "The Jewish War of Survival."

Nation Revisited and European Outlook

Nation Revisited is published monthly, our sister blog European Outlook is published less often. Both blogs seek reform by legal means. All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. We uphold the United Nations' Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:

"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people."










Sunday, 29 November 2020

Nation Revisited # 170 December 2020

Lest We Forget


The Cenotaph in Whitehall, London was established in 1920 to commemorate the British Empire dead of the First World War. It subsequently embraced those who fell in the Second World War and various conflicts since.  Edward Lutyens, the architect, avoided any reference to specific battles or regiments and no national or religious symbols are carved in its stone. It commemorates all who died for Britain, whatever their nationality, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation. Members of the Black Lives Matter movement and Gay Pride are wrong to regard it as racist or sexist monument.

There is no need for separate memorials for different people and there is no need for movements such as Black Lives Matter. All lives matter, not just black ones. Another nonsense is Black History. Black people are part of the human race and therefore share their history with the rest of us. If we are to live in peace with each other our studies and institutions must be inclusive. It would be illegal to found a White Policeman's Union and it must be just as unacceptable to have a Black Policeman's Union. Racism is just as bad from the Blacks as it is from the Whites.

The Nazis made the Jews wear yellow stars. In order to persecuted them they first had to know who they were. That experiment ended in disaster and so will the current obsession with race and sexual orientation. Let us judge people by the way they conduct themselves. I believe in European solidarity and I am opposed to mass migration but I don't look down on people from Africa and Asia, and I do not presume to tell people who they should be attracted to. 

The Zebra Killers - Mark Webb

This current period of racial tensions and hate/race related crimes in the US is not a new state of affairs and indeed some would argue that it has been going on since the Pilgrim Fathers encountered the First Nations people. One period of serious racial tension that took place in the early - mid 1970s is almost forgotten and is very rarely mentioned. However it's a history that should be recalled as it is relevant to 2020. 

In San Francisco from 1973 until 1974 police were baffled by a string of racist murders. White couples or lone white people were being attacked by four black men, sometimes acting together, or in pairs, or alone. They would run up to their victim/target and using either.32 cal revolvers or .32 cal automatic pistols, they would shoot the chosen victim repeatedly, without warning, then they would run off. Several times women were abducted, raped, tortured and hacked to death with machetes and shot with .32 cal bullets.

Some victims were just women carrying their shopping home. One victim was talking on a public phone, others were waiting at bus stops, one victim was folding her clothes in a laundry. Two victims were members of the Salvation Army handing out leaflets. The ages of the victims ranged from 15 to 81. They were made up of students, a janitor, an office worker, a sailor on leave, a homeless person etc. One was a community worker who survived the shooting and later became mayor. One of the white women shot and killed was the girlfriend of a black drug dealer who offered a huge amount of drugs or money as a reward to anyone finding her killers. At the height of the murders no one was walking the streets of SF at night. At one point there was almost a race war.

The police had three clues; all the victims were white, all the suspects were black males, and they always used the same .32 cal weapons with the same brand of ammo. Not much to go on.

The attackers did little to hide their faces and witnesses and survivors sat down with police sketch artists to create likenesses of the attackers. One man, Tony Harris, recognised himself on a police wanted poster. He was on the fringe of things and knew the killers. He did a deal with the police to supply information in return from immunity from prosecution and witness protection.


He told the detectives in charge of the case about four men; Manuel Moore, Larry Green, Jessie Lee Cooks, and JCX Simon. All members of the Nation of Islam and a group called The Death Angels. They had a simple plan, to kill 'blue eyed devils. Each man was to kill nine whites, murdering them at random, execution style. They would meet up after work and kill before 11 o'clock so they could be back at work the next day. Harris admitted that he had witnessed some of the killings but swore he was not one of the killers.

The four men in question were arrested in short order. They were all charged with murder, attempted murder, and conspiracy to murder. In 1976 the longest trial in Californian state history ended with the conviction of the Zebra killers. All four were found guilty and sentenced to life in prison. Two have since died in jail due to illness or old age, the other two are still locked up. In total the Death Angels officially murdered fifteen people and wounded ten (putting three of the wounded in wheelchairs for life). However, it is widely held that they, and others mixed up with the cult, have murdered seventy-three people from the late 60s until 1974. These killings took place up and down the coast, homeless white people were often targetted (all listed as unsolved cases). A large number of .32 cal gunshot woundings with the same MO as the Zebra killings also took place, but these were not linked at the time. Random stabbings of white taxi drivers and drive by shootings at police stations also took place in this period.

The lessons from this case should be remembered today. The police had a special radio band that was only to be used in matters relating to the killings. It was called 'Band Z' Zebra). The police stopped, searched and questioned around five thousand young black men aged between 25-35. in relation to the killings during 1973-4. Each time the men were checked out as OK. The police gave them a special card, called a Z card (which could not be duplicated). The men would show these pocket size cards to the police to prove that they had already been questioned, if they were stopped again. A task force was formed and a dragnet was imposed across the city. Tens of thousands of wanted posters were put up and leaflets were posted to every home in the city. Ultimately the police operation was a success, but huge questions remained unanswered. The Nation of Islam claimed to have no part in the killings, but they paid for the suspects' legal defence. None of the men convicted have spoken much about the events. There is no public memorial to the victims or services of remembrance.

Hate crime doesn't have a colour bar. Racism is not unique to any one race. It's vile regardless of whoever does it.

Other Californian killers, like the Manson Family, the Zodiak Killer, the Hillside Stranglers, and the Night Stalker, have been the subjects of many books, films and documentaries. There is no movie about the Zebra Killers, it's just too hot a topic! Those in charge really want this case to go away; it was left unfinished, justice was not served.

The ''Universal Aspects of Fascism' and 'Fascism' by James Strachey Barnes

This is two books published as one volume, The Universal Aspects of Fascism, and Fascism, both by James Strachey Barnes. Published by the Reconquista Press. 

It's difficult to review works that were topical nearly a hundred years old. Benito Mussolini's preface to the first book blames Fascism's poor reputation on bad journalism - false news, as Donald Trump might say today. The author's preface, and Robert Fiore's foreword both focus on Catholicism, but this was only part of a mixture of populism, nationalism and liberalism sprung from the First World War. Italy was a new country recently freed from Austrian control, and Fascism was an attempt at national unity.

Strachey Barnes, who was an Old Etonian, compared Fascism to the British Public School system. Both were based on military discipline, patriotism and Christianity.  In modern times Fascism has become a dirty word that is often used in conjunction with 'racism'. In fact, Fascism was not a racial movement until Italy introduced the Manifesto of Race in 1938. This was aimed at the Jews and designed to appease Adolf Hitler. When Italian troops invaded Ethiopia in 1935 they came across a little black girl lost in the desert. They immediately adopted her and the song Faccetta Nera (little black face) became the anthem of the Italian Expeditionary Force. There was nothing racist about it. 

When James Strachey Barnes was writing these books the economic catastrophe of 1929 was yet to happen. The Fascist Revolution was in full swing; roads, railways, homes, schools and hospitals were being constructed, the unemployed were being put to work and the enormous task of post-war reconstruction was being undertaken. This was the Golden Age of National Reconstruction, expressed in the United States as The New Deal and in Italy as Fascism. But it was not to last.

The second book 'Fascism' concentrates on  the offices of the State. Most of these structures were in place before the March on Rome. Syndicalism was supposed to be backbone of the system but industry and agriculture continued to be run on capitalist lines. When the Italian Social Republic was founded in September 1943, Syndicalism was given its proper place, but by then it was too late.

All political systems start out with good intentions. Fascism wasn't perfect but it was no worse than its competitors. Italian Fascism's reputation for violence was overstated. When Violet Gibson tried to assassinate Benito Mussolini in Rome in 1926, she fired her revolver at point blank rage but only grazed his nose. Mussolini declined to bring charges, she was treated gently and sent back to England, where she spent the rest of her life in a mental hospital. So much for Fascist brutality.

Fascism is rejected by those who do not understand it. It is respectable to be a Socialist in Europe but not in the United States. Nationalism used to be out of favour but it has been reclaimed by Donald Trump's Make America Great movement - a crude form of Fascism lacking any social conscience. Political slogans come and go but ideas persist. And the idea of a State dedicated to social advancement and above market capitalism is as valid now as ir was in 1922.

Frank P Walsh RIP


This photo was taken by Frank's devoted friend Lynne Capocciamo last Christmas when she took him his lunch.

Frank Walsh was born in Lancashire in 1925 and died in London on 19th November this year. He was a gentleman, a patriot and a scholar who fought against plutocracy to the bitter end.

Frank's father was badly wounded in the First World War and he was brought up in a children's home. He joined the Merchant Navy at the age of 14 and volunteered for the army in 1943.

He was known as the King of London's Speaker's Corner where he spoke fearlessly for many years despite a Red ban on patriotic speakers.

His Patriotic People's Power Party attempted to unite the  producers, the common people, against the parasites. His unique blog was updated monthly until March 2019, it was a fascinating mixture of graphic art, prose, poetry, and Social Credit. www.ab4ps.com

We do not know what arrangements Frank made for his archives. He certainly had many boxes of magazines and correspondence. When my old friend Carl Harley died earlier this year, without leaving a will, he was buried by the local authority and his books and magazines were disposed of. If you are an old fascist with one foot in the grave, like myself, I urge you to leave clear instructions of your treasured collection will end up in a skip.

Rest in peace old comrade. I shall miss your stoicism, your coffee and your conversation, and your sparkling eyes.

Comments

Use the facility at the end of this blog to leave comments and read what other have to say. But please don't post ad hominem attacks, we are interested in ideas not personalities.

Nation Revisited and European Outlook

Nation Revisited is published monthly, European Outlook is published less often. Both blogs seek reform by legal means. All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. We uphold the United Nations' Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:

"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people."




   

  

   


Friday, 16 October 2020

Nation Revisited # 169 November 2020

Mystery Solved

Last month I reported the delivery of an empty package. It turns out that it contained a book until it came open during sorting. It was simply a postal malfunction.

Looking Ahead

The UK is afflicted with a viral pandemic and we are about to exit the EU Customs Union and the Single Market. We will eventually recover but we face a challenging future.

Post-pandemic children will need a health and welfare system to look after them for a lifetime. They will need an educational system from nursery school to university. They will need jobs with pensions, and they will need homes that they can afford. To provide these services we will need a government committed to social equality. Boris Johnson has promised 95% mortgages but the banks will not offer mortgages to the unemployed.

In Britain today nursery care is patchy and expensive. Less than half of school pupils go to university and those that do have to pay for it. Jobs worth having are hard to find, pensions are inadequate, and housing is far too expensive.

The Tories are spending money like water during the current pandemic but when we get back to normal they will revert to scrimping on health and education in order to spend more on defence. They are deliberately provoking Russia by sending British troops on exercises to Ukraine. And they take great pride in our new aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth. Defence experts doubt the value of 'Big Lizzie' without a full compliment of aircraft or the necessary back up ships. But she shows the flag in foreign parts and that's all the Tories are worried about. 


They would like to return to the 'good old days' when Britannia ruled the waves and the workers doffed their caps to their lords and masters.

Years ago we had a run of working class Tory prime ministers. Ted Heath went to his local grammar school, Margaret Thatcher was a grocers daughter, and John Major was a Brixton boy who made good. But those days have gone, Britain is now ruled by Boris Johnson, a multi-millionaire who presides over a wealthy Cabinet. Their slogan "we are all in this together" is a hollow mockery, and those disgruntled Labour Party supporters who voted for them have only themselves to blame.

But there is light at the end of the tunnel. We are due a general election in 2024. By then we should be over the Coronavirus pandemic and our economy should have adjusted to life outside the European Union. The great British public will have another chance to choose a government and we can only hope that they give the matter a little more thought than they did in 2019.    

George Orwell's 1940 Review of Hitler's Mein Kampf

(Amazon have banned Mein Kampf but it continues to sell well all over the world).

It is a sign of the speed at which events are moving that Hurd and Blackett's unexpurgated edition of Mein Kampf, published only a year ago, is edited from a pro-Hitler angle. The obvious intention of the translator's preface and notes is to tone down the book's ferocity and present Hitler in as kindly a light as possible. For at that date Hitler was still respectable. He had c rushed the German labour movement and for that the property-owning classes were willing to forgive him almost anything. Both Left and Right concurred in the very shallow notion that National Socialism was merely a version of Conservatism.

Then suddenly it turned out that Hitler was not respectable after all. As one result of this, Hurst and Blackett's edition was reissued in a new jacket explaining that all profits would be devoted to the Red Cross. Nevertheless, simply on the internal evidence of Mein Kampf, it is difficult to believe that any real change had taken place in Hitler's aims and opinions. When one compares his utterances of a year or so ago with those made fifteen years earlier, a thing that strikes one is the rigidity of his mind, the way in which his worldview doesn't develop. It is the fixed vision of a monomaniac and not likely to be much affected by the temporary manoeuvres of power politics. Probably, in Hitler's own mind, the Russo-German Pact represents no more than an alteration of time-table. The plan laid down in Mein Kampf was to smash Russia first with the implied intention of smashing England afterwards. Now, as it has turned out, England has got to be dealt with first because Russia was the more easily bribed of the two. But Russia's turn will come when England is out of the picture - that, no doubt, is how Hitler sees it . Whether it will turn out that way is of course a different question.

Suppose that Hitler's programme could be put into effect. What he envisages, a hundred years hence, is a continuous state of 250 million Germans with plenty of "living room" (ie stretching to Afghanistan or thereabouts ) a horrible brainless empire in which essentially, nothing ever happens except the training of young men for war and the endless breeding of fresh cannon-fodder. How was it that he was able to put this monstrous vision across? It is easy to say that at one stage of his career he was financed by the heavy industrialists, who saw in him the man who would smash the Socialists and Communists. They would not have backed him, however, if he had not talked a great movement into existence already. Again, the situation in Germany with its seven million unemployed was obviously favourable for demagogues. But Hitler could not have succeeded against his many rivals if it had not been for the attraction of his own personality, which one can feel even in the clumsy writing of Mein Kampf, and which is no doubt overwhelming when one hears his speeches... The fact is that there is something deeply appealing about him. One feels it again when one sees his photographs - and I recommend especially the photograph at the beginning of  Hurst and Blackett's edition, which shows Hitler in his early Brownshirt days. It is a pathetic, dog like face, the face of a man suffering under intolerable wrongs. In a rather more manly way it reproduces the expression of innumerable pictures of Christ crucified, and there is little doubt that is how Hitler sees himself. The initial personal cause of his grievance against the universe can only be guessed at: but at any rate the grievance is here. He is the martyr, the victim. Prometheus  chained to the rock, the self-sacrificing hero who fights single-handed against impossible odds. If he were killing a mouse he would know how to make it seem like a dragon. One feels, as with Napoleon, that he is fighting against destiny, that he can't win, and yet he somehow deserves to. The attraction of such a pose is of course enormous; half the films one sees turn upon some such theme.

Also he has grasped the falsity of the hedonistic attitude to life. Nearly all western thought since the last war, certainly all "progressive" thought has assumed tacitly that human beings desire nothing beyond ease, security and avoidance of pain. In such a view of life there is no room, for instance, for patriotism and the military virtues. The Socialist who finds his children playing with soldiers is usually upset, but he is never able to think of a substitute for the tin soldiers; tin pacifists somehow won't do. Hitler, because in his own joyless mind he feels it with exceptional strength, knows that human beings don't only want comfort, safety, short working hours, hygiene, birth-control and in general common sense, they also, at least intermittently, want struggle and self-sacrifice, not to mention drums, flags and loyalty parades. However they may be as economic theories, Fascism and Nazism are psychologically far sounder than any hedonistic conception of life. The same is probably true of Stalin's militarised version of Socialism. All three of the great dictators have enhanced their power by imposing intolerable burdens on their peoples. Whereas Socialism, and even capitalism in a more grudging way, have said to the people "I offer you a good time." Hitler has said to them "I offer you struggle, danger and death," and as a result a whole nation flings itself at his feet. Perhaps later on they will get sick of it and change their minds, as at the end of the last war. After a few years of slaughter and starvation "Greatest happiness of the greatest number" is a good slogan, but at this moment "Better an end with horror than a horror without end" is a winner. Now that we are fighting against the man who coined it, we ought not to underrate its emotional appeal. 

Telling Lies and Acting The Fool

Frankie Howerd used to remind us that "it's wicked to mock the afflicted," but they are so numerous and vocal that one can hardly help it. We are beset by flat-earthers, climate change deniers, multiple conspiracy theorists, historical revisionists, separatists, vaccination refusers and poor demented souls who think that Bill Gates is responsible for the current pandemic.

These paranoid campaigners are not just people with alternative opinions. They are, in the words of Dave Cameron, "fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists." There is absolutely no point in arguing with people who  believe that the Royal family are lizards. Or that it's a good idea to break away from a successful trading bloc on our doorstep. It would be like arguing with a drunk.

Education might help them. They wouldn't cling to the flat earth theory if they were taught geography; they wouldn't preach 'economic nationalism' in a country like Britain which imports half of its fuel and food, if they were taught basic economics. And they wouldn't think that Elizabeth Windsor is a lizard if they were taught biology. But, unfortunately, their brains are damaged beyond repair.

None of this applies to Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson. He is a clever man who had an expensive education. He only jumped on the Brexit bandwagon to be prime minister of a country brainwashed by the Tory press. His cunning plan worked but he didn't know that a viral pandemic was waiting in the wings. We don't know how much damage the pandemic will do to our economy but it has already taken its toll. Whatever plans Boris had for us will have to be abandoned. His vision of a 'global Britain' striking trade deals with the rest of the world is now a remote possibility.

But whatever happens 'good old Boris' will not get the blame. His devoted followers will blame all our troubles on a revengeful EU. And Boris himself will carry on telling lies and acting the fool.

Max Hastings said of him:

"I have known Johnson since the 1980s when I was editor of the Daily Telegraph and he was our flamboyant Brussels correspondent. I have argued for a decade that, while he is a brilliant entertainer who made a popular maitre d' for London as its mayor, he is unfit for national office, because it seems he cares for no interest save his own fame and gratification." 

The Truth About Israel


The signing of the Abraham Accord between Israel and the Gulf States in August 2020 follows peace agreements with Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994. Saudi Arabia is supposed to be Israel's main enemy but crown prince Mohamed bin Salman is firmly committed to American foreign policy which supports the Zionist state. In the Middle East only Iran and Syria remain opposed to Israel. But Iran is crippled by US sanctions and Syria is recovering from a devastating civil war. The Palestinians have effectively been abandoned by most of their neighbours.

Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States are major oil producers with plenty of money available to help the Palestinians. They give to the Red Crescent and other charities but they have done little or nothing diplomatically or militarily to alleviate the suffering of the occupied Palestinians. 

In the West the parties of the far-right pay lip service to the Palestinian cause but some of them actually support Israel, and others worry about what would happen to six million Jewish refugees if Israel was destroyed. America would get most of them but the UK would be next in line. 

The truth is that Zionists are so powerful that most people are frightened to condemn Israel's cruel occupation of Palestine. Resolutions are passed at the United Nations and statements are made by world leaders, but the IDF continues to shoot children on the orders of 'Bibi' Netanyahu (pictured) who faces charges of fraud, bribery and breach of faith.

Adolf Hitler predicted in Mein Kampf: 

"The Jews domination in the state seems so assured that now not only can he call himself a Jew again, but he ruthlessly admits his ultimate national and political designs. A section of his race openly owns itself to be a foreign people, yet even here they lie. For while the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the dumb Goyim. It doesn't even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organisation for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks."

But nothing lasts forever. China is set to become the biggest economy in the world, and the Chinese don't suffer from guilt about the Holocaust like the Christian nations. When the European Jews were being rounded up and killed by the Nazis the Chinese were being slaughtered by the Japanese. 

Also, many Jews around the world are speaking out against Israeli atrocities.

When I lived in South Africa in the late 1960s it was unthinkable that the country would ever be ruled by the majority, but that's exactly what happened. The same thing will happen to Israel. Eventually there will be one state for Jews and Arabs with equal rights for all. There will be no Carthaginian settlement in the Middle East. Israel will not be driven into the sea and the Palestinians will not be expelled. The non-Jewish population of Israel now stands at twenty percent and the country is dependent on them for labour. Israel's future will be decided by economics and demographics, not by rhetoric.

Friendly Websites

We post links to friendly websites on a reciprocal basis, but we do not necessarily agree with them.

www.candour.org.uk
www.hertiageanddestiny.com
www.europeanaction.com

Comments

Use the facility at the end of this blog to leave comments and read what other have to say. But please don't post ad hominem attacks, we are interested in ideas not personalities.

Nation Revisited

This blog seeks reform by legal means. All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. We uphold the United Nations' Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:

"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people."