Showing posts with label Tactics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tactics. Show all posts

Sunday, 26 August 2012

Issue 70, August 2010


Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.
 
Nation Revisited
# 70 August 2010.  

The road to sanity
 
The sovereign debt crisis is international. Most developed countries have unacceptable levels of debt and are taking steps to reduce government spending and raise more in taxes. Even the USA and Germany are trimming their budgets. 
 
Borrowing was the easy option during the boom years but loans are much harder to come by since the credit crunch. The banks have been massively subsidised by national governments but they have written off billions in unpaid loans are not keen to lend to countries already submerged in debt.
 
This situation has nothing whatever to do with the euro; Britain, Japan and the USA are not in the eurozone but they are still in trouble. The financial ‘experts’ of Canary Wharf have been predicting the collapse of the euro for the past ten years. But it’s now a world reserve currency with a queue of states waiting to join. When Ambrose Evans-Pritchard goes to meet his chief broker the euro will still be going strong.
 
It is not what the tokens in your pocket are called that matters; you can call them dollars, yen, pounds, zlotys or whatever you like. What matters is the strength of the economy that issues them and the confidence that they inspire in trading partners and investors.
 
The trouble with the eurozone is that it’s not a monolithic economy but a lose currency union.  Member states are still vulnerable to the international loan sharks because they have their own reserves and credit ratings. The European Central Bank gives some protection but a genuinely united Europe would provide the security of being on a big ship in a storm.
 
Most of the southern states of the USA would be bankrupt if they were independent. Even the great state of California depends on the federal government. But the United States of America still has a good credit rating. She might be the world’s biggest debtor nation but President Obama would find it easier to get a loan that the president of a poor but frugal country. The USA is a huge country with abundant resources, a record of outstanding industrial achievement and an economy that’s still growing at 2.8%. Americans are united as one nation with one currency and one economy but Europeans are still divided.
 
Britain’s problem is that we have gone from employing 50% of our labour in manufacturing industry in 1960 to 15% now. The rise of containerised shipping and the booming low cost economies of Brazil, India and China have transformed our economy. We still make high tech equipment and pharmaceuticals but most of our cars and domestic goods are imported. We are now far too reliant on service industries and banking.
 
Some people believe that the Third World invasion of the UK and the decline of our industry are part of a deliberate conspiracy. Certainly the Labour government saw immigrants as potential supporters and welcomed the influx.  But it’s more likely that these things happened because governments had no idea what they were doing. Cheap imports and cheap labour seemed a good idea until the bubble burst. Our politicians were always too greedy and too stupid to look ahead. They were geared up to a five year parliamentary cycle and incapable of seeing beyond the next general election.
 
As a result of their criminal short-sightedness we are blessed with millions of immigrants, chronic unemployment and vast tracts of industrial wasteland.  Most of our best known brands are now foreign owned and the Japanese car plants, like Honda in Swindon, use agency labour to avoid paying for holidays, sickness and pensions. Workers who fought for years for decent conditions are now forced to work on a day to day basis for reduced rates of pay. Maggie Thatcher’s dream of a ‘flexible economy’ has come to pass.
 
The upside is that ‘open door’ politicians have run out of credibility. Nobody still believes that we need Third World immigration. Even the Labour Party now has an immigration control policy. The party that has done even more than the others to swamp us with the surplus population of Africa, Asia and the Americas has at last acknowledged that we do not have jobs and houses for them.
 
The road back to sanity will be long and hard but at least we have taken the first steps. We must be as self sufficient as possible and realise that we are not a great world empire sending industrial goods to a captive markets in return for cheap food. We must grasp these simple facts and stop trying to feed and defend half the world.

European solidarity
 
We all know that George Orwell and Laurie Lee fought for the International Brigade during the Spanish Civil War. Their efforts have been glorified in leftwing literature but some Britons fought for the winning side and helped to save Spain from communism. These included writers and academics as well as adventurers.
 
Peter Kemp was a lieutenant in a Carlist unit who recorded events in his 1957 autobiography “Mine Were of Trouble.” He later became a member of British Special Forces operating behind enemy lines in Europe and Asia. His book is hard to find, it
was recently offered on e-bay for £90.
Frank Thomas was badly wounded fighting in the Spanish Legion. His memoire “Brother Against Brother” is reckoned to be one of the finest accounts of the Spanish Civil War. It is available from Amazon.
 
Peter Keen was a British fascist who fought for the Nationalists and won one of their highest decorations. After fighting for the Finns against the Soviet Union he joined the British Airborne Division and proudly wore his Spanish medal ribbon on his tunic. His commanding officer admonished him for this but he quoted the section of King’s Regulations that says that all decorations must be worm.
 
Andrew Fountaine fought in the Spanish Civil War and later served in the Royal Navy where he rose from the rank of Ordinary Seaman to Lt Commander. His book “The Meaning of an Enemy” was serialised in Combat the newspaper of the 1960s BNP of which he was President. He co-founded the National Front in 1967 but later broke away to lead the short-lived NF Constitutional Movement.
 
John Amery smuggled arms and ammunition to Franco’s forces. He was hanged for treason in December 1945 for recruiting British POWs to fight for Germany. He was a pioneering European Unionist who considered WW1 to be a crusade against bolshevism. His recruiting pamphlet was called “England and Europe.”
 
The Irish sent 700 Blueshirts to fight for General Franco as the 15th Bandera under General Eoin O’Duffy. They were nationalists fighting for an international cause alongside thousands of Italian, German and Romanian volunteers.
 
They believed in European solidarity but some of their modern counterparts support the kind of ever decreasing nationalism that has broken up Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia and now threatens the unity of Belgium, Spain, Italy, Russia and the United Kingdom.
 
Attempts by far-right parties to come together in Europe are bedevilled by the very nationalism they preach. The ITS bloc collapsed in 2007 when Alessandra Mussolini upset the Greater Romanian Party.  Far from being united by a common ideology they are mutually hostile. Europeans can work together but people who imagine that they are racially superior will obviously find it hard to work with ‘lesser mortals.’
 
The BNP has joined a new alliance of minor parties that includes east Europeans. But their newspaper Voice of Freedom (printed in Slovakia) competes with the Daily Mail in reporting horror stories about ‘foreigners’ stealing British jobs. We all love our country and take pride in our nation’s achievements but the far-right harbours fantasies that are at odds with their membership of a pan-European party. It’s not surprising that they have gravitated towards Zionism when they share the same paranoid obsession that the whole world is against them. If they want to succeed in the European Parliament they need to abandon insularity and learn to live with their neighbours.

Fiends & Their Friends Show Their Chutzpah - Mau Mau Beasts Claim Compo
(Reprinted from Candour, July 2009) akctrust@yahoo.co.uk
 
In 1952 a State of Emergency was declared in the then British colony by the government of Kenya. An African secret society known as Mau Mau, largely based among the majority Kikuyu tribe, and whose aims included the removal of British rule and European settlers, had degenerated into the most violent sorts of barbarism, having begun by practising black magic and the administration of blood oaths.
 
A London based “human rights law firm,” Day & Co Solicitors, working in cahoots with the “Kenya Human Rights Commission” who in turn are acting on behalf of “The Mau Mau Veterans Association” issued a test claim on behalf of five “veterans” in London in June 2009.
 
The Solicitor Martyn Day, who has naturally applied for legal aid said, “This will be the first time the British government has had to account for its terrible deeds. This case is about justice for those individuals who had a terrible, terrible time. A number of them suffered from castration. Women suffered from horrendous sexual abuse. Many, many Mau Mau were beaten, tortured and killed. This case is about bringing all these issues before the British court and for a British judge to say, what we did was wrong.”
 
Scotland Yard is to investigate claims that British officials, troops and settlers were responsible for a catalogue of atrocities during the Mau Mau reign of terror more than half a century ago.
 
No one would deny that some excesses were committed against Mau Mau prisoners, particularly at the Hola Camp. The excesses were overwhelmingly the work of native troops outraged by Mau Mau atrocities aimed at them, their families and animals and frustrated by official refusal to sanction precisely the kind of treatment of which the British are now accused.
 
Apart from the obvious delight being taken by “the usual suspects” in yet another engineered opportunity to bash the tremendous achievements of the British and our Empire what an opportunity this is for White liberals and self-haters to revel in self-loathing and for Candour and its allies to expose them.
 
This is an extraordinary opportunity for us to engage in a broad-based campaign for truth in history based on a specific subject, place and time. To expose the realities of Mau Mau, the vileness of their blood oaths and initiation ceremonies. To publicise the realities of their slaughter of white settlers and servicemen; to expose the torture and mass murder of tens of thousands of their fellow Africans including black policemen, officials and tribal chiefs and elders.
 
Kenya became independent by 1963 and although the Mau Mau was effectively crushed by the British and loyal African troops by 1959 (for which white liberal Marxists hate themselves and us even more) the Mau Mau remained proscribed as a terrorist movement in Kenya until 2003!  Its atrocities did not cease at independence but continue to be committed today although the organisations later day successors are known as Mungiki.

A challenging future
 
The result of the 2010 UK general election was exactly predicted by the exit poll. The opinion pollsters are so good at forecasting elections that there’s little point in holding them. The contest was a draw between the two main parties resulting in a hastily arranged coalition between the Tories and the Lib Dems. It could almost have been arranged without an election and it would be even more representative if it included the Labour Party. The only argument was whether to slash spending now or later. All parties agree about continuing the war in Afghanistan until “the job is done” - whatever that means. They even agree about stopping immigration. We now have a coalition government that intends to stay in power for five years by working together and accepting compromise.
The Tories have promised a referendum on proportional representation and the Lib Dems have agreed to a cap on immigration and abandoned their plans to pardon illegal immigrants and bogus asylum seekers.  The Jurassic wing of the Tory Party has been silenced and their spokesmen are on their best behaviour so as not to upset their coalition partners.
 
Britain now has a broadly representative government in which extremists are neutralised. If they can hold together and reduce our crippling level of debt we stand some chance of emerging from the recession. Their next goal must be to increase manufacturing and get people back to work. Cheap imports are not so cheap when you include the cost of keeping unemployed workers on the dole. The coalition government must not make the same mistake as Margaret Thatcher by abandoning social responsibility to market forces. Employment is about more than making money; it gives men and women the chance to contribute.
 
Nobody would have believed that the Old Gang would turn against deficit spending and mass immigration. But events have forced them act in the national interest; they have run out of credit and been forced to balance the books. We are on the road to recovery after years of irresponsible government. 
 
When we have reduced the debt mountain and revived industry we must look at our place in the world. We do not have to be an American dependency and our army doesn’t have to be run from the Pentagon. Global capitalism is not about to go away but we can at least protect ourselves from its worst excesses; the twin evils of mass immigration and cheap labour imports.
 
There is already a government scheme to help immigrants to return to their own countries. It would be cheaper to fund this scheme that to keep millions of them on benefits.  We should start be deporting all illegal immigrants, bogus asylum seekers, dole scroungers and criminals, then we should encourage repatriation with incentives and a massive publicity campaign. We could use the foreign aid budget to reverse the social and economic disaster of Third World immigration.
 
We are never going to be a white country again but we can stop the influx and reclaim our culture. Those non-Europeans who remain here must respect British laws and customs. If Somalis do not want their children to learn a musical instrument they should go back to Somalia. Music is an integral part of our culture. Instead of changing our ways to suit immigrants they should be the ones to change.
 
We are a post imperial country in the process of reconstruction. We have wasted half a century pretending to be a world power, Let us now rebuild our economy to suit geo-political reality and train our young people to be engineers and scientists instead of filling their heads with Utopian claptrap.
 
First we must dismantle the sprawling race relations industry. Organisations like the Equality and Human Rights Commission do not promote equality they create division. People like Trevor Phillips are paid huge salaries for winding up blacks and Asians and annoying whites. They must all be sacked and retrained to do something useful. The future will be challenging but we must succeed.

Tactics
 
The National Front in the 1970s was famous for its rallies and marches. This was long before the Internet made it possible to reach thousands of people. Following Colin Jordan’s ill-fated Trafalgar Square meeting of 1962 it became increasingly difficult for Union Movement or the far- right movements to book public halls or hold street meetings. Several meetings were attacked by red mobs and every venue was a potential battle zone. This lasted until the NF became strong enough to resist red violence. By the early seventies they were holding marches all over the country and attracting newspaper and television coverage. This established the NF brand name and resulted in their impressive election results of 1973-1974.
 
But some people thought that confrontation with the reds would put off potential supporters. Pre-war fascist Bill Barnes writing under the name of Athelstan in the June 1974 issue of Nation (the first incarnation of this newsletter) warned: 
 
Has the time come for the National Front to abandon the romantic ritual of marches and rallies? Not completely, perhaps, but the march/rally/demonstration is heady stuff, to be used sparingly. The romanticists amongst us are stirred by the sight of waving banners, the beat of the drums, the chanting voices and the comradeship. But if we are to get the mass support to which we have a claim we must avoid the appearance of over aggressiveness, of “trailing our coat tails,” in short of ‘fascism’; the bogey of British political folk lore...
 
Now we are politically credible let us advance by political means. The Conservative, Liberal and Labour parties seldom find it advantageous to hold marches, rallies or anything other than indoor meetings. Should we feature them so frequently we stand the risk of being considered jejune and provocative, a sort of militarised Boy Scout movement with sinister undertones.
 
The man in the street has a fear of party dictatorship. Economic tyranny he is enduring; financial dictatorship he has long endured; but the thought of a Martin Mosley or Oswald Webster as Gauleiter of Greater London moves him to terrified reaction to the benefit of the liberal democrats.
 
As well as being effective marches and rallies were part of a political tradition going back to the 1930s. The British Union of Fascists defied the reds to hold some of the largest political demonstrations ever seen in Britain.  Mosley defended his actions in his 1961 book Mosley Right or Wrong:
 
The fact is that this sort of thing has always gone on in British politics, but it went beyond a joke when organised red violence brought an end to every meeting of which they disapproved. This happened in the thirties and if anyone who grew up later doubts the facts, he can easily verify them for himself from contemporary records. Endless instances were quoted in the press during that period of lesser Conservative meetings being smashed up all over the place by the extremes of red violence. It was just impossible to hold a meeting unless you were approved by the red tyranny. What we did was to bring violence to an end. When we have a chance we always bring violence to an end.
 
The National Front always denied being a fascist movement but historians Kenneth Lunn and Richard Thurlow compared their policies and tactics to the BUF in their 1980 book British Fascism:
 
Moving away from the content of NF ideology to its presentation, classic fascist features are apparent. Many phrases are virtually the same as Mosley’s: the ‘bankruptcy’ and ‘decadence’ of modern institutions; the ineptitude of the ‘Old Gang’; the ‘flabby weakness’ of ‘tired politicians’; the ‘inevitability’ of the ‘oncoming crisis’ etc. The whole tenor is that of ‘the modern movement’, the vehicle for the much needed revolution in government. It alone has the ‘spirit’ and ‘will’ to resist Britain’s enemies; that indeed is why it is the subject of such vile abuse. No other organisation can provide the force necessary for the building of a modern, strong and national state. And whilst a militaristic flavour is held in check, the NF none the less attempts to demonstrates strength in much the same way as did the BUF: by provocatively marching, often to the rhythm of a steady drumbeat, through sensitive inner city areas amidst protestations of the need to preserve law and order.
 
Martin Webster’s tactics as National Activities Organiser of the NF must be seen in their historical context. Faced with a ban on meetings, and a press boycott, marches and rallies were the only way of getting publicity.  But he was well aware of the risks involved:
If the name of the NF can be associated in the public mind more with violent incidents than with legitimate political expression, then a potentially serious threat to the Government could be neutralized. In giving the wink to the Red terrorists, the Government is deliberately encouraging a post-war tradition of violent conflict along the lines of that which existed in the 1930s, in the hope that the emergent Nationalist movement will dissipate, discredit and neutralize itself after the manner of the Mosleyites... it is vital that Nationalists observe a strict discipline and refrain from any precipitate action. (Martin Webster quoted by Martin Walker in The National Front 1977)
 
The choice between active and passive campaigning is still being debated more than thirty years later. Writing in Spearhead in November 1978 John Tyndall adopted an uncharacteristic middle-of-the-road position:
 
Democracy in its liberal form has abandoned Order in its headlong pursuit of Freedom; Fascism in the urgent quest for Order may well have gone too far in that quest and jeopardised Freedom. We may look at Liberal Democracy and Fascism as providing respectively thesis and antithesis. Our task now is to achieve synthesis.
 
Following Margaret Thatcher’s landslide election victory of 1979 the NF went into decline and their great marches were eventually abandoned.  The current far-right movements are constrained by legislation as well as the threat of organised violence. During the 2010 general election campaign there were several attacks on BNP members, some of them resulting in serious injury. But private meetings are still held and opinions are still divided on the question of marches and the wider debate about image and presentation.
 
The BNP claims 15,000 members. They have two seats on the European Parliament, one member of the Greater London Assembly and more than a score of councillors. But their performance at Barking was a bitter disappointment. They got wiped out at council level and suffered a setback in the parliamentary contest. Their attempt to get Nick Griffin elected as their first MP did not succeed. The white working class who have been consistently discriminated against by the Labour Party still gave their votes to the unspeakable Margaret Hodge.
 
But they still managed to capture 14.5% of the local vote and cannot be ignored. The nationwide protest against unrestricted immigration has prompted the government to act and proves that sustained political action can make a difference. The far-right will never come to power in the United Kingdom. Big business is against them and they lack credible policies and a charismatic leader, but they can influence public opinion and that is what democracy is all about.

Friday, 24 August 2012

Issue 9, June 2006


Nation Revisited

# 9, June 2006

An occasional email to friends

The Occupation of Iraq

By the time that General Khalil Pasha surrendered the Turkish 6th Army to General Sir William Marshal in October 1918 Britain had lost 92,000 men in Iraq. But the killing continued for another 14 years of military occupation. In 1920 Winston Churchill the Minister for War estimated that it would take 25,000 British troops, reinforced with 80,000 Indian troops, to occupy Iraq, but by using the Royal Air Force this could be reduced to 4,000 British and 10,000 Indians. Churchill said: “I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilized tribes to spread a lively terror.” The RAF under Squadron Leader Arthur “Bomber” Harris, dropped 97 tonnes of bombs, including gas and delayed action, on insurgent Arab villages resulting in 9,000 deaths. When Air Commodore Lionel Charlton saw mutilated civilian survivors in an Iraqi hospital he promptly resigned, but Squadron Leader Arthur Harris justified his actions by saying:

“The only thing the Arab understands is the heavy hand.”

The 8,000 British troops currently in Iraq have had 113 killed and 2,200 wounded policing the Shiite part of the country. The 132,000 Americans have had 2,400 killed and 20,000 wounded fighting the Sunni insurgents since President George Bush made the infantile statement “bring ‘em on.” But if Iran is attacked our troops will have to engage the Mahdi Army of Shiite cleric Muqtada al Sadr who has pledged to defend his Iranian coreligionists. To occupy the country under these conditions we would need to treble our forces and be prepared for heavy losses.

In 1918-1932 there was no pretence about weapons of mass destruction or introducing democracy. We blatantly detached Iraq’s most oil-rich province and set it up as the client state of Kuwait. Britain occupied Egypt, Palestine, Jordan, Iraq and South Arabia to expand the Empire and to neutralize Arab hostility to the Balfour Declaration that promised Palestine to the Jews. This situation is still much the same except that it is the American Empire that we are now defending and it is the British Army acting as colonial auxiliaries instead of the Indians.

Iran is developing nuclear weapons in response to Israel’s nuclear arsenal and to keep up with Pakistan and India. America has isolated President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and is threatening military action. But Iran is not a bankrupt and almost defenceless state, as was Iraq before the invasion, she is a nation of 68 million with vast resources. Tony Blair and Germany’s Angela Merkel are slavishly following American foreign policy but Russia and China are refusing to go along with George Bush’s threats. The  Middle East situation must be the subject of international agreement. The independence of these states should be guaranteed by the great powers working together. The days of America dictating to the world are over.

Action Francaise and the Front National                                                                   

On the night of February 6th 1934 French nationalists mustered at the Place de la Concorde to demonstrate against the Stavisky affair – the death of a Russian-born swindler who conspired with Cabinet Ministers to trade hundreds of millions of francs worth of worthless bonds. The demonstrators included the Camelots du Roy, the youth wing of the fascist-monarchist movement Action Francaise, and the ex-serviceman’s movement Croix-de-feu led by decorated war veteran Colonel Francoise de la Rocque. The police defending the National Assembly opened fire on the demonstrators killing sixteen and wounding thousands, but the nationalists immobilized Paris and brought down the corrupt Cartel des Gauches government.

The principle ideologue of Action Francaise was the writer and poet Charles Maurras born 1868, a dedicated monarchist who personally despised the Bourbon-Orleans dynasty, and an agnostic who supported the Catholic Church as the guardian of French tradition and culture. He was sentenced to death in 1944 for supporting the Vichy regime and confined to prison where he survived until his death in 1952

French nationalists were deeply divided between those who supported General Charles de Gaulle and the Free French and those who rallied to Marshal Philippe Petain and L’Etat Francaise. Thousands joined the Legion des Volontaires Francais and the SS Division Charlemagne were amongst the last troops fighting for Hitler when they were wiped out at the Battle of Berlin. Thousands more were slaughtered during the “Liberation” as the Reds took their revenge. From 1947 two rival newspapers “ Aspects de la France” and “La Nation Francaise” kept alive the nationalist philosophy. In 1972 Jean Marie le Pen succeeded in uniting various factions under the umbrella of the Front National.

But Action Francaise still exists as a separate entity and campaigns for the restoration of the monarchy and a return to traditional Catholicism.

Jean Marie le Pen was born in 1928. He saw active service as a paratrooper in Vietnam and North Africa and became France’s youngest MP when he was one of 53 candidates elected for Pierre Poujade’s Union de Defense Commercants et Artisans in 1956.

In 1965 he directed the Presidential campaign of Jean-Louis Tixier Vignancourt. In the 2002 Presidential Election Le Pen came second with 4.5 million votes – 15%. The nationalist vote was split with Philippe de Villiers, candidate of the New Right who got 4.7%. The Front National controls local authorities all over France and is represented in the European Parliament.

Le Pen’s movement boasted 60,000 members before the ethnic riots but they are now overwhelmed with applications. They campaign against immigration and call for mass repatriation. They are critical of the EU but have dropped their opposition to the Euro. The Front National is in the tradition of French nationalism since the 1920s. They maintain friendly relations with the BNP and with similar movements throughout Europe. They are currently campaigning for the Presidential Elections due in 2007. As the ethnic situation continues to deteriorate they have every chance of victory.


Views on the News                                                                                         

Only weeks after the British National Party’s stunning success at the local elections we have Labour Party spokespersons talking about the need to control immigration and deport alien criminals. The party that promoted the multicultural nightmare has now done an about face and is posing as the guardian of Britain. Let nobody forget that it was the Labour Party who passed the 1948 Nationality Act that started the non-European invasion. It was the Labour Party behind every bit of repressive legislation designed to silence the British people whenever they tried to protest against mass immigration. It was the Labour Party who forced “black studies” on British children and who campaigned against all things British and for all things multicultural and multiracial. The Tories have been spineless and inept but it was Labour who really believed in destroying the White Race by forcibly intermixing humanity. The race traitors of the Labour Party must never be forgiven for the hideous crimes that they have committed. One day they must be brought before the Courts and charged with attempting to destroy the British nation.

We do not really know what is causing global warming but there is no doubt that weather patterns are changing all over the world. This is yet another reason for the benighted people of Africa to head towards Europe in ever increasing numbers. Failed harvests in sub-Saharan Africa have made the plight of millions even worse. Drought and famine are driving people towards water and survival. But depopulation is not the answer to Africa’s problems; boreholes can be sunk and irrigation projects can be built. Water engineering has made the desert bloom in Egypt and Israel. According to the Black Britain website 7% of UK graduates are Afro-Caribbean; instead of working in Britain they should go to Africa to construct the dams and waterways that could transform their ancestral continent. The millions spent on welfare payouts to immigrants would be better invested in African agriculture and irrigation.

The inflation rate in Zimbabwe has now reached 1000%. At the time of Ian Smith and UDI the Rhodesian dollar was on par with the US dollar. Now it takes 100,000 Zim dollars to buy 1 US dollar. Under the dictatorship of Robert Mugabe – the darling of the British establishment not long ago – the country has all but collapsed. 80% of Zimbabwe people are unemployed and living in poverty. By nationalizing the commercial farms Mugabe has destroyed 400,000 jobs and reduced the European population to 30,000. In a recent military operation the government destroyed shanties and unauthorized camps making 700,000 people homeless. In a continent known for chaos Zimbabwe is an example of how not to run a country. Mugabe has taken Marxist dogma designed for 19th Century Europe and imposed it on 21st Century Africa. The result is starvation and the lowest expectation of life in the world. But still the Bush-Blair axis of arrogance ignores the fate of Zimbabwe whilst bringing “democracy” to Iraq and Afghanistan. When Tony Blair sent British troops to help America invade Iraq in 2003 he said: “We the British are a people that stand by their friends in time of need, trial and tragedy, and we do so without hesitation now.” Does the Prime Minister know that Rhodesia contributed more personnel per capita to the imperial war effort than any other country?

Symbols                                                                                                                

The way that multicultural regimes are cracking down on nationalists it is only a matter of time before they try to stop us from publishing anything. The Police and the Courts will use The Public Order Act and The Race Relations Act to silence any movement that dares to oppose government policy. It is difficult for them to ban parties outright and almost impossible if they have elected councilors, but they will use any pretext to close down websites or newspapers if they think that they can get away with it. This censorship has already started and nationalists have been prosecuted all over Europe. But we can still spread the word by publishing what we can and by the use of symbolism.

When the government banned cigarette advertising the tobacco companies used subterfuge to get their message across. Silk Cut used pictures of a piece of silk slashed with a knife to represent the words “Silk Cut.” Benson & Hedges used their familiar golden packet to convey the idea of their product with slogans like “solid gold.” These ads said nothing about the quality of the tobacco but still sold the product to the public.

By using symbols the nationalist movement can continue to sell their product, even if the multicultural enforcers impose a ban.

In Britain, under the Labour Party, any show of patriotism is viewed as suspect so people have come to identify national flags with the nationalist movement. We must continue to exploit and reinforce this idea by always using the Union Jack and the flag of St George. The Celtic cross is used by nationalists all over the world as the symbol of white consciousness. It decorates walls in Australia, The United States, Russia, Argentina and Europe. Some of the current leaders of the so-called far right associate symbols with the old days, but they are instantly recognizable and can say at a glance what it takes a whole leaflet to say.

If you stand on a street corner with a poster saying Keep Britain White the chances are that you will be arrested and charged. But if you stand there with a poster bearing the Celtic cross and just the name of the party, the police will have nothing to charge you with and the public will know exactly what you mean. Symbols are powerful ideograms that convey unwritten messages. The big companies use logos to identify their products. Everybody knows the Coca Cola icon even people who cannot read and write can recognize the distinctive lettering. The same goes for MacDonald’s, Heineken, Shell, Nescafe and many more global brands.

The Tories have their outstretched torch, the Labour Party has hijacked the English rose and the Liberal Democrats have a half-plucked bird. The old gang parties recognize the importance of symbols for conveying messages to the public. The fight for the survival of the White Race is worldwide and requires a symbol that is internationally recognized.

Other symbols in other times have changed history. The Christian message was carried around the world under the cross of Jesus Christ, a symbol of hope and resurrection. When future historians remember the resurrection of European civilization they may record that the symbol of hope throughout the great revolution was the Celtic cross.

Propaganda                                                                                                                 

People react to propaganda according to their opinions and attitudes, just as they do to music or comedy. Different people laugh or cry at different things. Many find attacks on religion distasteful but most nationalists take a hard line against Islam in particular.

The drive for respectability has resulted in race taking second place to religion. This development has been influenced by repressive legislation that can have writers locked up for telling the truth. But the general public would welcome an honest approach to race that simply stated that Britain is a European country with every right to remain so.

The BNP advocates a protectionist fishing policy that would restrict British waters to our own fishermen. That’s fair enough but the way they describe it is very alarming: “After a few foreign trawlers operating in set aside British waters had been sent to the bottom of the ocean by a salvo or two of Royal Navy cannon, then the message would go out to the rest of the world that we mean business.” Words reminiscent of the extremist attitude of the old days rather than the measured approach of a respectable party.

When Enoch Powell made his “Rivers of Blood” speech in 1968 the liberal establishment reacted with horror. An intellectual who spoke several Indian languages and studied philosophy and anthropology was dismissed as a “racist” for making a demographic prediction. Powell was one of the first MPs to question the mass immigration of millions of non-Europeans. Mosley, Chesterton, Fountaine, Bean, Tyndall, Jordan, Webster and others had been campaigning against the invasion for years but they were political outcasts. As an elected old gang politician Enoch Powell was one of their own. By speaking out he had defied the liberal consensus and was blackballed from the club.

Even today ordinary people who never embraced the multicultural obsession are saying that Enoch was right. Tory newspapers like The Daily Mail and The Telegraph dodge the issue and launch petty attacks on East Europeans, but they never say what most of their readers want them to say. Instead they drone on about the alleged benefits of cultural enrichment -  journalese for being overrun with Blacks and Asians. The editors of Canary Wharf are the products of private schools and prominent universities who have been insulated from the real world by generations of social apartheid. They think that it’s terribly common to say “Britain for the British,” and their editorials hinted that the recent BNP gains in East London were only to be expected from the rednecks living there.

When HMS Conqueror sank the ARA General Belgrano at the start of the 1982 Falklands conflict The Sun ran the banner headline “Gotcha” and lost all claim to be a responsible newspaper. This action was a legitimate act of war but its necessity was questioned at the time and the loss of 323 young sailors was the first indication of Margaret Thatcher’s cruel arrogance. The “ Falklands factor” temporarily boosted the Tories but their inhumanity coupled with their economic incompetence eventually destroyed them. The British people were ready to fight in two world wars but they do not glorify militarism or gloat over the slaughter of our perceived enemies. Tony Blair is discovering this at the moment as the war in Iraq spirals out of control.