Issue 18, November 2006

Nation Revisited

An occasional email to friends, # 18, November 2006

The Beginning Of The End

The crushing mid-term election defeat of the Republican Party shows that the American electorate has finally woken up to George Bush and his policies. The criminal lunatic Donald Rusfeld has been sacked and “stay the course” is fast being replaced by “cut and run.” America would need to employ Israeli style bombing, involving thousands of civilian casualties, to contain the situation in Iraq but the American people have now clearly demonstrated that they would not approve further aggression.

This leaves Tony Blair even further removed from reality. British military spokesmen are already starting to talk about handing over to the Iraqis who are now deemed capable of running their own affairs. This evokes visions of a High Commissioner in plumed hat and spurs standing beside a suitably cowed local dignitary as the Union Jack is saluted for the last time

 But we are not granting independence to a former colony, we are scuttling out of a sovereign state that we attacked and destroyed without reason. Together with our American masters we have killed and maimed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who were never any threat to Britain or our interests.

George Bush is being described as the worst American president in history, and Tony Blair, who was elected on promises of health and education reform, will be remembered only for his slavish support of him. This is the beginning of the end for both of them.

The BNP Trial

The retrial of BNP leader Nick Griffin and his director of publicity Mark Collett has ended in their acquittal. For the second time they have been found not guilty of inciting racial hatred. The case resulted from a BBC sting operation involving the secret filming of a private meeting. Now Gordon Brown is calling for stronger laws to silence opposition to mass non-European immigration. The BNP victory is a bitter blow to the anti-British fanatics of the Labour Party and a boost for the forces of resistance.

The BNP have frightened the multiculturalists by winning 54 council seats; now they are likely to win more seats in next May’s local elections. The British are sick of constantly bowing to immigrant demands and being made to feel like second class citizens in their own country. The sprawling race-relations industry has provided fat salaries for an army of parasites. Their days are numbered as Britain fights back against the traitors and fanatics who have championed the unwanted invasion.

 

Views On The News                                                                                                        

Political trendsetters have grown tired of multiculturalism and are transferring their attention to the environment. The same zealots who enthused about “celebrating diversity” and being “enriched by immigration” are now preaching “sustainability” and establishing “green credentials.” And just as they created a vast industry and bureaucracy out of race, they are now doing the same with the environment. Green is the new Black, and we will soon have armies of environmental advisors, holding environmental workshops, supported by environmental committees wasting billions of pounds of the taxpayers’ money. Mankind has been at war with nature since we first lit a fire to keep warm and fashioned a spear to go hunting. Our entire history has been a struggle to survive against the environment. Nature did not give us wings but we can fly higher and faster than any bird; it did not make us as fierce or strong as a lion but we have put these dumb creatures in safari parks and take the kids to see them. We used our wits to overcome nature and we will solve the problems of production, distribution and population in the same way.

The Russian Movement Against Illegal Immigration held mass demonstrations in 14 Russian cities on November 4th to commemorate National Unity Day and to protest against non-European immigration. Under the old Soviet regime people were confined to their own republics but under the new democratic system immigrants are pouring in and creating the same problems that beset Western Europe. Areas of St Petersburg and Moscow have been overrun and the familiar pattern of crime and violence has followed. Businesses that used to employ Russians are now driven by profit and are desperate for cheap imported labour. The market economy has transformed Russian society for the better but the downside is non-European immigration. Rodina Party MP Irana Saveleva said: “We demand to be rid of illegal immigrants. They are taking our jobs, bringing drugs and terrorism.”

Saddam Hussein has been sentenced to death for crimes against humanity by an Iraqi court set up by the American-controlled puppet government. A regime kept in power by a brutal sectarian police force that terrorizes the country. The killing of Saddam will not   stop the daily slaughter or restore the country to normality. Under Saddam’s secular rule Iraq held together and before the 1st Gulf War it was one of the most progressive Arab nations, with an impressive health service and educational system. Now the infrastructure of the country is destroyed and the population divided as never before. When the weary coalition armies eventually withdraw they will leave behind a ruined economy and a brutalized nation. And those Americans who thought that the war was to protect the USA will find that the terrorist threat has increased rather than diminished. George Bush and Tony Blair have deceived the American and British people. They have killed and maimed thousands of civilians and coalition troops for nothing. One day these lying murderers will face a higher court than the collaborationist tribunal of Baghdad. George Bush has got a degree in business administration and Tony Blair is a trained lawyer, so they should have no trouble preparing their defence.

                                                                                                                                      

Egypt Is The Issue (1956) - by Gamal Abdel Nasser – reprinted from Al-Ahram

The military operations that began in Sinai on the evening of 29^th October have a small prelude which I would like to share with the reader. It was a small prelude, a political prelude that took place at the headquarters of the United Nations in New York City, in early October – the same month that was later to witness the military operations in Sinai.

In October, the Security Council debated the question of the Suez Canal, concluding by adopting six principles towards a peaceful settlement of the issue, and on the basis of which negotiations would be conducted, while guaranteeing free and efficient passage through the Canal.

During and following the Security Council sessions, several meetings took place between UN secretary-general Dag Hammarskjold, Dr Mahmoud Fawzi, the Egyptian minister of foreign affairs and his British and French counterparts, Selwyn Lloyd and Christian Pineau. While these were not the negotiations called for by the Security Council, they were without a doubt the kind of exploratory contacts that by necessity precede any negotiations. The New York meetings concluded by reaching agreement on certain points, and with the participants agreeing to meet again soon for further discussions of the issues, the time and place of the next meeting to be arranged by Mr Hammarskjold.

A few days later, the UN secretary-general sent the Egyptian government a projected location and date for the upcoming meeting. The location was Geneva. The date was Monday, 29 October.

Upon receiving his message, the Egyptian government immediately notified the secretary-general that it would attend the proposed meeting, whereas the British and French governments stalled. Then news came from London and Paris indicating the matter involved more than playing for time. It soon became evident that London and Paris were attempting to find excuses to evade the scheduled date. The British and French governments had evidently scheduled a different meeting for 29 October. It was to convene in the Sinai Desert – not in Geneva – and they did not intend to meet with Egypt, but with Israel.

The aim was not to solve the problem of the Suez Canal. Rather, the new tripartite meeting aimed to annihilate Egypt – totally.

This is the truth which the parties to the tripartite conspiracy cannot deny…The issue was not about a canal that crosses Egypt. It was about Egypt – with all that it represents today, with all that it seeks and stands for…

• The issue is about a country striving for independence.

• The issue is about a country striving for power.

• The issue is about a country breaking the arms boycott.

• The issue is about a country wanting to liberate its economy.

• The issue is about Arab nationalism, an ideology which has engulfed our entire region.

Imperialism could not let this happen.

What the Papers Say – extracts from a selection of political newspapers and websites that do not necessarily reflect the views of “Nation Revisited.”  
                                                                                                    
Luke O’Farrell – Simon Sheppard’s website -  www.heretical.org

Jack Straw has been in politics for more than forty years. He’s supported multiculturalism for practically every second of his egomaniac climb to the top. If it’s taken him till 2006 to raise doubts about what it’s doing to Britain, he’s either stupid or crooked or both. I think it’s both and one thing you should always remember about this government is that Straw and many others would have served just as happily in a murderous communist dictatorship.

Frank Kimbal Johnson  – Nationalist Alliance  – www.allnationalist.com

Evolution is a history of failed experiments by that cosmic intelligence which drives all possible worlds. In the sonorous lines of O’Shaughnessy:

“We live in the ages lying, in the buried past of the earth,

Built Nineveh with our sighing, and Babel itself with our mirth;

And o’erthrew them with prophesying to the old of the new world’s worth,

For each age is a dream that is dying, or one that is coming to birth.”

It remains to be seen if Britain as a recognizable entity is in the throes of final dissolution or perhaps on the cusp of a new renaissance. As always, the decisive factor is not in the lap of whatever gods may be; certainly not in the gift of any political faction, much less of foreign agencies. It resides in the hearts and minds of our people, rallying to the greatest of our cultural icons and responding to the impetus of our noblest ancestors.

British People’s Party – www.bpp.org.uk

It is with the greatest pleasure we can report that both Nick griffin and Mark Collett of the BNP have been cleared of ALL race charges. This is smashing a path that will relight the flame of free speech in Britain and is a real slap in the face to the ZOG dominated oppressive system. We cannot agree with Mr Griffin’s strategy which has radically changed the BNP for the worse BUT it would have been a complete travesty of justice had they been imprisoned. It is a breath of fresh air to know some justice for British patriots still exists in this country. So we can say with quite an open heart – well done Collett and Griffin – a victory for all White Nationalists against a sick and rotten system.

Michael Newland - Freedom Party  – www.freedompartyuk.net

Opinion among those who do not believe in a future multiracial multicultural paradise divides between those who say “too late” and those who argue that almost any situation can be turned round given the political will.

British National Front – www.national-front.org.uk                                                      

The festival was organized to promote and celebrate a colourful Asian tableau to highlight the rich pageantry and diversity that we see around us every day as the friendly face of multiculturalism, and at the same time hopefully to even enhance and strengthen our own culture. On this day it has brought together many peoples of differing colours, languages, races, tribes and cultures of many countries to join hands to celebrate this wonderful moment in the English city of Peterborough but ended in violence as Pakistanis and Iraqi Kurds battled to beat the shit out of each other.                                                                            

Final Conflict – www.politicalsoldier.net

We do not want Asians to wear mini skirts, jeans, baseball hats…

We want Asians to stay separate. We do not want to assimilate – and we do not want these people to assimilate with us. Jack Straw made his statement to appear “hardline” to those supporting the Neo Con “War on Terror,” whilst also appearing moderate to Asians/Muslims who are wary of the growth of the veil-wearers. He knows John Reid (the possible next Labour leader) is popular for being “hardline” on Muslim terrorism and he wants a slice of that pie.

Peter Kendall – European Action – www.europeanaction.com

There are excellent state retirement pensions available in this country, enabling the beneficiaries to live in comparative luxury when they retire. The only problem is that these state pensions are only paid to MPs. After a lifetime of dedicated service and contributions to the National insurance scheme, the ordinary citizen must think himself lucky to get 85 pounds a week because far less is often paid to individuals even if they have paid tax all their working lives. Retired women who spent years mothering children of the new generation and who did not work or pay NI contributions during their motherhood days will not get a full pension because they refused to leave their children in care and go to work – equality and welfare are Labour myths.

John Bean – British National Party – www.bnp.org.uk

Almost every newspaper, and even the occasional TV pundit, is now informing us of the problems being created by mass immigration. Four years ago when it first began issuing reliable statistics on immigration, the Migrationwatch UK organization, chaired by Sir Andrew Green, was condemned, as being racist by the liberal-left intelligentsia and embryo Notting Hill Cameroons for saying there would be two million extra immigrants over the next ten years. With six years still to go we are almost three quarters of the way there. Polish plumbers, Latvian labourers and Czech checkout girls are the least of our problem, because according to the Home Office’s own statistics only 12% of immigrants are from mainland Europe. 8% are from “The Americas” including West Indians and black Brazilians; 5% the Middle East, and 71% are Afro-Asians.

Issue 13, August 2006

Nation Revisited

An occasional email to friends

# 13. August 2006. 

Minding our business

The Israeli attack on Lebanon has killed hundreds of non-combatants and uprooted hundreds of thousands. Since America forced the Syrian peacekeeping force out of Lebanon the country has been ripe for invasion. The Lebanese Army cannot control Hezbollah or take on the US-equipped Israeli Defence Force. Hezbollah has Katyusha and Fajir rockets and anti-tank weapons but the Israelis have Phantom fighter-bombers, helicopter gun ships and illegal phosphorus bombs. The Israeli air force has destroyed much of the country but the IDF is bogged down in Bint Jbeil against an increasingly confident and stubborn enemy.

Some British nationalists have advocated a policy of “stay out of trouble” and refuse to criticize Israel’s disproportionate intervention, even against the thousands of British refugees pouring out of the war zone. The appeasers say that Britain is “far too small a nation” to influence world affairs and suggest that we mind our own business. But Britain is a member state of the world’s biggest and most successful trading bloc. We are not just a country that is “far too small” but part of an emerging superpower that is destined to play an increasing part in world affairs.

The trouble is that Britain does not have a foreign policy but simply follows America’s Manichean vision without regard to our own interests. Tony Blair has continued the “special relationship” that was forged by Winston Churchill and confirmed by Margaret Thatcher. We have given up all pretence of national independence and use our armed forces to support American objectives. By adopting a common European policy we would take an active part in decision-making instead of simply obeying orders.

The “stay out of trouble” policy is disingenuous. Oil supplies and the fate of our citizens are legitimate British and European interests. The eastern Mediterranean is vital to Europe and it is everybody’s interest to restore the region to normality. At present Israel is waging war on Lebanon and Palestine, occupying part of Syria and threatening Iran. The Americans and their allies are fighting resistance movements in Iraq and Afghanistan. The situation is grave and getting worse by the day. Only international agreement between the US, the EU and Russia can bring peace. President George Bush is controlled by an alliance of extreme Zionists and born-again Christian warmongers.

They are in no mood to talk but eventually they will be forced to negotiate, just as Israel was forced to withdraw from Lebanon in 2000 after losing 1200 men in a costly occupation that started in 1982. Israel enjoys total American support and every bombing mission is seen as a victory, but this mood will change as the body bags come home.

This will be no six-day war but a long and bloody struggle.

What They Believe In                                                                                           

To find where the British nationalists parties stand on Europe I have looked at their websites and conclude that although most of them are against the EU, there is nevertheless a definite drift towards European solidarity. I have not bothered with UKIP because it is just a Tory group with no conception of race and nation.

The British National Party is committed to withdrawal from the European Union although some of its leaders are known to be euro-friendly. They claim that we pay 43 million pounds per day to the EU, that’s 15.6 billion pounds per annum. In fact last year we paid 9.9 billion Euros but got back 6.2 billion Euros, a real annual cost of 3.7 billion Euros, or 2.5 billion pounds; a fraction of the sum claimed by the BNP and a small price to pay for access to the world’s most successful trading bloc. The party that has tried to be realistic about immigration remains in a state of denial about Europe. Recent articles by BNP leaders point to a softening of the party line, even an acknowledgement of the need for cooperation between national representatives in Brussels. Such an alliance for reform would make more sense than the nihilistic wrecking policy of UKIP.

The National Front is against the EU: “The NF supports the right of self-determination for all European nations and demands that right for Britain. It seeks a Europe where each nation is friendly to others but where no nation seeks to dominate or interfere in the affairs of another. Consequently the NF would withdraw from the EU. The NF would encourage the cultural diversity between the nations of Europe and resist attempts to eliminate this. It totally opposes the monetary and political merging of the separate nations into a super-state.”

The British People’s Party shares its website with Aryan Unity, a movement dedicated to promoting unity between euro-nationalist groups worldwide. Their first objective is: 

“To build an organization which is dedicated to the promotion of White Nationalism.”

Nevertheless point 14 of the BPP policy statement calls for: “The withdrawal of Great Britain from the EU, NATO, the UN and all other arms of the New World Order.”

British Movement is pro-European but does not go into detail: “ National Socialism liberates the freethinking folk of the world to stimulate the development of civilization. The peoples of Europe stem from a common racial root; we must enjoin in spiritual union for the defence of our freedoms against common enemies. Our strong race-founded bloc will scale new heights in all fields for the advancement of our vibrant culture.”

The other openly national socialist party, the November IX Society is opposed to the EU but takes a positive attitude to European solidarity: “ We will strive to positively cooperate with our European neighbours… We believe that the nations of Europe should be free to trade and cooperate whenever it is mutually beneficial, though without being forced into a political and economic straitjacket – such as the disastrous current push for a Federal Europe.”

                                                                                                                                  

The England First Party wants to break up the United Kingdom and form a new union including Ireland. It is not clear if this federation would belong to the EU. Despite this extraordinary policy the EFP have two councillors in the Northwest.

The Nationalist Alliance works with like-minded groups including the EFP, NF, League of St George and N9S. Their policy statement includes complete withdrawal from the EU, but this is way down the list at number 17 in their 22-point manifesto.

The League of St George supports “Europe a Nation,” as befits their Union Movement origins. The LSG magazine “League Sentinel” promotes BUF and UM literature but also carries advertisements for the eurosceptic NF and BPP – but not for the BNP.

England First – not to be confused with the EFP – belongs to the International Third Position, a Catholic-social movement, and to the European National Front that stands for a Europe of the nations:

“Although we advocate a policy of England First, this does not mean that we are anti-Scottish, anti-Welsh, anti-Irish or anti-European. For us “No More Brothers Wars” is more than just a slogan – it is a statement of belief that calls for practical action… We are opposed to all ventures such as the EU, NATO and the UN, which seek to make England an impoverished province of the New World Order. We also oppose Big Business, Freemasonry and other NWO vested interests.”

The Freedom Party is critical of the EU but has given some thought to its position:

“On the other hand it is wrong to suggest (as the single issue UKIP does) that all our problems can be laid at Brussels’ door. Our abjectly pro-American, pro-war foreign policy is none of the EU’s doing, and the waves of asylum seekers heading for England come here because of our domestic politicians’ dereliction of duty over more than half a century. We therefore favour a more flexible, reformist approach to our relations with the EU, not a simplistic policy of wanting out regardless of the consequences, and with no clear plan for the future.”

The Euro 2006 opinion poll shows that 42% consider our membership to be a good thing, 25% think it’s a bad thing, 28% think that it’s neither good nor bad and 5% don’t know. The traditional anti-EU position is increasingly out-of-touch not only with the general public but also with informed nationalist opinion. Hostility to the EU is justified by invoking the bogeyman of the New World Order, but if one nation can fight back then several nations acting together must have an even better chance.

As well as being anti-EU most of the parties of the far right are also anti-American. The BNP has developed a split personality on this issue with articles in “Freedom” attacking American imperialism while the party manifesto calls for American troops to defend us from a European super-state. A great deal of confusion surrounds the issue of European Union due to the apocalyptic visions of AK Chesterton that have distorted the picture for generations of nationalists. But neither America nor the EU are inherently evil, just some of the politicians who work for them. The white people of America, the EU, the UK, the Commonwealth and Russia are the same people with different flags and passports.

Action and Reaction                                                                                                  

Pope Gregory XIII issued a papal bull in 1582 to replace the literally out-of-date Julian calendar. This reform was adopted by the Catholic nations of Europe and within a few years the Austrian Empire, France and the Catholic German states had changed over.

Eventually the Protestant states fell into line, but Britain held out until 1752 and the change was bitterly opposed by those who saw it as a foreign or popish plot.

“The English calendar as it appeared in the mid 18^th century was a great reef of religious, economic, social, ritual, customary and natural elements, the by-product of centuries of cultural accretion: it could not simply be reformed by a stroke of the legislator’s pen, like the pottle (half gallon) or the prayer book.” Early Modern Notes.

So it took 170 years for Britain to catch up with Western Europe, and it took even longer for the Russians who only adopted the Gregorian calendar in 1919.

In 1849 Britain minted a new coin called a florin, this was worth two shillings, or one tenth of a pound. This was the first step towards a decimal currency that was supposed to take ten years, but it was not completed until 1971, 122 years later.

In 1849 Lord Kelvin and the British Association for the Advancement of Science recommended that Britain adopt the metric system of weights and measures. This was endorsed a year later by a House of Commons select committee. The process did not get under way until 1965 and we are now being told that the changeover will be complete by 2009. That will be 148 years between recommendation and adoption.

Unsurprisingly metric weights and measures are opposed by UKIP. A spokesman has described their introduction as “metric fascism” and vowed to fight for the old avoirdupois system that we imported from France in the 14^th century. His father probably fought against decimal coinage and his distant ancestor may have been one of those who demanded, “Give us back our eleven days” as the popish plot was enacted.

Britain pioneered the industrial revolution and the development of railways, shipping, mining and heavy industry. Later we led with television, computers and the silicon chip.

All of these technologies were international in concept and benefited from the exchange of ideas throughout the world. But if the Ukippers had their way we would become isolated and frozen in time, like the Polynesians of Easter Island who were isolated by geography and so enslaved by ritual that they destroyed themselves.

The British nation, like its army and navy, is best going forward. A people who are always in the vanguard of scientific achievement cannot be buried by tradition. We are not an agricultural backwater but a world leader in science and technology. We cannot afford to mess about with rods, poles and perches while our industry turns out high-tech precision instruments. The cranks and neo-luddites of UKIP will not succeed in turning Britain into a peasant theme park for the amusement of tourists. The great ecological and logistical challenges of the modern world will force us to choose between the future and the past - between action and reaction. We have the intelligence to overcome all obstacles but we must not be held back by the dead hand of conservatism.

Views on the News                                                                                                   

Energy prices have increased by 20% and have more than doubled since 2003. The energy suppliers, Centrica and EDF are efficient companies but they are struggling with fuel price increases and lack of generating and distribution capacity. British Energy, the owner of our eight nuclear power plants, collapsed in 2002 and was virtually nationalized by the Department of Trade and Industry injection of 3 billion pounds in 2004. This state intervention has upset the free market fanatics but it will prove to be a vital part of our future energy industry. Power cuts in London have shown the need for greater capacity. Centrica have announced the construction of a new coal-fired power plant at Langage in Devon, in association with Drax, owners of the massive power plant in North Yorkshire. Infrastructure companies like energy and transport should have an element of state control and a coordinated development policy.

The sight of Tony Blair groveling to George Bush has become a regular feature of news broadcasts. George stumbles through a prepared speech full of inappropriate inflexions while Tony stares admiringly at his master like a devoted mongrel. Even Labour Party loyalists are now getting embarrassed by this performance. Margaret Thatcher was clearly besotted with Ronald Regan. The chemistry between them was palpable and their relationship was one of genuine mutual admiration. There is none of this about the master-servant relationship between Bush and Blair. When Bush called “Yo Blair” to his cringing acolyte the whole world witnessed the spectacle of the British Prime Minister being publicly humiliated.

Veteran nationalist Colin Jordan has recently had a letter published in his local paper the “Nidderdale Herald.” He is calling for support for local traders and for a boycott of the big supermarket chains including Tescos. Older readers will remember that CJ was fitted-up by the Special Branch in a Tescos shoplifting scam, many years ago.

The letter has been posted on the Nationalist Alliance website – http://www.allnationalist.com/colinjordan.htm

Two news items suggest that it is impossible to protect national cultures against foreign influences. In Albania the police do not know what to do about Scandinavian tourists bathing naked on their beaches. Conservative locals have complained to the police but Albania needs tourists and is reluctant to interfere with their freedom. And in Iran the President has issued a decree banning foreign words like “pizza” and “helicopter.” The Iranians will ignore this attempt to defend their language just as the French continue to ignore the Academie Francaise by using words like “weekend” and “e-mail.”

Cultural purists are fighting a losing battle all over the world. Trying to ban foreign words or foreign morals and manners will not succeed. People are now fully exposed to the Western way of life. Even strictly regulated tribal societies will break down when confronted by the free and easy lifestyle of liberal democracy. The so-called “honour killing” are a desperate attempt by Asians to maintain their traditions, but ultimately they will not succeed. For good or bad people will eventually opt for personal freedom over tribal and religious customs.

Issue 4, March 2006

Nation Revisited

March 2006, # 4

Despite the steady decline in British manufacturing the economy continues to thrive

We have become a service economy and make a living by selling things like banking, insurance and advice. The culture of workers pouring out of factory gates has almost gone. The industries that used to employ thousands of men and women have been outsourced to cheaper parts of the world. At present this system is working and most people have never had it so good, but a feeling persists that the whole thing is artificial and that it will fall apart. When we made ships there was something to see. Thousands of tonnes of steel in a shipyard was visible evidence of industry, but banking and insurance are invisible things. Nobody cheers when a loan is made as they did when a great ship slipped into the water.

As long as it lasts we will enjoy our high standard of living. We will put out of out minds the idea that we are dependent on others for our food and manufactured goods. We will accept that our electricity is generated from imported gas and oil and paid for out of what we earn by selling insurance or advertising. We will not mind that our armed forces are not capable of operating independently. Eventually we might forget that we were once a mighty industrial and military power.

The towns and villages of England grew up over hundreds of years as the population slowly increased and the economy developed. The location of these settlements was chosen carefully to take advantage of natural features. Villages were built near to water supplies and houses were built above the water table and with access to roads. Care was taken not to destroy good agricultural land and to maintain a balance between town and country. Now with an immigration-driven surge in population we are building new towns on flood plains and far away from available roads and reservoirs. Massive developments are being built with no clear plan for supplying them with water or coping with the additional sewage and refuse. Big settlements need adequate services. Lots of houses mean lots of roads, drains, power and all the requirements of modern living.

Local authorities must look at the overall plan before granting permission.

Pensions are seldom adequate to sustain people into old age. Successive governments have failed to make the necessary arrangements to look after a longer-living population.

Pensions are simply savings. The Chancellor should take savings out of taxation to encourage people to make provision for their retirement. The revenue lost to the Exchequer would be made up by the reduction in welfare benefits paid to needy pensioners.

By plundering savings set aside for pensions the government is going for short-term gain and trying to postpone the inevitable. This fast buck mentality motivates government policy on industrial planning, housing, immigration and pensions. They have no strategy for the future and think no further than the next election. The old gang politicians value their own fortunes ahead of posterity.

What The Papers Say                                                                                                   
 

A Recipe For Resentment: League Sentinel. Winter 2005/6.

Flooding a country with people from a different ethnic or cultural background is one certain way of generating resentment from the native population towards the newcomers. Giving them free housing, healthcare, food and other benefits only serves to exacerbate the situation. But when a government discriminates against its own people in favour of asylum seekers and other benefit claimants then trouble is sure to occur.

Such an example is that of the government benefits agency that made a mistake with its tax credit system and overpaid many claimants by a total of four billion pounds. In an effort to recover the money the agency have cut the benefit to British claimants who are the most vulnerable in our society. Single parents, and the elderly are facing reductions in their monthly income by up to ninety pounds a month. Yet the politicians have decided not to pursue foreigners who have been wrongly paid “as it would be too difficult”.

Coincidently, just after this decision became public, the Home Office reported that “race-hate” attacks had increased dramatically. Is it any wonder?

War in Iraq, Bombs in London, Riots in France: Final Conflict, Spring 2006.

There are a lot of terrible things happening. There is no doubt that at gut-instinct level many of these events are slowly turning people against immigration and multi-culturalism. Certainly the man-on-the-street is feeling equally uncomfortable about Muslims, wider immigration, government lies and the Neo-Con agenda.

As Nationalists we must always be able to see the news behind the news. The big question behind all this is who benefits?

Who created Al Qaeda, who really organized 9/11, who was behind the push for war?

The answers to these questions are already seeing the light of day. The trail leads back to the usual suspects. The upfront bogeyman, in this case militant Islam, is being promoted way beyond its means by a power desperate to use this huge terrorist agent provocateur to push its own agenda; even when those it seeks to bring down, like Iraq and Libya, are in fact secular Arab states on the hit list of the same militant Moslems.

Call the ones pulling the strings what you want; Neo-Cons, Zionists, Freemasons; it seems that the more things change the more they stay the same.
 

Saving Our Identities:  European Action, Jan/Feb 2006.

The reason we declare a European political faith is that we value national identities as of right. Our enemies regard this as “racism” and want all expressions of regional patriotism to be outlawed. Never confuse us with the cosmopolitan culture-destroyers of the EU bureaucracy who have no regard for true national expression. European Action stands for the protection of all the peoples of Europe… their traditions, customs, history and above all, their right to ethnic solidarity. We are National Europeans opposed to globalist dominance of our continent. Europe for the Europeans.

John Beckett                                                                                                                   

John Beckett was born in Thurlwood, Cheshire in 1894; he died in 1964. After a state school education he started work as a shop assistant aged fifteen. He served in the British Army and was disabled in World War I. He founded the National Union of Ex-Servicemen to look after the wives and children of returned servicemen and the widows of the fallen. This charitable movement was later taken over by the British Legion.

He served as a member of Hackney Borough Council from 1919 to 1922 during which time he shared a flat with the future Prime Minister Clement Atlee.

He became the youngest Labour MP when he was returned for Gateshead in 1924.

In 1927 in a heated exchange with the Tory Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin he called him a liar. For this breach of the rules he was suspended from Parliament.

In 1929 he was elected Labour MP for Peckham but by 1930 he was in trouble again for protesting against the government’s unemployment policy by stealing the mace and assaulting fellow MP James Maxton and a parliamentary attendant.

 

In 1934 John Beckett abandoned the Labour Party to join Sir Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists. He rose to become Director of Publications and editor of ‘Action.’

In 1937 the three leading BUF propagandists John Beckett, William Joyce and Angus Macnab broke away to found the National Socialist League. They were helped by another ex-blackshirt AK Chesterton. In 1939 William Joyce made his fateful decision to go to Germany; Angus Macnab closed down the NSL and John Becket founded the British People’s Party.  In 1940 he was interned under Defence Regulation 18B together with over a thousand other nationalists.  None of them were ever charged or tried and no appeal was possible. Many of them like Mosley and Beckett had served with distinction in the First World War.

Soon after his release from prison he reactivated the British People’s Party in 1945. This was a courageous venture in the immediate postwar era when his friend William Joyce and his contemporary John Amery were tried and executed. This was also the time of the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal with a political climate of guilt by association and hysterical anti-fascist propaganda.

The British People’s Party faced organized violence from the militant 43 Group who were given vital support and intelligence by the Police and the Security Services.

John Beckett invited a gifted young Cambridge student called Colin Jordan to join the BPP National Council; but Jordan was already in contact with Arnold Leese the prewar leader of the Imperial Fascist League who founded his short-lived National Workers Party in 1948. The British People’s Party was wound up when their patron Hastings Russell the Duke of Bedford was killed in a mysterious shooting accident in 1953.

John Beckett’s old BUF comrade AK Chesterton invited him to join his new movement The League of Empire Loyalists in 1954, but after a lifetime of service to his country he decided to retire.

Europe for The Europeans – by Bill Baillie                                                                

This abridged article first appeared in ‘Action’ in August 1975. In the 31 years since it was written the European Union has grown much bigger but it has abandoned economic nationalism for world trade. The ethnic invasion has got even worse and the predicted inter-racial strife is happening all the time. But there are now encouraging signs that public opinion is at last turning against the liberal consensus. Nationalist parties are making gains throughout Europe against the multicultural agenda.

Political union will solve divided Europe’s economic problems. A self-contained economy will outlaw the speculation that has caused steep rises in world prices under the present system. Sweated imports from the East will be excluded and the massive bargaining power of 300 million European customers will ensure fair prices for imports that might still be required. But Europe will still be doomed to collapse and failure unless the growing problem of non-European immigration is tackled. There are now millions of African, Asian and Caribbean migrants in Britain, France, Germany, Holland and other European countries.

These people have been cruelly exploited as cheap labour without regard for their long-term welfare or that of the native Europeans. Already the inevitable tensions of this multiracial situation have resulted in violence and death. Only the warped theoreticians of the race relations industry would deny that the assimilation of these immigrants is impossible. Britons and other Europeans who have been victims of large-scale immigration know that this policy is socially destructive and bound to end in disaster.

The apologetic politicians of the old parties claim that there are too many here to reverse the flood, but there are plenty of recent historical precedents for mass repatriation.

Thirteen million refugees were taken in by West Germany after the last world war.

More than half a million Asians have been exchanged by India, Pakistan and Bangladesh after their mutual conflict. Over a million pieds noirs were repatriated to France after her withdrawal from Algeria. Nearly one million Portuguese have flown home from Africa, and as I write are arriving in Lisbon at the rate of two thousand a day.

Israel has become the homeland of over three million Jews from Europe and the Arab states. This has been hailed as an historic achievement and Russia is universally condemned for limiting emigration. If it is considered a very good thing that millions of Jews should go to Israel the same standard must apply to the repatriation of Europe’s immigrants. This is both possible and essential now that they are unwanted in a Europe facing unemployment and depression.

Europe has the technological and financial capacity to launch a great programme of repatriation, coupled with aid to the developing nations that would benefit from the return of their skilled workers. If this is not done they will remain as an unwanted alien minority and we shall experience the same inter-racial strife that now threatens to tear the United States apart.

Views on The News                                                                                                 

The trial of Nick Griffin and Mark Collett of the BNP for inciting racial hatred went against the government so they are trying them again. In Austria the State is appealing against the sentence of 67 year old David Irving for questioning the holocaust because they think that three years is too lenient. In Germany the show-trials of Ernst Zundel and Germar Rudolf are under way. In Belgium Daniel Feret the leader of the Front National and his assistant George-Pierre Tonnalier are on trial for writing ‘racist’ propaganda. All over Europe the so-called democratic regimes are using legislation to crush dissent. The irony of the situation could hardly be sweeter, people are being thrown into prison to defend civil rights and silenced to protect freedom of speech.

The Americans and their camp followers have destroyed Iraq with indiscriminate bombing and have killed unknown numbers of civilians in the cause of democracy.

In order to depose a dictator they have destroyed waterways, pumping stations, power plants, roads, bridges, airports, hospitals, schools, orphanages and old people’s homes.

To bring freedom to the Iraqis they have tortured, raped and brutalized them. It is no accident that these atrocities have been filmed and shown around the world. The message is that the New World Order must be obeyed.

This system of democracy that is so important to the West is all about repression.

Freedom of expression is achieved by spying on communications and the will of the people is guaranteed by buying electoral success with millions of dollars. Racial equality is enforced with positive discrimination and cheap labour immigration is glorified as ethnic diversity. This circus of deceit operates in an atmosphere of breathtaking hypocrisy. The super-capitalists control the governments, resources, industrial output and manpower of most of the world. They have the commercial power to organize wars, invasions, revolutions and assassinations. Their real motive is profit but they disguise this with democracy, progress and all sorts of good intentions.

Iran has emerged from fifty years of American interference. First the nationalist regime of Mohammed Mossadegh was overturned by the Central Intelligence Agency with Operation Ajax in 1953. This installed the pro-American Shah Pahlavi who was deposed in 1979 by the Ayotollah Khomeini revolution. From 1980 until 1988 the country was at war with the American-sponsored Iraqis. A war that cost both sides 1 million lives and $1.9 trillion. Now Iran once more has a popular government under Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. But America will not rest until Iran’s vast mineral wealth is back under their control. Iran has not initiated a war against a neighbouring state since the 16^th Century but she is still demonized by the West. We are told that Iran’s nuclear programme cannot be allowed. China, Pakistan, India, Russia, North Korea and Israel are tolerated but Iran must be stopped. America does not explain why the military dictatorship of General Pervez Musharraf in Pakistan is preferable to the freely elected government of President Ahmadinejad in Iran.

Nation Revisited is a private communication. 

Issue 2, January 2006

Nation Revisited

# 2, January 2006

The Lamp Posts of Baghdad

The swift arrest and sentencing of the two rapists, who killed the British girl in Thailand, contrast sharply with our own creaking police and courts. If these evil thugs had committed their crime in the UK they would probably never have been caught. If they had been caught they would have got off on some legal technicality or been given a light sentence of which they would serve less than half. Britain is no longer a civilized country but a collapsed empire in the final stages of decay.  Everything fine and decent is suspect to the perverse lunatics who control us; patriotism is politically incorrect, pride in being European is even worse, love or the English language and culture is elitist. Everything repulsive is glorified including; discordant music, meaningless lyrics, idiotic fashions and infantile behaviour.

Our traditions are ridiculed and our faith has collapsed under political pressure. If you report a robbery to the Police they are more likely to arrest you than to look for the criminals. If you have been careful with your money the State will rob you but those who arrive with nothing are showered with handouts.

Parents who discipline their children are pilloried but perverts who rape children get piddling prison sentences. Drug dealers openly sell their wares on the streets while the Police look the other way. Our politicians are not just useless they are corrupt and utterly contemptible.

When Saddam Hussein led the 1968 Iraqi Revolution it was reported that the lamp posts of Baghdad were groaning under the weight of the corrupt politicians hanging from them. 

What a sight that must have been.

Remembering Coal

 

The recent gas dispute between Russia and Ukraine has highlighted Britain’s increasing reliance on imported gas. Our own natural gas production is slowing down and we are importing from Russia and North Africa. In the old days we used to process coal to make gas. This worked for two hundred years before we discovered natural gas and decided to abandon the coal industry. The result has been mass unemployment in the coalmining areas and the loss of an industry that gave meaning to the lives of thousands.  It is only a matter of time before the government rediscovers coal and launches a feasibility study on its potential as a power source. With modern technology it should be possible to produce coal gas more efficiently than in the old days. There is certainly no shortage of coal. The industry was shut down by a greedy and short-sighted government that was determined to break the unions and make lots of money by exploiting natural gas. The coal is still there under the ground, all we need is a government that can see further than the next dividend.

 

John Amery                                                                                                                

John Amery was born on 14^th March 1912 and executed on 19^th December 1945. After his education at Harrow and London University he fought for the Nationalists in the Spanish Civil War and was granted Spanish citizenship. Following General Franco’s victory Amery moved to France where he campaigned with the fascist leaders Jaques Doriot and Marcel Deat, who both fought for Germany as French volunteers. There he met his wife Jeannine Barde, who he described in his last statement as “my beloved friend and political revolutionary.”

He began broadcasting for the Germans in 1942 and started to raise a Free Corps from amongst British prisoners of war to fight on the Eastern Front. His recruiting leaflet ends with the words; “This conflict between England and Germany is racial suicide. We must unite and take up arms against the common enemy. We ask you to come into our ranks and fight shoulder to shoulder for Europe and for England.” In 1945 he was in Italy broadcasting for the Fascist Republic when he was captured by Partisans and brought back to England for trial at the Old Bailey.

The Crown-appointed psychiatrist Dr Edward Glover never examined John Amery but nevertheless made a diagnosis of moral insanity; this was based on evidence from parents and teachers that he had suffered a period of bed-wetting as a child and had been suspected of masturbation! Faced with a court that disregarded the diagnosis of insanity and his Spanish citizenship John Amery pleaded guilty.

The Times of 29^th November 1945 reported:

The Judge then said to him: “John Amery I have read the depositions and the exhibits in this case, and I am satisfied that you knew what you did and that you did it intentionally and deliberately after you had received warning from more than one of your fellow countrymen that the course you were pursuing amounted to high treason. They called you a traitor and you heard them; but in spite of that you continued in that course. You now stand a self-confessed traitor to your King and country, and you have forfeited the right to live.” The Judge then passed the only sentence allowed; death by hanging. Amery had kept his eyes on the Judge throughout his remarks and while he passed sentence. Showing no sign of emotion, he bowed with dignity to the Judge and turned to walk down the steps to the cells. No jury was sworn and the Attorney-General did not speak throughout the brief hearing.

The South African Prime Minister Jan Smuts made an appeal to British Prime Minister Clement Atlee on the grounds that the offence had been ideological and not criminal but it was rejected. The hangman Albert Pierrepoint described John Amery as the bravest man that he had ever had to hang. When his mother asked to see her son’s grave in 1948 she was refused. He left us two works “England and Europe” a synopsis of the situation in 1943 and “John Amery Speaks” a collection of his wartime radio transcripts. Both are available from Final Conflict, BCM Box 6358, London WC1N 3XX

The Far Right in the United Kingdom                                                                         

The term far-Right inadequately describes the various nationalist movements that often have progressive social policies. They are united by hostility to non-European immigration and a distrust of international capitalism. They are descended from the prewar fascist movements and contain diverse elements of political, economic and esoteric thought. These ideas are not exclusive to any single party but are present in various proportions in all of them.

Their postwar history has been well documented. Groups have come together and split apart with regularity. These splits have been about strategy and personalities rather than policy; the only real difference in ideology has been about European Union.

The main parties take part in local and parliamentary elections just like the established parties. The smaller groups tend to avoid elections and often justify their inactivity by claiming that participation is a waste of time. Some of these groups are not much more than a magazine and a website.

The British National Party is the biggest and most successful nationalist movement since the National Front of the 1970s. They have got more than twenty serving Councilors and fought 119 seats in the 2005 General Election, averaging nearly 5%. Nick Griffin has softened the party line and tried to appeal to a wider audience but this has not stopped him being charged with inciting racial hatred. The government has mounted an illegal campaign against the BNP including interfering with communications and seizing publications, but so far the courts have decided in the party’s favour. They publish a newspaper called ‘Freedom’ and the magazine ‘Identity’ edited by John Bean.

The National Front is still trying to recover from the setback of 1979 when Margaret Thatcher sunk their hopes by making false promises to control immigration. The NF contested 13 seats in the 2005 General election averaging less than 2%.  Their magazine is called ‘The Flame.’

The British People’s Party sprang from the Spearhead Group that backed the late John Tyndall against nick Griffin for the leadership of the BNP. The BPP was founded in 2005 and has not yet stood in any elections.  They have two publications ‘Imperium’ and ‘Vanguard.’

The Nationalist Alliance is another offshoot from the Tyndall faction that attempts to support the nationalist movement in general.

The Freedom Party is led by barrister Adrian Davies; it boasts an impressive list of contributors and tries even harder than the BNP to be respectable. In the 2005 General Election they put up one candidate and got less than 2%.

The England First Party advocates a new federation of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales. They have made a promising start in local elections. The EFP distribute the magazine ‘Heritage and Destiny.’

                                                                                                                                       

The rest of the parties of the far-Right do not contest elections but concentrate on street activities such as demonstrations and sales of papers.

British Movement is an openly National Socialist group originally founded by Colin Jordan in 1968. They publish a magazine called ‘Broadsword.’

The IX November Society is another National Socialist group that broke away from Union Movement in 1977. Their leader Kevin Quinn has been prosecuted for inciting racial hatred. Their magazine is called ‘Britain Awake.’

England First (not to be confused with the England First Party) is part of the International Third Position that is linked to nationalist movements all over the world. Their fanzine is called ‘Final Conflict.’

Third Way is a similar but unconnected movement based on Patrick Harrington’s interpretation of the ideas of Hillaire Belloc and GK Chesterton.

Both groups came from the Political Soldier faction of the 1980s National Front.

Since the demise of Union Movement following the death of Sir Oswald Mosley in 1980 and Jeffrey Hamm in 1994 their ideas have been propagated by The Friends of Mosley with their magazine ‘Comrade’ and their excellent website. Thousands of people have passed through UM over the years and although many of them are in the BNP or other parties they have kept faith with the European ideal. From 2005 an independent paper ‘European Action’ has been launched by Robert Edwards to cater for this readership and in support of a National Party for Europe.

The far-Right is unlikely to get Members of Parliament elected under the first-past-the-post system but they are more than capable of getting the five percent that would trigger representation under the electoral reforms proposed by the EU. Britain would then have nationalist MPs as well as local Councilors. This would be the breakthrough that the government is desperate to stop with new legislation to limit freedom of speech; but the far-Right has a long history of surviving persecution, imprisonment and even execution; they will surely survive this latest round of state repression.

Withdrawal from the EU remains a BNP fixation but far-Right advances throughout Europe, in reaction to third world immigration, has worked wonders for European solidarity. With a good campaign and a reasonable candidate nationalist parties can expect to get 5-10%. This average has been remarkably consistent; even after the war in the Fifties, following the Spearhead Trial and the Trafalgar Square Riot in the Sixties, during the heyday of the NF in the Seventies, throughout the financial crisis of the Nineties and right up to the present. Parties and leaders have come and gone but support has remained constant despite smear campaigns and negative propaganda.

Most of the leaders of the far-Right have been imprisoned for their beliefs or suffered loss of employment, physical violence and threats. Britain’s thriving nationalist movement is a tribute to the brave men and women who have soldiered on and kept the flag flying.

Views on the News                                                                                                        

Washington has admitted that prisoners of war have been flown around the world to be interrogated in places like Egypt and Romania. This would allow torture to be used without breaking United States laws. Secret flights have been made from the UK but Tony Blair says that there is no evidence of torture and Condoleeza Rice has said that these flights are necessary to defend democracy. When poor Ali has the electrodes clamped to his testicles he can take comfort in the idea that it’s all in a good cause. Security experts believe that the methods of torture include the use of drugs and sensory deprivation but doubt that prisoners are forced to listen to Donald Rumsfeld soundbites.

Spokesmen for the Police rank and file have stated that they will protest if any move is made against officers for shooting an innocent man at Stockwell. They suggest that policemen will hand in their guns if prosecutions are brought. Blair wants to amalgamate the police forces and Dave Cameron wants to sack bad cops; the best idea would be to militarize them. Soldiers are not asked their opinion about policy nor are they entitled to hand in their guns. If they disobey orders they can simply be brought before a military court and dealt with as mutineers. Policemen enjoy strutting about carrying guns so it’s only fair that they should be treated like soldiers. They are highly paid but unbelievably inefficient; if they were operating in the private sector they would all be fired.

Abu Hamza the militant Moslem and Nick Griffin the militant Christian are both on trial for inciting racial hatred. Is this a coincidence or some kind of democratic balancing act?

There is wisdom and poetry in the holy books but there are a lot of bloodthirsty passages that were written centuries ago for audiences less sophisticated than today. Quotations out of context add to this spiteful literature and encourage religious animosity. The answer does not lie in prosecution but in the acceptance of reality.

Legislation will not make people respect each other. Nations evolved to protect cultures and languages; they were not imposed but developed organically. Forcing diverse races and nations to share the same small island will always run the risk of conflict.

Venezuela and Bolivia have announced a trade deal that will barter oil for food without using US Dollars. The Banks will take a very dim view of the development.

If South Americans can trade without money there will be nothing to stop Germany sending cars to Russia and accepting payment in gas; or Argentina exchanging beef for British machine tools; or China swapping computers for French brandy. That would mean that nations would not have to borrow the money from the bankers, or pay interest on the loan, or exchange commission on the currency, or bank fees on the transaction.

It would give rich nations the chance to help poorer nations without huge sums of money being confiscated by the banks.

Very soon we will be told that these third world nations are really a great threat to the West and Britain will be backing an American plan to defend democracy by dropping half tonne bombs on Caracas and La Paz.

Nation Revisited is a private communication that is not for general distribution.