Nation Revisited
An occasional email to friends
# 16 October 2006
Keeping Up Appearances
The worldwide web is an invaluable
propaganda tool for those fighting for race and nation. A website can reach
thousands of people in an instant and enables us to compete on even terms. The
National Front has recently revamped its website and Stormfront has appointed a
Webmaster for its British section. These reforms were urgently needed to
reclaim these sites from the foul-mouthed racists who had come to dominate
them. Readers dislike crude and intemperate language, and people who constantly
resort to swearing and threatening are not taken seriously.
Far Right websites and publications try to
be objective but they should stick to verifiable stories from reliable sources.
There is little point in publishing sensational articles that can be challenged
by our opponents. The “Sun” and the “Daily Mail” sell the most copies but they
are known to be alarmist and downmarket newspapers. It’s far better to be
compared to “The Times” as a paper of record that tries to keep up appearances.
As Mosley’s prewar hagiographer AK Chesterton put it: “Quality in this movement
is immeasurably more important than quantity.”
Several critics of Blair’s policies are
still facing prosecution. The laws restricting free speech may be unfair and
unnecessary but they are in force and must be obeyed until they are thrown out
by parliament. These laws do not stop us from campaigning against non-European
immigration or unscrupulous big business, but they do require us to think
carefully about what we write and say. It is illegal to incite racial hatred
and it will probably soon be illegal to incite religious hatred. But reasoned
and intelligent discussion is not outlawed and the courts would not welcome
prosecutions that are unlikely to succeed. Another reason why we should try at
all times to present a sober and respectably image. Not by abandoning our
principles but by employing logical debate and a civilized approach. This will
appeal to the public, get our message across and frustrate the efforts of the
political establishment to stifle democracy.
The massive immigration of the past year
may prove to be the turning point. The irony is that Poles and Lithuanians are
no threat to our European stock. Their numbers came as a shock but because they
are white our politically correct commentators are free to speak.
In responce to public opinion and as a
result of election gains, governments are moving towards immigration control
throughout Europe. The next stage will be to restore our continent to her
citizens. After half a century of betrayal and subversion we are now on the way
to recovery.
A Question of Loyalty
The newspapers have agonized over resident
Muslims taking up arms against Britain.
They can’t understand why lads with Yorkshire accents become fanatical
supporters of Al-Qaeda and kill innocent British people. Their confusion is the
result of years of liberal propaganda. They have been pushing the idea of
peaceful coexistence for so long that they have started to believe it. But
blood is thicker than water and people will always have ties and sympathies
with their ancestral way of life
Muslim soldiers have fought for Britain all
over the world for hundreds of years. The British Indian Army comprised all
religions including Muslims. They fought for the British Empire in the Afghan
wars, in Iraq and France in the First World War and in North Africa, Italy and
Burma in the Second World War. Muslims fought for us but they were free to
practice and defend their own religion.
The Jews are another immigrant minority who
came from the East and settled in Britain. They served in the British Army in
both world wars and have become thoroughly absorbed into British society. But
would anybody expect them to fight for this country against Israel; it would
surely be too much to ask?
The Irish Republican Army in the Twenties
was comprised of British ex-servicemen, officers and other ranks that served in
the South African War and every theatre or the Great War. They became bitter
enemies of the British Empire when Ireland decided to pursue the very
independence that we had claimed for “ poor little Belgium.”
Only twelve years after the Treaty of
Vereeniging ended the South African War, young Afrikaners were fighting for
Britain against the Germans. Britain lost 22,000 men defeating President Paul
Kruger but his countrymen who fought us to a standstill in the
“Vryheidsoorlog,” the freedom war, had no problem fighting for the British
Empire once we granted them self-government.
It is not surprising that Muslims see the
wars in the Middle East as attacks on their kith and kin; it would be difficult
to describe them as anything else. Subject peoples are capable of being
faithful soldiers and citizens but it is unreasonable to expect them to fight
against their own kind, or expect them to ignore their slaughter. It is not
just a question of loyalty but also a matter of commonsense.
Given that fact many people would question
the wisdom of importing millions of immigrants who cannot always be trusted in
times of war. It is time for a national debate on population and immigration
policy. Open-door immigration has resulted in the formation of ethnic ghettos
that have little or no communication with the host nation. Distinguished
immigrants like George Aligiah and Trevor Phillips have now conceded that
multiculturalism does not work. Trevor Phillips, chairman of the Commission for
Racial Equality has said: “Britain is sleepwalking towards segregation.” But
they have stopped short of suggesting the obvious solution to the problem.
Sudan In The Balance
Sudan has joined Syria, Iran and North
Korea on America’s growing hit list. The troubled African nation of has all the
qualifications to become another candidate for regime change. President Omar
Hassan al-Bashir’s hard-line nationalistic regime has no diplomatic relations
with the USA and they have significant oil deposits.
The long running civil war between the
central government and the rebel south was settled in 2005. This was a tribal
war aggravated by religious conflict between the Muslim north and the Christian
south. The CIA backed the rebels and their Ugandan allies the Lord’s Resistance
Army, who specialized in kidnapping and enslaving children. The war was
presented as a Christian crusade against Muslim oppression but both sides
committed unspeakable atrocities.
The Darfur rebellion in the west is another
bloody tribal conflict but this time between fellow Muslims. The racial aspect
of this war has been highlighted but both sides are as dark-skinned as each
other. The Baggara Arabs are not Lebanese or Syrians who look like Europeans,
they are a mixed race that has traditionally ruled over the African tribes and
still regard them as subject people.
There has been inter-tribal carnage in west
Sudan for centuries. The Egyptians and the British both attempted to pacify
Darfur but with little success. Since independence Khartoum has relied upon the
Arab Janjaweed militia to enforce its writ, but the rebels have fought back and
threaten to form a breakaway state on the Chadian border.
A well-orchestrated campaign by movie stars
and all the usual suspects from the entertainment industry has highlighted the
Darfur rebellion, and British and American politicians who cheerfully ignore
the slaughter in Iraq and Afghanistan are making grim accusations of genocide
and calling for intervention.
The neighbouring Arab states to the north
are too weak to help Sudan. Libya is neutralized by the threat of annihilation
and Egypt by economic blackmail. Sudan is the only Arab state in Africa
prepared to defy America. Their best hope is that the China National Petroleum
Corporation is developing their oil industry. This commercial alliance may save
the Sudanese from another “shock and awe” invasion with British troops in
attendance. The Americans are bankrolling Chinese industry and it would not be
in their interests to upset such an important trade partner.
But America will still try to depose Omar
Hassan al-Bashir and replace him with a puppet like Hosni Murbarak of Egypt.
“Decapitation” has become a feature of their foreign policy. If they cannot
bribe or threaten a ruler they will organize a coup or an assassination. They
do not always succeed; Fidel Castro of Cuba has survived a string of attempted
murders and his bankrupt dictatorship struggles on against a crippling American
blockade. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union Fidel has been no threat to
America but it will probably take them another fifty years for to realize it.
William Cobbett
William Cobbett the great radical reformer
was born in Farham, Surrey in 1763. After military service and several years
teaching in America he founded “The Political Register” in 1802. He campaigned
for free speech and was again forced to flee to America to escape prison. He
continued to publish and was constantly threatened by the government. In 1819
he came home and in 1821 he started a tour of Britain, which he recorded in his
newspaper and published as “Rural Rides” in 1830. After several attempts to get
elected to parliament he succeeded at Oldham in 1832. He died in 1835.
The Political Register, November 1816
You have been represented in the Times
newspaper, by the Courier, by the Morning Post, by the Morning Herald, and
others as the scum of society. They say that you have no business at public
meetings; that you are a rabble, and that you pay no taxes. These insolent
hirelings, who wallow in wealth, would not be able to put their abuse of you in
print if it were not for your labour.
Thirteen Sermons 1822
All property has its origin in labour.
Labour itself is property; the root of all other property; and unhappy is that
community, where labourer and poor man are synonymous terms. No man is
essentially poor: poor and rich are relative terms; and if the labourer has his
due, and be in good health, in the vigour of life, and willing to labour, to
make him a poor man there must be some defect in the government of the community
in which he lives. Because the produce of his labour would by itself produce a
sufficiency of everything needful for himself and his family. The labouring
classes must always form nine-tenths of the people; and what shame it must be,
what an imputation on the rulers, if nine-tenths of the people be worthy of the
name poor!
The Political Register, August 1830
I perceive that you want very much to be
enlightened on the state of our press, which you appear to regard as being
free, and which, as I am going to prove to you, is the most enslaved and the
vilest thing that has ever been heard of in the world under the name of press.
I say that I am going to prove this; and proof consists of undeniable facts,
and not vague assertions.
Advertising is the great source of revenue
with our journals, except in very few cases, such as mine, for instance, who
have no advertisements. Hence these journals are an affair of trade and not of
literature; the proprietors think of the money that is to be got by them; they
hire men to write them; and these men are ordered to write in a way to please
the classes who can give most advertisements. The Government itself pays large
sums in advertisements, many hundreds a year, to some journals. The
aristocracy, the clergy, the magistrates (who are generally clergy too) in
several counties; the merchants, the manufacturers, the great shopkeepers; all
these command the press, because without their advertisements it cannot be
carried on with profit.
William Cobbett’s books, including Rural
Rides are available from Amazon Books.
Churchill on Europe
Sir Winston Churchill was a complex man who
is misunderstood by all sections of the political spectrum. The Left regard him
as a reactionary and a warmonger but he supported many liberal reforms. To the
far Right he was part of an international conspiracy but he had much to say on
that subject. By the end of the war he foresaw European Union, and in the
Fifties he was already asking questions about non-white immigration. But the
postwar electorate turned against him and poor, shattered, bankrupt Britain was
put on-hold for another generation. Churchill was a visionary surrounded by
nonentities. He once characterized this type of man when talking about Austen
Chamberlain who has served for many years on the Birmingham Corporation. He
said:
“ he sees the world through the wrong end
of a municipal drainpipe.” And of Clement Atlee he said: “he is a modest man,
with much to be modest about.” He was born in the Victorian age and never
really came to terms with the end of imperialism, but his famous speech
forecasting the European Union is testimony to his breadth of knowledge and
understanding of history.
September 19th Zurich,
Switzerland
If Europe were once united in the sharing
of its common inheritance there would be no limit to the happiness, to the
prosperity and the glory which its three or four hundred million people would
enjoy.
All the while there is a remedy which, if
it were generally and spontaneously adopted by the great majority of people in
many lands, would as if by a miracle transform the whole scene, and would in a
few years make all Europe, or the greater part of it, as free and as happy as
Switzerland is today. What is this sovereign remedy? It is to re-create the
European Family, or as much of it as we can, and to provide it with a structure
under which it can dwell in peace, in safety and in freedom. We must build a
kind of United States of Europe.
The structure of the United States of
Europe, if well and truly built, will be such as to make the material strength
of a single state less important. Small nations will count as much as large
ones and gain their honour by their contribution to the cause.
We must re-create the European Family in a
regional structure called, it may be, the United States of Europe. If at first
all the States of Europe are not willing or able to join the Union, we must
nevertheless proceed to assemble and combine those who will and those who can.
The salvation of the common people of every race and of every land from war or
servitude must be established on solid foundations by the readiness of all men
and women to die rather than submit to tyranny.
In all this urgent work, France and Germany
must take the lead together. Great Britain, the British Commonwealth of
Nations, mighty America and I trust Soviet Russia – for then indeed all would
be well – must be the friends and sponsors of the new Europe and must champion
its right to live and shine. Therefore I say to you: let Europe shine!
