Showing posts with label Balkans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Balkans. Show all posts

Saturday, 25 August 2012

Issue 53, February 2009


Nation Revisited

An occasional e-mail to friends. # 53, February 2009.

Economic Reality

The economies of all major states are shrinking because the banks have stopped lending money and people have stopped wasting it. Instead of buying new cars they are keeping their old models, and instead of trading up to new and bigger houses they are staying put and trying to cope with mortgage repayments, increased insurance premiums and fuel bills.

Britain abandoned coal in the “dash for gas.” There were plenty of uneconomic pits but the coalmining industry was a valuable national asset that should have been protected and modernized. The Tories blamed the NUM leader Arthur Scargill for the Miner’s Strike of 1984/5. But he was trying to defend 180,000 jobs and he was right when he said that the Thatcher government wanted to shut down the entire industry.

We will have to open new coal-fired power plants that will burn coal produced by our remaining 6000 miners. Our nuclear power industry is at the end of its useful life but a new generation of nuclear plants will take years to build and commission. Wind turbines and wave power are experimental technologies that will never generate enough power to justify their expense.

The recession is destroying jobs and pensions buy if it ends the “free trade” racket it will be no bad thing. We will have to live within our means and use our own industrial resources instead of importing goods and services. Cheap shirts made in China are not so cheap when they destroy our own garment industry and put British workers on the dole. And cheap imported labour is not so cheap when we have to feed, house and educate its dependants.

The age of arrogant capitalism ignoring national and social responsibilities is over. Throughout the boom cheap labour was imported from all over the world. It didn’t matter to the capitalists that Afro-Asian immigration was causing social problems so long as it was cheap and plentiful. The wheeler-dealers thought nothing of shutting down British factories and moving them to the Far East. But now imported labour is on the dole and overseas factories can no longer sell to cash strapped Britain.

Idealists like to think that William Wilberforce ended slavery. But it was actually more cost effective to employ white labour than to feed and house slaves. The same economic reality will force us to abandon Third World labour in favour of our own workforce.

Can we trust anyone?

Years ago the professional classes were respected. Doctors, lawyers, bank managers, school teachers, ministers of religion, local councilors, members of parliament, social workers, undertakers and even estate agents were upright citizens who were authorised to countersign our passport applications. Their integrity was rewarded by their status in society.

But today most of them have fallen from grace; doctors are little more than drug pushers, lawyers are professional liars, bank managers are hucksters, school teachers have abandoned their authority, the clergy no longer believe in anything, local councilors are at best incompetent, members of parliament are entirely distrusted, social workers are despised and estate agents are detested. Only undertakers have kept their position in society.

We can’t expect the rank and file to work hard and obey the law when their officers have gone to pot. Reform must start at the top. A few corrupt politicians sentenced to ten years imprisonment would encourage the others. Bent bankers and dodgy dealers would think twice if they faced stiff sentences instead of a gentle ticking-off.

Punishment should be proportionate not only to the crime but also to the status of the offender. Those who use their position for criminal ends should face harsher penalties than ordinary criminals. That includes policemen and lawyers who knowingly send down innocent men, doctors who dispatch their wealthy patients for a share of the family fortune, and local politicians who evict pensioners so that they can take over their houses. All of these things have been done and are being done on a regular basis.

Of course there are still decent and honest professionals who have not joined the rat race. They will keep things going when we finally come to our senses and sort out the crooks in high places.

The recession is a great auditor that has uncovered swindlers like Bernie Madoff who can only survive by taking money during an economic boom. But the entire banking system is based on the same deception. None of the international banks could repay their depositors if they all demanded their money back. They simply rob Peter to pay Paul.

Bankers and brokers provide legitimate services but they need to be controlled by law along with all the other professionals who handle our affairs. People who enjoy the advantages of education and position must be held accountable and those who take bribes must be dealt with as enemies of society. We have tried letting the professionals police themselves but they have proved that they cannot be trusted.

Freedom of speech

Simon Sheppard and Luke O’Farrell have unfashionable opinions but their freedom of speech is enshrined in the American Constitution and the UN Declaration of Human Rights. The Heretical website was no worst that many on the Internet. Their conviction is a blow against natural justice and honest debate. We have moved away from rigid artistic censorship but we are stuck in a politically correct mindset when it comes to the taboo subjects of race and identity. The twenty first century is supposed to be the age of open access and information technology. As Mosley said “let all things be discussed.”

This letter first appeared in Nationalist Week bppadmin@aryanunity,com


SUPPORT THE HERETICAL TWO!

Dear Nationalist,

I am writing to you with regard to the plight of the Heretical Two - Simon Sheppard and Steve Whittle (Luke O'Farrell) who were convicted at Leeds Crown Court last July on eleven counts and five counts respectively of so called 'speech crime'.

Conviction for these "speech crimes" is always very likely, as it is no longer necessary to prove intent to 'stir up racial hatred', as it is described in the emotive, insulting and deliberately misleading and imprecise language of these laws.  Simon and Steve sought political asylum in the USA before they could be sentenced and are currently being held in prison.  Subsequently Simon has been convicted in his absence on Thursday January 8, 2009 on a further six counts of 'speech crime'. Further details are available at www.heretical.com

The asylum hearings for the Heretical Two will be heard in Los Angeles in March 10, 12 and 24, 2009. It is critically important that both he, and Steve, should be professionally represented at the hearings.  Through Mark Weber of the Institute for Historical Review, they have found an excellent American attorney, Bruce Leichty (who previously represented Ernst Zundel), but funds are needed to meet his fees.

The sum of $30,000 will be required.  Half that sum has already been pledged on a 'dollar for dollar' basis by a supporter, so it is up to revisionists and nationalists in England, Europe and America to raise the balance.

I wish to make the importance of this case abundantly clear. It is not limited to the particular case of these two men, who face long terms of imprisonment for 'speech crime' if ever they are sent back to England.

Sheppard and Whittle have been convicted by an English court for publications on a web server in Torrance, California, on the basis that an English court is entitled to assert jurisdiction over writings on the internet if they can be downloaded in England (and not, I should emphasise, on the basis of their nationality, so this case is even worse than Ernst Zundel's.  The basis of the German court's assertion of jurisdiction in his case was that he is a German citizen.  The courts of most countries whose legal systems derive from the Roman or Civil Law, such as Germany, assert worldwide  jurisdiction over their own citizens).

Presumably, therefore the courts of any country from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe enjoy the same universal, long arm jurisdiction against dissidents who publish on the Internet, so rendering the protection of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America effectively illusory for any writer with the temerity to leave that country.
The asylum hearing in the case of the Heretical Two will set a precedent for dissidents all over Europe and in other lands whose benighted laws criminalise speech that outrages the selective sensibilities of their repressive political establishments.  If it fails, there will be nowhere for such people to flee.  If it succeeds, it will create a safe haven for dissidents and heretics, and profoundly humiliate the British authorities.

The question is not whether you like Sheppard and Whittle, or agree with their writings, or the other material posted on the Heretical site.  It is, quite simply, whether you are prepared to help ensure the effective representation of two men seeking to set a vital precedent for genuine asylum seekers from oppressive, liberticidal regimes, seeking refuge in the world's last true free speech zone.

Please give what you can in this crucial case in order to help win the battle against state oppression and to halt the slide into tyranny.

All Cheques, Postal Orders / Money Orders, etc. for the appeal fund to be made payable to:

The Croydon Preservation Society - details as follows: -
Lloyds-TSB - Sort code 77: 3003 - Account No 86187860
 
All donations can be posted to the address below.

P.O. Box 301
Carshalton
Surrey
SM5 4QW
UK
 
For further details of the campaign, or other ways to donate, contact paullballard@totalserve.co.uk or admin@drypool.org



Global War – part three

This concludes the article that first appeared on Sharon Ebank’s website in 2007.

In Europe the Kosovo Liberation Army, the Basque ETA and the Provisional IRA are all fighting to change the political map. There are many political movements wanting home rule for various provinces from Cornwall to Corsica. In fact there is hardly a country in Europe without a regional breakaway movement but the military groups are a much greater menace than the political.

To be effective an army needs weapons and ammunition. These can be bought on the open market or smuggled across borders. Shiploads of arms were intercepted on their way to Northern Ireland but we could never stop the majority of arms shipments from getting through. American supporters financed the IRA and it was not until the 9-11 terrorist attacks on New York and Washington that the donations dried up. The Irish Republicans are now close to achieving their aims by political participation and have signed a cease-fire. They have destroyed weapons under the terms of the cease-fire but they could easily rearm and muster if the political process broke down.

Tony Blair has made a big issue out of fighting terrorism at home and abroad but he signed the peace deal with the IRA that triggered the release of multiple killers from prison. He is currently waging a campaign against the Scottish and Welsh nationalists and stressing the importance of the unity of the UK but he didn’t worry about the Northern Ireland Unionists when he signed his deal with the IRA terrorists.

At their peak the IRA was capable of mounting bombings anywhere in the UK. They struck at military and civilian targets and caused thousands of deaths. But their real breakthrough was when President Bill Clinton forced Tony Blair to the conference table. The American appointed Mitchell Commission arranged the cease-fire and spelled out the terms of the political settlement.

In response to the IRA the Protestants rallied to the Ulster Volunteer Force and its many offshoots. But these paramilitary forces that were inspired by patriotism and loyalty degenerated into criminal gangs almost totally devoted to drugs and racketeering. Britain used the paramilitaries as “friendly terrorists” with devastating effect on the IRA but MI5 found that they could not trust of control them. Eventually Britain was beaten not by the IRA but by American manipulation.

Spain has been afflicted by a similar movement to the IRA; the Basque separatist ETA who mounted a thirty year terrorist war against the Spanish state. The ETA and the IRA shared explosives technology and cooperated with arms smuggling. They have also agreed to a cease-fire and are participating in the Spanish federalist arrangements that have granted autonomy to the regions.

Just as the IRA benefits from sympathizers in North America so the ETA rely on the Basque Diaspora of South America to fund their terrorist campaign. When General Franco rescued Spain from communism he dealt harshly with the Basque nationalists who sided with the Red Republic. The ETA attempt to justify their mass murder by the events of the Civil War, aided and abetted by the usual suspects amongst the liberal democrats. Ireland and Spain are peaceful at present and it is hoped that political agreements will be successful.

In the Serbian province of Kosovo the Americans intervened on the side of the Albanian Kosovo Liberation Army. The KLA was financed by heroin trafficking and fielded 50,000 guerrillas against the Serbian Army; but they had limited success until the Americans intervened on their behalf in 1999 with crippling air strikes on Belgrade. The Serbs were forced to withdraw and President Slobodan Milosevic was forced out of office and eventually hounded to his death. An ex-Yugoslav Brigadier General of Albanian stock called Agim Ceku who is wanted in Serbia for war crimes and drug running now runs the province of Kosovo. It is policed by NATO forces and subsidized by the EU.

Soon after bombing the capital city of an historic European nation in order to impose a Muslim regime on Kosovo, the Americans began their war on terror against the Muslim states of Afghanistan and Iraq. Various theories have been advanced to explain America’s strange policy of sponsoring a terrorist movement with no apparent benefit to the USA. But nothing can adequately explain their behaviour; it’s looking increasingly likely that their foreign policy is based on total ignorance of history and culture. Maybe they were still in Ronald Regan mode – supporting Muslim freedom fighters against those Godforsaken communists just as they had in Afghanistan. Milosevic had been a communist for many years and a stalwart of the Yugoslav Federal Republic, perhaps that was reason enough to bomb Belgrade and carve up a sovereign state that had never been any threat to the United States or their interests.

Whatever their reasons they committed the crime, with the customary assistance of Tony Blair and our armed forces. They have made similar miscalculations throughout the world. They have directly attacked Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Libya and Sudan. They have waged proxy wars in Colombia, El Salvador, Liberia, Congo and Chad. And they have financed and supported Israeli aggression against Palestine, Jordan, Egypt and Syria. Currently they are threatening Iran and compiling the same dodgy dossiers that they used to justify the attack on Iraq.

Apart from Chechnya and the tribal uprising in Bougainville every conflict is something to do with America. They are financing, arming or fighting in all the wars in the world. There are CIA advisors with the Contras in Central America and they are certain to take an interest in the regime of Hugo Chavez in oil-rich Venezuela and the newly elected government of the socialist native leader Evo Morales in Bolivia.

They are training Iranian dissidents in Iraq and they risk alienating their NATO ally Turkey by supporting the Kurdish separatist movement. Once again America has stirred up a hornet’s nest by backing the Kurds against the Iraqi central government. The Kurdish Peshmerga guerrilla army threatens Iran, Syria and Turkey from the safe haven of Iraqi Kurdistan. The Turks are now fighting Kurdish insurgents in the south and suffering a terrorist bombing campaign in their holiday resorts and major cities.

So long as Britain maintains her special relationship with America we will be part of their military empire and our armed forces will be committed to it. Britain and all the nations of the world must insist on collective security and impose sanctions on states that use aggression in pursuit of policy. The capitalists that rule America would not like to be shut out of world markets and would restrain the warmongers in Washington from annihilating entire nations.

Russian, Japanese and Chinese diplomatic pressure has forced America and North Korea to reach an agreement over nuclear weapons. Europe and Russia acting together would have a similar sobering effect on American foreign policy. As Europe and Russia grow in industrial and economic power American strategists will be forced to reconsider their objectives. The New American Century might be one of retreat instead of expansion.

The final countdown

The full extend of Britain’s national debt is so bad that some economists fear a total collapse of the economy. When Argentina went bankrupt as a result of the Falklands conflict in 1982 she was in a better position than we are today. Forty million Argentines share a country almost as big as India that is self-sufficient in food and oil. When the peso collapsed it didn’t matter so much as it would here but it nevertheless brought down the military government. We are not self-sufficient and rely heavily on imported fuel and food.

The shortsighted buffoons who managed our economy have done nothing to protect us from economic meltdown. We have pitiful reserves compared to most of our contemporaries and our decision to stay out of the euro has condemned us to a sinking pound. The petty nationalists’ dream of “independence” will suffer a reality check when the supermarket shelves are empty and the power is cut off.

When Chancellor Denis Healey went cap in hand to the International Monetary Fund in 1976 we had plenty of gas and oil as collateral. But this time it’s unlikely that the IMF will bail us out. According to the American investment guru Jim Rogers Britain is on the verge of bankruptcy. All we can do is work and save just as the Japanese have since their economic collapse of 1989.

The unfolding economic disaster will mean the end of the dangerous delusion that most Britons have been living under. We will have to face the fact that we are not a great military power that can afford to fight colonial wars all over the world; or have fleets of aircraft carriers showing the flag in foreign parts. We will be forced to abandon our obsession with America and her “war on terror.” We will have to grow up and start living like 21st century Europeans instead of 19th century imperialists.

We will have to stop encouraging an idle underclass to live on drugs and benefits. And we will have to dismantle the ridiculous race relations industry. If people want to study “black history’ let them go to Africa for an authentic education. We could save millions by returning the police to policing instead of them being enforcers for the Labour Party and part-time social workers. Every level of local and national government thrives on a culture of waste and overpayment. We must decimate the civil service and local government.

We will be forced to keep our politicians at home instead of letting them jet around the world on pointless missions. It’s insane that nearly bankrupt Britain is still doling out foreign aid to oil-rich countries like Nigeria. And Gordon Brown’s suggestion that Britain should use the Royal Navy to police the Palestine border must rank as his most fatuous statement to date. If bankruptcy brings hunger we can at least be consoled by the knowledge that the corrupt and vainglorious criminals of Westminster are facing the final countdown.

Views on the news

The many brave Jews who have spoken out against Israeli aggression have put silent politicians of all parties to shame. Gerald Kaufman MP condemned the destruction of Gaza and called for sanctions against Israel. And leading Jews in Britain, France, America and Israel supported him. The blanket accusation of “anti-Semitism” is not so easily leveled at Jewish critics of Israel. The United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon has described the situation in Gaza as “heartbreaking” and the UN has used the words “war crimes” for the first time. The International Red Cross has stated that there was no reason to shell a building full of women and children. Israel’s blitz on Gaza was indefensible and those who excused it will not be forgiven. The entire world has been outraged by three weeks of carnage. Gideon Levy writing in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz on 26-01-09 summed up the situation: “We have gained nothing in this war save hundreds of graves, some of them very small, thousands of maimed people, much destruction and a besmirching of Israel’s image.” 

When the Brown government runs out of money and credit it will be forced to cut public spending. Their defence programme will have to be reviewed. We cannot afford to update Trident and build a new fleet of submarines and aircraft carriers. We are not running a worldwide empire on which the sun never sets and we should not divert funds needed for health and education to the military. The only reason to for us to enlarge the navy is to help America to rule the world. The Brown-Cameron acceptance of American hegemony is also entrenched in the minds of our top brass. They don’t mind being auxiliaries to the Americans as long as they get new ships and missiles to play with. But there is a vital role for the military. We must bring our troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan and deploy them as border guards. Britain and all of Europe is under the constant threat of Third World invasion. We should use our armed forces for their original purpose, to defend the homeland and resist invasion.

The BBC is another colossal waste of money. We should keep a state-owned broadcasting service but it must be trimmed down to an acceptable size. There is no need for so many BBC radio stations and television channels. And there is certainly no need to pay Jonathan Ross six million pounds a year to talk like a dirty schoolboy. The corporation is a bloated monstrosity that is increasingly out of touch with reality. It should be reorganised from top to bottom and replaced with a basic public service facility with one radio station and one TV channel.

The euphoria surrounding the inauguration of President Barack Obama was the same that greeted Tony Blair in 1997. The same gushing words were used to extol his youth and good looks, and the same hopes were entrusted to a media promoted spokesman for big business. Tony Blair turned out to be a useless prime minister who led us into two bloody wars, threw open the floodgates of immigration and ruined the economy. Barack Obama will be no different because he belongs to the same political consensus that dominates the so-called democracies. It’s no wonder that such leaders give billions to the banks that own them body and soul. Barack Obama will obey the orders of the great corporations that dominate America.  He enjoys the support of black Americans and poor whites that see him as a champion of the dispossessed. But it will not take long for them to realize that he is just another disappointment.

As the recession gets worst the possibility of a “government of national unity” is being discussed. The Labour Party faces annihilation at the next election and the Tories are clearly unable to offer any viable alternative. The return of Kenneth Clarke to the opposition front bench would give a national coalition at least one man who knows what he is talking about. But the Euro-sceptic Tories are still parroting Daily Telegraph editorials about the demise of the euro as the pound sinks to new lows against the dollar.  The Old Gang politicians are rearranging the deckchairs as the SS Great Britain steams into the icebergs. They will probably only wake up when the icy waters of economic ruin sweep over them. The public is beginning to realize that the bipolar parliamentary system offers no hope for the future. The Tories are still fighting “dirty foreigners” at Agincourt and the Labour Party is hopelessly stuck in the cloth cap era of the Thirties. We live in interesting times.

Issue 42, March 2008


Nation Revisited

An occasional e-mail to friends. # 42, March 2008

Believing your own propaganda

Politicians tell you what you want to hear. When speaking to farmers they promise to promote agriculture. When talking to the middle class they promise immigration control and stronger measures on law and order. And when they are courting the immigrant vote they promise new laws against discrimination and extra handouts.

They are all things to all men. Their real interest is in preserving their privileged positions and inflated salaries. If they start out with a set of principles they tell themselves that the end justifies the means. We are only saying that in order to get into power; we are really socialists, conservatives, racialists – take your pick.

The trouble is that the leadership manipulates party members. So people who join a political party to fight for a declared programme find themselves supporting all sorts of policies that they never subscribed to. They have been hijacked by unscrupulous populism and their good intentions are lost in a fog of half-truths and distortions.

That is exactly what happened to the UK Labour Party. In order to get elected Tony Blair abandoned socialism and turned Labour into a reactionary party strongly allied to George Bush and the neocons. They took Britain to war on a tissue of lies and sold off all that remained of the state-owned industries. There may still be dedicated members working for peace and progress but their leaders long ago embraced plutocracy.

As Friedrich Nietzsche said, “If you stare into the Abyss long enough the Abyss stares back at you.” And if you preach nonsense because you think it will make you popular you will end up believing it.

People do not know what’s best for them. Given the chance they would reinstate hanging and flogging for a variety of offences. They seldom think beyond the last move and rarely consider the bigger picture. People are tribal, spiteful and selfish in equal measure. Of course they can also be wise and compassionate, but only if given leadership and guidance. That’s the function of religion and politics.

No government could collect taxes without consent. People can be persuaded to accept laws and obligations without necessarily endorsing them. Instead of pandering to their irrational fears politicians should be trying to educate them. But they find it easier to spout worn out clichés about “national independence” and the “clash of civilizations.” The danger is that people will actually believe them.

Natural resources

Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice claims that we are fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq to keep the world safe from terrorism. Britain’s PM Gordon Brown agrees with her and will call for more troops at the forthcoming NATO summit in Bucharest. Neither of them mentioned the 1,680 km trans-Afghanistan pipeline that is being constructed to supply 33 billion cubic metres of gas per year from the Dauletabad gas field in Turkmenistan.

9-11 was planned and executed in the United States by Saudis led by an Egyptian Mohamed Atta. The alleged mastermind Khalid Mohammed is a Kuwaiti and the infamous Osama bin Laden is a Saudi, now thought to be hiding in the mountains of Pakistan. The 7-11 attacks in London were the work of British-based Pakistanis and the botched follow-up operation was by Somali immigrants. The Madrid train bombing was by Moroccans based in Spain and the Bali bombing was by Indonesians. Not one of these terrorists was an Afghan. 

Coalition forces in Afghanistan and Iraq are meeting with stiff resistance. We hailed the courage of the Polish Home Army, the French Resistance and Marshal Tito’s Yugoslav Partisans for fighting the Germans. They fought with any means at their disposal and we backed them with money, personnel, weapons and military intelligence. We even backed the Afghan rebels when they were fighting the Soviet occupation. In those days the Mujahideen were praised as heroic freedom fighters but now they are dismissed as terrorists and fanatics.

The collapse of the Soviet Union inspired the neo-conservatives to launch their master plan for the “New American Century.” They have established military bases throughout the world, even provocatively on Russia’s borders. The US Navy dominates the oceans and NATO has become an imperial army committed to enforcing the “Pax Americana.”

They calculate that thousands of dead allied soldiers are an acceptable price to pay for Iraq’s 112 billion barrels of oil. But the $10 billion dollars a month of military spending is destroying the American economy. It would be better spent on healthcare and social security. George Bush’s attempt to seize the world’s energy supplies is doomed to failure. Only international agreement can ensure a fair distribution of natural resources.

Russia has paid off her foreign debts and amassed reserves of $470 billion by selling gas and oil to Europe. But China is buying oil in Sudan and Burma in defiance of American trade embargos. They are America’s great trading partner and massive holders of US dollars and bonds. It would be damaging for both countries if they fell out over oil. America faces economic as well as military disaster unless she gets rid of the neocon warmongers. Having the world’s biggest and most expensive armed forces will not guarantee future oil supplies.

Bugging MPs

The House of Commons has been having a fit of moral indignation about MP Sadiq Khan being bugged during his prison visits to suspected terrorist Baba Ahmad. Such surveillance apparently violates the “Wilson Doctrine” of 1966, a convention that forbids the bugging of MPs by the security forces.

Our elected representatives have decided that it’s fine for us to be bugged so long as they are left alone. They think that they are above suspicion and that their relationship with their constituents is as sacred as that between a doctor and patient. Nevertheless they are proposing that electronic surveillance should be allowed as prosecution evidence.

No section of British society harbours more political extremists and potential traitors than parliament. Prominent members of the governing party owed spiritual allegiance to the Soviet Union during the Cold War. And elected members of Sinn Fein maintained a close relationship with the IRA during the terrorist campaign leading to the power-sharing agreement.

The incessant sleaze reports of recent years have linked politicians to illegal payments from businessmen seeking favours. This has affected both old gang parties and has involved cabinet ministers and ordinary MPs. The case against Tony Blair for accepting payments for honours seems to have evaporated but new scandals involving the ruling Labour Party are being investigated.

MPs think that they are too important to be bugged. But history shows that they are more likely to be involved in financial irregularities, criminal conspiracies and terrorist activities than the rest of us.

Britain has a long tradition of political corruption at all levels of government. Bribes have always been solicited ranging from millions of pounds for defence contracts down to a few thousand pounds for planning permission. It did not take the arrival of Third World carpetbaggers to seduce our elected representatives but their presence has added an exotic touch to the Westminster bazaar.

Every government in the world eavesdrops on private conversations and phone tapping is as old as the telephone. The police and the security forces are bound to spy on people; that’s what they are paid for. The taxman has got access to your bank account, the utility companies know all your bank details and your supermarket even knows what you like to eat.

We are living in a surveillance society and it’s not going to get any better. The only thing that we can do is to insist that there is one law for all. Politicians must not be granted special dispensation. The relationship between an MP and his constituent is no better than that between a prostitute and her customer.

Understanding academics

The Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams has caused a storm by mentioning Sharia, the legal system based on Muslim teachings. Very few of his critics have actually read what he said before exploding with indignation. They have simply heard the word “Sharia” and reacted predictably.

Dr Rowan Williams is an academic who speaks in an obtuse and intellectual way that is hardly understood by the common people. It’s very difficult to follow his train of thought and much easier to pick out key phrases and write alarmist headlines around them.

The Press did the same thing with Enoch Powell. He made so many classical and biblical references that few people knew what he was talking about. He was an old-fashioned Tory free trader who thought that Britain was admitting too many blacks and Asians. He was never a racist. He was a devout Christian and an accomplished linguist who spoke several Indian languages.

As Minister of Health in Harold Macmillan’s government he imported West Indians to work in the National Health Service. But in 1968 his “Rivers of Blood” speech captured the mood of the public and resulted in the end of his career as a Tory cabinet minister.

Few of the workingmen who marched in support of Enoch Powell would have agreed with his proto-Thatcherite views on selling off the state owned industries and allowing “market forces” to determine unemployment and inflation rates. But they knew that he was calling for immigration control and they agreed with him.

Now it’s Dr Rowan Williamson’s turn to be misunderstood. He merely acknowledged that ethnic minorities “inevitably” look to their own traditions when dealing with legal matters within their own communities. But his matter of fact statement has been misinterpreted as a call for the adoption of Sharia Law.

Under the strictest interpretation of this system many of our bribe-taking politicians would be missing some of their limbs and we would probably run out of stones to throw at their adulterous wives and daughters. It’s not surprising that these serial recidivists are so outraged by the Archbishop of Canterbury’s innocent, if somewhat naïve, remarks.

We need a written constitution that’s entirely free from religious interference. If some people want to go to Church on Sunday that’s fine, and if others want to play football or go shopping that’s their business. Minorities must not be allowed to dictate to the rest of us. When we were uneducated peasants we needed priests as magistrates and teachers. But all that is in the past; today the Law must be at the service of the People.

Democracy

British society has never been overburdened with intellectualism. The old aristocracy put their brightest offspring into business, their bravest sons into the Army and their oddballs into the Church. The Arts were considered to be at least effeminate and probably degenerate. “Cleverness” was regarded as a foreign thing that was not to be encouraged. It offered no advantage on the battlefield or when hunting and fishing.

Our new aristocracy is made up of footballers and entertainers that are usually semi conscious and spend their undeserved fortunes on narcotics and rehabilitation clinics. They are obsessed with their own celebrity and devote their time to posing for the paparazzi. They think that their meaningless pronouncements are deeply significant and they support every politically correct campaign from global warming to the abolition of licensing laws. 

We have gone from the oafishness of the old order to the posturing pretence of the present without noticing it. The working class never understood their old masters and they are just as baffled by the new landed gentry. A constant barrage of second-rate game shows keeps them amused. They live on deep-fried take away food and spend their money on packaged holidays to destinations that they could not find on a map of the world.

Music is popular but the general public has little interest in painting or literature. Although over 90% of Europeans and Americans are literate very few of them read books or sensible newspapers. They read papers like The Sun and follow the latest exploits of their favourite stars.

But every four years these dedicated underachievers elect the government. People who have little idea what country they are living in decide who should govern them. Voters who are ignorant of history, economics and geography put illiterate crosses on ballot papers in support of opportunists who have flown in from all over the world.

White workers who are hostile to Afro-Asian immigration vote for Afro-Asian candidates, and homeowners struggling to meet mortgage payments vote for politicians who are on the boards of the banks that enslave them. This is the crazy system that we are currently trying to impose on fiercely reluctant Iraqis and Afghans.

If everybody embraces popular culture our long journey from the prehistoric caves will end in front of a television set. Noble ideas such as liberty and progress cannot compete with constant amusement. We must hope and pray that the innate defence mechanism of the human race is still intact and that there are enough gifted people left to save us from the disaster of democracy.

UKIP and NATO

MEP Gerard Batten made a speech on defence to the 2007 UKIP Conference. He was standing in for their official defence spokesman Rear Admiral Richard Heaslip who was unavoidably delayed by his late-docking cruise ship.

Batten started by outlining UKIP’s defence policy. “The purpose of a British defence policy must be to defend Britain, and our remaining overseas territories and overseas interests from attack, and a continuing commitment to NATO which has been the cornerstone of our defences over the last 58 years.”

His loyalty to NATO is matched by his enthusiasm for the “Special Relationship” and his suspicion of all things European. “The Europhiles like to say that the EU has kept the peace since 1945. No it hasn’t. It has been NATO that did that and our alliance with the United States of America.”

But his commitment to North Atlantic Treaty Organisation starts to disintegrate a few paragraphs later. “We should urgently reappraise our involvement in Afghanistan and review our commitment.” Batten’s loyalty to the USA is also in doubt: “Our forces in Iraq are now little better than sitting ducks in a shooting gallery. We should withdraw them in good order as soon as possible.”

It’s difficult to see how UKIP can have a commitment to NATO, “which has been the cornerstone of our defences for the last 58 years,” and at the same time advocate the withdrawal of our “sitting duck” army from Afghanistan. And it is not clear how Britain can have independent military forces when they are under NATO command.

Batten rightly suspects that the EU has its own military agenda. “The failed European Constitution, and its successor the so-called Reform Treaty, clearly states the intent to create common European Foreign Policy leading to a common European defence – as they phrase it – or as you and I might call it, a European Army.”

He surely doesn’t think that our participation in the proposed European Defence Force would be more harmful to British interests than our continued membership of NATO. He has already questioned our involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq. He must know that British troops under NATO command are not acting independently but on behalf of the New World Order.

UKIP’s defence strategy is as muddle-headed as the rest of their policies. We have no independence within NATO. It’s an instrument of American foreign policy that is provoking Russia and trying to revive the Cold War. We cannot remain in NATO and withdraw our forces from Iraq and Afghanistan. As George Bush famously said, “you are either with us or against us.”

The Multi-cultural disaster

The French attempt to assimilate Afro-Asians has left their major cities teeming with disaffected and unemployed second-generation immigrants. The French discouraged foreign languages and even tried to ban cultural icons like the Muslim headscarf. Every effort was made to integrate Third World immigrants and turn them into black and brown Frenchmen. But this exercise in cultural imperialism has ended in total failure. Immigrant riots have become a summertime fixture and the Sarkozy government only survives by stealing the rhetoric of the Front National. Now the race traitors that aided and abetted the non-European invasion are spouting patriotic slogans and talking about “defending French values.”

Britain took a completely different approach to the problem. Instead of trying to turn blacks and Asians into Britons we “celebrated diversity.” Alien languages and customs were promoted; “Black Studies” and “Diversity Awareness” was force-fed to our children. Countless millions of pounds were poured into immigrant areas and the police were hamstrung by political interference. The result has been an identical failure to the French model, and our cities are just as violent and lawless. The French failed to achieve racial harmony and so have we.  The same alienated second-generation immigrants are seething with hatred for the indigenous population. And the same white liberals are wringing their hands and wondering where they went wrong.

Law and convention have enforced political correctness. In a boxing match between a black and a white fighter the commentator will refer only to the colour of their shorts. Every media outlet has contributed to this illusion of racial harmony The hero of every American cop show is a black man and the desperate criminal is always white and often British.

But despite fifty years of relentless propaganda and state bullying non-whites are still seen as outsiders. Some white kids who grew up in multiracial areas have adopted alien lifestyles but most are proud of their heritage and are ready to defend it.

While the postwar boom lasted our greedy bosses couldn’t get enough Third World labour.  But now that George Bush has plunged the world into recession there is no need for them. If we still need workers there are plenty of Europeans available. It’s becoming clear that liberal propaganda in favour of non-European immigration had more to do with economic exploitation than brotherly love. Legions of social workers, schoolteachers, ministers of religion and politicians have failed to achieve their dream of a multiracial utopia. Now even they are beginning to question mass migration and the viability of the multi ethnic state. The genie of repatriation has been let out of the bottle and will not be put back by repressive legislation.

Views on the news

The independence of Kosovo is a political deception that changes nothing. Kosovo remains a EU protectorate occupied by 16,000 NATO troops. The Kosovars are still unemployed and their economy is still in ruins. They are victims of petty statism and international interference. Kosovo was a self-governing province of the Yugoslav Federation under Josip Broz Tito. But President Slobodan Milosovic took away their autonomy following Tito’s death in 1980. Yugoslavia has been carved into seven mini states and separatists from Cornwall to Transdniestria are threatening to turn Europe into a patchwork of glorified parishes. The Yugoslavs came together because they spoke related languages and shared a common history. They have been pulled apart by tribalism but eventually they will be part of United Europe. The evolving system of regional, national and federal government will protect all of our traditions. Those who can’t imagine hostile states working together should remember what Britain, France, Germany and Italy were doing to each other less than 70 years ago.

Gordon Brown was considered a good economic manager during the Tony Blair decade. As Britain shared in the worldwide boom his authority was established. But the collapse of Northern Rock and the threat of global recession have severely dented his reputation. Our Chancellor has been revealed to be a mere spectator with as much economic power as Robert Mugabe has in Zimbabwe. Britain is tied to a global economy that is driven by war and regulated by the price of oil. We are as independent as Puerto Rico and as sovereign as the Virgin Islands. The dreamers of UKIP must understand that our only hope of genuine independence lies in separating ourselves from “free trade” and building a viable alternative. Nicolas Sarkozy, Angela Merkel and Gordon Brown are committed to global capitalism. But Europe has the potential to develop into an economic superpower that can break free from Wall Street.

Filmmaker Steven Speilberg has resigned as artistic director to the Beijing Olympics in protest at China’s trade with Sudan. He thinks that China should do more to stop the fighting in Darfur between the central government and the rebels. The African conflict has killed and maimed thousands but it cannot be compared to the genocide in Palestine. The good and the great are protesting about Darfur but they are not interested in Palestine. Speilberg should focus the attention of the world on Palestine as he has on Sudan. All victims are deserving of sympathy and their oppressors are just as guilty whatever their ethnicity. America and Europe have consistently ignored Israeli aggression and maintained a deafening silence on their weapons of mass destruction. Not content with confining the Palestinians of Gaza to the world’s largest concentration camp the Zionists are now starving them to death. We have the necessary diplomatic machinery and military forces to police these trouble spots. But we lack the collective will to put down tyranny and protect human rights, especially when the humans concerned are Palestinians.

Friday, 24 August 2012

Issue 6, April 2006


Nation Revisited

April 2006. #6
An occasional email to friends

Surviving Westminster

Parties of the so-called far Right have been campaigning for over eighty years without returning a single Member of Parliament. The prewar Blackshirts were a mass movement with a charismatic leader, thousands of members, regional offices and scores of paid officials. The National Front of the Seventies was also a nationwide party that dominated the headlines with their volatile marches and meetings. But although these parties achieved a high level of support and a great deal of publicity, they never managed to get a candidate elected to parliament.

The Reds used to say that it didn’t matter if they had no MPs because there were enough far Left Labour members to promote their cause; but the nationalist movement has had very few friends in Parliament.
John Beckett was very much a socialist during his time as an Independent Labour MP before he left to join Mosley’s BUF.

Captain Ramsey was opposed to the war and the warmongers but he was a Tory and a traditionalist rather than a fascist.

Enoch Powell was famously opposed to immigration but he believed in parliamentary democracy and was opposed to authoritarianism.

There have been several MPs who have said all the right things but none of them have been nationalists in the sense that they believed in race and nation. Now, for the first time, we may be close to getting a decent candidate elected to what Jack Lelieve used to call “that once august establishment the House of Commons.”

The ethnic riots in Birmingham and the terrorist bombings in London can only help the BNP. People are afraid and for the future and sick of the sleaze associated with the old gang parties.

Although the first past the post electoral system favours the status quo, a good nationalist candidate in the right area could just make it.

It is important that such a candidate is not seduced by the culture of Westminster and its ancient tradition of bribery and corruption..

Most MPs are only interested in their own careers; party differences do not stop them from being mates who drink in the same bars with middlemen and fixers.

These amoral degenerates do not support the New World Order out of conviction but because they are handsomely paid to do so.

A weak-minded character exposed to this atmosphere of overwhelming corruption would soon become infected with parliamentary paralysis of the personality.

The people we send to Westminster must be imbued with the highest principles of our movement if they are to keep their integrity. They must remember that they are there to represent the British people; not to take bribes, enjoy free holidays and accept letterhead directorships.


Marvin Dag                                                                                                 
                                                                                                            
The incredible career of Marvin Dag began in 1916 when he was born in the foothills of the Himalayas to his Indian Army parents. The young Marvin was sent to Scotland for a Spartan education at McSnotties before going to Oxford. He quit his studies in 1936 to fight in the Spanish Civil War as a volunteer with General Eoin O’Duffy’s Irish Brigade.

He lost an eye at Ciempozuelos and was mentioned in dispatches.

In 1938 he arrived in London and immersed himself in fascist activities. In 1939 he split with Mosley, Leese, Joyce and Beckett and founded the short-lived and little-known National Socialist Direct Action Party. This small but dynamic movement specialized in attacking other people’s meetings and by the outbreak of war most of its members were serving prison sentences for assault. Dag was interned under Regulation 18B until 1944.

He used his time in Brixton Prison to write his first book ‘Fighting for Peace.’ In 1946 he was charged with causing an affray and remanded in custody until 1948 when the case was dropped for lack of evidence. He tried to sue the Attorney General for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment but with no success.

In 1949 Marvin Dag became disillusioned with life in Britain. He decamped to Argentina and secured a position with the General Confederation of Labour. He became a confidant of President Juan and Evita Peron and worked tirelessly for the Peronist movement until the CIA sponsored coup of 1955. He then spent five years in Paraguay doing welfare work amongst distressed German immigrants.

He returned to the UK in time for the great fascist revival of the early Sixties and progressed through the rosary of the Right from Empire Loyalist to National Front.

Marvin Dag became so depressed by the faction fighting of the late Seventies that he suffered a nervous breakdown. This was aggravated by immoderate drinking and resulted in him spending two years recovering in an American clinic. 

He founded a new movement the New Social Distributist Alliance Party in 1984.

The NSDAP refuses to take part in the democratic process but still functions from Dag’s remote highland retreat at Dounraey. The party issues an occasional bulletin called “The People’s Observer,” edited by their nonagenarian leader.

Marvin dag has always inspired loyalty or loathing. Mosley dismissed him as a dreamer,

Leese was convinced that he was working for the State; Chesterton said that he was mad.

But Tyndall admired his positive attitude; Bean thought him a likable chap and hundreds of followers are still loyal to the grand old man of the extreme Right.

His works include:
Fighting for Peace: an account of the anti-war campaign. 1946
Justice Denied: the story of his legal action against the government. 1949
Peron in Perspective: a tribute to the Argentine President. 1955
March of The Right: the British nationalist scene in the Sixties. 1967
Getting it Wrong: the decline of the British nationalist movement. 1983
Life on The Front Line: his autobiography. 1995

These books are available from the usual sources or direct from NSDAP Publications
PO Box 88, Princedale Road, London W11.
 
Keep it Simple                                                                                                         

Political parties without MPs do not need to publish detailed manifestos. They should stick to general principles and avoid unnecessary arguments about policy. The Tories need a manifesto that covers every issue because they could be called upon to form a government, but the nationalist movement is not in this position and should keep it simple.

Benito Mussolini came to power in 1922 as leader of a movement of ex-servicemen, unemployed workers and ruined members of the middle-class. Their revolution was a reaction to economic collapse. Mussolini proclaimed – “Those who form the productive class must know that Fascism wants to impose nothing more than order and discipline upon the Nation and to help raise the strength with which to renew progress and prosperity.” In the next twenty years the movement’s political policies were developed but when the Blackshirts marched on Rome they were concerned only with taking power.

The British National Party is well known because of the race hate trials and the National Front is remembered for their marches and demonstrations. Many people, and most newspapers, confuse the two parties or think that they are one and the same. But people vote against immigration and do not care what the party is called or exactly what its policies are. The 5 – 10% vote for nationalist candidates in parliamentary elections and the 10 – 30% in local elections have been consistent since the war.

With more than twenty councilors throughout the country the BNP is poised to make the breakthrough to parliamentary representation. When we achieve this it will be time to start thinking about detailed policies but until then we should concentrate on the main issue. Existing and proposed legislation will severely limit what parties can print in their manifestos. There is no point in publishing policies that will lead to imprisonment.

It is sufficient to state that we believe in Britain for the British; getting involved in arguments about exactly who is British, or who goes or stays is unnecessary for a party that has no MPs and no authority.

In 1922 the problem throughout Europe was unemployment and recession; today it’s the threat to our culture and ethnic survival. This core issue unites all factions and it is perfectly legal to call for an end to non-European immigration. As members of the EU we are obliged to accept fellow Europeans but we can legally object to non-Europeans on ‘political’ rather than racial grounds.  People know what we stand for and there is no need to get involved in heated debates or legal actions.

The 2005 General Election produced some good results but in a couple of areas there were competing nationalist candidates. The nationalist parties must agree on an electoral pact. If a particular party has got a good chance in a constituency that they have long cultivated it is only common sense to support them. This may be difficult for the party leaders but they must do it.

Views on The News                                                                                 

The steady increase in temperature threatens to melt the polar icecaps and raise sea levels. This would flood low-lying territories and cause meteorological problems throughout the world. It is thought that this phenomenon is due to the pollution from power generation, heavy industry and motor traffic.

We can reduce industrial pollution by using cleaner fuels and by treating emissions, but cars can only be controlled by political action. Buses and trains must be made available and the use of motor vehicles limited. Of course, no democratic government is going to commit political suicide by proposing such measures. When Bill Clinton was Governor of Arkansas he taxed car use to pay for road improvements. But the angry motorists reacted so violently that he had to scrap the taxes and apologize. This taught Bill never to mess with motorists and that you can always get out of trouble by apologizing.

Slobodan Milosevic has cheated the UN war crimes tribunal in The Hague by dying in custody. He was as bad as Franjo Trudman of Croatia and Alija Izetbegovic of Bosnia but certainly no worse. The Yugoslav disaster shows what can happen when Europeans forget their common ancestry and revert to tribalism. The Yugoslavs came together because they are the same people. The Croats and Slovenes adopted Catholicism under the Austro- Hungarian Empire. The Bosniaks were influenced by the Ottoman Empire and adopted Islam. The Serbs and Macedonians looked to Russia and remained Orthodox. These nations united under a popular monarchy and later under Marshal Josip Tito, but when he died the federation was torn apart by petty nationalists.

We must ensure that sectarian division in Ireland and linguistic division in Spain and Belgium do not threaten European solidarity as in the Balkans.

The sale of seats in The House of Lords to wealthy businessmen is hardly a new development. In the old days it was the King who dished out titles for cash, now it is Tony Blair. The answer is to sell peerages on the open market. We could get one of the great auction houses to handle it. Bids could be accepted by phone from America and Japan and we could create thousands of new peerages. At a million pounds a time this would help to pay for the National Health Service or buy a few missiles to fire at Iraqi civilians. The newly noble Lords could pose in their ermine and coronets for photos to be sent home to Tokyo or Crawford, Texas.

The latest riots in France were not just by disadvantaged African and Arab immigrants but included middle-class French people. The dismantling of France’s worker protection laws is the thin end of the wedge. France is copying the UK where it is much easier to sack people. This is part of the ‘flexible’ labour market so beloved of the New World order. The next step will be to adopt the American system where workers can be sacked on the spot without compensation. The civilized conditions enjoyed by French and German workers are what being European is all about. We will never be able to compete with the teeming masses of Asia and there is no reason why we should. This systematic undermining of labour is part of the world trade racket that would put all Europeans out of work in favour of cheaper workers from the far-east.
                                                                                                                                   
This article first appeared in ‘Action” in November 1980. In the 26 years since it was written the Soviet Union has been replaced by the Russian Federation and the big issue is now ‘The Clash of civilizations’ between Islam and the West.

Nick Griffin’s article in the March issue of ‘Identity’ examines this conflict and the role of pressure groups in manipulating American foreign policy.

He comes to the conclusion that there are many reasons for the current situation and that anyone who claims to know all the answers is a ‘crackpot.’

Conspiracy and Commonsense

Publications of the far Right all tend to subscribe to conspiracy theories. They claim that certain minorities are bent on subversion and attempt to prove their argument by quoting from obscure tracts, such as ‘The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion’ produced by the 19th Century Russian eccentric Sergei Nilus who believed that ‘hidden forces’ were conspiring to take over the world.

The fact is that there are two real powers in the modern world each openly seeking international control; the Soviet union which follows the avowed Marxist-Leninist objective of global hegemony, and the United States of America which heads international capitalism and naturally aims to export goods and credit to every nation.

Now a third ideology has emerged, an ever growing body of men and women who reject the excesses of communism and capitalism alike and are striving to create a new order of Europe and the former Dominions, a self-sufficient bloc free of both American-led capitalism and Soviet-dominated communism, but hostile to neither.

Only Europe the true mother of both the American and Russian civilizations has the resources, manpower and native genius to correct the mistakes of the past – such as non-European immigration into Britain – and lead the world of the next century, which clearly will be divided into geopolitical entities.

Historians of the future will not attribute the political disasters of today to secret cabals meeting in dark alcoves but to elected representatives meeting in open assemblies, motivated not by duplicity but by stupidity. The old parties blame each other, or the French or the Common Market for our ills. The conspiracy freaks denounce everybody from Buddhists to Baptists. We put the blame where it belongs; on the heads of bumbling politicians who cling to the worn-out thinking of the past and reject the modern scientific solutions, which only we advocate.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

‘European Action’ is the new publication edited by Robert Edwards in support of a National Party for Europe.

PO Box 415, Ramsgate, Kent CT11 9WW