Nation Revisited # 180 October 2021

Why the Tories and Labour love the Asian invasion: Edmund Morrison. White Nationalist Letter, April 2020

Veteran patriot Eddy Morrison died last year but through the wonder of the Internet his words live on. I only met Eddy once, at a New Right meeting about ten years ago, but I exchanged e-mails with him for many years. I didn't always agree with him but I admired his tenacity.

The Indian invasion of Britain took place in two significant waves; though tens of thousands are still pouring in, often illegaly. The first was in the late 40s and 50s when non-Whites were recruited directly from India by successive governments to fill the national shortage that resulted from the Second World War. What labour shortage? Millions of ex-servicemen came home to no job!

These non-Europeans mainly settled in the Midlands and North West of England, working in foundries and textile manufacturing. They were heavily involved in building Britain's anti-racist and trade union movements in the 50s and 60s, drawing on lessons learned from anti-colonial struggles back home to organise their communities in Britain. In other words they were anti-British agitators who wanted Indian independence and when they got it they headed for Britain!

To this day these communities are disproportionately working class and Labour voting. In more and more parliamentary constituences if you don't control the Asian vote you aren't going to get elected!

The second wave of Indian invaders to Britain were the so-called 'twice migrants' who arrived from East Africa in the 60s and 70s, having been expelled or encouraged to leave by the newly independent regimes in Uganda, Kenya and Tanzania. The families of our Chancellor, Home Secretary, and Attorney General are part of this latter group

So how and why have their descendants become so prominent on the Tory frontbenches? The answer begins in 1895 with the creation of the British East Africa Protectorate. British officials envisioned the Protectorate, which occupied roughly the same area as modern day Kenya, as the 'America of the Hindu', a settler colonial project to be led by Indians on behalf of the British. In the early 20th Century, thousands of Indians, mostly Goans, Gujaratis and Punjabis, were imported into East Africa as subcolonial agents of civilisation. They were recruited to work in colonial administration and serve in the colonial police and army, to keep the 'native peoples' in order. At the same time more than 30,000 indentured labourers were brought over from India to build the Kenya-Uganda railway.

Many of these labourers chose to settle in the Protectorate after the railway was completed. They were soon joined by many other Indian subjects who moved freely to the Protectorate in search of economic prosperity. Functioning as a subordinate ruling class, Indians in East Africa enjoyed success in business, finance and the professions throughout the colonial period, and gained significant control over the economy. By the time Kenya won its independence in 1963, Indians , who accounted for less than 3% of the population, owned more than two thirds of the country's private non-agricultural assets!

Although in most ways a lunatic, Idi Amin expelled all the Uganda Asians as he quite rightly saw they were running his country!

When this group of Indians arrived in Britain (very few of them went back to India) many brought with them the considerable wealth they had accured, along with a hostility towards Black Africans. Others brought with them the benefits of English-language education. These advantages virtually guaranteed the economic success of East African Indians in Britain, especially in the retail business of Margaret Thatcher's 'enterprise economy', for which they soon became known. Rishi Sunak's pharmacist mother and Priti Patel's newsagent-owning parents were typical of their generation.

The Conservative leadership of the time identified this demographic as potential voters. From the 80s onwards the Tories began to court an imagined 'Indian Community' limited to East African Indians who had settled around London. Successful British Indians were held up as evidence of what could be achieved under a free-market Conservative government. In 1988 Thatcher welcomed the new Indian High Commissioner to Britain with the following words: "We so much welcome the resourceful Indian community here in Britain. You have brought the virtues of family, of hard work, and of resolve to make a better life... you are displaying splendid qualities of enterprise and initiative, which benefit not just you and your families but the Indian community and indeed the nation as a whole."

This is the woman who lied to the British White electorate at the 1979 general election and helped wipe out what would have been a huge vote for the National Front. The Tories have always been liars and Thatcher, whilst busily smashing the White working class mining industry, praised the Asians.

Fast foreward to 2010, and the Conservatives held 30% of the British Indian vote. After 30 years of Thatcherite ideology, British Indians were the most pro-Conservative ethnic minority, after the Jewish community. After decades of gradual advance this number soared to 40% in 2017. In the 2019 election, as the Conservatives chased a realignment towards White Northern voters based on fake 'racist' scaremongering, support in constituencies with high Indian populations increased substantially again. At every point this has included members of both groups of Indian migrants. Now, British Indians make up 15% of the Tory Cabinet. The Tories have now managed to extend their appeal beyond the 'two time' migrants by finding common cause in a project of Islamophobia. Supported by the Indian government and its far-right ruling party, the BJP, the Conservatives have exploited a sharp rise in Hindu nationalism within the British Indian community to play off Hindu and Muslim communities against each other.

The Conservative campaign in Harrow East, a marginal constituency in which 25% of the voters are of Indian origin, provided the clearest example of this. The constituency's Conservative MP Bob Blackman, whose Twitter background photo shows him smiling next to Prime Minister Modi, saw fit to retweet a post by the far-right commentator Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (alias Tommy Robinson) that highlighted Muslim violence against Hindus. He stated that he had done this in error, but along with others in the Conservative Party, he has encouraged the portrayal of Labour as anti-Hindu and pro-Muslim, citing Labour's percieved support for the Kasmiri struggle for self-determination as evidence. In the 2019 election his majority increased by more than 6,000 votes, and he was sworn into parliament on the Bhagavad Gita! Another gifted liar!

As the Tories, Labour and the rest of the Westminster vermin struggle into their saris and kaftans the White voters of Britain's wishes are completely ignored! Only a policy of repatriation backed by a sensible and humane plan can restore our country back to its righful owners; we the British people!

Being born in a country may change your passport; it doesnt change your race. Cliff Richard isn't ever described as an Asian even though he was born in India.

We need to see a sensible and responsible Asian community in Britain who know that their skills, money and knowledge are urgently needed in Pakistan and India. But the Government wouldn't back such a 'Back to Asia' movement led by Asians.

A stamp on a passport can magically wipe out 100,000 years of racial evolution. Napoleon called us 'a nation of shopkeepers', I wonder what he would call us now?

NATO

The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation was founded in 1949 to protect North America and Western Europe from the Soviet Union. The founding states were; The USA, Canada, the UK, Norway, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Iceland, Portugal, and Italy. Turkey and Greece were admited in 1952 in reward for their gallant participation in the Korean War. Germany joined in 1955, Spain was admited in 1982 after the death of General Franco. Poland and Hungary joined in 1999 following the collapse of the Soviet Union. Slovenia, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia joined in 2004. Croatia and Albania joined in 2009 and North Macedonia in 2020.

The original purpose of NATO no longer applies because the Soviet Union has ceased to exist. It has been replaced by the Russian Federation which has no territorial ambition in Europe, with the possible exception of the Russian-speaking Donbas region of Ukraine. 

When NATO invaded Afghanistan and Iraq the enemy was distinctly anti-Communist. The Taliban had fought the Soviet Union for ten years and Sadaam Hussein was an Arab Nationalist who had destroyed the Communist Party in Iraq. 

The question must therefore be asked, what is NATO for? Attempts to turn it into a European defence force have so far come to nothing. But if  America continues the isolationist policies started by Donald Trump this could change. America contributes the most to NATO, so the European states would have to increase their efforts to sustain the Alliance. The position of Canada would have to be decided.

No European state can match America militarily but the UK, France, Germany, Spain and Italy, each have armies averaging 80,000, not counting reservists. They are already co-ordinated under NATO. If they pooled their resources we would have an army of 400,000, more than enough to deter any aggressor.

America shelters Europe under her nuclear umbrella but Britain and France possess their own nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them. Even without Trident and the Vanguard fleet we would still have our Astute class submarines that could be armed with nuclear-capable cruise missiles.

NATO made sense in 1949 when the threat of a Soviet invasion of Europe was real, but it's difficult to justify the cost to the American taxpayer. Future wars will almost certainly be fought outside our continent, where they should be the resposibility of the United Nations.

 

Is Putin A Sociopath? - Sam Dickson

Colleagues:

I get notices from an outfit called "Quora." They pose questions, give answers and invite comments. The one today inquired as to whether Putin was a sociopath. The answer was that yes, he probably is a sociopath. I'm pasting my comments below. I don't know how long it will be up. Sam

Comment:

This is really dumb. "Psychoanalysis" of someone you have never met based on what the hostile news media says about him. If Putin were a sociopath, he would not be taking controversial positions defending Russia and its people. He'd be a "go-along-get-along" type... along the lines of Angela Merkal. Or Biden. He would engage in gimmicks and posturing like the "insurection" hearings of the "Russia Investigations."

He would be sure to get in line with Maxine Waters like 219 Democrats in the Congress did when they refused unanimously to condemn Waters. Waters addressed a Black Lives Matter mob at the courthouse in Minneapolis as the jury in the George Floyd  case were a couple of days from beginning their deliberations. She threatened that if the jury didn't convict the cop, Blacks would riot all over America.

None of this bothered a single Democrat in the House. It would be different, of course, if the mob had been White, the rabble rousers had been in the Klan and the defendant had been Black or Jewish. Then it would have been like the Leo Frank case way back when in Atlanta. All 219 Democrats would be looking for photo ops to posture about how horrible it was.

If you're looking for sociopaths, look for them in Congress, the White House and among the judges in the courts. Look there. Republicans too. Don't think they are any better. But Putin? No. Putin cares about his people. The hallmark of a psychopath is that he does not connect with anybody else. He doesn't connect with his family. He doesn't connect with other kids on his Little League team. He doesnt connect with his fraternity brothers. He doesn't connect with his region. He dosen't connect with his race. He doesn't connect with his country. He's looking after number one! In short: he's the perfect "woke" White liberal. That's where you find your sociopaths. 

Letters to the Editor

From Bernard Franklin - theflameuk.com 

The Labour, Conservative, Liberal and Communist Parties all have similar nation-wrecking policies. They are led by Zionists, bankers, Freemasons and Fabians all a similar agenda. Spread the word we need to get rid of of the political parties and elect constituency candidates, chosen for their honesty, knowledge and ability.

Since 1980 houses and blocks of flats have been built all over the country from Northumberland on the Scottish border to London. The White British population is smaller now than it was in the 1960s so they are not needed. They are being built to get us White British outnumbered and outvoted by Blacks, Pakistanis, Chinese and others. More recently Chinese have been building them. China and Israel have recently linked up to try and control the world. 

Nation Revisited: You are right about the need for political reform. Hilaire Belloc and Cecil Chesterton wrote in 'The Party System':

We have just attempted a sketch of representative government as it ought to be, and the English people long believed that they had got, if not quite that, at least a decent approximation to it.  It was their boast that without bloodshed or violent severance with the past they had as much of the reality of self-government as the most perfectly planned Republic could have. In what degree this was ever true will form the matter of discussion later. But undoubtedly it was widely believed. Most Englishmen until very lately, if told that they were not self-governing, would have laughed in your face.

But now a dim suspicion has begun to arise in the minds of a least a section of the people that this historic optimism is not quite as true as it looks, that the electors do not as a fact control the Government, that something alien has intervened between electors and elected, between legislature and Executive, something that deflects the workings of representative institutions. That thing is the Party System. 

Those words were written in 1911 but they are just as true today. The party system serves big business, not the people. Our elected representatives should take their orders from their constituents, not from the party bosses. And they shouldn't be 'whipped' or face deselection for departing from the 'Party Line'. 

Gordon Strange 13 July 1950 - 3 September 2021

Our old friend Gordon Strange has died of Cancer at his Ramsgate home. Gordon was a long time member of the British National Party. He served in the Royal Fusiliers and worked for many years as a London bus driver. He was opposed to the EU but he regularly attended Friends of Mosley reunions. May he rest in peace.

Nation Revisited 

This blog seeks reform by legal means. All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. We uphold the United Nations' Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:

"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people"

European Outlook

Our sister blog is posted in support of Nation Revisited. https://europeanoutlook.blogspot.com 

 

 

   

Nation Revisited # 172 February 2021

Fishponds Road 

Mark Cotterill, the editor of 'Heritage and Destiny' magazine, asked me about Fishponds Road which was the last address of Action Society and its journal 'Action'.

`

It all started in 1931 when Oswald Mosley founded the New Party with 'Action' as its newspaper. Following disappointing results in the 1931 general election the party was disbanded, but it was replaced by the British Union of Fascists in 1932, The movement published 'The Blackshirt' which was edited by AK Chesterton, and 'Action' which was edited by Alexander Raven Thomson from 1939 until it was closed down under Defence Regulation 18B in 1940.

Oswald Mosley published 'The Alternative' in 1947. The BUF believed in Imperial Preference but the Second World War had destroyed the Empire and Mosley realised that our future was with Europe. Union Movement was founded in 1948 with 'Union' as its newspaper. 'Union' was edited by Alexander Raven Thomson. He died in 1955 and 'Union' was replaced in 1956 by 'Action' edited by Robert Row. Mosley died in 1981 and the paper's financial position was reported in 'Action' of July 1981:

"By the end of June 'Action' had survived six months since the death of Sir Oswald Mosley, which was not only a grievous personal loss to us, but also deprived us of the quarterly fee he was paying us for research and secretarial services we provided for him. This aggravated our already grave financial problems."

'Action' of November 1983 was published form its new address, Nash House, Fishponds Road, Tooting, London SW17. This served as the headquarters for Action Society until May 1992. The post-war publication of 'Action' began in 1956, when it replaced 'Union', edited by Robert Row. It ended in November 1992 following the death of Jeffrey Hamm, the leader of Action Society.

The Friends of Mosley organisation was founded in 1982 and 'Comrade' was published as their in-house journal in 1986 under the editorship of professional journalist and press photographer John Warburton. He died in 2004 but 'Comrade' continued to be published until 2017.

There's no longer a hard copy journal dedicated to Oswald Mosley's ideas but they are propagated by the Friends of Mosley website: www.oswaldmosley.com  

The Good Don't Realise How They Hand Power To Evil - Bernard Franklin

Many Europeans look aghast at the immoral actions of their government, as British and American servicemen, in particular, are sent to attack sovereign countries where we have no right to interfere. In whose interest are these attacks, usurpation of power, and theft of national assets taking place? The answer is the secretive New World Order that wants to rule the world. Are these murderers, corrupters, scaremongers, liars, cheats, thieves, destroyers of nations, cultures and civilisations really the kind of people who should be in charge of Western governments and as a result, have the ability to legislate for developing countries? The answer must certainly be no!

There are millions of good Christians who attend church every week ro ensure they follow God's laws. These churchgoing Christians, even collectively, do not possess the power to start warts, put countries in debt, or bully nations into acceding to unreasonable demands. Yet, through ignorance, it is good Christians who have voted the evil people into power. There are surprisingly some Christians who feel Satan has got so far with his programme of destruction, that he should be helped along until the situation becomes so terrible that Jesus Christ will have to take over. This makes no sense at all. We know which politicians are following the Anti-Christ agenda and logically, it can only be those with the ability to make changes that are responsible for the destruction of the white British nation and other countries.

The drive towards world government has created a situation where power is concentrated in very few hands. By taking charge of the West's armed forces, today's rulers, can inflict carnage on a scale unimagined at the time of the English or French revolutions. The saying that "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely" is very true. See how Tony Blair, George Bush, Winston Churchill, Obama, Sarkozy, May, Cameron and Boris Johnson having been elected as inappropriate national leaders, and went on to feel they have a right to act as universal Gods, despite their characters being seriously flawed.

According to Christian teaching we are put on earth to resist evil temptation. Then why, by voting for the major parties, has the predominately Christian public give an evil army complete control over our lives? One possible explanation for the sudden attempt o remove certain long established Arab leaders is that unlike Christian Europeans, they refuse to allow their people to become slaves to the bankers' system of usury. 

The overall effect in the West has been to pass power to the unelected 1% of greedy manipulators. They have been able to buy up 95% of broadcasting companies around the world and control public thinking, start unnecessary wars, and control world trade, while their banking system has constantly devalued money. With their multinational corporations they have polluted our planet and been responsible for global warming. They are also the ones who committed the greatest single crime in history by making the atomic bomb.

Don't Neglect Those Worthy of our Support

There are many thousands of great Britons tirelessly working for the community without expecting payment or fame. Many do charitable work, while others try to gain some political say for the British. All of these volunteers give up their time, and spend their own money on what they consider to be vital for our collective welbeing. If you were to sit down and write a list of what you believe should be government policy, and present it to the Committee of the local Labour, Liberal or Conservative Party, you would find them either dismissive or hostile. There are many honest and knowledgeable Britons who could do a far better job than politicians. But none of them would join a political party. I don't know anyone who belongs to a political party. One has to be very brave in Britain today to stand up for the British. Doesn't this tell you that there is something terribly wrong with the political establishment? This is good reason to support those who raise their heads above the parapet for you.

To become a teacher in a comprehensive school today one has to be prepared to instil in white children a loathing of their own race. This teaching is followed up by dangerous race hate nonsense which suggests that  to overcome an illusory racism one should take a black partner. The origin of the anti white programme can be traced to September 1952, and is recorded in the files of the Canadian Intelligence Service. This non military warfare states: "We will identify with the races of Asia and Africa... In the interest of wiping out racial tensions (that they created with their immigration programme) whites must be forbidden from mating with whites. The white women must cohabit with members of the dark races, and white men with black women. Thus, the white race will disappear, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory." Like fools we allow our children at school to be programmed for our own racial suicide. Schools exert too great an influence on young minds to be left in the hands of our enemies.

Eustace Mullins 

The speech mentioned by Bernard Franklin was given by Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovich to a meeting of the Emergency Council of European Jews in Budapest in 1952. The Jews denied that the speech had been made, just as they denied the 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion'.

The 'Protocols' appeared in Tsarist Russia in 1903. They were investigated by The Times newspaper and declared to be a forgery, but the great American industrialist Henry Ford was so impressed by them that he had half a million copies printed and distributed. He said: "The only statement I care to make about The Protocols is that they fir in with what is going on."

Eustace Mullins (1923-2010) obtained a copy of 'Our Race Will Rule the World Undisputed' from a Bulgarian diplomat who defected to the United States. It was published by several right wing journals including the Canadian Intelligence Service which was published by the Canadian League of Rights.

Eustace Mullins was a prolific writer on the Money Power and the Holocaust. He was convinced that the Federal Reserve was controlled by the Rothschilds. He campaigned for banking reform and contributed to James Madole's National Renaissance Party and Matt Koehl's American Nazi Party.

He was a disciple of the modernist poet Ezra Pound who was confined to a mental hospital by a vengeful American government for broadcasting from Italy during World War Two. 

His books include; The Secret of the Federal Reserve, That Difficult Individual Ezra Pound, The Federal Reserve Conspiracy, The World Order, and Our Secret Rulers.

Like many anti-Zionists, Mullins never tried to justify what the  Nazis had done to the Jews, he simply denied the whole thing.

The Eustace Mullins website is at: http://www.eustacemullins.us/ 

How Many People Actually Entered The Cabinet Building? -Sam Dickson

According to USA Today the day after the tempest in a teapot, "several dozen" Trump supporters entered the Capitol.

On the front page was a huge glaring headline saying "Pro-Trump Mobs Attack Capitol."

(One mob was not enough. It has to be mobs, plural. I couldn't figure out where the different mobs came from.)

The front page was full of shocking accounts of what transpired - in generalities. Lots of "wide brush" tactics. "Trump demonstrators looted the Capitol." Things like that.

But when you turned to Page 2, the story began to shrink and shrink as the facts sifted out from the hyperbole and hysteria.

Instead of "mobs " storming into the Capitol as asserted on Page 1, the reader learned that "several dozen" Trump supporters entered the building. (it wasn't expressly stated but the pictures made it clear  that many thousands of Trump supporter demonstrators did NOT attempt to enter the Capitol but simply stood on the steps and street in front of the Capitol with their protest signs and flags.) Somehow, all of them are guilty.

Please remember that demonstrations take place on the Capitol steps ALL THE TIME. I personally have witnessed around 10 such demonstrations when I have walked past the Capitol on trips to DC. The last one was a demonstration by Sarah Brady's people in support of gun confiscation. So it is absolutely NOT a crime or anything out of the ordinary for demonstrations to take place there.

As one continued to read USA Today, one saw lots of pictures and stories about the "several dozen" illegal entrants.

Of course, there were the ubiquitous pictures of the guy holding the podium (this was the only picture of any looting but the Media labels all the Trump supporters as "looters,") or the guy with his feet on Pelosi's desk, the guy with the only Confederate flag in view (this has become mass displays of Confederate flags  according to media like National Public Radio on its "All Things Considered") and the guy repelling from the balcony into the House Chamber.

So that's 4 out of the "several dozen."

The rest of the illegal entrants appear in pictures answering questions from journalists, walking around the hall carrying a sign or a flag. etc.

Please also remember that incidents like this one are commonplace,

You will remember that during the tense hearings on the shocking and breath-taking issue of whether or not Kavanaugh came on to a woman 37 years ago, when he was 17 rears old and a drunk 11th grader, the hearings were several times interrupted by organised groups of feminists standing up and shouting down the hearings before being dragged out by the police. Nothing to be upset about there!

This is an elaborately feigned morality fit.

An academy award should be given to Shoomuh, Pelosi and the others for their acting in the drama.

The End of an Era

Donald J Trump has finally left the White House after four flamboyant years. His populist regime was supported by half the American electorate, but Joe Biden won the race to be president. One geriatric Zionist has been replaced by another. Both of them serve what President Eisenhower called "the military industrial complex."

President Donald Trump masqueraded as a businessman but he turned out to be just another bandwagon jumper who would do anything to stay in power. He started to build a wall to keep the Mexicans out, but he employed them on his construction sites. He banned Muslims from entering the US, except for those shopping for military hardware with which to attack their neighbours. He didn't start any new wars but he provoked a trade war with China, despite China's massive ownership of American bonds. And he quit the Paris agreement on climate change and the World Health Organisation.

As far as the UK is concerned, we will slavishly follow whoever is in charge of the US. Boris Johnson and his motley crew are obsessed with 'sovereignty' but they cherish the 'special relationship' between the UK and the US. In fact, their only special relationship is with Israel. America came to our aid in both world wars, and we speak the same language, but American foreign policy has always put America first.

The Coronavirus pandemic has severely damaged the American economy, but no nation is better placed to recover. The US is self sufficient in gas and oil and has almost unlimited industrial potential. A resurgent America would revitalise Europe and the UK. We live in a global economy where the success of one nation does not depend on the failure of another. When America booms the whole world booms. We therefore pray for the success of the Biden government. 

Nation Revisited and European Outlook

Nation Revisited is published monthly, our sister blog European Outlook is published less often. Both blogs seek reform by legal means. All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. We uphold the United Nations' Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:

"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people."

 

 

      

  

   

                          

Nation Revisited # 171 January 2021

Tony Blair's Suicide Note for the British - by Bernard Franklin

For all the Union Jack flag waving, engaged in by the Labour Party during the last election, it is clear that the victorious "New Labour" government is just as committed to the destruction of Britain's Anglo-Saxon-Celtic ethnic unity, cultural identity and national sovereignty as was Old Labour.

Evidence of this was seen in the support which Tony Blair has given to a "Commission on the future of Multi-Ethnic Britain." The Commission was recently set up by the Runnymead Trust, which describes itself as an independent charity concerned with the issues of racial injustice and equality. In reality it is a self appointed organisation which seeks the destruction of European nations and tries to bring in laws to make the genocide of the white race compulsory.

In response to the "Commission" Mr Blair wrote: "Britain is changing fast: old patterns are being replaced by new diversity and it is vital that we modernise our institutions to reflect this changing reality. I would like to encourage groups and individuals to contribute to create a fair and open Multi-Ethnic Britain."

If we British as a people should ever cease to exist as a result of genocide through race-mixing, that trite little message will be seen by historians as the nation's suicide note.

At first sight Blair's message seems nothing more than a vacuous hyperbole of the type that Peter Sellers lampooned in the "All purpose political speech." What are "these old patterns" to which he refers so casually? Are they some unimportant scrap of cultural litter to be confined to the dustbin?

No! What de dismisses so lightly are two thousand years of history, of nation building, of creativity, toil and struggle in every field of human endeavour by a racially homogenous folk whose achievements, generation after generation, have shaped the world to an extent that has never been surpassed.

Ethnic Continuity

What does Blair mean by "new diversity"? The flooding of our island sin ce 1960 with millions of racially alien and culturally dissimilar people who are uncomfortable with, or downright antagonistic to the very concept of the British nation and culture and who are resentful of our history as it stands in comparison to their own. Amazingly Blair talks of "diversity" and "social cohesion" as if they were one and the same when they are complete opposites. For a nation to exist the people must have a common history, a common identity, and a shared vision of the future. The major political parties have no long term plans for a British future, for they are hell bent on destroying the British as a nation. In the strident tone of all tyrannies down the ages, we are told, in this instance, that we must accept a massive foreign invasion, the loss of our country and racial identity. Should we demur too stridently, we face prosecution and imprisonment. This is a fact, but of course it never appeared in any Labour, Liberal, Conservative or communist manifesto.

A second foreword to the "Commission" prospectus was written by the "Chair" of the Runnymead Trust, the black broadcaster, and long term friend of Peter Mandelson, Trevor Phillips. In it he declares: "The question that we are trying to answer is about identity and culture and how we reshape the nation - these are matters of intense interest to the whole nation..." How kind of Mr Phillips to acknowledge that the way in which he and his equally alien cronies plan to "reshape" our nation to be more congenial to himself, should also be of interest to those whose ancestral home is being destroyed.

The Runnymead Trust constantly asserts that it is in business to highlight injustices being inflicted  on ethnic groups. The British are suffering the greatest injustices, which are being aggravated by this particular (Runnymead) kangaroo court.

1) The injustice to the ethnic British people of having a multi-racial society inflicted on them without their permission ever having been sought or given at any time, and in the face of their sustained, if sometimes muted majority opposition.

2) The mass trespass of our country by millions of uninvited aliens. A situation which would lead the white British being outnumbered in our own country by coloured non-Europeans. This is a contrived political programme aimed at the destruction of our nation and culture through multi-racialism. This is definitely a contrived genocidal process, since Britons are being denied the fundamental human right to survive as a distinct ethnic group in their own homeland. It has been made a serious crime even to comment on it.

Tony Blair like so many twerps hell-bent on the destruction of European nations was brainwashed at Oxford University. The reason we are constantly ruled by our enemies is that the Ashkenazi tribe are warmongering Europeans and not Semitic  Jews as they make out. This allows our enemies such as Peter Mandelson, Lord Levy, Theresa May, David Cameron, Keith Joseph, and Boris Johnson to get elected. Because they are Europeans they look like us. To fool the public many of them have changed their names. As a result an ever increasing number of our enemies are taking over Parliament, our shops and industries, They have total control of Oxford University and the LSE, as well as the Stock Exchange. They own 95% of the television broadcasting companies world wide, transmitting what they want us to believe. Since 1939 the Ashkenazi menace has been creating wars  that could have been avoided . See how Parliament still continues to make a big thing out of Remembrance Day. Most of the soldiers who actually fought in the Second World War did their best to forget it. The Ashkenazi tribe are trying to take control of every country to create what they call  "The New World Order". Every country has a right to exist and should unite against them.

Happy New Year

Older NR readers have lived through some terrible times. We remember the humiliation of Suez in 1956 when America ordered us out of Egypt under threat of economic ruin. And twenty years later when our Chancellor of the Exchequer, Denis Healey, was forced to borrow £3.9 billion from the International Monetary Fund to stop our leading bank from defaulting. But nothing compares to the economic crisis facing us today with the Coronavirus pandemic.

Boris Johnson has signed a trade deal with the EU that  satisfies all but the most fanatical anti-Europeans, but our economy is already on life support due to the Coronavirus pandemic. How will he pay back the enormous sums that he has borrowed? The poor can't be taxed anymore because they have no money, and the rich have hidden their ill-gotten gains in trust funds and offshore accounts. That only leaves the working people, the backbone of the nation, who are already ground down by excessive taxation.

Our recovery will depend on how quickly the world gets its act together. China, the US and the EU are big enough to withstand the storm, but we are not so fortunate. Of course, we will recover but it might take some time.

Meanwhile, Boris' chums; the asset strippers, tax avoiders, pension fund robbers, slum landlords, and rent racketeers are destroying our traditional high streets and the multinational corporations are dodging taxes by locating in one country and trading all over the world. The UK has become a crook's paradise under Boris Johnson. The gap between rich and poor is getting wider, our doorways are full of rough sleepers, suicide rates are soaring, and school fees at Eton start at £42,000. Happy New Year.

Julian Assange

The campaigning Australian editor and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is awaiting extradition from the UK to the US where he faces a possible 175 years imprisonment for revealing details of the United States' invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. He is being held in London's Belmarsh Prison and his hearing will be held on January 4th 2021.

Support him by visiting Crowd Justice: https://crowdjustice.com/case/julianassange/

Poverty in Britain

Jacob Rees-Mogg, the fabulously wealthy MP for North Somerset, is upset that Unicef has donated money to relieve poverty in Britain. But poverty is a reality in many parts of our unequal country. It will not go away because the Tories are embarrassed by it. The social Metrics Commission estimates that there are 4.5 million people in Britain living in 'deep poverty'. 

Mark Webb writes from South London.

Those on low pay, benefits, pensions, and students, unemployed graduates, and others are facing crippling debt. Those without these issues just cannot grasp what's happening. I hear middle class women in Camberwell  saying that those on benefits are "swimming in cash". Right wing, liberal, green or socialist in nature, they are all under exactly the same impression that we do not have poverty here, that there is no hardship and people are not going without.

I know three young women in their late teens, early twenties, all living and working in Camberwell. One is working in a shop, one in a supermarket, and one in a restaurant. All three are on low pay and sharing digs with others. They were not born locally so they are trying to return home to see their parents at Christmas. One needs to get down to the West Coast, one to the North of England, and another to Denmark. Between their rent, travel and cost of living they are all borrowing, using credit cards and taking loans. They are all getting help from their parents. All of them are very bright and should be working in industry or business, and yet they are stuck in dead end jobs.

The current set-up in society is soul crushing for younger people. These young women are hard workers, all are good natured and yet their futures are very unstable. One may not be able to work or even to live here due to Brexit. One is facing the sack if building plans for the centre of Camberwell go ahead. The other wants to return to college but this is in doubt due to the Coronavirus. 

Sadly a factor in the mix is that they have been raised to be weak. They are the 'snowflake' generation, they cannot fight, they cannot look after themselves in conflict situations. Underneath their outwardly happy demeanour, I sense fear, weakness and a feeling of hopelessness. None of these women know one another, but they all live in close proximity. London is a big but lonely city. All three girls are very attractive but none of them are dating. Between work, study and sleeping there's not much time for a social life, let alone a love life. They live and work in London but none of them have seen its sights, been to a show or been out for a meal in the West End. They have been conditioned to lack ambition.  All three are still working despite the current pandemic regulations. They are getting by on tips, freebies at work, staff discounts and the like. It's heart breaking to see bright talented people just wasting their lives and living in fear of everything.

Richard Edmonds RIP

Veteran nationalist Richard Edmonds was born 10th March 1943 and died 23rd December 2020. He joined the National Front in 1972, but he was not a narrow nationalist, he spoke Russian, French and German and he was a member of the Swiss-based Europaeisch Aktion which stands for European Confederation.  See his tribute in Heritage and Destiny: www.heritageanddestiny.com

Churchill, The Jews And The Second World War - Richard Edmonds  

Why are white people so demoralised? Only a really demoralised people would tolerate so dumbly the massive and heartless betrayal committed against them by the vicious, shameless and useless party-politicians. Clearly it is the two world wars that have knocked the stuffing out of the White race. Look at all the British names on war-memorials from one end of this country to the other. The names of those men who marched away from every town, city and village in this country never to return. When you look at modern Britain, you know that those men died for nothing. They were betrayed by the party-politicians.

The dedication to the Fallen of the two world wars inscribed on the War-memorial at Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire reads:

"We gave our todays, so that you might have a tomorrow." But we who come after, we know that our Tomorrows have become a nightmare, a multi-racial, multi-criminal nightmare, where we are becoming a minority in our own cities, and where white children, under-age girls are raped, sexually abused, and sold into prostitution: crimes committed with impunity for years and years right across the North of England by the vile Asian grooming gangs, and in the full knowledge of the authorities.

Question: So how then did we get a Second World War just twenty years after the First, when the majority of British folk most certainly did not want another war? Who then did want a second war? Who schemed and who agitated and who got a second war just twenty years after the first mindless bloodbath?  Almost a million British soldiers were killed in the First World War: a wicked waste of good men's lives. Two million German soldiers, a million French soldiers, several million Russian soldiers and hundreds of thousands of American soldiers; all good white men ; and nobody can give you a justification for that first murderous war.

First off: the only prominent politician who wanted a second war was Winston Churchill. Churchill was almost unique amongst British politicians at that time in campaigning for a Second World War. But Churchill was not alone in wanting the destruction of Adolf Hitler and his Germany. Out of sight to most people, were powerful and wealthy Jewish individuals who saw war as a means to destroy the Germany that they hated. These powerful and wealthy Jews saw Churchill as the man to bring about the war against Adolf Hitler that they so desired.

In those years before the Second World War, effectively nobody in Britain wanted a second war, nobody in Europe or the USA, and nobody in Russia outside of the sinister Bolshevik-Communist clique around Joseph Stalin. Churchill in the 1930s was politically and socially isolated, but he found backers and supporters he needed in wealthy and powerful Jews. David Irving in his book, Churchill's War Part 1, writes of Churchill that "he sold his soul to a syndicate of politicians and financiers." Irving then proceeds to name those to whom Churchill sold his soul: Sir Robert Waley-Cohen, chairman of the Shell oil company and vice chair of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, donated fifty thousand pounds to Churchill's campaigning for a repeat war against Germany. Irvin writes of Churchill receiving substantial Jewish funds, and gives the example of Sir Henry Strakosh, a Jewish gold-mining industrialist based in South Africa, who "lent" Churchill twenty thousand pounds. These were colossal sums of money. At the height 1930s world-wide economic slump, a man who was lucky enough to be in full-time employment might be earning two pound a week, the pound having a much greater purchasing power then.

This backing of Winston Churchill was, of course, a closely guarded secret only revealed decades later by the researches of David Irving and others. But in parallel other powerful Jews openly called for war: within a few weeks of Adolf Hitler being appointed German Chancellor, the wealthy American Jew, Samuel Untermeyer, organised a campaign which the British Daily Express newspaper (of 24 March 1933) reported with its notorious headline: "Jews of the world declare war on Germany."

A full year before the outbreak of war, in June 1938, the Jewish publication, The American Hebrew, made this prediction:

"The forces against Adolf Hitler's Germany are being mobilised (that's our soldiers they are talking about). A combination of England, France and Russia (Joseph Stalin's Soviet Union) will oppose the crazed Fuhrer. Either by accident or design, a Jew has come to the position of foremost importance in each of these nations, England, France and Russia. In the hands on non-Aryans lie the very lives of millions (Gentiles)." The American Hebrew concludes: "When the smoke of battle clears away and the man who played God, the swastikered Christus, is buried in a hole in the ground, then a trio of non-Aryans will intone a requiem, standing proud, militant and aggressive, "Elie, Elie, Elie."

This quote can be found in Arnold Leese's book, "The Jewish War of Survival."

Nation Revisited and European Outlook

Nation Revisited is published monthly, our sister blog European Outlook is published less often. Both blogs seek reform by legal means. All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. We uphold the United Nations' Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:

"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people."