Why the Tories and Labour love the Asian invasion: Edmund Morrison. White Nationalist Letter, April 2020
Veteran patriot Eddy Morrison died last year but through the wonder of the Internet his words live on. I only met Eddy once, at a New Right meeting about ten years ago, but I exchanged e-mails with him for many years. I didn't always agree with him but I admired his tenacity.
The Indian invasion of Britain took place in two significant waves; though tens of thousands are still pouring in, often illegaly. The first was in the late 40s and 50s when non-Whites were recruited directly from India by successive governments to fill the national shortage that resulted from the Second World War. What labour shortage? Millions of ex-servicemen came home to no job!
These non-Europeans mainly settled in the Midlands and North West of England, working in foundries and textile manufacturing. They were heavily involved in building Britain's anti-racist and trade union movements in the 50s and 60s, drawing on lessons learned from anti-colonial struggles back home to organise their communities in Britain. In other words they were anti-British agitators who wanted Indian independence and when they got it they headed for Britain!
To this day these communities are disproportionately working class and Labour voting. In more and more parliamentary constituences if you don't control the Asian vote you aren't going to get elected!
The second wave of Indian invaders to Britain were the so-called 'twice migrants' who arrived from East Africa in the 60s and 70s, having been expelled or encouraged to leave by the newly independent regimes in Uganda, Kenya and Tanzania. The families of our Chancellor, Home Secretary, and Attorney General are part of this latter group
So how and why have their descendants become so prominent on the Tory frontbenches? The answer begins in 1895 with the creation of the British East Africa Protectorate. British officials envisioned the Protectorate, which occupied roughly the same area as modern day Kenya, as the 'America of the Hindu', a settler colonial project to be led by Indians on behalf of the British. In the early 20th Century, thousands of Indians, mostly Goans, Gujaratis and Punjabis, were imported into East Africa as subcolonial agents of civilisation. They were recruited to work in colonial administration and serve in the colonial police and army, to keep the 'native peoples' in order. At the same time more than 30,000 indentured labourers were brought over from India to build the Kenya-Uganda railway.
Many of these labourers chose to settle in the Protectorate after the railway was completed. They were soon joined by many other Indian subjects who moved freely to the Protectorate in search of economic prosperity. Functioning as a subordinate ruling class, Indians in East Africa enjoyed success in business, finance and the professions throughout the colonial period, and gained significant control over the economy. By the time Kenya won its independence in 1963, Indians , who accounted for less than 3% of the population, owned more than two thirds of the country's private non-agricultural assets!
Although in most ways a lunatic, Idi Amin expelled all the Uganda Asians as he quite rightly saw they were running his country!
When this group of Indians arrived in Britain (very few of them went back to India) many brought with them the considerable wealth they had accured, along with a hostility towards Black Africans. Others brought with them the benefits of English-language education. These advantages virtually guaranteed the economic success of East African Indians in Britain, especially in the retail business of Margaret Thatcher's 'enterprise economy', for which they soon became known. Rishi Sunak's pharmacist mother and Priti Patel's newsagent-owning parents were typical of their generation.
The Conservative leadership of the time identified this demographic as potential voters. From the 80s onwards the Tories began to court an imagined 'Indian Community' limited to East African Indians who had settled around London. Successful British Indians were held up as evidence of what could be achieved under a free-market Conservative government. In 1988 Thatcher welcomed the new Indian High Commissioner to Britain with the following words: "We so much welcome the resourceful Indian community here in Britain. You have brought the virtues of family, of hard work, and of resolve to make a better life... you are displaying splendid qualities of enterprise and initiative, which benefit not just you and your families but the Indian community and indeed the nation as a whole."
This is the woman who lied to the British White electorate at the 1979 general election and helped wipe out what would have been a huge vote for the National Front. The Tories have always been liars and Thatcher, whilst busily smashing the White working class mining industry, praised the Asians.
Fast foreward to 2010, and the Conservatives held 30% of the British Indian vote. After 30 years of Thatcherite ideology, British Indians were the most pro-Conservative ethnic minority, after the Jewish community. After decades of gradual advance this number soared to 40% in 2017. In the 2019 election, as the Conservatives chased a realignment towards White Northern voters based on fake 'racist' scaremongering, support in constituencies with high Indian populations increased substantially again. At every point this has included members of both groups of Indian migrants. Now, British Indians make up 15% of the Tory Cabinet. The Tories have now managed to extend their appeal beyond the 'two time' migrants by finding common cause in a project of Islamophobia. Supported by the Indian government and its far-right ruling party, the BJP, the Conservatives have exploited a sharp rise in Hindu nationalism within the British Indian community to play off Hindu and Muslim communities against each other.
The Conservative campaign in Harrow East, a marginal constituency in which 25% of the voters are of Indian origin, provided the clearest example of this. The constituency's Conservative MP Bob Blackman, whose Twitter background photo shows him smiling next to Prime Minister Modi, saw fit to retweet a post by the far-right commentator Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (alias Tommy Robinson) that highlighted Muslim violence against Hindus. He stated that he had done this in error, but along with others in the Conservative Party, he has encouraged the portrayal of Labour as anti-Hindu and pro-Muslim, citing Labour's percieved support for the Kasmiri struggle for self-determination as evidence. In the 2019 election his majority increased by more than 6,000 votes, and he was sworn into parliament on the Bhagavad Gita! Another gifted liar!
As the Tories, Labour and the rest of the Westminster vermin struggle into their saris and kaftans the White voters of Britain's wishes are completely ignored! Only a policy of repatriation backed by a sensible and humane plan can restore our country back to its righful owners; we the British people!
Being born in a country may change your passport; it doesnt change your race. Cliff Richard isn't ever described as an Asian even though he was born in India.
We need to see a sensible and responsible Asian community in Britain who know that their skills, money and knowledge are urgently needed in Pakistan and India. But the Government wouldn't back such a 'Back to Asia' movement led by Asians.
A stamp on a passport can magically wipe out 100,000 years of racial evolution. Napoleon called us 'a nation of shopkeepers', I wonder what he would call us now?
NATO
The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation was founded in 1949 to protect North America and Western Europe from the Soviet Union. The founding states were; The USA, Canada, the UK, Norway, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Iceland, Portugal, and Italy. Turkey and Greece were admited in 1952 in reward for their gallant participation in the Korean War. Germany joined in 1955, Spain was admited in 1982 after the death of General Franco. Poland and Hungary joined in 1999 following the collapse of the Soviet Union. Slovenia, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia joined in 2004. Croatia and Albania joined in 2009 and North Macedonia in 2020.
The original purpose of NATO no longer applies because the Soviet Union has ceased to exist. It has been replaced by the Russian Federation which has no territorial ambition in Europe, with the possible exception of the Russian-speaking Donbas region of Ukraine.
When NATO invaded Afghanistan and Iraq the enemy was distinctly anti-Communist. The Taliban had fought the Soviet Union for ten years and Sadaam Hussein was an Arab Nationalist who had destroyed the Communist Party in Iraq.
The question must therefore be asked, what is NATO for? Attempts to turn it into a European defence force have so far come to nothing. But if America continues the isolationist policies started by Donald Trump this could change. America contributes the most to NATO, so the European states would have to increase their efforts to sustain the Alliance. The position of Canada would have to be decided.
No European state can match America militarily but the UK, France, Germany, Spain and Italy, each have armies averaging 80,000, not counting reservists. They are already co-ordinated under NATO. If they pooled their resources we would have an army of 400,000, more than enough to deter any aggressor.
America shelters Europe under her nuclear umbrella but Britain and France possess their own nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them. Even without Trident and the Vanguard fleet we would still have our Astute class submarines that could be armed with nuclear-capable cruise missiles.
NATO made sense in 1949 when the threat of a Soviet invasion of Europe was real, but it's difficult to justify the cost to the American taxpayer. Future wars will almost certainly be fought outside our continent, where they should be the resposibility of the United Nations.
Is Putin A Sociopath? - Sam Dickson
I get notices from an outfit called "Quora." They pose questions, give answers and invite comments. The one today inquired as to whether Putin was a sociopath. The answer was that yes, he probably is a sociopath. I'm pasting my comments below. I don't know how long it will be up. Sam
Comment:
This is really dumb. "Psychoanalysis" of someone you have never met based on what the hostile news media says about him. If Putin were a sociopath, he would not be taking controversial positions defending Russia and its people. He'd be a "go-along-get-along" type... along the lines of Angela Merkal. Or Biden. He would engage in gimmicks and posturing like the "insurection" hearings of the "Russia Investigations."
He would be sure to get in line with Maxine Waters like 219 Democrats in the Congress did when they refused
None of this bothered a single Democrat in the House. It would be different, of course, if the mob had been White, the rabble rousers had been in the Klan and the defendant had been Black or Jewish. Then it would have been like the Leo Frank case way back when in Atlanta. All 219 Democrats would be looking for photo ops to posture about how horrible it was.
If you're looking for sociopaths, look for them in Congress, the White House and among the judges in the courts. Look there. Republicans too. Don't think they are any better. But Putin? No. Putin cares about his people. The hallmark of a psychopath is that he does not connect with anybody else. He doesn't connect with his family. He doesn't connect with other kids on his Little League team. He doesnt connect with his fraternity brothers. He doesn't connect with his region. He dosen't connect with his race. He doesn't connect with his country. He's looking after number one! In short: he's the perfect "woke" White liberal. That's where you find your sociopaths.
Letters to the Editor
From Bernard Franklin - theflameuk.com
The Labour, Conservative, Liberal and Communist Parties all have similar nation-wrecking policies. They are led by Zionists, bankers, Freemasons and Fabians all a similar agenda. Spread the word we need to get rid of of the political parties and elect constituency candidates, chosen for their honesty, knowledge and ability.
Since 1980 houses and blocks of flats have been built all over the country from Northumberland on the Scottish border to London. The White British population is smaller now than it was in the 1960s so they are not needed. They are being built to get us White British outnumbered and outvoted by Blacks, Pakistanis, Chinese and others. More recently Chinese have been building them. China and Israel have recently linked up to try and control the world.
Nation Revisited: You are right about the need for political reform. Hilaire Belloc and Cecil Chesterton wrote in 'The Party System':
We have just attempted a sketch of representative government as it ought to be, and the English people long believed that they had got, if not quite that, at least a decent approximation to it. It was their boast that without bloodshed or violent severance with the past they had as much of the reality of self-government as the most perfectly planned Republic could have. In what degree this was ever true will form the matter of discussion later. But undoubtedly it was widely believed. Most Englishmen until very lately, if told that they were not self-governing, would have laughed in your face.
But now a dim suspicion has begun to arise in the minds of a least a section of the people that this historic optimism is not quite as true as it looks, that the electors do not as a fact control the Government, that something alien has intervened between electors and elected, between legislature and Executive, something that deflects the workings of representative institutions. That thing is the Party System.
Those words were written in 1911 but they are just as true today. The party system serves big business, not the people. Our elected representatives should take their orders from their constituents, not from the party bosses. And they shouldn't be 'whipped' or face deselection for departing from the 'Party Line'.
Gordon Strange 13 July 1950 - 3 September 2021
Our old friend Gordon Strange has died of Cancer at his Ramsgate home. Gordon was a long time member of the British National Party. He served in the Royal Fusiliers and worked for many years as a London bus driver. He was opposed to the EU but he regularly attended Friends of Mosley reunions. May he rest in peace.
Nation Revisited
"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people
Our sister blog is posted in support of Nation Revisited. https://europeanoutlook.blogspot.com
1 comment:
Many thanks for the obituary regarding Gordon Strange. I knew him as a fellow inhabitant of Ramsgate. Although he came from London, I was born in the town in 1948.
A few months ago, Gordon and I bumped into each other in the High Street where he told me he was suffering from cancer brought on by exposure to asbestos. It was terminal then. He was incredibly stoical about his condition and seemed to accept the inevitable. May he rest in peace.
Post a Comment