Nation Revisited # 159 January 2020

Tory Landslide 

Boris Johnson won a landslide general election victory over the alleged anti-Semite Jeremy Corbyn with the brilliant slogan "Get Brexit Done". His massive 80 seat majority enables him to emulate King Herod by ordering the Massacre of the Innocents. But he will not get Brexit done in a hurry. It will take as long as it takes to negotiate a comprehensive trade deal with the EU.

The people have chosen the former Mayor of London to lead us into 'Terra Incognita'. We have gone through a traumatic period since the referendum but the landscape has not changed. We are still tied to the Continent by history, geography, blood and culture. Michael Heseltine thinks that it could be twenty years before we rejoin the EU. He may be right, but in the great scheme of things a temporary interruption hardly matters. The union of Europe is inevitable. 

Bring Back Oliver Cromwell - Vic Sarson 

I support tougher prison sentences but what is a seriously long sentence in these times where a liberal elite controls the judiciary, the media, education, the civil service and nearly all politicians are signed up to it?

The application of capital punishment certainly needed reviewing but its outright abolition not only demoted the crime of murder but of all violent crime. Now, vicious, violent criminals are treated with greater leniency than someone who has not paid a TV licence.

A recent article in the Daily Mail showed the photographs of six such thugs that had walked out of court smiling having been given non-custodial sentences for vicious random attacks against members of the public. They were separate individuals unknown to each other in British courts in different towns. Another item on another date showed the photograph of an elderly woman who had suffered blows to the head with an axe that were so severe as to expose her skull. The robber had attacked her in broad daylight when she was out shopping. He too walked free from court.

Anyone, it seems, can be a magistrate and the liberals have got it sewn up: the interviewers are liberals and ensure that only liberals are appointed. Judges these days are, in the main, little better.

I am torn in one sense. While believing in capital punishment (and corporal for violent crime) I would have to vote against it in a referendum because I have so little faith in the competence and integrity of the police, the judiciary and the legal system. In recent decades there have been far too many miscarriages of justice and the behaviour of the police has often been disturbing. However, I continue to uphold capital and corporal punishment as being the only way to halt the continual slide into anarchy of British society.

Finally, just look at the parade of inadequates that competed for our votes in the general election. Would you bother to cross the road to speak to any of them? They are the cause of our ills and misfortunes not the solution. Bring back Oliver Cromwell.


Far Right Terrorism - Vic Sarson 

As we go through life we come to realise that just as there are fashions in clothing, art, architecture, music, food and drink, and home décor etc. so also are there fashions in thinking. The attention of the general public is directed to threats from far right terrorists but most such terror attacks have been by 'radicalised' individuals originating from the Middle East.

Most opinions expressed by the average man in the street are manufactured elsewhere and put into his mind and mouth by the media and other sources of influence. Slogans and soundbites are inserted into the minds of ordinary people who then repeat them in the belief that they are freely expressing their 'opinion' that they declare to be their right and entitlement.

Indeed they do have such right and entitlement but as I have often responded, the right to have an opinion and the ability to form one are a distance apart. Without accurate information (and the ability to reason objectively) forming an 'opinion' worthy of being called an opinion is impossible. So it is that they absorb information through the media, the educational system. the Government, and Government agencies such as the police and take for granted that what is presented to them as information is indisputable fact. So far, most acts of terrorism (post IRA) in the UK have been from people of Middle Eastern origin with extreme anti-Western and anti-Christian attitudes, but the killers of Fusilier Lee Rigby are Africans, and the Shoe Bomber, Richard Reid had an English mother and a Jamaican father. 

There have been a number of far right attacks including David Copeland, the Brixton bomber, Darren Osborne, the Finsbury Park killer, and Thomas Maire who assassinated the Labour MP Jo Cox. These atrocities compare to the murder of Lee Rigby, the Manchester bombing, the attacks on Parliament, and London Bridge and the return of 600 ISIS fighters to the UK. Senior police officers warn of far right extremism, but the threat from anti-Western terrorists is just as dangerous. The trouble is that once a slogan becomes generally accepted it becomes fashionable to vent it as an 'opinion'. 

Government Data Breached - Vic Sarson

For many years I have argued that data breaches from Government Departments like the recent publication of the personal addresses of individuals who were given public honours are not always 'accidents' or due to 'error': procedures within the Civil Service are, if correctly followed, designed to prevent leakage of sensitive information: and this was the case before the introduction of GDPR. Despite the premierships of Thatcher, Major, Blair, Cameron and May nothing has been done to address the fact that the Civil Service employs many individuals with hard left political views who will do such mischief at every opportunity, indeed they run a closed shop so that only their own kind can obtain such employment. 

Labour Party Policies - Jeff Wallder

I've noticed that the Labour Party has stolen British Union economic policy lock, stock and barrel. Every company with over 250 employees will be run by a board which will include worker representatives AND consumer representatives. And the shares will be owned by the workers and profits distributed amongst them. I tell you Bill, it's straight out of Raven Thomson's 'The Coming Corporate State'. It's so close I'm convinced it's no coincidence.

Fortunately for Labour none of their tabloid enemies or Tory propagandists have picked up on this. Otherwise they'd be pointing out that this confirms Corbyn's fascist tendencies. First the anti-Semitism and now economics taken directly from the British Union of Fascists.

Of course you, me and Jeremy know that this anti-Semitism nonsense is to punish him for criticising the Israeli government's murderous treatment of the Palestinians. Before long any criticism of Israel will be classified as a hate crime.

What next? We'll have Labour calling for no more wars unless British interests are involved and adopting the famous BU slogan 'The War on Want is the War We Want!

NR Comment: The 'Market' will sort itself out if left alone, but at what cost? Without regulation capitalism follows the law of the jungle; which is alright if you happen to be a lion. Civilised labour laws and industrial partnership are essential.

Alexander Raven Thomson's book 'The Coming Corporate State' is available from: www.stevenbooks.co.uk

Eddy Morrison

(The Tories have swept away the opposition in England including the little parties of the far-Right, but in the immortal words of Alexander Pope: "Hope Springs Eternal." Here is Eddy Morrison's WVA Bulletin for October 2019).

We dare not dream of ultimate victory. The taking of power in this ZOG controlled land we once called our own, yet if we are to only exist from one day to another, without tactical plans and a strategy then we are forever lost to wandering in the Wilderness. But if we plan a strategy for victory and we re-learn the tactics to make that strategy possible then we will lift our eyes and hearts to build a movement that will make that strategy for rebirth possible, then if our path is clear and our will irresistible, then we shall see the day when the symbolic flags of White Nationalism fly over Westminster and the great clear out of all the Reds and Libertards can begin. 

We must set a date for us to aim at. No factory or business sets up shop without having a clear plan to take them to success but we Nationalists do it all the time. We are stuck in a surreal wheel where failure comes round and round until one by one Comrades fall away and still the wheel keeps spinning powered by negativity and those of us within it have no hope for the future.

We must draw up a plan which is twofold for we need to take on the System on two levels - we must be a Movement of the streets and at the same time organising our Movement so that EVERY Parliamentary Constituency has an active unit working busily within it ready for the time when through local elections, by-elections and general elections we can apply the success of our street tactics which bring in fresh blood; new finance, new talent of every kind which will then be applied not to this sickening squabbling amongst ourselves but bringing about the complete overthrow of this rotten maggot infested System we have come to live under.

I believe Comrades that we must be positive and have the Will to Power which we have lost - in some cases we have never had.

We must set our sights on a Great Britain ten years hence and aim with might, main and clarity that we shall take power in this country by the year 2030.

We have Ten Short Years to turn the System on its head and bring about a revolution that is not some far off dream but a reality as we seize the reigns of power!

Ten years of Agitation; Propagation, Demonstration and Organisation that we must NEVER DOUBT that 2030 will see a White Nationalist Victory! 

Terrorism

Normal people are revolted by terrorism and have no sympathy for criminal lunatics that plant bombs, use cars as weapons, or attack people with knives. Since World War Two we have faced waves of terrorism linked to our imperial past. In the Forties it was the Israeli Stern Gang who blew up the King David Hotel and booby trapped the bodies of murdered British soldiers. Later, in the Fifties and Sixties it was EOKA fighting for the union of Cyprus with Greece. And then there was the IRA that slaughtered Catholics and Protestants alike to achieve a united Ireland. Currently it's Muslim fanatics that are attacking us but whatever their religion the terrorists are convinced that God is on their side.

Each terrorist group was linked to a nationality and a religion; the Stern Gang was Israeli and Jewish, EOKA was Greek and Greek Orthodox, the IRA were Irish and Catholic. The latest killers are not all of one nationality but they are Muslims of the Salafi cult. The British public reacted to every atrocity but few of us blamed innocent immigrants for the sins of their compatriots. The current wave of terrorist attacks may provoke hostility to Muslims, but only a minority of them support violence.

We will survive the latest wave of death and destruction. The police will catch the terrorists and the courts will deal with them. Many people support the death penalty for terrorism but given the current liberal dispensation there will be no return to capital punishment. We can only be vigilant and trust our security forces. We have every right to hate terrorists but we shouldn't blame law-abiding foreigners who are just here to earn a living.

Government's Claim on 'Managed Migration' Demolished.

(No less than 12 immigration acts have been passed in the UK since 1905, but the influx continues. John Bean wrote this piece for 'Identity' in 2005 when it was at its worst. Boris Johnson has promised to control immigration with an Australian-style points-based system; but we have heard it all before).

Immigration figures released last month by the Office for National Statistics completely demolish New Labour's claim that it has a 'managed immigration' policy. The latest ONS forecast is that Britain's population is projected to rise by more than seven million in the next 25 years and more than half of this will be a direct result of immigration. While four million of the population rise is directly due to net migrants, of the remaining 3.2m more than half will be children of immigrants. Thus, it is not scaremongering to predict that racial conflict as last month's clash between Afro-Caribbeans and Pakistanis in Birmingham will become commonplace.

The increase in population which is far greater than previous official forecasts, means that total numbers are expected to rise from under 60 million today to 67 million by 2031. Combined with the two million increase since 1990, this means that within a lifetime the population has increased by a fifth, the most rapid expansion since the beginning of the last century. Last year saw the highest net migration to the UK on record, with an inflow of 223,000, some 72,000 more than the previous year. The number of British citizens leaving to live elsewhere increased to 208,000, again a record. This, of course, accelerates the changing face of Britain - now welcomed by the Tories of the Cameron and Davis era as much as by New Labour and the Lib Dems as Afro-Asians become instant Britons once subjected to the miraculous geography of the British Isles.

This year net migration is forecast to be even higher at 255,000. Much of the population increase will be in England and especially in the South-East. By contrast Scotland's population will increase only slightly, until the year 2019 and then start to decrease, whereas Wales will continue to increase at a slow rate.

These official predictions are even greater than those made by the Migrationwatch UK think-tank, whose forecasts were dismissed in the past by the liberal-left media as alarmist. Its chairman said that "these latest figures show that immigration  into the UK is out of control".

He also added what the BNP has been proclaiming for some time: "This enormous level of immigration is directly contrary to the wishes of the vast majority of the population and has been allowed to develop without any real discussion about the long term consequences in terms of community cohesion, quality of life and practical matters like housing where we already have major problems of supply.

.

Nation Revisited

This blog seeks reform by legal means. All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. We uphold the United Nations' Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:

"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share ideas with other people." 

Comments

Please use this facility to leave your comments and read what others have to say.

   

Nation Revisited # 158 December 2019

Money Problems

Few nations manage to balance their books. They spend more than they collect in taxes and rely on bond sales and borrowing to bridge the gap. When the Labour government came to power in 1997 they inherited a balanced budget but within four years Gordon Brown had turned it into a deficit of £170 billion. The Tories tried to reduce the deficit by cutting public spending but that led to failing schools, understaffed hospitals and rising crime.

The Bank of England's promise to "pay the bearer on demand" can't be taken seriously. It has reserves of gold, foreign currencies and government bonds but it issues many times more money than it has on deposit. The BOE also supervises the commercial banks that handle our accounts. This arrangement gives us some protection from a predatory government that has raided our pension funds and would love to gain access to our savings. If they nationalized the banks, our money would become their money.

Perhaps we will devise a better monetary system in the future but in the meantime we should demand strict banking controls and reasonable interest rates. The Thatcher-Reagan banking reforms ended in the crash of 2008. Free from regulation, the banks lent money that they never had to people who could never pay it back. The result was that banks crashed, like Lehman Brothers, or were bailed out by the taxpayers, like the Royal Bank of Scotland.

The Chinese are looking into Social Credit. It's not exactly the system devised by CH Douglas (pictured) but, like him, they envisage a social wage, or dividend, funded by their booming economy. The 'unemployed' would spend their time studying or caring for the elderly. The trouble is that those working would resent those who were not. But economic reforms will have to be made before we sink under the sheer weight of debt. 

People with financial problems should only pay what they can reasonably afford, and we need a limit on interest rates. If a borrower has repaid the original loan he should be excused any outstanding interest. That would upset the bankers but they have squeezed more than enough out of the system, and many of them were rescued by their tax-paying customers in the crash of 2008.

Robert Best's Letter to 'Broadsword'

Robert Best is an independent writer and researcher. His books are available from - www.stevenbooks.co.uk 

Dear Broadsword, I was pleased to see the photograph of Sir Oswald Mosley and his Blackshirts at Cable Street, in Broadsword issue number42.

'Reds' and Jews still claim that they inflicted a massive defeat against British Fascism and National Socialism to this day.
However, two weeks after the 'Battle of Cable Street', Mosley spoke to 12,000 people in Victoria Park Square, Bethnal Green, East London and the BUF marched to Salmon Lane in Limehouse. They did pass after all!

Also, the BUF recruited 2,000 new members in the East End alone, in the aftermath of Cable Street due to the publicity.

Personally, I do not believe that Mosley was a "kosher  fascist". By 1936 the official title of his party was The British Union of Fascists and National Socialists, (BUFNS), and he proposed in his book 'Tomorrow We Live' that Jews who abused our hospitality should be resettled in a Jewish homeland alternative to Palestine. He wrote that  "Jews originate in the Orient and are more alien to us than any Western nation".

Mosley always stated that his first wife Cynthia Curzon was not Jewish, her grandfather Levi Leiter was actually a Dutch Protestant, which explains the Biblical name.

Mosley was consistently opposed to non-European immigration and the 'Jewish Money Power'; and let us not forget that the nationalist slogans "Britain First" and "Britain for the British", were first used by Mosley in the 1930's, when he was campaigning for full employment, decent housing, the abolition of poverty, and peace with Germany. 

After the 'Brothers' War' (WW2) when he launched his Union Movement (UM), he was the first to call for the repatriation of coloured immigrants. If the British people had listened to Mosley we would not be in such a mess today.

Climate Change

Greta Thunberg awakened the world to the dangers of  Climate Change. Predictably, President Donald Trump mocked her but the sixteen year old Swedish school girl must be admired for addressing the United Nations in a language that is not her own. She is part of a campaign that has gone viral. London has been disrupted by demonstrations and young people all over the world are worrying about the future.

The extent to which humanity is responsible for climate change is debatable but there is no doubt that it's happening. Planet Earth is a cooling sphere of magma orbiting an uncontrolled nuclear explosion known as the Sun. It is subject to gravitational forces, volcanic activity and constant bombardment by radiation and cosmic debris.

In 1815 Napoleon's army at Waterloo was bogged down by torrential rain when Mount Tambora in Indonesia erupted killing 10,000 people. In 1883, the neighbouring volcanic island of Krakatoa exploded, killing 36,000 people and causing a drop in global temperatures that lasted for five years. Other catastrophic volcanic eruptions include Mount Pelee in Martinique in 1902 that killed 29,000 people and Ruiz in Columbia that killed 25,000 people. 

In parts of Sweden and Scotland the ground is rising at the rate of 10cm per century because millions of tonnes of glacial ice have melted. It's therefore not surprising that the polar icecaps are receding or that the deserts are expanding. There's not much we can do about natural events but it's common sense not to pollute the air with carbon or the seas with rubbish. We must find cleaner ways of generating electricity and replace plastic with bio-degradable material.

Those of us who are old enough to remember the London smog of the Fifties know very well that pollution is a killer. 12,000 Londoners died in the great smog of 1952 and thousands more suffered damaged lungs (Kate Dawson - Death in the Air). It was ended by the Clean Air Act of 1956 which banned coal fires. 

The public don't know what to believe, but scientists are more likely to tell the truth than politicians. They are not elected and they do not have to protect vested interests. Donald Trump must know that coal and oil are major pollutants but he needs the votes of the coalminers, the oil drillers, and the power workers, and the financial backing of their employers. He is a typical short-sighted politician who only cares about himself. 

From The Archives - 400,000 Support Country Life - John Bean, Beanstalk 2004

Having been on the two previous Countryside Alliance marches in London, I can confirm that it was not just about supporting the traditional right of fox hunting. It was to draw attention to how many English, Welsh, Scots and Irish people are concerned with the constant undermining of the rural way of life, which has gained momentum under Tony Blair and his Islington cronies. For me there was the added bonus of being with more than 400,000 fellow aboriginals (whites, if I may dare say so) marching through multiracial London.

Many of those who support the Countryside Alliance share the same view on fox hunting and game shooting that I do. I have no reason to change the opinion I expressed in 1993 on the subject and which appeared in my book on the changes in a rural community, 'Ten Miles From Anywhere'. It appears on page 146 under the heading 'Thoughts of a Failed Rat Catcher'. It now has greater significance as even more city and suburban dwellers embrace the Bambi syndrome.

"Over the New Year I spent some hours in trying to kill a rat who had come from a nearby compost heap to nose around my door. My now aging cat, who in her youth would kill anything that moved as long as it was not more than twice her size, went through all the motions but didn't even score a near miss. Surprisingly to me, the only creature to nearly get the rat was a cock pheasant, who apparently objected to the rat going for his jugular.

I got to thinking. If that rat had a nice fluffy tail and his face was not so pointed, people would call me a monster for wanting to despatch him not only from my lawn but from this earth. Now if I had shot the pheasant, quite a number of people would also consider me a monster. Perhaps city-based animal right activists would demonstrate in our village, such is the dominance of emotion over common sense when it comes to the relationship of homo sapiens with the rest of the animal kingdom.

Like the rest of my species, I was born an omnivore, i.e. I function best on a diet of meat and two veg. Although I would find it difficult to kill a pheasant, I would if hungry, but certainly not 'sport'. To me, there is a world of difference between shooting a pheasant or two for 'the pot' and trying to outdo each other in seeing how many you can slaughter, to give away, in an afternoon. Yet again, pheasants are so stupid that if they were not reared for shooting, their natural predators - particularly the fox - would have probably eliminated them in Britain by now.

Then what of Brer Fox himself? If he had a rat-like tail instead of such an attractive brush would anti-hunt protestors be so keen to throw themselves under horses hooves? We won't go into the equally emotive issue of the carnage the fox can cause in a chicken run, but point out that ten times as many foxes are killed by the motor car than by huntsmen. And the hunt is certainly a quicker way than snaring or shooting, which often leads to a lingering death.

I do not hunt but respect the rights of those who want to. All I say is that if Brer Fox has gone to earth, he has won - that's his rights." 

A Dangerous Illusion

The UK has now missed its third departure date and we are still in the European Union. Boris Johnson jumped on the Brexit bandwagon when it looked unstoppable. Ukip was threatening the major parties and the "will of the people" had to be obeyed. Three and a half years later we are still in the EU and the country is still divided. In 2016 the referendum result was 52 to 48 percent in favour of leaving but recent polls show that this is changing. 

Public opinion does change over time. When the Berlin Wall came down thirty years ago Margaret Thatcher was sending desperate messages to the Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev pleading with him to stop German reunification. She was not on her own in 1989 but few people today would admit to such prejudices. We have finally stopped hating the Germans.

The general election on the 12th of this month is likely to result in a Tory victory. But instead of "getting our country back" we will become a dependency of the USA. Some people would prefer the American alternative. That's fair enough, they are entitled to their opinions, but they should stop waving union jacks. They have no monopoly on patriotism.

The United Kingdom is a developed nation (GDP $2.8 trillion) located twenty miles from the European mainland. We have kept our British identity as members of the European project since 1973. Leaving the EU is proving to be difficult but rejoining would be easy; we would simply return to our old status. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has warned that the economy will shrink and borrowing will rise if we leave the EU. And the Office for National Statistics has released figures for June 2019 showing that we received 48,000 migrants from the EU, and 229,000 from outside the EU. Brexit is a dangerous illusion.

Matteo Salvini
 

The popular Italian Senator Matteo Salvini is a former Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior who is tipped to be a future Prime Minister.

He started out in the Lombard League, a regionalist movement that campaigned for autonomy for Lombardy. This evolved into the Northern League which encompassed the rest of northern Italy. Today, the reformed party has dropped the 'Northern' appendage to become La Liga and now stands for a federal Italy within the European Union.

The League's rise to power was driven by the mass migration of economic refugees from Africa. This illegal traffic was limited by the Gaddafi regime in Libya until Dave Cameron helped to bring it down. Another short-sighted criminal blunder that he will be remembered for.

Liga is the Italian equivalent of the French National Front, a populist movement opposed to Third World immigration, but unlike the NF it has risen above petty nationalism to embrace Europe. 

Salvini wrote in the conservative daily 'Il Foglio':

"I say this once and for all, and I hope that nobody inside or outside my party will raise this issue again. The Lega does not have any intention of taking Italy out of the euro or the European Union. Let me be clearer still, to stop journalists from fantasizing, the euro is irreversible". 

Nation Revisited

This blog seeks reform by legal means. All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. We uphold the United Nations' Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:

"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share ideas with other people." 

Comments

Please use the facility at the end of this blog to leave your comments and read what others have to say.

     

Nation Revisited # 157 November 2019

Marxism and Communism - Jeffrey Hamm

(Many voters distrust Jeremy Corbyn because he is a self-confessed Marxist. But what is Marxism? The following extract is from "Mosley's Blackshirts" by Jeffrey Hamm (pictured). Available from Black House Publishing). www.blackhousepublishing.co.uk 

Mosley was perfectly familiar with Karl Marx's ideas. John Strachey, later to become the leading English Marxist intellectual, had been Mosley's principle lieutenant from 1924 to 1931. Mosley accepted that Marx had produced the first important overview of human society, but considered his analysis to be faulty in almost every detail. Even in 1867, when the first volume of Das Kapital was published, the condition of the working class was changing. The Great Reform Bill of 1832 and the Municipal Corporations Act of 1835 had removed political powers from the aristocracy and landed gentry and opened the way for working class enfrachisement.

The course of history and the structure of human societies were not determined, as Marx believed, by blind economic forces but by remarkable individuals. To achieve the universally desired end of an economic system that was both efficient and humane required not class warfare but a class unity that would eventually lead to to the disappearance of all classes.

Laissez-faire capitalism had proved efficient as far as the production of wealth was concerned, but inefficient in the way this wealth was distributed. Marxist Communism, by ignoring the mainspring of human motivation, had resulted in societies that are both economically inefficient and inhumane. The real division is not between workers and capitalists but between financiers and producers. Co-ownership and co-partnership can provide workers with both a share of ownership and a share of profits. Eventually technology will reduce th part played by money, banking and finance, to a point at which wealth is produced and distributed with minimal human intervention.

Maj Gen Saad el-Shazly

Kim Darroch the British ambassador to Washington was recalled on President Donald Trump's insistence, but he was not the first ambassador to be rejected. In 1974 the Jews mounted a campaign against Maj Gen Saad el-Shazly (pictured) as Egyptian ambassador to London. 

He was known is the Middle East as the 'Arab Rommel' for his invasion of the Negev in the 1967 Six Day War, and his successful assault on the 'impregnable' Bar-Lev Line during the 1973 Yom Kippur War.  Amnesty International accused him of war crimes, when he was Egyptian Chief of Staff, for giving the following order:

"Kill the Jews wherever you find them and take good care that they don't trick you, for they are deceivers pretending to surrender so that they may overcome you and kill you easily. Kill them and don't show them any pity or mercy."

The Jews were incensed by the appointment of Maj Gen el-Shazli who fraternised with anti-Zionist groups when he was the Egyptian military attache in London. 

In February 1974, I wrote in my newsletter 'Nation': 

"Anyone hated by the Zionists is welcome in our country. We are opposed to mass migration but we seek good relations with all nations. The Arabs need our weapons and we need their oil. The British government recently lost an arms deal with Saudi Arabia because of Israeli pressure. Instead, France clinched the deal.

In 1956 Britain, together with France and Israel invaded Egypt on the pretext of defending the Suez Canal, only to be forced into a humiliating withdrawal by the United States. We have no quarrel with the Arabs and we must not be influenced by those who have. 

Not so long ago, Menachem Begin was wined and dined in London. He was an Irgun terrorist during the Palestine mandate and he now leads a fanatical Zionist movement. If we can stomach a killer like Begin we should welcome el-Shazly, a soldier and a scholar who has never done us and harm."

Maj Gen el-Shazli was dismissed as ambassador to Britain following his criticism of the Camp David Accord in 1978. He took refuge in Algeria but returned to Egypt following the assassination of President Anwar Sadat. He died in Cairo in 1982 aged 88.

Menachem Begin was Prime Minister of Israel 1977-1983. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, together with President Anwar Sadat of Egypt, for his part in the Camp David Accord. He died in 1992 aged 78. 

Squarerig Two

(In May 2016 I reported on a meeting of the London Forum which prompted the following correspondence from 'Squarerig Two').

May 1, 2016. Thank you for the Voice of Reason. I have been a racial nationalist for more than fifty years and, at this stage, have virtually given up. For, at every meeting I attend there is such an assembly of cranks, loonies, JOO haters and conspiracy theorists that it is obvious, to any rational thinking man - or woman! - that with such people we are going absolutely nowhere!

It is my experience, based upon observations and listening to people's views, that the overwhelming majority are attracted to this movement for one reason, this reason looming so large in their minds as to practically exclude all others, and this is their pathological anti-Semitism. Joining such groups as ours - there is a large variety of nationalist 'parties' to chose from - allows them to express their visceral, unreasoning and blind hatred of everything Jewish or even remotely connected with the Jews without fear of reproach. If I should happen to name some of my Jewish acquaintances many of the listeners will immediately develop that 'knowing' look, the equivalent of taping the side of the nose, some even going so far as to tell me that I do not understand the JOOS and that the gestures of friendship and support I received from these acquaintances when severely ill, is merely a ruse to deceive and lead me, as it were, up the Jewish garden path. I am viewed in some circles, as being the useful and misused Goy, for which they have some Yiddish term, the use of which implies a deep if not profound knowledge of all things Jewish!

I am not familiar with your views on this matter but I refuse to believe that it is the Jews, and the Jews alone, who are responsible for or at least the prime cause of every mishap and every act that tends to the downfall of our nation and its terminal decline. The complex affairs of men have never been that simple and to paint the world in black and white, apart from placing the artist in the enviable position of being able to understand everything, all at once, to hold such childish conceptions leads to false conclusions and ridiculous behaviour. 

Whilst not in agreement with all your assessments, nevertheless, I find your articles well-written, almost free of prejudice, balanced and certainly worthy of discussion. Long may you continue to write such interesting matter.

May 2, 2019. I also attended this meeting - I assume that you refer to the one held in the Holiday Inn in Kensington - and I listened, attentively, to all that was said and done - and it mostly was! Out of all the speakers - I leave aside our glorious poetaster, the gentleman dressed in outlandish garb who is, according to his own lights, a worthy successor to the Anglo-Saxon bards of old - I also found that Whitby's address, if one could really call it that; this almost hysterical, garbled, rambling, irrational rant against all and everything took the biscuit! How on earth was this man ever elected to anything? He is not only ignorant but his head is filled with strange, ominous, doom-ridden figures whose sole raison d'etre, if you will, is to destroy us and elevate the JOOS - again - to the most powerful position in the universe. Whilst being pleasant to be among like-minded people of my own race, nevertheless, I feel that my time, of which I have but little, is too valuable to squander on such silly gatherings where much is made of the glories of one Adolf Hitler. My wife is the daughter of prominent members of the NSDAP and could tell a different story but they are not interested in anything which runs counter to their version of the 'truth' - their truth of course! Each one consists of men and women who simply want to air their grievances, talk and talk and talk but who have absolutely no plans on how to halt the rot in our society. Apparently the JOOS are superhuman, possessed of unearthly powers, their sole purpose in life is to subjugate the rest of humanity.

Outstanding scientist, as Richard Feynman, mathematicians such as Cantor, Einstein, outstanding researchers in Israel are all dismissed, and this for the main part by people who have no knowledge of these areas of human activity, as being of no account or yet another part of the grand plan for world domination.

I am fully aware of the role played by many Jews in seeking to impose their values and even Weltanshauung upon others; but surely this is their right. If we disagree it is up to us to work against their agenda and may the best man or theory win! We hear much from nationalists about survival of the fittest, Darwinism in the political field and yet when
confronted with what they regard as a threat they do nothing, unless one considers small meetings of like-minded people in the back rooms of pubs around the country or pointless demonstrations.

But curious, is it not, when Gerhard Menuhin writes a book which agrees to some extent with their views they accord him, a JOO, the highest praise!

If our fellow nationalists would only descend from their favourite but very lame hobby horse of anti-Semitism. I am sure we could make some progress. Many of them possess admirable qualities but rational thinking does not figure large among them. 

Wanted: A Dynamic Leader

Our traditional political parties defend class interests. The Tories look after the rich, the Labour Party protects the working class, and the Lib-Dems represent the middle class. They all pretend to be 'broad churches' but they enforce party discipline by threats and expulsions. Changes are slow to happen, except when a revolutionary figure emerges to upset things.

Margaret Thatcher transformed the Tory Party by selling council houses and shares in privatised industries to working class voters. She tamed the trade unions, won concessions from Europe, and defeated the Argentines in the Falklands, but she went too far with the Poll Tax and was dumped by Central Office.

Tony Blair made the Labour Party electable by abolishing Clause Four - the basic tenet of Socialism. He dumped nationalization and won three general elections in a row. The standard of living improved on his watch but he will always be blamed for involving Britain in the American invasion of Iraq.

Oswald Mosley was a rising cabinet minister who left the Labour Party in 1930 when they rejected his memorandom on unemployment. His background should have guaranteed his political career but his movement, the British Union of Fascists, was banned by the State and he was imprisoned, together with a thousand of his followers, for opposing the Second World War.

Revolutionary politicians are exceptions to the rule. Political parties dislike change and most MPs do as they are told. Winston Churchill crossed the floor of the House and changed history, but he had the backing of powerful friends such as the Rothschilds, Sir Ernest Cassel, and the filmmaker Alexander Korda. 

Boris Johnson has leadership qualities but he is a bumptious imposter who poses as a champion of the people whilst enjoying the backing of the right-wing press. Genuine rebels vanish into obscurity and new parties are boycotted by the mass media, starved of funds, attacked by 'anti-fascists', or shut down by the State.  

The current upheaval in Westminster will not last forever.  Parliamentary democracy protects itself with rules and regulations that have been perfected over the years. The main parties are under pressure at the moment but when the dust settles we will still have a right-wing party, a left-wing party, and a centrist party; all obediently serving big business.

The Scottish Nationalist Party rules north of the border; Northern Ireland is divided by sectarianism, and Wales remains a poor relation. But the Celtic nations are economically insignificant compared to England and their cherished independence is mostly cosmetic. In or out of the EU, the UK will remain in the grip of global capitalism until a dynamic leader emerges. 

Why I Lost The Plot - John Bean, Beanstalk 2001

(JB has criticised this blog for being "locked into the past for 20 years or more". Well, here is something that's only 18 years old).

For half a century I have been the recipient of numerous tracts that warned of a world-wide plot to destroy the white world, culturally, politically and racially. Inspired by 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion', we were invariably told that this was the fault of the Jews, who could also be blamed for anything ranging from global warming to ingrowing toenails and the state of the rhubarb crop.

When we look at the state to which Britain, the US, and the European nations and the white world in general have been reduced to, one can be forgiven for thinking that there must have been some 'plot' to account for our decline - and impending demise. I have never thought that there was any specific 'plot' but rather that the West's predicament stems from the work of Marxist exiles (I admit that many were Jewish) from Hitler's Germany. These invaded Western academe - the American in particular and implemented the 'Critical Theory' that replaced Marxian class struggle with cultural struggle. The Italian Marxist Gramsci and other theorists held that the proletariat would not revolt, that civilisation must be wrecked by subverting the West's cultural  institutions including the family.

The neo-Marxist academics such as Herbert Marcuse became the gurus of a new generation that now holds power in most Western nations and whose ideas have become the status quo throughout. To these neo-Marxists in place of a revolutionary proletariat would emerge another revolutionary vanguard composed of feminists, homosexuals, and with youth alienated from the cultural mainstream.

Understand this and you can understand the popularity of 'Eastenders' and other poisonous soaps.

In his book 'The Death of The West' Patrick J Buchanan, the American conservative right-winger shows that he is fully aware that this cultural revolution makes strides because it is also in keeping with its mirror image, big business which, as he states, holds no loyalty beyond money.

Nation Revisited

This blog seeks reform by legal means. All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. We are protected by the UN Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19: "We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share ideas with other people."

European Outlook

Our sister blog European Outlook is posted on - https://europeanoutlook.blogspot.com 

Comments

Please use the facility at the end of this blog to leave your comments and read what others have to say.