Nation Revisited # 210, April 2024

We Must Secure The Existence Of Our People And A Future For White Children - Robert Baggs. Part one

Most Nationalists will be very familiar with the above statement, known as the Fourteen Words. David Eden Lane (2^nd November 1938 – 28^th May 2007), a member of the American group The Order, coined and publicised the phrase through the now defunct Fourteen Word Press, along with other writings. He has been described by the Southern Poverty Law Center as “one of the most important ideologues of contemporary white supremacy”. The 14 Words are now popularly used by white Nationalists as their raison d'être and rightly so. Essentially, unless action is taken the white race is doomed to extinction. However, despite the popularity of the phrase, are we doing all we can to comply? 

There are two strands, both working hand in hand, to ensuring we see this through. The first being the spreading of the word, that is, creating an awareness of the fact that the white race is in a relatively rapid decline for various reasons. Sadly, there are millions of people, who would argue that it doesn’t really matter, that we are all human beings living on the same planet and that we are all in one huge melting pot. Melting Pot, was actually the name of a song by 1970’s pop band Blue Mink, with a chorus which went “What we need is a great big melting pot, big enough to take the world and all it’s got and keep it stirring for a hundred years or more, and turn out coffee coloured people by the score”. However, these same people would similarly argue that we should save the whale, the Bengal tiger, the snow leopard, the chimpanzee and so on, as they are on the World Wildlife Fund’s list of endangered species but also Brazilian jungle tribes.

So why is it seemingly important to save certain animals but not certain humans, i.e. the white tribe? The attitude seems contradictory particularly when the “certain humans” are potentially themselves and their offspring. No doubt, when using this argument with those having a white race death-wish, the over-used accusatory RACIST term would be thrown into the mix. There are, of course, many of us who passionately believe that we are worth saving and who do our bit towards that end, finding a future melting pot abhorrent!              

But our task is a difficult one, being extremely challenging due to the seemingly increasing number of people who would not be unhappy with a white genocide, together with the fact that our time is running out with our numbers reducing as non-whites are increasing.

Much of the first strand to ensuring our survival relies on our political activists who attempt to publicise the very real dangers that face us. Nearly 70 years of work, with varying levels of impact, have been devoted to seeking a political solution, with Nationalists putting themselves forward at elections in the hope we can influence government at local and national levels. Sadly this has very rarely been successful and of late has become almost a non-event, with fewer and fewer Nationalists standing for elections, with those who do receiving derisory results. It seems that we spread ourselves too thinly as a result of the number of parties that have existed in the past and those that exist today and consequently our impact is negligible. It could be reasonably argued that the future of the white race appears to be less important than the petty squabbles that take place amongst the various big fish in the small ponds of Nationalism. This together with the failure of policy-makers to make adjustments necessary to appeal to a broader section of the electorate means our progress is painfully slow. At the heart of this lies the need for unity amongst the Nationalist community and attempts to achieve this have largely fallen on deaf ears and have so far failed, but nevertheless without it, the establishment win every time when there are multiple groupings with broadly similar aims and objectives but where many feel more comfortable as large fish in small ponds. Again, this begs the question as to whether we are serious about our future. Much work is required, but it is not an insurmountable task, the only obstacle really being that of time and unless we successfully unite the various groups to work together to our common goal then we may as well give up now.

Together with the electioneering, Nationalists have attempted to spread the word by leafletting communities, holding demonstrations and marches and meetings and, of late, by utilising social media. All of these activities have had varying levels of success but never the levels required for the major breakthrough required to shake the electorate from their slumbers. Generally all of these activities take a great deal of effort and result in little positive return. The efforts made in carrying out leafletting, for example, result in responses being received, it is suggested, of between 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 10,000 depending on the type of community leafletted.

Demonstrations and marches tend to result in negative press coverage, often well-deserved due to the inability of our ranks to turn out in a well-disciplined and smart order. Meetings take much organisation, even before trying to prise potential attendees away from their television sets or computer devices, which leads us conveniently on to social media for which there is a potentially huge audience, it prevents Nationalists networking face-to-face.

Of course, we all know that much of our work is sabotaged by a hostile, socialist dominated media who will always play-down what we are doing and what we achieve, but also will deliberately and blatantly attempt to destroy us at every turn by showing the worst faces of Nationalism in order to alienate us from the general public. As mentioned above it must be agreed, however, that the responsibility for a lot of the coverage lies squarely with ourselves. There have been violent confrontations, which may or may not have resulted from the need to defend ourselves, but also we need to question how we present ourselves. Many would argue that, in this enlightened age of equality, judgements made on appearance are wrong and that is often true however those believing this is actually true in practice have been brain-washed by yet another form of political correct nonsense that just does not hold up. Appearances always matter and a bare-chested, heavily tattooed, shaven-headed, beer-can carrying man is never going to appeal to the public in the same way a sober-suited and tidy man is. Sadly the general public, if asked to describe a white Nationalist will nearly always go for the former description partly because of the politically correct brainwashing, partly due to the image of us portrayed by the mass media and partly due to our own adherence to the image. But again if we care about our future, we should care about our image and make that extra effort to defy that negative stereotype. Only when the public see us as one of them will we be taken seriously enough to achieve the support and recognition necessary for the 14 words to impact as required.

This means we need to ensure we are successful with the first strand in achieving the 14 words and we must seriously look at ourselves and get our act together on many levels. This suggestion will not go down well with many Nationalists, but when disputing this it needs to be asked if they are actually serious, really serious, about saving the white race, or are just playing at it.

Part two will be posted in Nation Revisited # 211, May 2024.

The Democratic Conundrum

Jacob Rees-Mogg one of our elected representatives.

People want good services and low taxes, but that can only be achieved within a thriving economy. If the government spends lavishly on health, education and other popular causes it will get elected next time, but not by the productive section of the electorate that pays taxes.

If, on the other hand, the government skimps on services but reduces taxation it will be popular with the productive class but unpopular with the unproductive class that relies on government handouts.

The Rishi Sunak government has antagonised both classes with crumbling services and soaring taxes. The events of recent years have seriously impacted our economy; the Prime Mortgage Crisis, Brexit, the Pandemic, the Liz Truss fiasco, and the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East have left us with a national debt that's 100% of our national income; under the Labour government of Gordon Brown it was 40%.

One way out of this nightmare is total austerity. If we shut down hospitals and schools, abolished state retirement pensions and social benefits, and at the same time, increased taxes, we would be better able to repay our loans. Of course, this would not work because the people wouldn't stand for it. Even the docile and sheep-like British public would object to starvation. Under such a regime the trade unions would get their act together to call a general strike and bring down the government.

But if the government took the opposite track and started spending money like a drunken sailor the forces of international finance would soon intervene. Just the announcement of Liz Truss' budget proposals was enough to panic the Market and send the pound plunging. Brexiteers imagine that we are now in control of our own affairs but the stark reality is that we are still part of a global economy and we are bound by the rules of the game.

So what's the answer? We need a Government of National Unity comprised of all the political parties and representatives from both sides of industry. Such a government would have to tread a delicate fiscal path that avoided unnecessary spending and crippling taxation. We would not be able to afford an unaccountable monarchy that wastes the public purse on princes, dukes, and geriatric members of the House of Lords. We would not be able to afford unseaworthy aircraft carriers or nuclear-powered submarines armed with dud American missiles. We would not be able to give arms and money to corrupt regimes like that of Zelensky or Netanyahu. And we would not be able to send ministers swanning around the world on pointless peace missions. In other words, we would have to mind our own business.

A Government of National Unity appointed for ten years with wartime powers could transform our poor benighted country. Our so-called democratic system is not fit for purpose.

Wars and Rumours of Wars

Public opinion is controlled by the mainstream media, which has decided to take the side of Ukraine in their territorial dispute with Russia, and Israel in their colonisation of the West Bank and their invasion and bombardment of Gaza.

There is no British interest involved in either of these wars, but the overwhelming majority of MPs are members of the Conservative Friends of Israel, or the Labour Friends of Israel, and all the media proprietors are self-confessed Zionists. It's therefore logical that they support the Zionist state of Israel and the Zionist-dominated Zelensky regime in Ukraine.

The one-sidedness of the reporting on the Ukraine and Israel wars is staggering. We are expected to believe that Zelensky is fighting for democracy, when he has cancelled elections, locked up the opposition, and used military police to drag old men and boys off the street to prop up his diminishing army.

And we are expected to believe that the Israeli Defence Force only bombs military targets, when they have destroyed almost every hospital, mosque and church in Gaza and cut off food, water and electricity to the starving Palestinian population. 

At a time when our schools and hospitals are crumbling for want of money our government is sending arms and ammunition worth billions of pounds to their friends in Israel and Ukraine.

But Britain and the EU can't supply Zelensky indefinitely and the USA is having second thoughts as Donald Trump prepares for power. Trump's entire family are married to Jews but he is more concerned with the American taxpayers than he is with the Jewish lobby.

The Democrats have weaponised the American legal system to stop Donald Trump because If America stopped funding Netanyahu and Zelensky they would  be forced to the conference table, and the kickbacks would have to stop.

No less an authority than President Eisenhower coined the phrase "The Military-Industrial Complex" to describe the powerful American arms industry. At present it's booming as billions of dollars are spent on arming their friends. And when billions of dollars are being spent it's inevitable that some of it finds its way into the offshore bank accounts of corrupt politicians. Because it's not just arms manufacturers that profit from war, there's also contractors, suppliers, shipping companies, and legions of agents, lawyers and accountants.

This is what Gore Vidal meant by "Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace." The long series of wars fought by America and her allies; WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria etc., were all justified by "fighting for democracy", but they were really designed to boost the American economy. The super capitalists than run the world couldn't care less about the millions of souls that were sacrificed in the name of profit. The love of money is the root of all evil.

European Outlook -  https://europeanoutlook.blogspot.com 

Nation Revisited

All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. The editor reserves the right to shorten or otherwise amend articles submitted for publication. We seek reform by lawful means according to the UN Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:

"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people."