Have the Brexiteers got what they want?
The British National Party pretended to be a White Nationalist movement before it collapsed. They even tried to set up a pan-European group within the EU, but it was all superficial. They never really believed in European unity and they supported the Daily Mail's hateful campaign against the Poles and other East Europeans.
The Brexiteers even spouted their propaganda whilst protected by young Polish volunteers at meetings of the London Forum. Concepts such as 'Aryan Unity' were forgotten in a rush to embrace the divisive slogans of UKIP and the lunatic fringe of the Tory Party.
Our cowardly newspapers, led by the Daily Mail, never mentioned non-European immigration for fear of the Race Relations Act, but the Poles were fair game. They convinced their readers that the Poles were a threat to their identity. But the Poles are fellow Europeans who have contributed in full to every branch of civilisation. We thank them for Chopin, the mine detector, talking pictures, radium, and for the brave Polish servicemen who fought alongside us in the Second World War.
Having torn the UK from Europe and driven the Poles away with a campaign of hostility, the Brexiteers have created labour shortages that they are now trying to address. Boris Johnson is recruiting Chinese and Indian immigrants, and Tim Martin of Wetherspoons is calling for more EU workers to work in his charmless pubs.
It's difficult to know exactly where we stand with the Coronavirus still distorting the economy, but we are in debt up to our ears and short of labour. We need foreign workers but Dominic Cummings' threat of an influx of 70 million Turks was just another brazen Brexit lie.
Immigration was the weapon used by the petty nationalist to achieve Brexit, but the British government could have stopped non-EU immigration at any time. Under the terms of the EU treaty we were expected to take European workers but there was nothing stopping us from shutting the doors to the Third World.
When this dreadful virus has run its course and we rebuild our economy we must address the demographic problem of our aging population. If we need immigrants we should chose our fellow Europeans who are easier to assimilate than people from widely different backgrounds.
Personal View - Mark Webb
Further to the mass brawl in Hyde Park involving weapons, the Sky News headline reads: "Police release images of stabbed in Hyde Park."
Images show young men facing off and charging each other with Goloks (a machete issued to the British Army operating in a jungle setting). Machete / Kukri hybrids (long curved slicing blades). Footage on Youtube shows hundreds of people involved.
I have long campaigned for a ban on the sale of machetes in the UK. The reasons being the following:
1. They are a status weapon amongst gang members.
2. The injuries that can be caused from a single swing of a machete blade range from life altering to fatal. (See The Mirror 19th April 2021: "Liverpool Machete Attack: Man in 20s has hand chopped off."
3. What is the purpose of the sale of such items? We have no jungles or rain forests to hack through in Southwark (a London borough). There's no sugar cane, banana or bamboo harvesting in Southwark. Machetes are not used in arboriculture, horticulture, construction or food processing in the UK.
Machetes have a deadly track record as weapons. They were used to deadly effect in the Mau Mau Uprising (The Lari Massacre); in Haiti by the Tonton Macoute; during the 1994 Rwandan genocide; in the Township Wars in South Africa between the Zulus and the ANC; by drug cartels in Mexico for decapitations; and by the Triads in Hong Kong. The Machete is the growing weapon of choice for street gangs in the US, the UK and the EU.
Other incidents of note include the foiled plot to kill Rosie Cooper the current Labour MP for West Lancashire. Members of the banned Neo-Nazi group 'National Action' purchased a Gladios Machete with which to murder her. This weapon is widely available. It took me seconds to find several UK websites stocking that item for £29.99. Some suppliers were out of stock but Amazon are selling a range of machetes for as little as £11.00 for a 20 inch blade.
For further evidence look at other recent events; a four way machete brawl in Greenwich June 3, the double machete attack in Birmingham May 30, the machete fight between two men in Morecombe May 10, the two teenagers injured in the Leeds alleyway machete fight May 5.
I will never forget the ITV footage of a police officer being attacked in Leytonstone in 2019. It shows bodycam footage of a van driver repeatedly hitting a police officer with a machete. He survived with deep wounds to his head, a fractured skull and wounds to his hands and arms.
Is this a Camberwell problem? Well, yes it is. We have had two machete attacks in McDonalds in recent years. The local police have found machetes, Rambo blades, and combat knives during weapons sweeps. When they chased a group of youths one of them dropped an 18 inch Kukri blade which was recovered by the officers.
Photo credit Sky News
During the knife crime peak in 2008, 16 youths were stopped and held by police on a bus. They were travelling to fight another group of youths. I was there that day when the police disarmed these kids of a haul of pool cues, a hockey stick, knives, bats, brass knuckles and seven machetes. When I say kids, some of them were 13 or 14 years of age,
What type of psychopath would take a machete and attack others with it? I am not a doctor or a social worker so I can't answer that. However, I think that a ban is in order.
Carrying a knife already has an automatic sentence, but a machete should equal more jail time. Banning the sale of machetes should be a first step in reducing violent crime.
An enquiry from Johan de Hont
1. What are the biggest myths about Fascism?
The biggest myth about Fascism is that it was a movement against the common people. Fascism was a revolt against the terrible living conditions throughout Europe after the First World War. In Italy, Spain, Britain, the Netherlands and Belgium it was essentially a nationalist movement. In Germany it adopted the racial theories which led to the Second World War and the near destruction of Europe. Remember that Fascism had governed Italy from 1922, and it was only destroyed by Hitler's mad invasion of the Soviet Union.
What books best describe what Fascism is?
A good selection of books on Fascism can be found at: www.blackhousepublishing.co.uk
Which documentaries about Fascism are the most reliable?
History is written by the victors and we are still too near the events of the 20th century to make objective judgements.
Did the Holocaust really take place?
Yes it did. The exact number of people killed can be debated but there is no doubt that millions of Jews were rounded up by the Nazis and sent to concentration camps where they died. It is ridiculous to deny that these things happened.
Did Adolf Hitler really hate the Jews?
Yes. He devoted many pages of Mein Kampf to denouncing the Jews. National leaders throughout history have criticised the Jews, including Napoleon, but none of them hated them like Hitler.
Fascism belongs to the past, Soviet Communism has been consigned to 'the dustbin of history', the Chinese regime is turning to Social Credit, and liberal democratic governments throughout the world are mired in sleaze and corruption. The search for a fair and efficient system of government goes on. The old problems of supply and demand have largely been solved but mankind faces the challenges of pollution and climate change. Given that there is nothing new under the Sun, some aspects of the past are bound to survive. Leadership will always be necessary and so will the great industrial corporations. But the bristling sabre rattling of Fascism and National Socialism is not to be repeated.
What Went Wrong?
Britain was in a bad way when I was born in London in 1945, our major cities had been bombed to destruction, our infrastructure was broken and millions of ex-servicemen were coming home after six long years of war. But nothing would dampen the enthusiasm of one of my schoolteachers. He told us that we were lucky children who would enjoy a wonderful future. He said that we have got a Labour government so we would be looked after from the cradle to the grave. We would be medicated by the National Health Service, we would all go to university, the class system would be dismantled, everybody would be equal, there would be no more wars because we belonged to the United Nations, state pensions would be enough to live on, electricity would be free because we had harnessed to power of the atom, and we would all be given a council house when we got married. It sounded too good to be true, and it was.
We are now coming out of another national disaster, the Coronavirus pandemic. The global economy has been turned upside down but politicians are already making predictions for the future. With the relentless rise of automation and artificial intelligence the need for workers will decrease but people will still need an income. This is already happening in China, and the rest of the world will not be far behind. It doesn't really matter if we call subsistence payments 'Job Seekers Allowance', 'Family Credits', or 'Unemployment Benefit'. These are just words to describe a redistribution of wealth amongst the population. In the future many people will be paid to study, look after the elderly, or express themselves artistically.
We can only hope that the coming social experiment will work out better than the current one. Britain has got two million pensioners living in poverty and thousands of families dependent on food banks. The gap between rich and poor is widening and we have added race to class as a division of society. What went wrong?
Reflections on the Covid Revolution - Dennis Whiting, Chairman of Patria
“Building back greener and building back fairer and building back more equal and, how shall I, in a more gender neutral and, perhaps a more feminine way.” Thus says the bumbling subversive, Johnson. How can building back (whatever this curious term may mean) be done in both a more “gender neutral” and a more “feminine” way at one and the same time? If it’s more feminine then by definition it’s less “gender neutral”. Conversely, if it’s more gender neutral then it’s less feminine. Furthermore, how does the unrestricted pouring of concrete over our green and pleasant land, destroying the habitat of wildlife in the process, equate with being “greener”? Logic alert!
The summit was billed as a G7 meeting so the two EU functionaries, who are not heads of government, ought not to have been present or, if in attendance, certainly not standing on the dais with the seven heads of government.
The security was overdone. There was no need for 6,000 police officers, for example. If an incident had occurred they would simply have got in each other’s way. An ordinary citizen rarely gets to see even a single police officer if their home is burgled, so why should professional politicians receive such special treatment at our expense?
Allow a jumped-up professional politician with an ego bigger than their intellect to snatch more power over the lives of ordinary folk and it’s the devil of a job to get it back again. History shows this time and time again. What does Johnson intend to convey by the innocuous sounding phrase “build back better”? More interference by government and big business in the lives of ordinary people, more state sponsored child abuse, more gender-bending of the young, more criminalizing of dissent, more promotion of immigration and immigrants at the expense of the English and more destruction of the natural environment to house the new arrivals.
The occupation government raised the white flag of surrender to its “wokest” wing when it agreed to reverse its planned cut of four billion pounds to the foreign aid budget. That’s four billion pounds more the government will need to borrow, at interest, in order to give away overseas. Foreign aid, as we nationalists know, is taking money from poor people in rich countries and giving it to rich (and often very unpleasant) people in poor countries.
Conservative? Just what exactly are they conserving? Apart from their bank balances? Certainly not ours.
So are things hopeless, then? Far from it. To quote Churchill “Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm” and “Success is not final, failure is not fatal, it is the courage to continue that counts”.
We British nationalists are not defeated. We have not yet begun to fight. We are only getting warmed up for the titanic struggles that lie ahead. The election of at least two British nationalists to district and county council seats, one in Essex and another in Durham County, is a sign of things to come.
The phrase “Let a hundred flowers bloom” could apply with equal relevance to the ideological distinctions within the broad nationalist movement as to the myriad of organizations espousing those various shades of opinion.
Whereas over the course of the last decade or so we have seen a centrifugal force within nationalism, in the years to come we are likely to see a centripetal force operating.
It remains to be seen which ideas within nationalism will be the most attractive to our people and which vehicle or vehicles most successfully propagate those ideas. But ideas, unlike individuals and institutions, never die.
Giuseppe Tarrocca RIP 1942-2021
Another old campaigner has passed away. I first met Giuseppe Tarrocca at the 1962 BNP Camp in Norfolk. He was a great Italian and European patriot who never gave up the fight. His family is spread over Spain, Italy, Monaco and the UK but he died surrounded by his wife Mathilda, his son Carlo, and his two daughters. He is seen here with Nick Griffin during a conference in Spain in 2011.
Nation Revisited
"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with
4 comments:
Social Credit as pioneered by Major Clifford Hugh Douglas and taken up by John Hargrave ("White Fox") should not of course be confused with the oppressive and sinister Orwellian "Social Credit System" national blacklist scam as imposed on the Chinese people, by the dictatorship of the Communist Party of China.
Hargrave and Sir Oswald Mosley corresponded and discussed a possible merger between the Green Shirt Movement for Social Credit/Social Credit Party of Great Britain and the British Union of Fascists during the early 1930s, but such an alliance was eventually rejected. (Hargrave's father was an English Quaker artist and his mother was Jewish). The Green Shirts attacked Usury and the private International Banks such as the Rothschilds (like Mosley's Blackshirts), but were never anti-Jewish, although admittedly Mosley was never as anti-Semitic as the genocidal crank Arnold Spencer Leese of the IFL.
https://greenshirtengland.blogspot.com
The Greenshirts were anti-fascist right from the start, they participated in demonstrations against the BUF as it the Hyde Park rally in 1934. There was violence between Blackshirts and Greenshirts in Liverpool, and in the east end of London the Greenshirts were found in the ranks of the reds. All that being the case, I would have thought it extremely unlikely these two organisations would have considered merging. It sounds like a fantasy to me, and is there any hard evidence of talks about this.
Dear Anonymous,
See the book "Social Movements and Their Supporters: The Green Shirts in England" by Mark Drakeford and "The Social Credit Movement in Britain" by Roger Bartlett in "Heritage and Destiny" magazine (back issue) for details of the Hargrave-Mosley merger talks and other links. Yes, there were fights between the Social Credit Green Shirts and the Fascist Blackshirts, but this street rivalry had ended by 1939 when the Mosleyite Money Reformers General J.F.C. Fuller, Henry Williamson and Alliot Verdon-Roe were endorsed on the Green Shirt/SCPGB pamphlet "These Names Make Social Credit News". Many Blackshirts were interned for supporting Nazi Germany when the Nazi Luftwaffe were bombing London and Coventry, but a few BU members did their duty such as RAF Servicemen George Brocking and Kenneth Day, the first recorded casualties of WWII...
The Green Shirt says, "The Green Shirts attacked usury, the private international banks such as the Rothschilds ... but it was never anti-Jewish".
This is a complete contradiction in itself. Attacking usury and the Rothschilds in the same breath would be deemed anti-Semitic today as it was then.
Post a Comment