Nation
Revisited # 106, August 2013
e-mail: nationrevisited@gmail.com
website: http://nationrevisited.blogspot.co.uk
Defence
British armed forces are being restructured in line
with the 2010 Defence Review but they will still be highly trained, well-equipped
and funded by the fourth largest defence budget in the world. The army will
consist of 82,000 regulars and 30,000 Territorial Army reservists. The Royal
Navy will consist of 36,000 personnel, including 7,000 Royal Marines and 5,200
men and women of the Fleet Air Arm. The Royal Air Force will have 33,000
personnel.
Our Type 45 destroyers; Daring, Dauntless, Diamond,
Dragon, Defender and Duncan are the world’s most advanced warships. They
displace 8,000 tonnes and are equipped with the Sea Viper missile system and
Sampson radar. After much speculation our 65,000 tonne aircraft carriers HMS
Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales are due to enter service in 2017. Each
ship can carry 36 Lightning Joint Strike Fighters, 4 helicopters and a crew of
1600. Two Astute class submarines, Astute and Ambush are in service and five
more will follow. These 7,000 tonne nuclear-powered submarines are armed with
Spearfish torpedoes and Tomahawk cruise missiles capable of carrying nuclear
warheads.
The RAF’s main aircraft is the formidable Panavia
Tornado fighter-bomber. This is being replaced with the even more advanced
Eurofighter Typhoon – probably the world’s best multi-role aircraft. The
Hercules fleet is being replaced by 22 Airbus A400 transporters.
Our nuclear deterrent depends on Trident missiles
supplied by the US under the 1958 UK-US Mutual Defence Agreement. They are
carried aboard four submarines; Vanguard, Victorious, Vigilant and Vengeance. Each
vessel displaces 16,000 tonnes and carries 16 Trident ballistic missiles with
multiple warheads. The future of Trident will be decided in 2016. The cost of
upgrading the submarines, missiles and warheads is estimated at £20 bn by the
government and £100 bn by Greenpeace. The true figure is somewhere in between.
We are more than capable of defending ourselves and in
cooperation with our European partners we are developing affordable domestic
materiel. Typhoon multi-role aircraft, Augusta Westland combat helicopters, Sea
Viper and Storm Shadow missiles, Spearfish torpedoes, Sampson radar, and Airbus
A400 transport planes put us in the forefront of military technology and
provide valuable jobs for British workers.
The Housing CrisisIt cannot be right that the seventh richest country on earth has a desperate housing shortage. There are 4.5 million people in the UK waiting to be housed and 3,960 families living in emergency bed and breakfast accommodation (National Housing Federation). Between 1951 and 1954 Harold Macmillan the Minister for Housing in Winston Churchill’s government built 300,000 houses per year. But we only managed to build 7,090 houses in 2012 (National House Building Council). In 2007 Gordon Brown pledged to build one million affordable houses but at the present rate of progress this will only amount to 400,000, less than half, by 2020 (The Guardian).
The UK housing shortage has been made worst by immigration
and the financial constraints on local authorities. But with interest rates at
rock bottom now is the right time to be building; and it would be cheaper than
keeping people in B&Bs. There is no reason why social housing should not be
profitable. Houses built at volume and sold or rented at realistic prices
should cover the cost of construction and maintenance.
When Margaret Thatcher started selling off council
houses the Labour Party protested but it soon became obvious that Labour
Councilors were at the front of the queue. The Labour Party is good at talking
socialism but it took a true-blue aristocrat like Harold Macmillan to set the
record for house building. He is hated by Labour for saying that we had “never
had it so good”, and he is hated by the Tories for his “Winds of Change” speech.
In fact, he had an understanding of geopolitics and a rapport with the people
that is sadly lacking in Dave Cameron.
A national house building programme would get families
out of inadequate and expensive accommodation, get unemployed construction
workers off the dole and give the economy a boost. Defenders of the free market
are against government intervention but the private sector has completely
failed to provide affordable homes. Banks are restrained from granting
mortgages by new rules governing lending and property developers are hampered
by planning permission.
Oswald Mosley’s Union Movement had an extensive range
of policies including housing. These were set out in their many books and
pamphlets and all of them were covered in Mosley:
Right or Wrong - (available from www.amazon.com at £9.00).
“Housing must be treated as a national problem. To
leave it in the hands of local authorities is another case of stage-coach
politics. You do not fight wars by farming out the job to local authorities.
Why will present government never take anything seriously except fighting a
war? It is only then that we have a national effort. The housing of the people
should be taken seriously, and treated like a problem of war. Many of the same
slums disgrace us today (1961) as when I entered politics. We have got to clean
up the British housing problem in double quick time.”
Ukip blames the housing crisis on our membership of
the European Union. They claim that the housing shortage is caused by
immigration and pledge to solve the problem by getting Britain out of Europe.
But this is simply not true. Apart from Citizens of the Irish Republic who are
covered by the Anglo-Irish Treaty of 1923 the majority of immigrants come from
South Asia, Africa and the Caribbean. Quitting the EU would do nothing to
control them.
The less respectable nationalist parties follow the
same line. They are dedicated to the mantra that was carved in stone when the
National Front was founded in 1967: “Stop immigration, start repatriation, and
get Britain out of the Common Market.”
We have had a housing shortage since the Second World
War but apart from Harold Macmillan’s commendable effort in the fifties not
enough has been done about it. People
bought their own houses during the boom but now they can’t get mortgages and
the present government is torn between its duty to provide housing and its
commitment to reducing the budget deficit.
Immigration did not cause the housing problem but it
has aggravated it and continues to do so. Tony Blair and Gordon Brown imported
2.5 million immigrants in pursuit of their dream of a multiracial Britain; and
in the hope that they would vote Labour. They never considered the availability
of houses, jobs, schools and hospitals. They should have been charged with
criminal negligence instead of being rewarded with prime ministerial pensions.
Some say they should have been charged with treason.
When we built 300,000 houses per year just after the
war we were short of materials, money and manpower. With modern construction
methods, and rock bottom interest rates, we could build enough affordable
houses for all our people. It would take a great national effort and it would
upset profiteering bankers, landlords and estate agents but it can, and must be
done.
The Dismantling of a Democracy
(Reprinted from The
Flame August 2011 – http://theflameuk.com
People are claiming today that Britain has become an
obedient poodle at the beck and call of the United States. This is nothing new
Winston Churchill put us in this position in the 1930s.
In 1948 the British government signed away more of our
freedoms when it signed the United Nations Charter and bound us to its terms.
Alger Hiss, an American convicted communist and Soviet agent, together with
Andrei Gromyko, a senior Soviet official, saw to it that Britain became
embroiled in this trickster’s charter. The UN Act binds Parliament to a body
over which it has no control.
Politicians must be the world’s greatest illusionists;
for while they tell the public they are doing something good, they are usually
getting away with the reverse, and few spot how this is done. Since 1937
plotters have been at work methodically getting rid of all the public
safeguards which were built into our constitution. For instance they have
gradually reduced the ability of the Sovereign (Crown) to defend her subjects,
while dismissing all free and independent critics from the House of Lords. This
has for the first time given Parliament a free hand to do just as it wants.
A letter from the Home Secretary dated 31st
May 1988 appears in the Independent newspaper on Monday 17th June
1988. This document made it clear that her Majesty the Queen is prepared to
place at the disposal of Parliament of her remaining prerogatives, including
the power to make war or peace. The letter was signed by Douglas Hurd, while
serving in Margaret Thatcher’s government. This has left Parliament and their
non-elected partners the ability to decide where and when they deploy our armed
forces.
With neither the Queen, nor the House of Lords able to
place restraints on the government – or to be precise, the cabinet and their
advisers – we now have a virtual elected dictatorship. Which is why, Tony Blair
felt free to drag Britain into an unjustified and illegal assault on the
sovereign nation of Iraq. To make matters worse he involved us in another
illegal attack, by allowing American warplanes carrying bombs for the
devastation of the Lebanon, to pass through the UK.
As there is no effective opposition party in the House
of Commons, it is now left to journalists and the public to try and keep
Parliament in check by using whatever means remain. Families who had their sons
illegally killed while serving in Iraq have called for a public enquiry into
the justification for war. It is possible that Tony Blair and Lord Goldsmith
may, one day have to give evidence under oath. The Iraq conflict was not only
morally wrong, but the reasons given for the engagement were fabricated.
However, a more pertinent point not generally raised
is that servicemen sign up to fight for the defence of our nation, not to be
lent out as mercenaries and placed at the disposal of that private organization
that calls itself “The New World Order”. In fact our armed forces were
commandeered in 1939 by a world government group led by Winston Churchill, and
as yet they haven’t been returned. This is why our army and air force are
constantly being used in wars which have absolutely nothing to do with us,
while our shores and airports are continually used as points of arrival for an
illegal invasion.
Editor: The United Kingdom has been militarily
dependent on the USA since 1917 and economically dependent on them since 1944.
We need to seriously consider our links with America, Europe and the rest of
the world.
Five
Questions Answered by Claire Khaw
We asked our readers the
following five questions. Who are you? What do you believe in? If you could
direct government policy what would you do? What are you proud of and what do
you regret? How would you like to be remembered? Interested readers should
e-mail their replies to: nationrevisited@gmail.com
So
far we have had replies from John Bean of the British Democrats # 76, Robert
Edwards of European Action # 77, Bill Baillie of Nation Revisited # 78, Michael
Woodbrige of Western Springs # 96, Eddy Morrison of the NF 97, Robert Best of
the League of St George # 98, Arlette Baldacchino of Viva Malta # 99, Alex
Morana from North America # 100, Rufus of News from Atlantis # 101, Pete
Williamson of The White Way Home # 103. Here is Claire Khaw of The Voice of Reason.
Who are you?
What do you believe in?
I
believe that; (1) representative democracy, (2) liberalism, (3) feminism, (4)
the desecration of marriage, (5) atheism; will be the death of Western
civilization.
(1)
Repeal the Equality Act 2010. (2) Repeal the European Communities Act 1972.
(3)
Repeal the Murder (Abolition of the Death Penalty) Act 1965. (4) Repeal the
Human Rights Act 1998. (5) Make it a requirement for couples to agree a
marriage contract before they can marry.
What are you proud of and
what do you regret?
I
am proud of my understanding of the hearts and minds of the British people as
well as my knowledge of their history, culture, religious differences and class
system.
It is too early to say if I
have any regrets. I will have a better picture of the regrettable things I have
done in my life on my deathbed.
How would you like to be
remembered?
I would like to be
remembered for not being afraid to say what I believe to be the truth and for
saying what I feel needs to be said, rather than what is merely socially
acceptable to say. A mediocre politician is economical with the truth, while a
great politician is generous with the truth and also praised for the telling of
it. I hope I will at least be something in between.
Bill White: Enemy of the State
The former
leader of the American National Socialist Workers’ Party is back in prison for
giving an unauthorized radio interview to the American Free Press. Bill White, a 36 year-old psychology
graduate, has been in and out of federal prisons for the last five years
although most of the original charges against him have been dropped. He is
accused of provoking violence by addressing an audience that is “inherently
violent”. His website used to get 150,000 hits before it was shut down under
legislation intended to protect America against terrorism. His former lawyer dropped
out when she was advised that representing him could be a federal offence. And
a subsequent state-appointed lawyer failed to turn up. Nobody knows how long he
will be detained, or even where.
The Washington
Post was so determined to incriminate Bill White that they tried to blame
his website for the Columbine High School massacre of 1999. When Eric Harris
and Dylan Klebold shot dead twelve students they suggested: “some police hate
crime experts say privately it is not inconceivable that the teen-age gunmen in
this case visited the site.” In fact White had merely said that the state
education system endangered the mental health of its students. Even the FBI
admitted that there was no evidence against him.
The British government used Defence Regulation 18B in
1940 to detain opponents of Churchill’s war without charge or trial. This
emergency legislation was introduced to fight the IRA but it was used against
Oswald Mosley and his supporters. The present government is preparing new
legislation in response to recent terrorist outrages but they already have
plenty of repressive laws at their disposal. Colin Jordan and Nick Griffin were
prosecuted under the Race Relations Act and Simon Sheppard and Luke O’Farrell
were given punitive sentences after being refused political asylum in the US.
The British and American governments fully co-operate in locking up “enemies of
the state.” The Atlantic Alliance is stronger than ever.
Bill White’s opinions are forthright but harsh words
do not actually kill people. President Obama, on the other hand, speaks softly
but backs the rebels in Syria and orders the killing of thousands of people
throughout the world with missiles, bombs, heavy artillery and gunfire. The
dissident writer is held in prison while the Commander in Chief enjoys all the
comforts of the White House. Democracy is supposed to guarantee freedom of
speech but criticizing the Money Power is obviously a freedom too far. In
defence of “freedom” plutocratic governments are using all the instruments of
oppression at their disposal.
You can access Bill White’s former website www.overthrow.com by visiting Way Back Machine at http://archive.org/web/web.php
The Great Divide
Those
of us who opposed communism, global capitalism and unrestricted immigration in
the fifties and sixties gravitated towards parties holding those views. But a
clear division soon emerged between Oswald Mosley’s vision of Europe a Nation
and the limited horizons of the petty nationalists. I wrote in Nation in 1973: “We are divided on
Europe but agreed on the need to stop immigration and control the Money Power.
We stand on the threshold of success.” Apart from the Panglossian final
sentence the statement is still true.
Individuals
and parties come and go but ideas are indestructible. We who believe in Europe
are still divided from those chasing the fantasy of “national independence.” We
know that the EU will not destroy the individual nations of Europe any more
than the United Kingdom destroyed England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Nations
are not destroyed by federation. France, Germany and Italy have been in the EU
since it was founded by the Treaty of Rome in 1957, but they are still
indisputably French, German and Italian.
This
debate was revived by an article on Marine Le Pen by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
the dystopian business editor of the Daily
Telegraph. He welcomed Marine Le Pen’s promise to destroy the euro by
withdrawing France from the eurozone. Even its strongest critics acknowledge
that the collapse of the euro would be catastrophic; not just for the eurozone
but for the UK and the rest of Europe. But Ambrose Evans-Pritchard thinks it’s
a good idea. No wonder the Daily
Telegraph’s circulation has halved in the past decade. If the Barclay
Brothers want their ailing newspaper to survive they should dump him and
embrace reality.
The
Front National did well in recent elections, but after 41 years of campaigning
they only have 2 seats in the National Assembly and 3 in the European Parliament.
They will probably do well in the coming European election; as will Ukip in the
UK and the Freedom Party in the Netherlands. They will pick up protest votes
but their only answer to the worldwide economic crisis is protectionism. This
did not work in the 1930s and it will not work now. France will not prosper on
her own and nor will Britain or the Netherlands; we are bound together by ties
of blood, culture and historical inevitability. Marine Le Pen, Geert Wilders
and Nigel Farage may delay European unity but they will never stop it.
Markets
always respond to changing circumstances. Rising wages and expectations in
China and a reduction in spending power in Europe and North America will
rebalance the economies of the world. The future is looking good for our
expanding high-tech industries but an isolated Britain hiding behind protective
tariffs and lacking dollars to buy gas and oil is not something to look forward
to.
Views on the News
Veteran campaigner and Nation Revisited subscriber Roger Clare was briefly interviewed outside Charing Cross Station on Andrew
Neil’s Daily Politics TV show on Thursday 27/06/13. Adam Fleming asked him what
he thought about George Osborne’s spending review. Roger replied that the
Chancellor should have looked at the foreign aid budget. He told me later that
he is not completely opposed to foreign aid but doesn’t see why it should be
ring-fenced.
Eric Pirie died in a Nottingham Hospital on 8th
July 2013. He was the younger brother of Denis Pirie. Both brothers were
members of the original British National Party who followed Colin Jordan into
the National Socialist Movement in 1962 and survived the riot that ended their
inaugural rally in Trafalgar Square. RIP Eric.
Ted Davey died of cancer in a Bournemouth hospice on 8th
July 2013. He was an active member of Union Movement in the fifties, a
supporter of the original BNP and later Colin Jordan in the sixties and a
regular at Friends of Mosley socials in the eighties and nineties. He was an
avid letter writer with many contacts at home and abroad. RIP Ted.
Ten years after the death of weapons inspector Dr
David Kelly a group of doctors led by radiologist Stephen Frost are calling for
an inquest. The Hutton Inquiry found that he had committed suicide but this has
been widely disputed. Courts of Inquiry usually find in favour of governments.
But in the age of the Internet and the Freedom of Information Act it’s getting
harder to manipulate the truth. Recent inquiries have uncovered corruption in
high places. The Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq War is due to report next year
but the government is still refusing to release official documents. Lord
Hutton’s verdict may be right but only a proper inquest by a trained coroner
will settle the matter.
Dave Cameron has announced a crackdown on child
pornography and plans to force Internet providers to install filters to stop
children from accessing porn sites. But filters can be switched off by computer
savvy children; and perverts can send pictures by e-mail. This is yet another empty
Tory gesture to go with charging foreigners to use the National Health Service
and advising illegal immigrants to go home. We need vigilant border guards to
stop illegal immigrants and we need courts ready and willing to convict criminals.
We cannot turn Internet providers, social workers, doctors and nurses into
policemen. This government is addicted to gestures. They have promised a
referendum on Europe to appease Ukip but they have no intention of acting on
it. They promised to combat terrorism but openly supported the rebels in Syria.
And they talk about stopping immigration and then tell us that we need another
7 million immigrants. Almost everything this government does is a deception
involving smoke and mirrors. It’s time we got rid of them.
3 comments:
I understand Ted Davey has now been shown by his own admission to have been a police informer. That a man can snitch on his comrades is the lowest of the low.
I have only just heard about this. We have been riddled with spies and informers for as long as I can remember. I guess the best thing is to have no secrets for them to uncover.
It was announced at his funeral that Ted Davey had been a MI5 and MI6 informant since the 1970s. The person who made this announcement was Ted's executor: an ex-police officer who had been Head of Security at Southampton Docks where he was Ted's boss and the person who originally recruited Ted.
Ted's last wish was to have his ashes scattered in the garden beneath the Berghof, Hitler's mountain retreat in Bavaria. They deserve each other.
Post a Comment