Nation Revisited # 217, March 2025

The Special Relationship

President Donald Trump is back in the Whitehouse with a populist and protectionist agenda. We can't take seriously his ambition to annex Greenland and Canada, and we must be concerned with his love of tariffs. The United States is our second biggest market after the European Union. We are estranged from Europe because of Brexit so we need our $73,538 billion exports to the USA.

President Donald Trump has threatened to slap a 25% tariff on some imports to protect American producers. This would damage sales of British made cars such as: Jaguar, Land Rover, and Rolls Royce, and it would also damage sales of Scotch whisky. After all, the US has General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, Jack Daniels and Jim Beam, so why should they import cars and whisky?

The USA is a huge country stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific. It's self-sufficient in food, energy, technology, and military might. If the rest of the world retaliated against tariffs by levelling tit-for-tat tariffs of their own, it wouldn't make much difference to the American economy.

Britain, on the other hand, imports half of its food and energy. We need international trade to feed our immigrant-swollen population, and to keep the lights on. The USA has the resources to manage on their own, but we do not.

Keir Starmer has to placate the 'Little Englanders' who distrust Europe but love America, because they speak English, and the pro-Europeans who love Europe because we are Europeans, but distrust America because they seek to dominate the world.

British politicians imagine that we have a 'Special Relationship' with America. It's true that our two nations have links of language, culture and history, but they count for nothing when it comes to trade. President Donald Trump's mother was Scottish but he is unlikely to think of her when he slaps 25% on Scotch whisky.

The only country with a special relationship with the USA is Israel. Britain and the rest of Europe are just convenient bases for America's armed forces.

NATO was established after WW2 to defend Europe against the Red Army. In response the Soviet Union formed the Warsaw Pact. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 the Warsaw Pact was dissolved, but NATO was increased, thus proving that NATO's real objective is to protect American interests; not liberty and democracy as we were told, but McDonald's and Kentucky Fried Chicken.

The Russian Federation, which replaced the Soviet Union, is a Parliamentary Democracy with an independent judiciary, a written constitution and an elected president. The Western media accuses Russia of being a dictatorship under Vladimir Putin, but this is not true. At present Russia is engaged in a war with Ukraine over possession of Crimea and the Donbas region, butt apart from these Russian-speaking regions President Putin has no further territorial ambitions in Europe, as claimed by NATO.

Already the German economy has been devastated by the war in Ukraine. The gas pipeline from Russia to Germany was sabotaged almost certainly by NATO. If the Russians wanted to cut-off supplies to Germany they would simply turn off the tap.

The destruction of the European and Russian economies is an American objective designed to boost their exports. Russian gas and oil, BMW cars, and Airbus planes are serious obstacles to American imperialism.

It's unfortunate that the noble principles of the Roman Republic, on which the United States was founded, have degenerated into the worst aspects of the Roman Empire.

Denis Pirie

Wikipedia describes Denis Pirie, who passed away in January this year,  as: " a veteran of the British far right." It's true that he served a prison sentence for belonging to Colin Jordan's paramilitary Spearhead formation, and he was the opening speaker at the 1962 NSM meeting in Trafalgar Square. but by 1968 his youthful exuberance gave way to maturity and he wrote an article in 'Combat' entitled 'Britain's Fraudulent Democracy'; a calm and sensible critique of our corrupt parliamentary system:

"Two classes of people would object to this basic progressive reform of our unwritten constitution. Firstly the old party politicians who would naturally resent any form of curtailment of their personal power. With the existence of a public referendum mechanism they could hardly continue their old games of promising  the electorate one thing and then breaking their promises with impunity.

The second type of objector is the self-styled "progressive" liberal. He objects for a different reason. He is perfectly satisfied with the status quo because he knows that in the establishment parties, his liberal friends in government are firmly entrenched in key positions. He knows full well that many of the measures his friends in government introduce  would never be accepted by the general public if their views had weight."

Denis Pirie's call for representative government is even more urgent today. Successive governments, both Tory and Labour, have eroded democracy and practically banned free speech. It's not members of the so-called far right that threaten our freedom but the professional liars and hypocrites of Westminster.

Sam Dickson

I engage in little debates in a chat forum called Quora.

Someone posted a question asking why Keir Starmer hates the UK and old people and gave his opinion that Starmer's attitudes emerged from some incident that took place early ion his career.

I concurred that Starmer hates his own people but suggested a different diagnosis.

Here is my comment.

Mr Lang: you are right  in your diagnosis that Starmer hates his country and his people but I humbly submit that the reason is not this incident but a much more deep seated psychological  defect.

Keir Starmer is an example of a psychological type we find all over Europe and in the European Diaspora in the US, Canada and Australia.

Starmer is an ethnomasochist. He hates his people and he derives a sick pleasure in seeing his people degraded and dispossessed.

This abnormal psychology of ethnomasochism is usually linked to a profound lack of loyalty to one's own people, language, ethnic group, race, religion and even family.

Such people are loners, self-promoters. They never connect. They  don't connect with the other boys on the Little League team. They don't connect with their classmates and colleagues in school  and college. They don't connect with the other workers in their firms. 

They certainly don't connect with their country.

In Starmer's case he has blithely cooperated with a foreign country in seizing control of the Labour Party and expelling Jeremy Corbyn.

He has done in fact the very thing that Trump was falsely accused of doing.

He has been a willing participant in foreign interference in his country's elections.

While as an ethnomasochist he hates his own country and revels in colonizing the UK with 3rd World settlers, he happily supports an ethnostate in the Middle East and its genocide in Gaza.

The government of Israel through one of its NGOs worked with Starmer to remove Jeremy Corbyn.

If you observe public life in your country, you will spot many such people. Ethnomasochist traitors to their people and their country, who usually display extreme self-righteousness and love to virtue-signal , letting everyone know how good they are, how much better they are than normal people who love their country, their ethnic group, their race etc.

Such people need to be identified, recognized for what they are and isolated by use of the good old Anglo-Saxon cold shoulder.  

Influencing People

Forty years ago I worked with a Russian man called Val Kowalski. He served in the Red Army during WW2 where he was captured by the Germans and eventually liberated by the British. He was allowed to come to Britain to deal with unexploded bombs and shells. He did this dangerous work for some years after the War.

He had two girlfriends; Olga, an intellectual Russian woman for conversation, and Francis, an attractive West Indian girl for sex.

Val was an avid reader and something of a philosopher. He believed that every human contact we make leaves an impression. It might be because we have written a book, published an article, because of a conversation, or even a chance encounter.

I was impressed by Val's wise words and have always remembered them. We may never know how we influence people but our thoughts and observations leave their mark, just like fingerprints or DNA traces.

It's not necessary to bore everyone with incessant propaganda, indeed that's likely to turn them off, but gentle and consistent persuasion can often change minds.

The mass media is the strongest influence on public opinion but we can still get our message across without owning newspapers and television channels. A conversation with a fellow passenger on a bus, or with a fellow drinker in the local pub, can be just as rewarding as a column in the Daily Mail.

It's therefore important to express your opinions. Don't hide your light under a bushel. Don't be afraid to love your country. Patriotism has been practically banned under the Liberal Consensus, but with the rise of Donald Trump and Georgia Meloni (pictured) it's back in fashion.

Georgia leads Fratelli D'Italia, a nationalist movement sprung from Fascism. The Italians have been subjected to over eighty years of anti-Fascist propaganda, from the usual suspects, but undaunted, she has won the hearts of her people by clearly stating her position: "I am Georgia, I am Italian, I am European, and I am Christian."

European Outlook -  https://europeanoutlook.blogspot.com 

Nation Revisited

All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. The editor reserves the right to shorten or otherwise amend articles submitted for publication. We seek reform by lawful means according to the UN Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:

"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people."

 

 

 

 

Nation Revisited # 216, February 2025

A Lifetime of Nationalism

Nick Griffin the expelled leader of the British National Party

This year marks my 80th birthday (February 2) and 64 years involved in nationalist politics. I joined the League of Empire Loyalists when I was 16 but, at the same time, I attended Union Movement meetings at Earls Court, Bethnal Green, Brixton, Kensington Town Hall, and Trafalgar Square. I was also attracted to John Bean's original British National Party which stood for a Confederation of European States; although John Bean always opposed the European Common Market which he believed to be a step toward World Government.

I never took 'parties' very seriously, it was the cause that interested me. This ecumenical approach was discouraged by the leaders of the various parties, but  nearly all of them had been in Union Movement or the LEL. And the same applied to the small band of followers whose faces were to be seen at the various street corner meetings that we held in those days.

There was little difference between the LEL and the BNP, so it was not surprising when they merged together in 1967 to become the National Front.

Colin Jordan and John Tyndall broke away from the BNP in 1962 to found the National Socialist Movement. This was an  authoritarian party that denied the Holocaust and glorified the Third Reich. It fell apart when its leaders were imprisoned, but for a short while they dressed up as Stormtroopers and played war games.

Veteran nationalist Alan Wells recalls: The NSM hired a room above a pub in Kent. The regulars at the pub were alarmed when thumping noises were heard and the lights started flickering. It turned out that the 'Spearhead' detachment were marching around the room upstairs.

Following a contest between Colin Jordan and John Tyndall for the hand of Francoise Dior, an attractive French heiress, John Tyndall, the defeated suitor, broke away from the NSM to form the Greater Britain Movement. The National Front eventually absorbed the GBM, but they refused to admit Colin Jordan who, therefore, founded British Movement, which, after many setbacks, is still going.

In 1965 I went to South Africa, and then to Australia, and finally New Zealand. I had always been pro-European and my Commonwealth tour convinced me that a revival of the British Empire was not going to happen, so I joined Union Movement which promoted Oswald Mosley's vision of 'Europe a Nation'.

UM was eclipsed by the National Front, largely due to Martin Webster's organisational skills. He staged impressive marches and rallies throughout the country that made the NF a household name. Unfortunately the party was infested with government agents who instigated many splits before John Tyndall left to found another incarnation of the British National Part

A much diminished NF is still going under the leadership of Tony Martin.

The new BNP plodded along under John Tyndall but when Nick Griffin took over, it won scores of seats on local councils, two members of the European Parliament, and  one seat on the London Assembly. But it all fell apart in 2014 when Nick Griffin, was expelled for alleged financial irregularities. Today the BNP still exists but it's politically inactive.

Half a dozen little parties emerged from the wreckage of the BNP. None of them has a charismatic leader, like Oswald Mosley, a brilliant orator who was forever damned by his association with Adolf Hitler before the Second World War. Mosley never advocated the destruction of the Jews, but the mass media linked him to the gas chambers and ruined his career as a politician. Considering the sheer weight of hostile propaganda, and the proximity to the war, it was remarkable that Oswald Mosley, standing for Union Movement, achieved 8.1 % in North Kensington in the 1959 general election.

The march of time has left few of us to carry the banner of European Socialism. The Friends of Mosley organisation, of which I am proud to belong, meets twice a year to reminisce about the old days and complain about the present state of the country.  We are no longer the idealistic young men who fought the Reds on the streets, but we maintain an informative website: oswaldmosley.com 

During all this time I have met many outstanding people, and more than a few cranks and misfits. Conspiracy theories have always been with us but they seem to be gaining ground amongst nationalists. I believe them to be an escape from reality; a false religion that claims to explain everything when the obvious answer is usually the right one; JFK was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald, 9/11 was the work of Arab terrorists, and Covid was a naturally occurring viral pandemic. 

Some of the ideas of the so-called far-right are too extreme to be taken seriously, but a healthy democracy should make room for all shades of opinion, including nationalism.

In the 102 years since Miss Rotha Lintorn-Orman founded the British Fascists we have not had a single MP elected to the Westminster Parliament.

Oswald Mosley's pre-war movement, the British Union of Fascists, held mass meetings and marches which so frightened the Establishment that they used Defence Regulation 18B to shut them down.

In the 1970s the National Front boasted thousands of members, until they were fatally undermined in 1979 when Margaret Thatcher said that she understood people's fear of being "swamped" by immigration.  

The British National Party under Nick Griffin started to look like a viable political paerty, but, following a disastrous and embarrassing appearance on the BBC Question Time program the party disintegrated.

Was my lifetime in nationalist politics a waste of time? Jeffrey Hamm, the effective leader of Union Movement in its last years, was asked the same question by John Pitman in a 1976 BBC 'Tonight' interview. He replied in his autobiography 'Action Replay'.

"But what are they really asking me to do? To give up what I know to be right because it is difficult, or to take up something that I know to be wrong because it is easier."

Jeffrey Hamm never lived to see the rise of nationalist parties all over the world. People are sick and tired of being ripped off by big business and lied to by politicians. Their cheap labour racket  has flooded Europe and North America with Third World immigrants. But, as I often say, nothing lasts forever. If President Donald Trump keeps his promise to deport millions of illegal immigrants, Europe, including the UK, will follow.

The Truth Will Out

Elon Musk the South African born tech billionaire, has called for the prosecution of former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, the former head of the Crown Prosecution Service, Keir Starmer, and all those local councillors, police, and social workers complicit in the Grooming Gangs cover up.

This scandal is at last being acknowledged by politicians of all parties, and by the mass media that helped to supress the story because the men involved in the sexual exploitation of schoolgirls were nearly all Pakistanis and the girls involved were nearly all white British.

This deliberate suppression of the truth has done nothing to improve race relations in the UK. Rather, it has played into the hands of extremists. Most people of Pakistani origin in the UK are decent law-abiding workers, but those Pakistanis who drugged and raped schoolgirls are criminals who should be deported.

Politicians blame the European Court of Human Rights for this situation, but the British government has always been able to deport criminals and undesirables. English Law is all about precedents and interpretations; further confused and obstructed by unprincipled lawyers who pocket millions of pounds of taxpayer's money in legal aid.

This has resulted in a demand to abolish the ECHR, an independent court which was set up under the auspices of the  European Declaration of Human Rights. It's a tempting idea, but it's a dangerous policy to abolish courts because we don't agree with their verdicts; and it's extremely unlikely that the ECHR would go against a ruling of the British Supreme Court. 

The Grooming Gangs were protected by cowardly authorities steeped in liberal propaganda and scared of being accused of 'racism'.

Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, was wrong about Brexit, which has turned out to be a disaster, but he is right about sacking and prosecuting those involved in a shameful coverup.

Politicians are often right about one thing and wrong about another. Nigel Farage is right about immigration, but he is wrong about Europe. Donald Trump is right about the Ukraine war but wrong about Israel. What we need is a man with a practical mind who is not stunted by dogma or emotion. Unfortunately, at 80 years of age I am too old for the job.

Tommy Robinson

Elon Musk has called for Tommy Robinson to be released from prison. The usual suspects point out that TR is serving time for contempt of court, not because of his opinions. This is hair-splitting to say the least. He wouldn't be in prison at all if we had freedom of speech in this country.

The mass media have labelled him a fascist and and a racist but he is neither. The English Defence League, which he founded, flies the Israeli flag at their gatherings, and it welcomes black members. TR is an old-fashioned nationalist who campaigns against Muslim immigration.

His rhetoric finds willing listeners amongst the general public who remember the Pakistani rape gangs and terrorist atrocities. This is unfair because there are plenty of white paedophiles and not all terrorists are Muslims; the Stern Gang was Jewish and the IRA. were Catholics.

The UK is still a Christian country despite poor leadership of the Church of England, falling Church attendances, and a constant barrage of atheistic propaganda by the mass media. Britons who never go to Church or read the Bible are nevertheless Christians by culture and tradition. 

As such, we are appalled by some Muslin practices, such as mutilating little girls, or covering women's faces, but most of us accept Muslims just as we accept Jews, as long as they obey our laws and make an effort to integrate into British society.

Tommy Robinson may be hated by the Liberal Consensus but the majority of British people agree with him.

We should not apologise for having the greatest empire the world has ever seen. Slavery was a sad chapter in history, but we Europeans were not the only ones guilty of exploitation. All civilisations used forced labour, and human beings are still being bought and sold in the slave markets of Mauretania and Libya..

Never forget that it was the Royal Navy that stopped the Atlantic slave trade in the 19th century. We are blamed for taking part in slavery but seldom credited with stopping it. 

Tommy Robinson is the proud father of three children who loves his country, as every Briton should. He may be a rascal but he is entitled to his opinion and he deserves to be heard.

Censorship

Some readers have complained about having to sign in to access my blogs. This is Google's response to the government's policy of censorship, There is nothing that I can do about it. I could switch to another platform but most of them impose similar conditions.

Free speech in the UK is being eroded day by day. Russian Television has been banned and Al Jazeera is under threat. Any broadcaster or journalist who criticises Plutocracy is liable to be prosecuted under so-called anti terrorist legislation.

Our overcrowded prisons hold scores of dissidents, mostly young men who spoke out against the Third World invasion.

Under the latest directive from Westminster tech companies can be held responsible for the views of their customers. And having your website overseas is no protection against prosecution, just ask Simon Shepperd who based his website in the USA. He served four prison sentences, one in the Netherlands and three in the UK. On one occasion he fled to the USA to claim political asylum but he was promptly deported.

The hypocrisy of our rulers is truly staggering. They condemn Russia and China for being less than perfect democracies while British patriots are sentenced to long prison sentences just for expressing an opinion.

The situation looks grim but developments in the USA may yet save us from intellectual strangulation. Elon Musk has bought the social media platform Twitter, renamed it X, and vowed to guarantee free speech. He is a personal friend of Donald Trump and a true champion of democracy, not the false democracy of the Old Gang but genuine freedom.

Denis Pirie 1940-2025

We have lost another old comrade. Denis Pirie died in Brighton Hospital aged 85 on 19th January 2025. May he rest in peace

.

European Outlook -  https://europeanoutlook.blogspot.com 

Nation Revisited

All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. The editor reserves the right to shorten or otherwise amend articles submitted for publication. We seek reform by lawful means according to the UN Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:

"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people."

 

 

 

 

Nation Revisited # 215 , January 2025

 f'm Back for the New Year

Nation Revisited # 214 July 2023

A History of Borrowing

Britain had always borrowed money to fight foreign wars. In the old days we didn't use the money for social services because they didn't exist. Parishes tried to look after the destitute but there was no nation provision for the poor..

We really cottoned on to borrowing during the Napoleonic Wars when an obliging Nathan Rothschild, a German bullion dealer, lent the British Government the money to finance Wellington's army, and made a killing on the London Stock Exchange by betting on the result using insider information.

Incidentally, I met Nathan's descendant, Evelyn Rothschild, during the building of the Queen's stand at Epsom Racecourse. He was the Secretary of the Jockey Club which owned the site. He was a tall, elegant man of aristocratic bearing. A tribute to the power of assimilation. 

The Rothschild experience established a pattern that endures to this day. We borrowed the money for the Crimean War, the South African War, the First World War, and the Second World War. By 1945 we had 3,000,000 men under arms but poverty was widespread, our industries were in ruins and out transportation system had suffered heavily from the bombing. 

When I was a boy, just after the war, our local shop operated an informal credit system. Mother would give me a shopping list and tell me to tell Mrs Brown the grocer that she would pay her at the end of the week.

Working class people never had bank accounts in those days. They used to get paid in cash  and if someone got a cheque he would get a publican to change it for a small fee.

People borrowed because they had no choice. Britain was bankrupt after six years of war  and taxes were even higher than they are today. Not that they effected the working class who didn't earn enough money tom pay taxes. It was the upper class that lost their stately homes and the middle class, the backbone of the nation, that were taxed the most.

The post-war Labour government launched a massive house building program, started the National Health Service and built a British Atomic Bomb, all on borrowed money

Britain scuttled out of India and Palestine as soon as possible because our once-mighty empire had become an intolerable drain on resources.

In 1950 the Korean War broke out and the government was forced to reduce NHS dental care to save money.

All of the African colonies were agitating for independence and the British Government soon lost interest in trying to protect white settlers, first Kenya was abandoned to black rule, then Rhodesia, and finally South Africa.

Prime Minister Harold Wilson was a race traitor of the first order but he kept us out of the Vietnam War. Nevertheless, we fought a series of ultimately pointless and financially crippling colonial wars in Malaya, Aden, Cyprus and Kenya. When we completely ran out of money Chancellor Denis Healey was forced to go cap in hand to the International Monetary Fund for a loan.

The discovery of oil and gas in the North Sea saved us in the 1970s. We were able to survive the 'Nixon Shock' that tore up the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade that tied the pound to the dollar.

The pound promptly started to sink until Margaret Thatcher linked it to the Deutschmark, but she did it at the wrong rate and we were thrown out of the Exchange Rate Mechanism.

Today, we are not at war but we are pouring money and missiles into Ukraine and  behaving like an imperial power. We are still giving foreign aid to India, a nuclear power with a thriving economy and an impressive space program..

Governments of all colours have slashed public spending but defence, and defence procurement, continues to cost untold billions. We now have two of the world's largest aircraft carriers, with very few planes fly off them, and we are currently renewing the Trident missile system that will never be used.. Of course, it's nice to have big ships that show the flag all over the world, but the money would be better spent on schools and hospitals.

Such showing off is part of the Imperial Mentality that clings to grand notions of sovereignty and independence.. The myth of our independence was exposed when Liz Truss's expansionist budget was soundly rejected by the bond market. We have almost reached the end of our credit limit and future governments will have to curb their addiction to borrowing.

Elections

Britain, France and the United States are all having elections. The American election is undoubtedly the most important because Washington rules the European Union and the United Kingdom. As I write the choice is between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, but 'Sleepy Joe' is obviously suffering from dementia and he may be replaced as the presidential candidate, even at this late stage.

Donald Trump is a swindler, a sex pest and a liar, but he is not a warmonger and he doesn't seek to perpetuate the anti-Russian line. 

In France Marine le Pen's National Rally has increased its vote and gained a majority in the French National Assembly., but President Macron will probably stay in power due to the complexity of the French electoral system. Madam le Pen has dropped her opposition to the EU and the Euro, like her counterpart in Italy, Georgia Meloni, she will adapt her 'fascism' to suit reality.

The UK approaches election day with barely controlled indifference. After 14 years of Tory rule the country is sick of one cock-up after another. We have gone through a financial crisis, a pandemic, a war in Europe, and Liz Truss's kamikaze budget but the biggest blow to our economy was Brexit. There is now a reported majority in favour of re-joining the EU, but only the minority Liberal Democrats and the Greens are supportive. The Tories are in the grip of the lunatic right and  the Labour Party id frightened of its so-called Red Wall. 

The Tories have a deceitful immigration policy that concentrates on stopping 40,000 so-called  illegal immigrants whilst welcoming over a million legals. Labour also have an unannounced plan that's thought to include a visa scheme and a general amnesty for those already here.

According to the opinion polls, a Labour landslide victory is predicted. The Tories will  be decimated, the Liberal Democrats will improve their performance, and the newly-formed Reform UK, led by Nigel Farage,  will suffer the same fat as Ukip, lots of votes but very few seats under first-past-the-post.

And when the counting is done and new bottoms occupy the seats of power, nothing much will have changed. The widening gap between rich and poor will probably get bigger, non-Europeans will continue to pour into Europe and North America, and war veterans will still be sleeping in doorways.

The demographic crisis effecting all three countries is very real. We need selective immigration to maintain our services, but uncontrolled and indiscriminate immigration will destroy us, unless we take urgent and co-ordinated steps to stem the tide.

Nation Revisited

Sorry that this issue is shorter than usual. I am suffering from an eye complaint called Macular Oedema for which I am being treated. This means that I find it difficult to type. I hope things will be back to normal in the near future. Our sister blog is posted on - .

European Outlook -  https://europeanoutlook.blogspot.com 

All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. The editor reserves the right to shorten or otherwise amend articles submitted for publication. We seek reform by lawful means according to the UN Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:

"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people."

 

 

 

 

Nation Revisited # 211, May 2024

We Must Secure The Existence Of Our People And A Future For White Children - Robert Baggs. Part two

The second strand we need to look at is the “white children” element of the 14 words. The simple truth is that there are not enough of them. Even ignoring all other elements, we are just not breeding in sufficient quantities to maintain our present numbers, we are essentially destroying ourselves. White men and white women need to ensure they have children, it really is as simple as that.

So not only are we not actively trying to increase the white population we are being outbred by the non-white population and the figures illustrating this are alarming to say the least.

According to the statistical bulletin, “Population Estimates for UK, England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland: mid-2016”, published by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) on the 22^nd June 2017, the population of the United Kingdom, as at 30^th June 2016, was estimated as 65,648,000 people. This was an increase of 0.8%, or 538,000 people in the year up to that date. This increase is a combination of those born here and net migration, the latter being 336,000 or 62.4% of the increase! There has been a steady annual increase since 1992 when the total population change stood at approximately 150,000.

Once this growth rate is broken down into ethnic groups more alarm bells start to ring. A separate ONS bulletin “Population Estimates by Ethnic Group 2002 – 2009” published on the 18^th May 2011 shows that the white British population actually decreased over this period, albeit marginally. However, that in itself is frightening particularly when the total population grew by over 2 million over the same period! The average annual percentage growth rate of non-white and mixed race groups ranged from 0.9%, in the case of the black Caribbean group, to 8.6% in the case of the Chinese group. The latter fact may be surprising but the increase was from 233,000 to 451,500, indeed a large enough increase of over 200,000 but the total increase for black African and Asian: Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi groups was over 1 million. Look at some of these figures again – the white British population remained static but some non-white groups increased by 1 million in less than 10 years. In fact the total increase of non-white British over this period was approximately 2,500,000, that’s 2½ MILLION! Of course much of this increase is due to migration and a Nationalist government would put a stop to this. But fertility rates by ethnic groups have yet to be considered yet already there is evidence indeed that by the middle of this century the white population will be in the minority and this certainly won’t be news to anyone. Even back in 2001, BBC News reported “Ethnic birth rate climbs” saying that “Britain’s ethnic minorities are growing at 15 times the rate of the white population … data collected by the ONS (and published in its Population Trends report) between 1992-1994 and 1997-1999 showed… compared to 1% for white people”.

Further and perhaps the most worrying evidence projecting our demise can be found in yet another ONS statistical bulletin – Births in England and Wales: 2016, which provides data on live births, stillbirths and the intensity of childbearing measured by the total fertility rate. Main points from this bulletin include:

There were 696,271 live births in England and Wales in 2016.

The total fertility rate decreased to 1.81 children per woman.

Over a quarter (28.2%) of live births were to mothers born outside the UK, the highest level on record.

Drilling down into these figures it can be determined that women born in certain countries such as India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and African countries tend to have above-average fertility, this meaning that white British women have average or below average fertility thereby having less children. Obviously over time this disparity will be more and more marked, resulting in the white population being outnumbered by non-whites. The urgency of this problem cannot be emphasized enough as those living in predominantly white areas still do not, or will not see, the extent of this change.

To emphasis further the changes that are taking place with the birth rates in this country, readers are reminded of recent press coverage showing the most popular names given to males in 2016. This coverage, which, although showed Oliver as being the most popular with 6,623 boys so named, was actually the second most popular if the eighth most popular, Muhammad, with 3,908 births, was added to Mohammed (at no. 31, with 2,228), Mohammad (at no. 68, with 948), Muhammed, (no. 118 with 534), and Mohamed, (no. 177, with 321), which together total 7,939!

This situation will only get worse and even if all white Nationalists increase their family size massively, still we will not achieve our 14 words. So where are we going wrong here?

The main problem seems to be with general attitude, do our young men and women actually care, or are they blind to the fact that they are looking at their children and grand-children becoming a minority population in the very near future? As mentioned earlier, part of this attitude is a denial that such changes are taking place and that these changes will not affect them so it doesn’t actually matter.

Sadly much needs to be done to reverse this attitude, an attitude which has its roots in the permissiveness of the 1960’s, exacerbated by the selfishness created during the Thatcher years and further developed in the 2000’s. This results in young people putting themselves, their careers and their fun before all else including the natural process of raising a family, which happens later in life, if at all. This allied to the increasing acceptability of homosexuality and the feminisation of men must result in the reduction in the size of pool of males capable of fathering children.

No mainstream political party has any formula for this problem as they don’t see it as a problem, in fact, on the latter point above, they actively encourage it! As Nationalists, we do see it as a problem, hence the 14 words. Consequently we must urgently look at how we are managing our response and combining our resources and our political activity to ensure we manage this need to increase our population. Recently the right-wing German AfD (Alternative for Deutschland) had great success in the German elections, with posters being displayed advertising the need to increase their population. It may be that, rather than using the less accessible 14 words, whilst not abandoning it, we actually utilise a more direct message similar to the AfD. On top of that, even if total unity does not occur amongst Nationalists, there is a real need to create a unified approach to managing how we bring this to the forefront of the British political agenda and start turning around how the real British population see themselves and their future before it’s too late.

Labour's Dilemma

Clement Attlee the prime minister who started mass migration. 

The Labour Party welcomed the importation of millions of Muslims because they tended to vote Labour. But at the same time the Party embraced Zionism and boasted many Jewish members. This situation lasted as long as the leadership refrained from taking sides in the Middle East, but now that Keir Starmer has proudly declared himself to be a Zionist the Party faces a dilemma; should they take the side of Israel to please their powerful Jewish supporters, or should they take the side of the Muslims. The Jews number only 200,000 in the UK but the Muslims are twenty times as numerous at 4 million.

The Tories have been just as bad as Labour at turning the UK into a mixed race country, but it was the post-war Labour government that started the influx of blacks and Asians with prime minister Clement Atlee's British Nationalities Act of 1948.

Before the BNA the non-European population of the UK was tiny. There were Chinatowns in London and Liverpool and well established black communities in Cardiff and Bristol, but there was nothing like the complete takeover that has occurred in placed like Leicester.

Those of a conspiratorial nature see mass migration as a deliberate plot to destroy the white race in the UK. I prefer to see it as blatant capitalist exploitation. The industrialists and financiers see the Third World as an unending source of cheap labour. They don't consider the social and economic damage it does to the native population, and they care even less about the racial factor.

Since WW2 our economy has grown and so has our immigrant-swollen population. We need manpower and the Third World needs jobs, but now a new and largely unexpected development has come into play in the form of artificial intelligence. In future AI will take over millions of jobs now done by immigrants and native Britons alike, and we will face the unfamiliar problem of having too much labour.

If our immigrants had been treated as guest workers with no right of citizenship, it would be easy enough to put them on planes and ships and send them back where they came from. But the BNA of 1948 bestowed on them the right of settlement.

It could be argued that the politicians of 1948 never realised the consequences of their actions, but some, including Winston Churchill, spoke out about the danger. Churchill was a Zionist and a warmonger but he was right about immigration. 

He knew that there was simmering tension between whites and blacks in the United States and South Africa, and he didn't want to repeat it in the UK. Only the most optimistic socialists expected racial harmony to prosper in the UK when it had failed elsewhere. Nevertheless, they went ahead with mass migration to provide medical staff for the National Health Service and bus crews for London Transport.

Who can tell what the future holds? Will vastly different races disappear in the mix? Will religious fanatics become token Muslims just as we Brits have become token Christians? Or will the whole thing come crashing down in a multiracial bloodbath?

These are the thoughts that should occupy Keir Starmer as he prepares to move into No 10 Downing St.

Nick Griffin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBXE39MkZx4 

In his 2020 speech "A Message to Nationalists", Nick Griffin, the former leader of the National Front and the British National Party concludes that there is no electoral road to success for nationalists.

He refers to the infamous Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan which has joined the Protocols of Zion and the Zinoviev Letter as yet another conspiracy theory. Coudenhove-Kalergi's oft-quoted words about Europe becoming mixed race were a warning not an aspiration.

His unselfconscious evaluation of nationalist leaders as narcissistic, greedy and corrupt is chillingly accurate, and so is his description of their fragmentation of the movement.

He says that most (presumably European) countries are majority white, except South Africa and Kosovo. We all know that South Africa has been taken over by the Blacks, but that's not the case in Kosovo. The people of the Balkans adopted the religion of their conquerors. The Croats became Catholics under the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Kosovars became Muslims under the Ottoman Empire, and the Serbs became Orthodox Christians under the Russian Empire. But they are all Europeans. 

If he thinks that Kosovo's association with the Turks is demeaning he should consider that genetically the Turks are only 15% of Central Asian origin. They speak an Asian language but so do the Finns and Hungarians.

This kind of racism comes strangely from the man who coined the phrase "a little salt in the soup" to justify the acceptance of non-whites into the BNP.

At the end of his speech he claims that his message is not all doom and gloom. He says that victory is still possible but he doesn't go into details.

Two Senile Old Men - Robert Lyons writes from Baltimore

Hello Bill, I agree with you that "two senile old men" is all the US can produce, it's our stupid two party system, as Commander Rockwell used to say the choice was between "tweedle-dee and tweedle-dum" meaning no choice at all. Most of us who feel disenfranchised either don't vote or throw our vote away to some miniscule third party who managed to petition themselves on the ballot in our state. Yes it's a sad, sad situation and can't be changed. All my best Bob.

NR: Robert Lyons represented the National States' Rights Party at the 1961 British National Party Camp in Norfolk, where delegates from all over the world gathered at Andrew Fountain's estate to celebrate their European heritage. I kept in touch with many of them over the years but with the passing of time there are not many of us left. We are often accused of being too nationalistic but the comradeship forged in the Sixties shows that blood and culture are more important than flags and passports.

European Outlook -  https://europeanoutlook.blogspot.com 

Nation Revisited

All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. The editor reserves the right to shorten or otherwise amend articles submitted for publication. We seek reform by lawful means according to the UN Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:

"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people."

 

 

 

Nation Revisited # 210, April 2024

We Must Secure The Existence Of Our People And A Future For White Children - Robert Baggs. Part one

Most Nationalists will be very familiar with the above statement, known as the Fourteen Words. David Eden Lane (2^nd November 1938 – 28^th May 2007), a member of the American group The Order, coined and publicised the phrase through the now defunct Fourteen Word Press, along with other writings. He has been described by the Southern Poverty Law Center as “one of the most important ideologues of contemporary white supremacy”. The 14 Words are now popularly used by white Nationalists as their raison d'être and rightly so. Essentially, unless action is taken the white race is doomed to extinction. However, despite the popularity of the phrase, are we doing all we can to comply? 

There are two strands, both working hand in hand, to ensuring we see this through. The first being the spreading of the word, that is, creating an awareness of the fact that the white race is in a relatively rapid decline for various reasons. Sadly, there are millions of people, who would argue that it doesn’t really matter, that we are all human beings living on the same planet and that we are all in one huge melting pot. Melting Pot, was actually the name of a song by 1970’s pop band Blue Mink, with a chorus which went “What we need is a great big melting pot, big enough to take the world and all it’s got and keep it stirring for a hundred years or more, and turn out coffee coloured people by the score”. However, these same people would similarly argue that we should save the whale, the Bengal tiger, the snow leopard, the chimpanzee and so on, as they are on the World Wildlife Fund’s list of endangered species but also Brazilian jungle tribes.

So why is it seemingly important to save certain animals but not certain humans, i.e. the white tribe? The attitude seems contradictory particularly when the “certain humans” are potentially themselves and their offspring. No doubt, when using this argument with those having a white race death-wish, the over-used accusatory RACIST term would be thrown into the mix. There are, of course, many of us who passionately believe that we are worth saving and who do our bit towards that end, finding a future melting pot abhorrent!              

But our task is a difficult one, being extremely challenging due to the seemingly increasing number of people who would not be unhappy with a white genocide, together with the fact that our time is running out with our numbers reducing as non-whites are increasing.

Much of the first strand to ensuring our survival relies on our political activists who attempt to publicise the very real dangers that face us. Nearly 70 years of work, with varying levels of impact, have been devoted to seeking a political solution, with Nationalists putting themselves forward at elections in the hope we can influence government at local and national levels. Sadly this has very rarely been successful and of late has become almost a non-event, with fewer and fewer Nationalists standing for elections, with those who do receiving derisory results. It seems that we spread ourselves too thinly as a result of the number of parties that have existed in the past and those that exist today and consequently our impact is negligible. It could be reasonably argued that the future of the white race appears to be less important than the petty squabbles that take place amongst the various big fish in the small ponds of Nationalism. This together with the failure of policy-makers to make adjustments necessary to appeal to a broader section of the electorate means our progress is painfully slow. At the heart of this lies the need for unity amongst the Nationalist community and attempts to achieve this have largely fallen on deaf ears and have so far failed, but nevertheless without it, the establishment win every time when there are multiple groupings with broadly similar aims and objectives but where many feel more comfortable as large fish in small ponds. Again, this begs the question as to whether we are serious about our future. Much work is required, but it is not an insurmountable task, the only obstacle really being that of time and unless we successfully unite the various groups to work together to our common goal then we may as well give up now.

Together with the electioneering, Nationalists have attempted to spread the word by leafletting communities, holding demonstrations and marches and meetings and, of late, by utilising social media. All of these activities have had varying levels of success but never the levels required for the major breakthrough required to shake the electorate from their slumbers. Generally all of these activities take a great deal of effort and result in little positive return. The efforts made in carrying out leafletting, for example, result in responses being received, it is suggested, of between 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 10,000 depending on the type of community leafletted.

Demonstrations and marches tend to result in negative press coverage, often well-deserved due to the inability of our ranks to turn out in a well-disciplined and smart order. Meetings take much organisation, even before trying to prise potential attendees away from their television sets or computer devices, which leads us conveniently on to social media for which there is a potentially huge audience, it prevents Nationalists networking face-to-face.

Of course, we all know that much of our work is sabotaged by a hostile, socialist dominated media who will always play-down what we are doing and what we achieve, but also will deliberately and blatantly attempt to destroy us at every turn by showing the worst faces of Nationalism in order to alienate us from the general public. As mentioned above it must be agreed, however, that the responsibility for a lot of the coverage lies squarely with ourselves. There have been violent confrontations, which may or may not have resulted from the need to defend ourselves, but also we need to question how we present ourselves. Many would argue that, in this enlightened age of equality, judgements made on appearance are wrong and that is often true however those believing this is actually true in practice have been brain-washed by yet another form of political correct nonsense that just does not hold up. Appearances always matter and a bare-chested, heavily tattooed, shaven-headed, beer-can carrying man is never going to appeal to the public in the same way a sober-suited and tidy man is. Sadly the general public, if asked to describe a white Nationalist will nearly always go for the former description partly because of the politically correct brainwashing, partly due to the image of us portrayed by the mass media and partly due to our own adherence to the image. But again if we care about our future, we should care about our image and make that extra effort to defy that negative stereotype. Only when the public see us as one of them will we be taken seriously enough to achieve the support and recognition necessary for the 14 words to impact as required.

This means we need to ensure we are successful with the first strand in achieving the 14 words and we must seriously look at ourselves and get our act together on many levels. This suggestion will not go down well with many Nationalists, but when disputing this it needs to be asked if they are actually serious, really serious, about saving the white race, or are just playing at it.

Part two will be posted in Nation Revisited # 211, May 2024.

The Democratic Conundrum

Jacob Rees-Mogg one of our elected representatives.

People want good services and low taxes, but that can only be achieved within a thriving economy. If the government spends lavishly on health, education and other popular causes it will get elected next time, but not by the productive section of the electorate that pays taxes.

If, on the other hand, the government skimps on services but reduces taxation it will be popular with the productive class but unpopular with the unproductive class that relies on government handouts.

The Rishi Sunak government has antagonised both classes with crumbling services and soaring taxes. The events of recent years have seriously impacted our economy; the Prime Mortgage Crisis, Brexit, the Pandemic, the Liz Truss fiasco, and the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East have left us with a national debt that's 100% of our national income; under the Labour government of Gordon Brown it was 40%.

One way out of this nightmare is total austerity. If we shut down hospitals and schools, abolished state retirement pensions and social benefits, and at the same time, increased taxes, we would be better able to repay our loans. Of course, this would not work because the people wouldn't stand for it. Even the docile and sheep-like British public would object to starvation. Under such a regime the trade unions would get their act together to call a general strike and bring down the government.

But if the government took the opposite track and started spending money like a drunken sailor the forces of international finance would soon intervene. Just the announcement of Liz Truss' budget proposals was enough to panic the Market and send the pound plunging. Brexiteers imagine that we are now in control of our own affairs but the stark reality is that we are still part of a global economy and we are bound by the rules of the game.

So what's the answer? We need a Government of National Unity comprised of all the political parties and representatives from both sides of industry. Such a government would have to tread a delicate fiscal path that avoided unnecessary spending and crippling taxation. We would not be able to afford an unaccountable monarchy that wastes the public purse on princes, dukes, and geriatric members of the House of Lords. We would not be able to afford unseaworthy aircraft carriers or nuclear-powered submarines armed with dud American missiles. We would not be able to give arms and money to corrupt regimes like that of Zelensky or Netanyahu. And we would not be able to send ministers swanning around the world on pointless peace missions. In other words, we would have to mind our own business.

A Government of National Unity appointed for ten years with wartime powers could transform our poor benighted country. Our so-called democratic system is not fit for purpose.

Wars and Rumours of Wars

Public opinion is controlled by the mainstream media, which has decided to take the side of Ukraine in their territorial dispute with Russia, and Israel in their colonisation of the West Bank and their invasion and bombardment of Gaza.

There is no British interest involved in either of these wars, but the overwhelming majority of MPs are members of the Conservative Friends of Israel, or the Labour Friends of Israel, and all the media proprietors are self-confessed Zionists. It's therefore logical that they support the Zionist state of Israel and the Zionist-dominated Zelensky regime in Ukraine.

The one-sidedness of the reporting on the Ukraine and Israel wars is staggering. We are expected to believe that Zelensky is fighting for democracy, when he has cancelled elections, locked up the opposition, and used military police to drag old men and boys off the street to prop up his diminishing army.

And we are expected to believe that the Israeli Defence Force only bombs military targets, when they have destroyed almost every hospital, mosque and church in Gaza and cut off food, water and electricity to the starving Palestinian population. 

At a time when our schools and hospitals are crumbling for want of money our government is sending arms and ammunition worth billions of pounds to their friends in Israel and Ukraine.

But Britain and the EU can't supply Zelensky indefinitely and the USA is having second thoughts as Donald Trump prepares for power. Trump's entire family are married to Jews but he is more concerned with the American taxpayers than he is with the Jewish lobby.

The Democrats have weaponised the American legal system to stop Donald Trump because If America stopped funding Netanyahu and Zelensky they would  be forced to the conference table, and the kickbacks would have to stop.

No less an authority than President Eisenhower coined the phrase "The Military-Industrial Complex" to describe the powerful American arms industry. At present it's booming as billions of dollars are spent on arming their friends. And when billions of dollars are being spent it's inevitable that some of it finds its way into the offshore bank accounts of corrupt politicians. Because it's not just arms manufacturers that profit from war, there's also contractors, suppliers, shipping companies, and legions of agents, lawyers and accountants.

This is what Gore Vidal meant by "Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace." The long series of wars fought by America and her allies; WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria etc., were all justified by "fighting for democracy", but they were really designed to boost the American economy. The super capitalists than run the world couldn't care less about the millions of souls that were sacrificed in the name of profit. The love of money is the root of all evil.

European Outlook -  https://europeanoutlook.blogspot.com 

Nation Revisited

All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. The editor reserves the right to shorten or otherwise amend articles submitted for publication. We seek reform by lawful means according to the UN Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:

"We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people."