Saturday, 25 August 2012

Issue 16, October 2006

Nation Revisited

An occasional email to friends
# 16 October 2006

Keeping Up Appearances

The worldwide web is an invaluable propaganda tool for those fighting for race and nation. A website can reach thousands of people in an instant and enables us to compete on even terms. The National Front has recently revamped its website and Stormfront has appointed a Webmaster for its British section. These reforms were urgently needed to reclaim these sites from the foul-mouthed racists who had come to dominate them. Readers dislike crude and intemperate language, and people who constantly resort to swearing and threatening are not taken seriously.

Far Right websites and publications try to be objective but they should stick to verifiable stories from reliable sources. There is little point in publishing sensational articles that can be challenged by our opponents. The “Sun” and the “Daily Mail” sell the most copies but they are known to be alarmist and downmarket newspapers. It’s far better to be compared to “The Times” as a paper of record that tries to keep up appearances. As Mosley’s prewar hagiographer AK Chesterton put it: “Quality in this movement is immeasurably more important than quantity.”

Several critics of Blair’s policies are still facing prosecution. The laws restricting free speech may be unfair and unnecessary but they are in force and must be obeyed until they are thrown out by parliament. These laws do not stop us from campaigning against non-European immigration or unscrupulous big business, but they do require us to think carefully about what we write and say. It is illegal to incite racial hatred and it will probably soon be illegal to incite religious hatred. But reasoned and intelligent discussion is not outlawed and the courts would not welcome prosecutions that are unlikely to succeed. Another reason why we should try at all times to present a sober and respectably image. Not by abandoning our principles but by employing logical debate and a civilized approach. This will appeal to the public, get our message across and frustrate the efforts of the political establishment to stifle democracy.

The massive immigration of the past year may prove to be the turning point. The irony is that Poles and Lithuanians are no threat to our European stock. Their numbers came as a shock but because they are white our politically correct commentators are free to speak.
In responce to public opinion and as a result of election gains, governments are moving towards immigration control throughout Europe. The next stage will be to restore our continent to her citizens. After half a century of betrayal and subversion we are now on the way to recovery.

A Question of Loyalty                                                                                              

The newspapers have agonized over resident Muslims taking up arms against Britain.  They can’t understand why lads with Yorkshire accents become fanatical supporters of Al-Qaeda and kill innocent British people. Their confusion is the result of years of liberal propaganda. They have been pushing the idea of peaceful coexistence for so long that they have started to believe it. But blood is thicker than water and people will always have ties and sympathies with their ancestral way of life

Muslim soldiers have fought for Britain all over the world for hundreds of years. The British Indian Army comprised all religions including Muslims. They fought for the British Empire in the Afghan wars, in Iraq and France in the First World War and in North Africa, Italy and Burma in the Second World War. Muslims fought for us but they were free to practice and defend their own religion.

The Jews are another immigrant minority who came from the East and settled in Britain. They served in the British Army in both world wars and have become thoroughly absorbed into British society. But would anybody expect them to fight for this country against Israel; it would surely be too much to ask?

The Irish Republican Army in the Twenties was comprised of British ex-servicemen, officers and other ranks that served in the South African War and every theatre or the Great War. They became bitter enemies of the British Empire when Ireland decided to pursue the very independence that we had claimed for “ poor little Belgium.”

Only twelve years after the Treaty of Vereeniging ended the South African War, young Afrikaners were fighting for Britain against the Germans. Britain lost 22,000 men defeating President Paul Kruger but his countrymen who fought us to a standstill in the “Vryheidsoorlog,” the freedom war, had no problem fighting for the British Empire once we granted them self-government.

It is not surprising that Muslims see the wars in the Middle East as attacks on their kith and kin; it would be difficult to describe them as anything else. Subject peoples are capable of being faithful soldiers and citizens but it is unreasonable to expect them to fight against their own kind, or expect them to ignore their slaughter. It is not just a question of loyalty but also a matter of commonsense.

Given that fact many people would question the wisdom of importing millions of immigrants who cannot always be trusted in times of war. It is time for a national debate on population and immigration policy. Open-door immigration has resulted in the formation of ethnic ghettos that have little or no communication with the host nation. Distinguished immigrants like George Aligiah and Trevor Phillips have now conceded that multiculturalism does not work. Trevor Phillips, chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality has said: “Britain is sleepwalking towards segregation.” But they have stopped short of suggesting the obvious solution to the problem.

Sudan In The Balance                                                                                                

Sudan has joined Syria, Iran and North Korea on America’s growing hit list. The troubled African nation of has all the qualifications to become another candidate for regime change. President Omar Hassan al-Bashir’s hard-line nationalistic regime has no diplomatic relations with the USA and they have significant oil deposits.

The long running civil war between the central government and the rebel south was settled in 2005. This was a tribal war aggravated by religious conflict between the Muslim north and the Christian south. The CIA backed the rebels and their Ugandan allies the Lord’s Resistance Army, who specialized in kidnapping and enslaving children. The war was presented as a Christian crusade against Muslim oppression but both sides committed unspeakable atrocities.

The Darfur rebellion in the west is another bloody tribal conflict but this time between fellow Muslims. The racial aspect of this war has been highlighted but both sides are as dark-skinned as each other. The Baggara Arabs are not Lebanese or Syrians who look like Europeans, they are a mixed race that has traditionally ruled over the African tribes and still regard them as subject people.

There has been inter-tribal carnage in west Sudan for centuries. The Egyptians and the British both attempted to pacify Darfur but with little success. Since independence Khartoum has relied upon the Arab Janjaweed militia to enforce its writ, but the rebels have fought back and threaten to form a breakaway state on the Chadian border.

A well-orchestrated campaign by movie stars and all the usual suspects from the entertainment industry has highlighted the Darfur rebellion, and British and American politicians who cheerfully ignore the slaughter in Iraq and Afghanistan are making grim accusations of genocide and calling for intervention.

The neighbouring Arab states to the north are too weak to help Sudan. Libya is neutralized by the threat of annihilation and Egypt by economic blackmail. Sudan is the only Arab state in Africa prepared to defy America. Their best hope is that the China National Petroleum Corporation is developing their oil industry. This commercial alliance may save the Sudanese from another “shock and awe” invasion with British troops in attendance. The Americans are bankrolling Chinese industry and it would not be in their interests to upset such an important trade partner.

But America will still try to depose Omar Hassan al-Bashir and replace him with a puppet like Hosni Murbarak of Egypt. “Decapitation” has become a feature of their foreign policy. If they cannot bribe or threaten a ruler they will organize a coup or an assassination. They do not always succeed; Fidel Castro of Cuba has survived a string of attempted murders and his bankrupt dictatorship struggles on against a crippling American blockade. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union Fidel has been no threat to America but it will probably take them another fifty years for to realize it.

William Cobbett 
William Cobbett the great radical reformer was born in Farham, Surrey in 1763. After military service and several years teaching in America he founded “The Political Register” in 1802. He campaigned for free speech and was again forced to flee to America to escape prison. He continued to publish and was constantly threatened by the government. In 1819 he came home and in 1821 he started a tour of Britain, which he recorded in his newspaper and published as “Rural Rides” in 1830. After several attempts to get elected to parliament he succeeded at Oldham in 1832. He died in 1835.

The Political Register, November 1816
You have been represented in the Times newspaper, by the Courier, by the Morning Post, by the Morning Herald, and others as the scum of society. They say that you have no business at public meetings; that you are a rabble, and that you pay no taxes. These insolent hirelings, who wallow in wealth, would not be able to put their abuse of you in print if it were not for your labour.

Thirteen Sermons 1822
All property has its origin in labour. Labour itself is property; the root of all other property; and unhappy is that community, where labourer and poor man are synonymous terms. No man is essentially poor: poor and rich are relative terms; and if the labourer has his due, and be in good health, in the vigour of life, and willing to labour, to make him a poor man there must be some defect in the government of the community in which he lives. Because the produce of his labour would by itself produce a sufficiency of everything needful for himself and his family. The labouring classes must always form nine-tenths of the people; and what shame it must be, what an imputation on the rulers, if nine-tenths of the people be worthy of the name poor!

The Political Register, August 1830
I perceive that you want very much to be enlightened on the state of our press, which you appear to regard as being free, and which, as I am going to prove to you, is the most enslaved and the vilest thing that has ever been heard of in the world under the name of press. I say that I am going to prove this; and proof consists of undeniable facts, and not vague assertions.
Advertising is the great source of revenue with our journals, except in very few cases, such as mine, for instance, who have no advertisements. Hence these journals are an affair of trade and not of literature; the proprietors think of the money that is to be got by them; they hire men to write them; and these men are ordered to write in a way to please the classes who can give most advertisements. The Government itself pays large sums in advertisements, many hundreds a year, to some journals. The aristocracy, the clergy, the magistrates (who are generally clergy too) in several counties; the merchants, the manufacturers, the great shopkeepers; all these command the press, because without their advertisements it cannot be carried on with profit.

William Cobbett’s books, including Rural Rides are available from Amazon Books.

Churchill on Europe                                                                                                    

Sir Winston Churchill was a complex man who is misunderstood by all sections of the political spectrum. The Left regard him as a reactionary and a warmonger but he supported many liberal reforms. To the far Right he was part of an international conspiracy but he had much to say on that subject. By the end of the war he foresaw European Union, and in the Fifties he was already asking questions about non-white immigration. But the postwar electorate turned against him and poor, shattered, bankrupt Britain was put on-hold for another generation. Churchill was a visionary surrounded by nonentities. He once characterized this type of man when talking about Austen Chamberlain who has served for many years on the Birmingham Corporation. He said:
“ he sees the world through the wrong end of a municipal drainpipe.” And of Clement Atlee he said: “he is a modest man, with much to be modest about.” He was born in the Victorian age and never really came to terms with the end of imperialism, but his famous speech forecasting the European Union is testimony to his breadth of knowledge and understanding of history.

September 19th Zurich, Switzerland

If Europe were once united in the sharing of its common inheritance there would be no limit to the happiness, to the prosperity and the glory which its three or four hundred million people would enjoy.

All the while there is a remedy which, if it were generally and spontaneously adopted by the great majority of people in many lands, would as if by a miracle transform the whole scene, and would in a few years make all Europe, or the greater part of it, as free and as happy as Switzerland is today. What is this sovereign remedy? It is to re-create the European Family, or as much of it as we can, and to provide it with a structure under which it can dwell in peace, in safety and in freedom. We must build a kind of United States of Europe.

The structure of the United States of Europe, if well and truly built, will be such as to make the material strength of a single state less important. Small nations will count as much as large ones and gain their honour by their contribution to the cause.
We must re-create the European Family in a regional structure called, it may be, the United States of Europe. If at first all the States of Europe are not willing or able to join the Union, we must nevertheless proceed to assemble and combine those who will and those who can. The salvation of the common people of every race and of every land from war or servitude must be established on solid foundations by the readiness of all men and women to die rather than submit to tyranny.

In all this urgent work, France and Germany must take the lead together. Great Britain, the British Commonwealth of Nations, mighty America and I trust Soviet Russia – for then indeed all would be well – must be the friends and sponsors of the new Europe and must champion its right to live and shine. Therefore I say to you: let Europe shine!

No comments: